Abstract
Configural relations and a critical band of spatial frequencies (SFs) in the middle range are particularly important for face recognition. We report the results of four experiments in which the relationship between these two types of information was examined. In Experiments 1, 2A, and 2B, theface inversion effect (FIE) was used to probe configural face encoding. Recognition of upright and inverted faces and nonface objects was measured in four conditions: a no-filter condition and three SF conditions (low, medium, and high frequency). We found significant FIEs of comparable magnitudes for all frequency conditions. In Experiment 3, discrimination of faces on the basis of either configural or featural modifications was measured under the same four conditions. Although the ability to discriminate configural modifications was superior in the medium-frequency condition, so was the ability to discriminate featural modifications. We conclude that the band of SF that is critical for face recognition does not contribute preferentially to configural encoding.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bachmann, T. (1991). Identification of spatially quantised tachistoscopic images of faces: How many pixels does it take to carry identity?European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,3, 85–103.
Biederman, I., &Kalocsai, P. (1997). Neurocomputational bases of object and face recognition.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London,352, 1203–1219.
Carey, S., &Diamond, R. (1994). Are faces perceived as configurations more by adults than by children?Visual Cognition,1, 253–274.
Costen, N. P., Parker, D. M., &Craw, I. (1996). Effects of high-pass and low-pass spatial filtering on face identification.Perception & Psychophysics,58, 602–612.
Diamond, R., &Carey, S. (1986). Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,115, 107–117.
Fiorentini, A., Maffei, L., &Sandini, G. (1983). The role of high spatial frequencies in face perception.Perception,12, 195–201.
Freire, A., Lee, K., &Symons, L.A. (2000). The face-inversion effect as a deficit in the encoding of configural information: Direct evidence.Perception,29, 159–170.
Gauthier, I., &Tarr, M. J. (1997). Becoming a “greeble” expert: Exploring mechanisms for face recognition.Vision Research,37, 1673–1682.
Gauthier, I., Williams, P., Tarr, M. J., &Tanaka, J. (1998). Training “greeble” experts: A framework for studying expert object recognition processes.Vision Research,38, 2401–2428.
Hayes, T., Morrone, M.C., &Burr, D.C. (1986). Recognition of positive and negative bandpass-filtered images.Perception,15, 595–602.
Leder, H. (1996). Line drawings of faces reduce configural processing.Perception,25, 355–366.
Leder, H., &Bruce, V. (2000). When inverted faces are recognized: The role of configural information in face recognition.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,53A, 513–536.
Liu, C. H., Collin, C. A., Rainville, S. J., &Chaudhuri, A. (2000). The effects of spatial frequency overlap on face recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,26, 956–979.
Macmillan, N. A., &Creelman, C. D. (1991).Detection theory: A user’s guide. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Maurer, D., LeGrand, R., &Mondloch, C. J. (2002). The many faces of configural processing.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,6, 255–260.
Moscovitch, M., &Moscovitch, D. A. (2000). Super face-inversion effects for isolated internal or external features, and for fractured faces.Cognitive Neuropsychology,17, 201–219.
Nagayama, R., Yoshida, H., &Toshima, T. (1995). Interrelationship between the facial expression and familiarity: Analysis using spatial filtering and inverted presentation.Japanese Journal of Psychology,66, 327–335.
Näsänen, R. (1999). Spatial frequency bandwidth used in the recognition of facial images.Vision Research,39, 3824–3833.
Solomon, J. A., &Pelli, D. G. (1994). The visual filter mediating letter identification.Nature,369, 395–397.
Tanaka, J.W., &Farah, M. J. (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,46A, 225–245.
Tanaka, J. W., &Sengco, J. A. (1997). Features and their configuration in face recognition.Memory & Cognition,25, 583–592.
Thompson, P. (1980). Margaret Thatcher—A new illusion.Perception,9, 483–484.
Valentine, T. (1988). Upside-down faces: A review of the effect of inversion upon face recognition.British Journal of Psychology,79, 471–491.
Wenger, M. J., &Townsend, J. T. (2000). Spatial frequencies in shortterm memory for faces: A test of three frequency-dependent hypotheses.Memory & Cognition,28, 125–142.
Young, A. W., Hellawell, D., &Hay, D. C. (1987). Configural information in face perception.Perception,16, 747–759.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by a fellowship from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) to I.B. and CIHR Grant R0010026 to J.F.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Boutet, I., Collin, C. & Faubert, J. Configural face encoding and spatial frequency information. Perception & Psychophysics 65, 1078–1093 (2003). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194835
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194835