Abstract
Although the effects of attentional focus and perceptual load on selective attention when targets and distractors are distinct objects that occupy separate locations are well known, there has been little examination of their role when both relevant and irrelevant information pertains to the same object. In four experiments, participants were shown Stroop color words or strings of letters in a task of speeded color identification. When the participants’ attentional focus was manipulated via cue validity or precue size, greater Stroop interference was observed when the attentional focus was narrow than when it was broad. However, when the participants were induced to adopt a comparable attentional focus in a dual-task paradigm, the differential Stroop interference was eliminated. Furthermore, contrary to the prediction of the perceptual load hypothesis, different levels of processing load did not lead to differential Stroop interference. These results emphasize the importance of stimulus structure in understanding distractor processing. They indicate that when relevant and irrelevant information pertains to the same object, narrowing attentional focus increases distractor processing, and perceptual load has a negligible effect on the extent of distractor processing.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Balz, G.W., &Hock, H. S. (1997). The effect of attentional spread on spatial resolution.Vision Research,37, 1499–1510.
Baylis, G. C., &Driver, J. (1992). Visual parsing and response competition: The effect of grouping factors.Perception & Psychophysics,51, 145–162.
Beck, J., &Ambler, B. (1973). The effects of concentrated and distributed attention on peripheral acuity.Perception & Psychophysics,14, 225–230.
Chen, Z. (2000). Spatial attention reduces response interference in low, but not in high, processing load tasks.Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society,5, 93.
Cohen, J. D., Dunbar, K., &McClelland, J. L. (1990). On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect.Psychological Review,97, 332–361.
Cohn, N. B., Dustman, R. E., &Bradford, D. C. (1984). Age-related decrements in Stroop color test performance.Journal of Clinical Psychology,40, 1244–1250.
de Fockert, J.W., Rees, G., Frith, C. D., &Lavie, N. (2001). The role of working memory in visual selective attention.Science,291, 1803–1806.
Dempster, F. N. (1992). The rise and fall of the inhibitory mechanism: Toward a unified theory of cognitive development and aging.Developmental Review,12, 45–75.
Driver, J., &Baylis, G. C. (1989). Movement and visual attention: The spotlight metaphor breaks down.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 448–456.
Duncan, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,113, 501–517.
Egeth, H. (1977). Attention and preattention. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 11, pp. 277–320). New York: Academic Press.
Eriksen, B. A., &Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task.Perception & Psychophysics,16, 143–149.
Eriksen, C. W., &Hoffman, J. E. (1973). The extent of processing of noise elements during selective encoding from visual displays.Perception & Psychophysics,14, 155–160.
Eriksen, C.W., &Shultz, D.W. (1979). Information processing in visual search: A continuous flow conception and experimental results.Perception & Psychophysics,25, 249–263.
Eriksen, C. W., &St. James, J. D. (1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model.Perception & Psychophysics,40, 225–240.
Garner, W. R. (1970). The stimulus in information processing.American Psychologist,25, 350–358.
Garner, W. R. (1974).The processing of information and structure. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Garner, W. R., &Felfoldy, G. L. (1970). Integrality of stimulus dimensions in various types of information processing.Cognitive Psychology,1, 225–241.
Gatti, S. V., &Egeth, H. E. (1978). Failure of spatial selectivity in vision.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,11, 181–184.
Glaser, M. O., &Glaser, W. R. (1982). Time course analysis of the Stroop phenomenon.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,8, 875–894.
Gottwald, R. L., &Garner, W. R. (1975). Filtering and condensation tasks with integral and separable dimensions.Perception & Psychophysics,18, 26–28.
Handy, T. C., &Mangun, G. R. (2000). Attention and spatial selection: Electrophysiological evidence for modulation by perceptual load.Perception & Psychophysics,62, 175–186.
Harms, L., &Bundesen, C. (1983). Color segregation and selective attention in a nonsearch task.Perception & Psychophysics,33, 11–19.
Hartley, A. A. (1993). Evidence for the selective preservation of spatial selective attention in old age.Psychology & Aging,3, 391–379.
Johnson, D. N., McGrath, A., &McNeil, C. (2002). Cuing interacts with perceptual load in visual search.Psychological Science,13, 284–287.
Kahneman, D., &Chajczyk, D. (1983). Tests of the automaticity of reading: Dilution of Stroop effects by color-irrelevant stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,9, 497–509.
Kahneman, D., &Henik, A. (1981). Perceptual organization and attention. In M. Kubovy & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.),Perceptual organization (pp. 181–211). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kahneman, D., &Treisman, A. (1984). Changing views of attention and automaticity. In R. Parasuraman & D. R. Davies (Eds.),Varieties of attention (pp. 29–61). New York: Academic Press.
Kramer, A. F., &Jacobson, A. (1991). Perceptual organization and focused attention: The role of objects and proximity in visual processing.Perception & Psychophysics,50, 267–284.
LaBerge, D., &Brown, V. (1986). Variations in size of the visual field in which targets are presented: An attentional range effect.Perception & Psychophysics,40, 188–200.
LaBerge, D., Brown, V., Carter, M., Bash, D., &Hartley, A. (1991). Reducing the effects of adjacent distractors by narrowing attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 65–76.
Lappin, J. S., &Uttal, W. R. (1976). Does prior knowledge facilitate the detection of visual targets in random noise?Perception & Psychophysics,20, 367–374.
Lavie, N. (1995). Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 451–468.
Lavie, N. (2000). Selective attention and cognitive control: Dissociating attentional functions through different types of load. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.),Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 175–194). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lavie, N., &Cox, S. (1997). On the efficiency of attentional selection: Efficient visual search results in inefficient distractor rejection.Psychological Science,8, 395–398.
Lavie, N., &Fox, E. (2000). The role of perceptual load in negative priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,26, 1038–1052.
Lavie, N., &Tsal, Y. (1994). Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention.Perception & Psychophysics,56, 183–197.
Littman, D., &Becklen, R. (1976). Selective looking with minimal eye movements.Perception & Psychophysics,20, 77–79.
MacLeod, C.M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review.Psychological Bulletin,109, 163–203.
MacLeod, C.M., &Hodder, S. L. (1998). Presenting two incongruent color words on a single trial does not alter Stroop interference.Memory & Cognition,26, 212–219.
Mayfrank, L., Kimmig, H., &Fischer, B. (1987). The role of attention in the preparation of visually guided saccadic eye movements in man. In J. K. O’Regon and A. Levey-Schoen (Eds.),Eye movements: From physiology to cognition (pp. 37–45). New York: North-Holland.
McDowd, J. M., &Oseas-Kreger, D. M. (1991). Aging, inhibitory processes, and negative priming.Journal of Gerontology,46, 340–345.
Miller, J. (1987). Priming is not necessary for selective-attention failures: Semantic effects of unattended, unprimed letters.Perception & Psychophysics,41, 419–434.
Miller, J. (1991). The flanker compatibility effect as a function of visual angle, attentional focus, visual transients, and perceptual load: A search for boundary conditions.Perception & Psychophysics,49, 270–288.
Morton, J., &Chambers, S. M. (1973). Selective attention to words and colours.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,25, 387–397.
Nakayama, K., &Mackeben, M. (1989). Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention.Vision Research,29, 1631–1647.
Nealis, P.M. (1973). The Stroop phenomenon: Some critical tests of the response competition hypothesis.Perceptual & Motor Skills,37, 147–153.
Neisser, U., &Becklen, R. (1975). Selective looking: Attending to visually specified events.Cognitive Psychology,7, 480–494.
Pan, K., &Eriksen, C.W. (1993). Attentional distribution in the visual field duringsame-different judgments as assessed by response competition.Perception & Psychophysics,53, 134–144.
Panek, P. E., Rush, M. C., &Slade, L. A. (1984). Locus of the age-Stroop interference relationship.Journal of Genetic Psychology,145, 209–216.
Paquet, L., &Craig, G. L. (1997). Evidence for selective target processing with a low perceptual load flankers task.Memory & Cognition,25, 182–189.
Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,32, 3–25.
Posner, M. I., &Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.),Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531–556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Posner, M. I., &Snyder, C. R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In R. L. Solso (Ed.),Information processing and cognition: The Loyola symposium (pp. 55–85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R. R., &Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,109, 160–174.
Rees, G., Frith, C. D., &Lavie, N. (1997). Modulating irrelevant motion perception by varying attentional load in an unrelated task.Science,278, 1616–1619.
Schooler, C., Neumann, E., Caplan, L. J., &Roberts, B. R. (1997). A time course analysis of Stroop interference and facilitation: Comparing normal and schizophrenic individuals.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,126, 19–36.
Schulz, T. (1979). Components of the reaction time Stroop-task.Psychological Research,40, 377–395.
Shalev, L., &Algom, D. (2000). Stroop and Garner effects in and out of Posner’s beam: Reconciling two conceptions of selective attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,26, 997–1017.
Shiffrin, R.M., McKay, D. P., &Shaffer, W.D. (1976). Attending to forty-nine spatial positions at once.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,2, 14–22.
Sichel, J., &Chandler, K. A. (1969). The color-word interference test: The effects of varied color-word combinations upon verbal response latency.Journal of Psychology,92, 219–231.
Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions.Journal of Experimental Psychology,18, 643–662.
Townsend, J. T. (1971). A note on the identifiability of parallel and serial processes.Perception & Psychophysics,10, 161–163.
Townsend, J. T. (1974). Issues and models concerning the processing of a finite number of inputs. In B. H. Kantowitz (Ed.),Human information processing: Tutorials in performance and cognition (pp. 133–185). Potomac, MD: Erlbaum.
Treisman, A., &Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention.Cognitive Psychology,12, 97–136.
Ward, R. (2001).Visual attention moves no faster than the eyes. In K. Shapiro (Ed.),The limits of attention: Temporal constraints in human information processing (pp. 199–216). New York: Oxford University Press.
Woodman, G. F., &Luck, S. J. (1999). Electrophysiological measurement of rapid shift of attention during visual search.Nature,400, 867–869.
Yantis, S., &Johnston, J. C. (1990). On the locus of visual selection: Evidence from focused attention tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 135–149.
Yantis, S., &Jones, E. (1991). Mechanisms of attentional selection: Temporally modulated priority tags.Perception & Psychophysics,50, 166–178.
Yantis, S., &Jonides, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 601–620.
Yantis, S., &Jonides, J. (1990). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Voluntary versus automatic allocation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 121–134.
Yee, P. L., &Hunt, E. (1991). Individual differences in Stroop dilution: Tests of the attention-capture hypothesis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 715–725.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This study was supported in part by a research grant from the University of Canterbury.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, Z. Attentional focus, processing load, and Stroop interference. Perception & Psychophysics 65, 888–900 (2003). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194822
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194822