Abstract
Motor responses can be affected by visual stimuli that have been made invisible by masking. Can masked visual stimuli also affect nonmotor operations that are necessary to perform the task? Here, I report priming effects of masked stimuli on operations that were cued by masking stimuli. Cues informed participants about operations that had to be executed with a forthcoming target stimulus. In five experiments, cues indicated (1) the required response, (2) part of the motor response, (3) the stimulus modality of the target stimulus, or (4) the task to be performed on a multidimensional stimulus. Motor and nonmotor priming effects followed comparable time courses, which differed from those of prime recognition. Experiment 5 demonstrated nonmotor priming without prime awareness. Results suggest that motor and nonmotor operations are similarly affected by masked stimuli.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrams, R. L., &Greenwald, A. G. (2000). Parts outweigh the whole (word) in unconscious analysis of meaning.Psychological Science,11, 118–124.
Allport, A., Styles, E. A., &Hsieh, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.),Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 421–452). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bachmann, T. (1984). The process of perceptual retouch: Nonspecific afferent activation dynamics in explaining visual masking.Perception & Psychophysics,35, 69–84.
Breitmeyer, B. (1984).Visual masking: An integrative approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Buckner, R. L., &Koutstaal, W. (1998). Functional neuroimaging studies of encoding, priming, and explicit memory retrieval.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,95, 891–898.
Cheesman, J., &Merikle, P. M. (1986). Distinguishing conscious from unconscious perceptual processes.Canadian Journal of Psychology,40, 343–367.
Corbetta, M., Miezin, F. M., Dobmeyer, S., Shulman, G. L., &Petersen, S. E. (1990). Attentional modulation of neural processing of shape, color, and velocity in humans.Science,248, 1556–1559.
Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Le Clec’H, G., Koechlin, E., Müller, M., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., van de Moortele, P. F., &Le Bihan, D. (1998). Imaging unconscious semantic priming.Nature,395, 597–600.
Eimer, M., &Schlaghecken, F. (1998). Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 1737–1747.
Eriksen, C. W. (1960). Discrimination and learning without awareness: A methodological survey and evaluation.Psychological Review,67, 279–300.
Fehrer, E., &Raab, D. (1962). Reaction time to stimuli masked by metacontrast.Journal of Experimental Psychology,63, 143–147.
Francis, G. (1997). Cortical dynamics of lateral inhibition: Metacontrast masking.Psychological Review,104, 572–594.
Grady, C. L., Van Meter, J. W., Maisog, J. M., Pietrini, P., Krasuski, J., &Rauschecker, J. P. (1997). Attention-related modulation of activity in primary and secondary auditory cortex.Neuro-Report,8, 2511–2516.
Greenwald, A. G. (1992). Unconscious cognition reclaimed.American Psychologist,47, 766–779.
Greenwald, A. G., Draine, S. C., &Abrams, R. L. (1996). Three cognitive markers of unconscious semantic activation.Science,273, 1699–1702.
Holender, D. (1986). Semantic activation without conscious identification in dichotic listening, parafoveal vision, and visual masking: A survey and appraisal.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,9, 1–66.
Jacoby, L. L., Lindsay, D. S., &Toth, J. P. (1992). Unconscious influences revealed.American Psychologist,47, 802–809.
Jensen, A. R. (1996). Theg factor.Nature,381, 729.
Keele, S. W. (1981). Behavioral analysis of movement. In V. B. Brooks (Ed.),Handbook of physiology: Section 1. Vol. 2: Motor control (pp. 1391–1414). Bethesda, MD: American Physiological Society.
Klinger, M. R., Burton, P. C., &Pitts, G. S. (2000). Mechanisms of unconscious priming: I. Response competition, not spreading activation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 441–455.
Klotz, W., &Neumann, O. (1999). Motor activation without con scious discrimination in metacontrast masking.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,25, 976–992.
Köhler, S., &Moscovitch, M. (1997). Unconscious visual processing in neuropsychological syndromes: A survey of the literature and evaluation of models of consciousness. In M. Rugg (Ed.),Cognitive neuroscience (pp. 305–375). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
Leuthold, H., &Kopp, B. (1998). Mechanisms of priming by masked stimuli: Inferences from event-related potentials.Psychological Science,9, 263–269.
Leuthold, H., Sommer, W., &Ulrich, R. (1996). Partial advance information and response preparation: Inferences from the lateralized readiness potential.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,125, 307–323.
Macmillan, N. A., &Creelman, C. D. (1991).Detection theory: A user’s guide. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Merikle, P. M. (1992). Perception without awareness.American Psychologist,47, 792–795.
Merikle, P. M., &Daneman, M. (1998). Psychological investigation of unconscious perception.Journal of Consciousness Studies,5, 5–18.
Merikle, P. M., &Joordens, S. (1997a). Measuring unconscious influences. In J. D. Cohen & J. W. Schooler (Eds.),Scientific approaches to consciousness (pp. 109–123). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Merikle, P. M., &Joordens, S. (1997b). Parallels between perception without attention and perception without awareness.Consciousness & Cognition,6, 219–236.
Miller, J. O. (1982). Discrete versus continuous stage models of human information processing: In search of partial output.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,8, 273–296.
Milner, A. D., &Goodale, M. A. (1995).The visual brain in action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Monsell, S. (1996). Control of mental processes. In V. Bruce (Ed.),Unsolved mysteries of the mind (pp. 93–148). Hove, U.K.: Erlbaum.
Naccache, L., &Dehaene, S. (2001a). The priming method: Imaging unconscious repetition priming reveals an abstract representation of number in the parietal lobes.Cerebral Cortex,11, 966–974.
Naccache, L., &Dehaene, S. (2001b). Unconscious semantic priming extends to novel unseen stimuli.Cognition,80, 215–229.
Neumann, O. (1984). Automatic processing: A review of recent findings and a plea for an old theory. In W. Prinz & A. F. Sanders (Eds.),Cognition and motor processes (pp. 255–293). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Neumann, O. (1990). Direct parameter specification and the concept of perception.Psychological Research,52, 207–215.
Neumann, O., &Klotz, W. (1994). Motor responses to nonreportable masked stimuli: Where is the limit of direct parameter specification? In C. Umiltà, & M. Moscovitch (Eds.),Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 124–150). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Norman, D. A., &Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior. In R. J. Davidson, G. E. Schwartz, & D. Shapiro (Eds.),Consciousness and self-regulation (pp. 1–18). New York: Plenum.
Pashler, H. E. (1998).The psychology of attention. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Phillips, W. A. (1997). Theories of cortical computation. In M. D. Rugg (Ed.),Cognitive Neuroscience (pp. 11–46). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ramachandran, V. S., &Cobb, S. (1995). Visual attention modulates metacontrast masking.Nature,373, 66–68.
Reingold, E. M., &Merikle, P. M. (1988). Using direct and indirect measures to study perception without awareness.Perception & Psychophysics,44, 563–575.
Reingold, E. M., &Merikle, P. M. (1990). On the inter-relatedness of theory and measurement in the study of unconscious processes.Mind & Language,5, 9–28.
Requin, J., Brener, J., &Ring, C. (1991). Preparation for action. In J. R. Jennings & M. G. H. Coles (Eds),Handbook of cognitive psychophysiology: Central and autonomic nervous system approaches (pp. 357–448). Chichester, U.K.: Wiley.
Rogers, R. D., &Monsell, S. M. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,124, 207–231.
Rosenbaum, D. A. (1980). Human movement initiation: Specification of arm, direction, and extent.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,109, 444–474.
Shiffrin, R. M., &Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory.Psychological Review,84, 127–190.
Spence, C., &Driver, J. (1997). On measuring selective attention to an expected sensory modality.Perception & Psychophysics,59, 389–403.
Thomas, E. A. C., &Ross, B. H. (1980). On appropriate procedures for combining probability distributions within the same family.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,21, 136–152.
Tulving, E., &Schacter, D. L. (1990). Priming and human memory system.Science,247, 301–306.
Ungerleider, L. G. (1995). Functional brain imaging studies of cortical mechanisms for memory.Science,270, 769–775.
Vorberg, D., Mattler, U., Heinecke, A., Schmidt, T., & Schwarzbach, J. (in press). Invariant time-course of priming with and without awareness. In C. Kaernbach, E. Schröger, & H. Müller (Eds.),Psychophysics beyond sensation: Laws and invariants of human cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Wentura, D. (2000). Dissociative affective and associative priming effects in the lexical decision task: Yes versus no responses to word targets reveal evaluative judgment tendencies.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 456–469.
Wolff, P. (1989, April).Einfluss des maskierten Testreizes auf die Wahlreaktion auf den Maskierreiz bei Metakontrast [Effect of masked stimulus on choice response to the masking stimulus in metacontrast]. Paper presented at the 31st Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen, Bamberg, Germany.
Woodruff, P. W., Benson, R. R., Bandettini, P. A., Kwong, K. K., Howard, R. J., Talavage, T., Belliveau, J., &Rosen, B. R. (1996). Modulation of auditory and visual cortex by selective attention is modality-dependent.NeuroReport,12, 1909–1913.
Yellott, J. I., Jr. (1971). Correction for fast guessing and the speed-accuracy tradeoff in choice reaction time.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,8, 159–199.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
A preliminary report of the data was given at the Conference of Cognitive Neuroscience in Bremen (Germany), November 1999.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mattler, U. Priming of mental operations by masked stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics 65, 167–187 (2003). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194793
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194793