Abstract
Two experiments were performed to determine whether categorization of the pitch of a probe tone is influenced by the pitch of, and response made to, a preceding prime tone. The prime and the probe could be drawn either from a pool of low-frequency sounds or from a pool of high-frequency sounds. The results of both experiments indicated that the performance obtained was best when the prime and the probe were the same pitch (and therefore required the same response), intermediate when the two sounds differed in pitch and required different responses, and slowest when the prime and the probe differed in pitch but required the same response (i.e., they were drawn from the same frequency pool). The results of Experiment 2 revealed in addition that when a repeated response was required, performance declined as the magnitude of the frequency change increased and that responses were made more quickly and accurately if the direction of the frequency change was away from the alternative category than if it was toward the alternative category. The results demonstrate that categorization of sounds by pitch is accomplished with reference to a previous processing episode.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bertelson, P. (1965). Serial choice-reaction time as a function to response versus signal-and-response repetition.Nature,206, 217–218.
Bregman, A. S., Achim, A., &Ahad, P. A. (1992).The Maple software system. Montreal: McGill University.
Cherry, E. C. (1953). Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,25, 975–979.
Creelman, C. D. (1959). Detection of signals of uncertain frequency.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,32, 805–810.
Duncan, J. (1977). Response selection errors in spatial choice reaction tasks.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,29, 415–423.
Fletcher, B. C., &Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1978). The changing pattern of perceptual analytic strategies and response selection with practice in a two-choice reaction time task.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,30, 417–427.
Greenberg, G. Z., &Larkin, W. D. (1968). Frequency-response characteristic of auditory observers detecting signals of a single frequency in noise: The probe-signal method.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,44, 1513–1523.
Henke, W. L. (1990).An interactive dialogue language for time signal processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Research Laboratory of Electronics.
Hommell, B. (1998). Event files: Evidence for automatic integration of stimulus—response episodes.Visual Cognition,5, 183–216.
Hübner, R., &Hafter, E. R. (1995). Cuing mechanisms in auditory signal detection.Perception & Psychophysics,57, 197–202.
Jones, M. R., &Yee, W. (1993). Attending to auditory events: The role of temporal organization. In S. McAdams & E. Bigand (Eds.),Thinking in sound: The cognitive psychology of human audition (pp. 69–112). Oxford: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.
Krueger, L. E., &Shapiro, R. G. (1981). Intertrial effects of same— different judgements.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,33A, 241–265.
Larkin, W., &Greenberg, G. Z. (1970). Selective attention in uncertain frequency detection.Perception & Psychophysics,8, 179–184.
Mondor, T. A., Breau, L. M., &Milliken, B. (1998). Inhibitory processes in auditory selective attention: Evidence of location-based and frequency-based inhibition of return.Perception & Psychophysics,60, 296–302.
Mondor, T. A., &Zatorre, R. J. (1995). Shifting and focusing auditory spatial attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 387–409.
Moore, B. C. J. (1989).An introduction to the psychology of hearing (3rd ed.). Toronto: Academic Press.
Moore, B. C. J. (1995). Frequency analysis and masking. In B. C. J. Moore (Ed.),Hearing:Handbook of perception and cognition (2nd ed., pp. 161–205). San Diego: Academic Press.
Moray, N. (1959). Attention in dichotic listening: Affective cues and the influence of instructions.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,12, 214–220.
Moray, N. (1975). A data base for theories of selective listening. In P. M. A. Rabbitt & S. Dornic (Eds.),Attention and performance V (pp. 119–135). New York: Academic Press.
Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1992). Many happy repetitions: A celebration of the “Bertelson Repetition Effect” 1961–1991. In J. Alegria, D. Holender, J. Junca de Morais, & M. Radeau (Eds.),Analytic approaches to human cognition (pp. 313–330). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Rabbitt, P. M. A., &Vyas, S. M. (1979). Memory and data-driven control of selective attention in continuous tasks.Canadian Journal of Psychology,33, 71–87.
Scharf, B., Quigley, S., Aoki, C., Peachey, N., &Reeves, A. (1987). Focused auditory attention and frequency sensitivity.Perception & Psychophysics,42, 215–223.
Shower, E. G., &Biddulph, R. (1931). Differential pitch sensitivity of the ear.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,3, 275–287.
Simon, J. R. (1990). The effects of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.),Stimulus—response compatibility: An integrated perspective (Advances in Psychology, Vol. 65, pp. 31–86). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Simon, J. R., Craft, J. L., &Small, A. M. (1971). Reactions toward the apparent source of an auditory stimulus.Journal of Experimental Psychology,89, 203–206.
Simon, J. R., &Rudell, A. P. (1967). Auditory S-R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing.Journal of Applied Psychology,51, 300–304.
Smith, E. E., Chase, W. G., &Smith, P. G. (1973). Stimulus and response repetition effects in retrieval from short-term memory: Trace decay and memory search.Journal of Experimental Psychology,98, 413–422.
Smith, M. C. (1968). Repetition effect and short-term memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology,77, 435–439.
Stoet, G., &Hommel, B. (1999). Action planning and the temporal binding of response codes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,25, 1625–1640.
Walker, P., &Marshall, E. (1982). Visual memory and stimulus repetition effects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,111, 348–368.
Wier, C. C., Jesteadt, W., &Green, D. M. (1977). Frequency discrimination as a function of frequency and sensation level.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,61, 178–184.
Zwicker, E., Flottorp, G., &Stevens, S. S. (1957). Critical bandwidth in loudness summation.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,29, 548–557.
Zwislocki, J. J. (1978). Experimental and theoretical aspects of simultaneous, forward, backward, and central masking. In E. C. Carterette & M. P. Freidman (Eds.),Handbook of perception: Vol. IV. Hearing (pp. 283–336). New York: Academic Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by a grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada to T.A.M.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mondor, T.A., Hurlburt, J. & Thorne, L. Categorizing sounds by pitch: Effects of stimulus similarity and response repetition. Perception & Psychophysics 65, 107–114 (2003). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194787
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194787