Abstract
When novel scenes are encoded, the representations of scene layout are generally viewpoint specific. Past studies of scene recognition have typically required subjects to explicitly study and encode novel scenes, but in everyday visual experience, it is possible that much scene learning occurs incidentally. Here, we examine whether implicitly encoded scene layouts are also viewpoint dependent. We used the contextual cuing paradigm, in which search for a target is facilitated by implicitly learned associations between target locations and novel spatial contexts (Chun & Jiang, 1998). This task was extended to naturalistic search arrays with apparent depth. To test viewpoint dependence, the viewpoint of the scenes was varied from training to testing. Contextual cuing and, hence, scene context learning decreased as the angular rotation from training viewpoint increased. This finding suggests that implicitly acquired representations of scene layout are viewpoint dependent.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Aks, D. J., &Enns, J. T. (1996). Visual search for size is influenced by background texture gradient.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 1467–1481.
Berry, D. C., &Dienes, Z. (1993).Implicit learning. Hove, U.K.: Erlbaum.
Biederman, I., &Gerhardstein, P. C. (1993). Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 1162–1182.
Biederman, I., Mezzanotte, R. J., &Rabinowitz, J. C. (1982). Scene perception: Detecting and judging objects undergoing relational violations.Cognitive Psychology,14, 143–177.
Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox.Spatial Vision,10, 433–436.
Bravo, M. J., &Nakayama, K. (1992). The role of attention in different visual-search tasks.Perception & Psychophysics,51, 465–472.
Bulthoff, H. H., &Edelman, S. (1992). Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,89, 60–64.
Chun, M. M. (2000). Contextual cuing of visual attention.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,4, 170–178.
Chun, M. M., &Jiang, Y. (1998). Contextual cuing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention.Cognitive Psychology,36, 28–71.
Chun, M. M., &Jiang, Y. (1999). Top-down attentional guidance based on implicit learning of visual covariation.Psychological Science,10, 360–365.
Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (in press). Implicit, long-term spatial contextual memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition.
Chun, M. M., &Nakayama, K. (2000). On the functional role of implicit visual memory for the adaptive deployment of attention across scenes.Visual Cognition,7, 65–81.
Chun, M. M., &Wolfe, J. M. (2001). Visual attention. In B. Goldstein (Ed.),Blackwell handbook of perception (pp. 272–310). Oxford: Blackwell.
Diwadkar, V. A., &McNamara, T. P. (1997). Viewpoint dependence in scene recognition.Psychological Science,8, 302–307.
Egeth, H. E., Virzi, R. A., &Garbart, H. (1984). Searching for conjunctively defined targets.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 32–39.
Hayhoe, M. M. (2001, May).Memory for spatial structure in saccadic targeting. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Vision Sciences Society, Sarasota, FL.
Huttenlocher, J., &Presson, C. C. (1973). Mental rotation and the perspective problem.Cognitive Psychology,4, 277–299.
Jacoby, L. L., &Witherspoon, D. (1982). Remembering without awareness.Canadian Journal of Psychology,36, 300–324.
Jiang, Y., &Chun, M. M. (2001). Selective attention modulates implicit learning.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,54A, 1105–1124.
Johnston, W. A., Hawley, K. J., Plew, S. H., Elliott, J. M., &De-Witt, M. J. (1990). Attention capture by novel stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,119, 397–411.
Kawahara, J. (2002, May).Contextual cuing effect in three dimensional layouts. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the Vision Sciences Society, Sarasota, FL.
Lassaline, M. E., &Logan, G. D. (1993). Memory-based automaticity in the discrimination of visual numerosity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 561–581.
Levine, M., Jankovic, I. N., &Palic, M. (1982). Principles of spatial problem solving.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,111, 157–175.
Logan, G. D. (1988). Towards an instance theory of automatization.Psychological Review,95, 492–527.
Marr, D., &Nishihara, H. K. (1978). Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Series B,200, 269–294.
Miller, J. (1988). Components of the location probability effect in visual search tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,14, 453–471.
Olson, I. R., &Chun, M. M. (2001). Temporal contextual cuing of visual attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 1299–1313.
Olson, I. R., &Chun, M. M. (2002). Perceptual constraints on implicit learning of spatial context.Visual Cognition,9, 273–302.
Palmer, S. E. (1975). The effects of contextual scenes on the identification of objects.Memory & Cognition,3, 519–526.
Palmeri, T. J. (1997). Exemplar similarity and the development of automaticity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 324–354.
Pashler, H. (1998).The psychology of attention. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies.Spatial Vision,10, 437–442.
Peterson, M. S., &Kramer, A. F. (2001). Attentional guidance of the eyes by contextual information and abrupt onsets.Perception & Psychophysics,63, 1239–1249.
Reber, A. S. (1989). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,118, 219–235.
Rensink, R. A., O’Regan, J. K., &Clark, J. J. (1997). To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes.Psychological Science,8, 368–373.
Rieser, J. J. (1989). Access to knowledge of spatial structure at novel points of observation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 1157–1165.
Rosenthal, R., &Rosnow, R. L. (1991).Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Schacter, D. L. (1987). Implicit memory: History and current status.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 501–518.
Schneider, W., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search and attention.Psychological Review,84, 1–66.
Shanks, D. R., &St. John, M. F. (1994). Characteristics of dissociable learning systems.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,17, 367–395.
Shaw, M. L. (1978). A capacity allocation model for reaction time.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,4, 586–598.
Shaw, M. L., &Shaw, P. (1977). Optimal allocation of cognitive resources to spatial locations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,3, 201–211.
Sheinberg, D. L., &Logothetis, N. K. (1998). Implicit memory for scenes guides visual exploration in monkey.Society for Neuroscience Abstracts,24, (Pt. 2), 1506.
Shelton, A. L., &McNamara, T. P. (1997). Multiple views of spatial memory.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 102–106.
Shepard, R. N., &Cooper, L. A. (1982).Mental images and their transformations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Simons, D. J., &Levin, D. T. (1997). Change blindness.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,1, 261–267.
Simons, D. J., &Wang, R.-F. (1998). Perceiving real-world viewpoint changes.Psychological Science,9, 315–320.
Sperling, G. (1960). The information available in brief visual presentations.Psychological Monographs: General & Applied,74, 1–29.
Squire, L. R. (1992). Declarative and nondeclarative memory: Multiple brain systems supporting learning and memory.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,99, 195–231.
Stadler, M. A., &Frensch, P. A. (Eds.) (1998).Handbook of implicit learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Tarr, M. J. (1995). Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study on the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of threedimensional objects.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,2, 55–82.
Treisman, A. M., &Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention.Cognitive Psychology,12, 97–136.
Treisman, A. [M.], &Gormican, S. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries.Psychological Review,95, 15–48.
Wang, Q., Cavanagh, P., &Green, M. (1994). Familiarity and pop-out in visual search.Perception & Psychophysics,56, 495–500.
Wolfe, J. M. (1994a). Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,1, 202–238.
Wolfe, J. M. (1994b). Visual search in continuous, naturalistic stimuli.Vision Research,34, 1187–1195.
Yantis, S., &Jonides, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 601–621.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The research was supported by National Science Foundation Grant BCS-0096178.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chua, KP., Chun, M.M. Implicit scene learning is viewpoint dependent. Perception & Psychophysics 65, 72–80 (2003). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194784
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194784