Abstract
Previous research has shown that a salient feature singleton may capture attention in a stimulus-driven, bottom-up fashion (e.g., Theeuwes, 1992, 1994b). This conclusion has been challenged by others claiming that the observed attentional capture by irrelevant singletons may not be stimulus driven but due to top-down attentional control settings and/or nonspatial filtering costs. In the present study, we show that inhibition of return (IOR) occurs at the location of an irrelevant singleton. Participants were slower to detect a target presented at the location of the irrelevant singleton, relative to other locations. Since IOR can be observed only as a result of anexogenous, stimulus-driven shift ofspatial attention, it is unlikely that top-down control settings and/or nonspatial filtering costs played a role. In line with earlier claims, the present findings provide strong evidence that salient singletons capture spatial attention in a purely bottom-up way.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bacon, W. F., &Egeth, H. E. (1994). Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture.Perception & Psychophysics,55, 485–496.
Caputo, G., &Guerra, S. (1998). Attentional selection by distractor suppression.Vision Research,38, 669–689.
Deubel, H., &Schneider, W. X. (1996). Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism.Vision Research,6, 1827–1837.
Folk, C. L. &Remington, R. [W.] (1998). Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: Evidence for two forms of attentional capture.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 847–858.
Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., &Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 1030–1044.
Fuentes, L. J., Vivas, A. B., &Humphreys, G. W. (1999). Inhibitory tagging of stimulus properties in inhibition of return: Effects on semantic priming and flanker interference.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,52, 149–164.
Gibson, B. S., &Amelio, J. (2000). Inhibition of return and attentional control settings.Perception & Psychophysics,62, 496–504.
Hoffman, J. E., &Subramaniam, B. (1995).The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements.Perception & Psychophysics,57, 787–795.
Jonides, J., &Yantis, S. (1988). Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention.Perception & Psychophysics,43, 346–354.
Joseph, J. S. &Optican, L. M. (1996). Involuntary attentional shifts due to orientation differences.Perception & Psychophysics,58, 651–665.
Kahneman, D., Treisman, A., &Burkell, J. (1983). The costs of visual filtering.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,9, 510–522.
Kawahara, J., &Toshima, T. (1996). Stimulus-driven control of attention: Evidence from visual search for moving target among static nontargets.Japanese Journal of Psychonomic Science,15, 77–87.
Kim, M. S., &Cave, K. R. (1999). Top-down and bottom-up attentional control: On the nature of interference from a salient distractor.Perception & Psychophysics,61, 1009–1023.
Klein, R. M. (2000). Inhibition of return.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,4, 138–147.
Klein, R. M., &Taylor, T. L. (1994). Categories of cognitive inhibition with reference to attention. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.),Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 113–150). New York: Academic Press.
Kowler, E., Anderson, E., Dosher, B., &Blaser, E. (1995). The role of attention in the programming saccades.Vision Research,35, 1897–1916.
Kumada, T. (1999). Limitations in attending to a feature value for overriding stimulus-driven interference.Perception & Psychophysics,61, 61–79.
Lavie, N. (1995). Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 451–468.
Lupiáñez, J., Milán, E. G., Tornay, F. J., Madrid, E., &Tudela, P. (1997). Does IOR occur in discrimination tasks? Yes, it does, but later.Perception & Psychophysics,59, 1241–1254.
Mohler, C. W., &Wurtz, R. H. (1976). Organization of monkey superior colliculus: Intermediate layer cells discharging before eye movements.Journal of Neurophysiology,39, 722–744.
Posner, M. I., &Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.),Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531–556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Posner, M. I., Rafal, R. D., Choate, L., &Vaughan, J. (1985). Inhibition of return: Neural basis and function.Cognitive Neuropsychology,2, 211–218.
Pratt, J., Hillis, J., & Gold, J. M. (2001). The effect of the physical characteristics of cues and targets on facilitation and inhibition.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,8.
Pratt J., Kingstone, A., &Khoe, W. (1997). Inhibition of return in location- and identity-based choice decision tasks.Perception & Psychophysics,59, 964–971.
Pratt, J., Sekuler, A. B. &McAuliffe, J. (2001). The role of attentional set on attentional cuing and inhibition of return.Visual Cognition,8, 33–46.
Rafal, R. D., Calabresi, P. A., Brennan, C. W., &Sciolto, T. K. (1989). Saccade preparation inhibits reorienting to recently attended locations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 673–685.
Rizzolatti, G., Riggio, L., Dascola, I., &Umiltà, C. (1987). Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention.Neuropsychologica,25, 31–40.
Simons, D. J. (2000). Attentional capture and inattentional blindness.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,4, 147–155.
Taylor, T. L., &Klein, R. M. (1998). On the causes and effects of inhibition of return.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,5, 625–643.
Terry, K. M., Valdes, L. A., &Neill, W. T. (1994). Does “inhibition of return” occur in discrimination tasks?Perception & Psychophysics,55, 279–286.
Theeuwes, J. (1990). Perceptual selectivity is task dependent: Evidence from selective search.Acta Psychologica,74, 81–99.
Theeuwes, J. (1991). Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity.Perception & Psychophysics,50, 184–193.
Theeuwes, J. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and form.Perception & Psychophysics,51, 599–606.
Theeuwes, J. (1993). Visual selective attention: A theoretical analysis.Acta Psychologica,83, 93–154.
Theeuwes, J. (1994a). Endogenous and exogenous control of visual selection.Perception,23, 429–440.
Theeuwes, J. (1994b). Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: Selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 799–806.
Theeuwes, J. (1995). Abrupt luminance change pops out; abrupt color change does not.Perception & Psychophysics,57, 637–644.
Theeuwes, J. (1996). Perceptual selectivity for color and form: On the nature of the interference effect. In A. F. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles, & G. D. Logan (Eds.),Converging operations in the study of visual attention (pp. 297–314). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Theeuwes, J., Atchley, P., &Kramer, A. F. (2000). On the time course of top-down and bottom-up control of visual attention. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.),Attention and performance XVII: Control of Cognitive processes (pp. 105–125). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Theeuwes, J., &Burger, R. (1998). Attentional control during visual search: The effect of irrelevant singletons.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 1342–1353.
Theeuwes, J., &Godijn, R. (2001). Attention and oculomotor capture. In C. Folk & B. Gibson (Eds.),Attraction, distraction, and action: Multiple perspectives on attentional capture (pp. 121–150). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Turatto, M., &Galfano, G. (2001). Attentional capture by color without any relevant attentional set.Perception & Psychophysics,63, 286–297.
Yantis, S. (1996). Attentional capture in vision. In A. F. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles, & G. D. Logan (Eds.),Converging operations in the study of visual attention (pp. 45–76). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Yantis, S. (2000). Goal directed and stimulus driven determinants of attentional control. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.),Attention and performance XVIII: Control of cognitive processes (pp. 71–104). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Yantis, S., &Egeth, H. E. (1999). On the distinction between visual salience and stimulus-driven attentional capture.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,25, 661–676.
Yantis, S., &Jonides, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from selective search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 601–621.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Theeuwes, J., Godijn, R. Irrelevant singletons capture attention: Evidence from inhibition of return. Perception & Psychophysics 64, 764–770 (2002). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194743
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194743