Abstract
In three experiments, the effects of contextual temporal variation on the perception of timing and on sensorimotor synchronization were examined. Experiment 1 showed that exposure to a variably timed auditory precursor sequence reduces the detectability of deviations from isochrony in a musical test sequence. By contrast, in Experiment 2 there was only a small and transient effect of identical precursor sequences on the variability of finger taps that were synchronized with a similar test sequence. Moreover, the precursor did not impede phase error correction following deviations from isochrony in the test sequence. Experiment 3 employed a within-subjects design that required simultaneous detection of irregularities in and synchronization with nonmusical auditory sequences. Precursor variability impaired only detection, not synchronization performance. These results suggest that perception of deviations from regularity engages context-sensitive timing processes, probably related to conscious awareness, that are not involved in sensorimotor synchronization.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barnes, R., &Jones, M. R. (2000). Expectancy, attention, and time.Cognitive Psychology,41, 254–311.
Beek, P. J., Peper, C. E., &Daffertshofer, A. (2000). Timekeepers versus nonlinear oscillators: How the approaches differ. In P. Desain & L. Windsor (Eds.),Rhythm perception and production (pp. 9–33). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Creem, S. H., &Proffitt, D. R. (1998). Two memories for geographical slant: Separation and interdependence of action and awareness.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,5, 22–36.
Friberg, A., &Sundberg, J. (1995). Time discrimination in a monotonic, isochronous sequence.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,98, 2524–2531.
Gentilucci, M., Chieffi, S., Daprati, E., Saetti, M. C., &Toni, I. (1996). Visual illusion and action.Neuropsychologia,34, 369–376.
Haffenden, A., &Goodale, M. A. (1998). The effect of pictorial illusion on prehension and perception.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,10, 122–136.
Ivry, R. B. (1997). Cerebellar timing systems.International Review of Neurobiology,41, 555–573.
Ivry, R. B., &Hazeltine, R. E. (1995). Perception and production of temporal intervals across a range of durations: Evidence for a common timing mechanism.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 3–18.
Ivry, R. B., &Keele, S. W. (1989). Timing functions of the cerebellum.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,1, 136–152.
Ivry, R. B., &Richardson, T. C. (2002). Temporal control and coordination: The multiple timer model.Brain & Cognition,48, 117–132.
Jones, M. R. (1976). Time, our lost dimension: Toward a new theory of perception, attention, and memory.Psychological Review,83, 323–355.
Jones, M. R., &Boltz, M. (1989). Dynamic attending and responding to time.Psychological Review,96, 459–491.
Jones, M. R., &Yee, W. (1997). Sensitivity to time change: The role of context and skill.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,23, 693–709.
Keele, S. W., Pokorny, R. A., Corcos, D. M., &Ivry, R. B. (1985). Do perception and motor production share common timing mechanisms: A correlational analysis.Acta Psychologica,60, 173–191.
Klotz, W., &Neumann, O. (1999). Motor activation without conscious discrimination in metacontrast masking.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,25, 976–992.
Kolers, P. A., &Brewster, J. M. (1985). Rhythms and responses.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,11, 150–167.
Large, E. W., &Jones, M. R. (1999). The dynamics of attending: How we track time-varying events.Psychological Review,106, 119–159.
Mates, J. (1994). A model of synchronization of motor acts to a stimulus sequence: I. Timing and error corrections.Biological Cybernetics,70, 463–473.
Meegan, D. V., Aslin, R. N., &Jacobs, R. A. (2000). Motor timing learned without motor training.Nature Neuroscience,3, 860–862.
Michon, J. A. (1967).Timing in temporal tracking. Assen, The Netherlands: van Gorcum.
Neumann, O. (1990). Direct parameter specification and the concept of perception.Psychological Research,52, 207–215.
Pressing, J. (1999). The referential dynamics of cognition and action.Psychological Review,106, 714–747.
Repp, B. H. (1994). On determining the basic tempo of an expressive music performance.Psychology of Music,22, 157–167.
Repp, B. H. (1998a). The detectability of local deviations from a typical expressive timing pattern.Music Perception,15, 265–290.
Repp, B. H. (1998b). A microcosm of musical expression: I. Quantitative analysis of pianists’ timing in the initial measures of Chopin’s Etude in E major.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,104, 1085–1100.
Repp, B. H. (1998c). Obligatory “expectations” of expressive timing induced by perception of musical structure.Psychological Research,61, 33–43.
Repp, B. H. (1998d). Variations on a theme by Chopin: Relations between perception and production of deviations from isochrony in music.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 791–811.
Repp, B. H. (1999a). Control of expressive and metronomic timing in pianists.Journal of Motor Behavior,31, 145–164.
Repp, B. H. (1999b). Detecting deviations from metronomic timing in music: Effects of perceptual structure on the mental timekeeper.Perception & Psychophysics,61, 529–548.
Repp, B. H. (1999c). Relationships between performance timing, perception of timing perturbations, and perceptual-motor synchronization in two Chopin preludes.Australian Journal of Psychology,51, 188–203.
Repp, B. H. (2000a). Compensation for subliminal timing perturbations in perceptual-motor synchronization.Psychological Research,63, 106–128.
Repp, B. H. (2000b). Pattern typicality and dimensional interactions in pianists’ imitation of expressive timing and dynamics.Music Perception,18, 173–211.
Repp, B. H. (2001). Phase correction, phase resetting, and phase shifts after subliminal timing perturbations in sensorimotor synchronization.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,27, 600–621.
Repp, B. H. (2002). The embodiment of musical structure: Effects of musical context on sensorimotor synchronization with complex timing patterns. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.),Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention and performance XIX (pp. 245–265). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Robertson, S. D., Zelaznik, H. N., Lantero, D. A., Bojczyk, K. G., Spencer, R. M., Doffin, J. G., &Schneidt, T. (1999). Correlations for timing consistency among tapping and drawing tasks: Evidence against a single timing process for motor control.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,25, 1316–1330.
Rumiati, R. I., &Humphreys, G. W. (1998). Recognition by action: Dissociating visual and semantic routes to action in normal observers.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 631–647.
Schubotz, R. I., Friederici, A. D., &von Cramon, D. Y. (2000). Time perception and motor timing: A common cortical and subcortical basis revealed by fMRI.NeuroImage,11, 1–12.
Smith, O. W. (1957). Relationship of rhythm discrimination to motor rhythm performance.Journal of Applied Psychology,41, 365–369.
Thaut, M. H., Tian, B., &Azimi-Sadjadi, M. R. (1998). Rhythmic finger tapping to cosine-wave modulated metronome sequences: Evidence of subliminal entrainment.Human Movement Science,17, 839–863.
Treisman, M., Faulkner, A., &Naish, P. L. N. (1992). On the relation between time perception and the timing of motor action: Evidence for a temporal oscillator controlling the timing of movement.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,45A, 235–263.
Turvey, M. T. (1977). Preliminaries to a theory of action with reference to vision. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.),Perceiving, acting, and knowing (pp. 211–265). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Viviani, P., &Stucchi, N. (1989). The effect of movement velocity on form perception: Geometric illusions in dynamic displays.Perception & Psychophysics,46, 266–274.
Viviani, P., &Stucchi, N. (1992a). Biological movements look uniform: Evidence of motor-perceptual interactions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 603–623.
Viviani, P., &Stucchi, N. (1992b). Motor-perceptual interactions. In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.),Tutorials in motor behavior II (pp. 229–248). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Vorberg, D., &Wing, A. (1996). Modeling variability and dependence in timing. In H. Heuer & S. W. Keele (Eds.),Handbook of perception and action (Vol. 2, pp. 181–262). London: Academic Press.
Wallace, S. A. (1996). Dynamic pattern perspective of rhythmic movement: An introduction. In H. N. Zelaznik (Ed.),Advances in motor learning and control (pp. 155–194). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Wing, A. M., &Kristofferson, A. B. (1973). Response delays and the timing of discrete motor responses.Perception & Psychophysics,14, 5–12.
Yee, W., Holleran, S., &Jones, M. R. (1994). Sensitivity to event timing in regular and irregular sequences: Influences of musical skill.Perception & Psychophysics,56, 461–471.
Zelaznik, H. N., Spencer, R. M., &Doffin, J. G. (2000). Temporal precision in tapping and circle drawing movements at preferred rates is not correlated: Further evidence against timing as a general-purpose ability.Journal of Motor Behavior,32, 193–199.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by NIH Grant MH-51230.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Repp, B.H. Perception of timing is more context sensitive than sensorimotor synchronization. Perception & Psychophysics 64, 703–716 (2002). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194738
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194738