Abstract
In two experiments, we examined whether one source of cross-dimensional interference in visual search involves cross-trial position priming. In Experiment 1, we demonstrated cross-dimensional interference in search for an orientation-defined target: Search for a left-tilted target among right-tilted nontargets was disrupted by the presence of a singleton color distractor. In all conditions, search was facilitated when a target was presented at the same position as a target in the previous trial (positive position priming). In addition, there were negative effects of position priming on orientation targets that fell on the same side as singleton distractors on the previous trial. In Experiment 2, to examine the impact of negative position priming on cross-dimensional interference, trials with and without singleton distractors were presented in a single trial block. The chance of a singleton distractor’s being present on a preceding trial was then equated across displays when the distractor was and when it was not subsequently present. Cross-dimensional interference was eliminated under this mixed presentation condition, suggesting that the cost of cross-dimensional interference was not determined by the stimulus-driven factors in the current trial, at least when a limited number of target and distractor locations was used. We conclude that top-down selection is possible during visual search, and this leads to inhibition of the location of salient distractors. The cost of this is slowed detection of targets at inhibited locations on subsequent trials.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bacon, W. F., &Egeth, H. E. (1994). Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture.Perception & Psychophysics,55, 485–496.
Cepeda, N. J., Cave, K. R., Bichot, N. P., &Kim, M.-S. (1998). Spatial selection via feature-driven inhibition of distractor locations.Perception & Psychophysics,60, 727–746.
Folk, C. L., &Remington, R. W. (1998). Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: Evidence for two forms of attentional capture.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 847–858.
Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., &Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 1030–1044.
Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., &Wright, J. H. (1994). The structure of attentional control: Contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 317–329.
Found, A., &Müller, H. J. (1996). Searching for unknown feature targets on more than one dimension: Investigating a “dimensionweighting” account.Perception & Psychophysics,58, 88–101.
Houghton, G., Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., &Shore, D. I. (1996). Inhibition and interference in selective attention: Some tests of a neural network model.Visual Cognition,3, 119–164.
Kahneman, D., Treisman, A., &Burkell, J. (1983). The cost of visual filtering.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,9, 510–522.
Kim, M.-S., &Cave, K. R. (1999). Top-down and bottom-up attentional control: On the nature of interference from a salient distractor.Perception & Psychophysics,61, 1009–1023.
Klein, R. M. (1988). Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search.Nature,334, 430–431.
Kumada, T. (1999). Limitations in attending to a feature value for overriding stimulus-driven interference.Perception & Psychophysics,61, 61–79.
Maljkovic, V., &Nakayama, K. (1996). Priming of pop-out: II. The role of position.Perception & Psychophysics,58, 977–991.
Maylor, E. A. (1985). Facilitatory and inhibitory components of orienting in visual space. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.),Attention and performance XI (pp. 189–204). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Posner, M. I., &Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of attention. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.),Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531–556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rizzolatti, G., Riggio, L., Dascola, I., &Umiltà, C. (1987). Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention.Neuropsychologia,25, 31–40.
Theeuwes, J. (1991). Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity.Perception & Psychophysics,50, 184–193.
Theeuwes,J. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and form.Perception & Psychophysics,51, 599–606.
Theeuwes, J. (1994). Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: Selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 799–806.
Theeuwes, J. (1995). Perceptual selectivity for color and form: On the nature of the interference effect. In A. P. Kramer, G. H. Cole, & G. C. Logan (Eds.),Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention (pp. 297–314). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Theeuwes, J., &Burger, R. (1998). Attentional control during visual search: The effect of irrelevant singletons.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 1342–1353.
Theeuwes, J., Kramer, A. F., Hahn, S., &Irwin, D. E. (1998). Our eyes do not always go where we want them to go: Capture of the eyes by new objects.Psychological Science,9, 379–385.
Tipper, S. P., Howard, L. A., &Houghton, G. (2000). Behavioral consequences of selection from distributed representations. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.),Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 223–245). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Treisman, A. M. (1988). Features and objects. The fourteenth Bartlett memorial lecture.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,40A, 201–237.
Van Selst, M., &Jolicoeur, P. (1994). A solution to the effect of sample size on outlier elimination.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,47A, 631–650.
Watson, D. G., &Humphreys, G. W. (2000). Visual marking: Evidence for inhibition using a probe-dot detection paradigm.Perception & Psychophysics,62, 471–481.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported by grants from the Humboldt Foundation, the Medical Research Council (U.K.), and the Human Frontier Science Programme to the second author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kumada, T., Humphreys, G.W. Cross-dimensional interference and cross-trial inhibition. Perception & Psychophysics 64, 493–503 (2002). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194720
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194720