Abstract
In two experiments, the contributions of internal and external competition in a task known to produce a reverse Stroop effect were investigated. In this paradigm, the verbal meaning of an incongruent Stroop stimulus is identified by pointing to a patch of matching color—a task made difficult by the incongruent print color. The experiments showed that there was somewhat more interference when the (irrelevant) color in which the target word was printed was available as an alternate response patch than when it was not. However, significantly more interference was determined by whether the (irrelevant) print color belonged to the set of colors actually used as target words in the course of the experiment. Moreover, the same patterns of interference emerged when the task was altered so that the mere presence of the correct color had to be indicated with a keypress, rather than by pointing to the color’s location. Consistent with translation models of Stroop interference, these results demonstrate the theoretical importance of competition among internal representations, rather than among stimuli or responses.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cohen, J. D., Dunbar, K., &McClelland, J. L. (1990). On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect.Psychological Review,97, 332–361.
Compton, R. P., &Flowers, J. H. (1977). Pictorial interference with geometric shapes and achromatic shades.Perception & Psychophysics,22: 303–309.
Durgin, F. H. (2000). The reverse Stroop effect.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,7, 121–125.
Dyer, F. N., &Severance, L. J. (1972). Effects of irrelevant colors on reading of color names: A controlled replication of the “reversed Stroop” effect.Psychonomic Science,28, 336–338.
Egeth, H. E., Blecker, D. L., &Kamlet, A. S. (1969). Verbal interference in a perceptual comparison task.Perception & Psychophysics,6, 355–356.
Flowers, J. H., Warner, J. L., &Polansky, M. L. (1979). Response and encoding factors in “ignoring” irrelevant information.Memory & Cognition,7, 86–94.
Glaser, W. R., &Glaser, M. O. (1989). Context effect in Stroop-like word and picture processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,118, 13–42.
Gumenik, W. E., &Glass, R. (1970). Effects of reducing the readability of the words on the Stroop Color-Word Test.Psychonomic Science,20, 247–248.
Hock, H. S., &Egeth, H. (1970). Verbal interference with encoding in a perceptual classification task.Journal of Experimental Psychology,83, 299–303.
Kanne, S. M., Balota, D. A., Spieler, D. H., &Faust, M. E. (1998). Explorations of Cohen, Dunbar, and McClelland’s (1990) connectionist model of Stroop performance.Psychological Review,105, 174–187.
Klein, G. S. (1964). Semantic power measured through the interference of words with color-naming.American Journal of Psychology,77, 576–588.
Kornblum, S. (1992). Dimensional overlap and dimensional relevance in stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus compatibility. In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.),Tutorials in motor behavior II (pp. 743–777). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Logan, G. D., &Zbrodoff, N. J. (1998). Stroop-type interference:Congruity effects in color naming with typewritten responses.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 978–992.
MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review.Psychological Review,109, 163–203.
Melara, R. D., &Mounts, J. R. W. (1993). Selective attention to Stroop dimensions: Effects of baseline discriminability, response mode, and practice.Memory & Cognition,21, 627–645.
Mewhort, D. J., Braun, J. G., &Heathcote, A. (1992). Response time distributions and the Stroop task: A test of the Cohen, Dunbar, and McClelland (1990) model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 872–882.
Morton, J., &Chambers, S. M. (1973). Selective attention to words and colours.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,25, 387–397.
Pashler, H., &Shiu, L.-P. (1999). Do images involuntarily trigger search? A test of Pillsbury’s hypothesis.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,6, 445–448.
Proctor, R. W. (1978). Sources of color-word interference in the Stroop color-naming task.Perception & Psychophysics.23, 413–419.
Salthouse, T. A. (1986). Perceptual, cognitive, and motoric aspects of transcription typing.Psychological Bulletin,99, 303–319.
Sharma, D., &McKenna, F. P. (1998). Differential components of the manual and vocal Stroop tasks.Memory & Cognition,26, 1033–1040.
Simon, H. A. (1981).The sciences of the artificial (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Simon, J. R. (1969). Reactions toward the source of stimulation.Journal of Experimental Psychology,81, 174–176.
Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions.Journal of Experimental Psychology,18, 643–661.
Sugg, M. J., &McDonald, J. E. (1994). Time course of inhibition in color-response and word-response versions of the Stroop task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 647–675.
Treisman, A. M., &Fearnley, S. (1969). The Stroop test: Selective attention to colours and words.Nature,222, 437–439.
Uleman, J. S., &Reeves, J. (1971). A reversal of the Stroop interference effect, through scanning.Perception & Psychophysics,9, 293–295.
Virzi, R. A., &Egeth, H. E. (1985). Toward a translational model of Stroop interference.Memory & Cognition,13, 304–319.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Durgin, F.H. Translation and competition among internal representations in a reverse Stroop effect. Perception & Psychophysics 65, 367–378 (2003). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194568
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194568