Abstract
Masked primes presented prior to a target can trigger response activation processes that may later be subject to inhibition. Evidence for response inhibition has previously been obtained with primes presented at fixation, but not with primes presented in the periphery of the visual field. It is argued that thiscentral—peripheral asymmetry reflects a threshold mechanism in motor control. Foveal masked primes give rise to stronger perceptual representations than do peripheral primes, resulting in stronger response activations. Strong response activations are actively inhibited, whereas weaker activations remain below a hypothetical inhibition threshold. Evidence in favor of this hypothesis is obtained in four experiments that manipulated the perceptual strength of foveal and peripheral primes. Experiments 1 and2 demonstrate that when the perceptual strength of peripheral primes is gradually increased by delaying mask onset, positive prime—target compatibility effects (reflecting the absence of response inhibition) turn into negative effects (indicating the presence of response inhibition). Experiments 3 and 4 demonstrate that when the perceptual strength of foveal primes is gradually decreased by degradation, negative compatibility effects turn into positive effects. The results are discussed in terms of a simple functional model of early motor control.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allport, A., Tipper, S., &Chmiel, N. R. J. (1985). Perceptual integration and postcategorical filtering. In M. I. Posner & O. S.M. Martin (Eds.),Attention and performance XI (pp. 107–132). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Band, G. P., &van Boxtel G. J. (1999). Inhibitory motor control in stop paradigms: Review and reinterpretation of neural mechanisms.Acta Psychologica,101, 179–211.
Coles, M. G. H., Gratton, G., Bashore, T. R., Eriksen, C. W., &Donchin, E. (1985). A psychophysiologicalinvestigation of the continuous flow model of human information processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,11, 529–553.
Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Le Clec’H, G., Koechlin, E., Mueller, M., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., van de Moortele, P.-F., &Le Bihan, D. (1999). Imaging unconscious semantic priming.Nature,395, 597–600.
De Jong, R., Coles, M.G.,&Logan, G.D. (1995). Strategies and mechanisms in nonselective and selective inhibitory motor control.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 498–511.
De Jong, R., Coles, M. G., Logan, G. D., &Gratton, G. (1990). In search of the point of no return:The control of response processes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 164–182.
De Jong, R., Liang, C., &Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus—response correspondence.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 731–750.
Eimer, M. (1993). Effects of attention and stimulus probability on ERPs in a go/nogo task.Biological Psychology,35, 123–138.
Eimer, M. (1995). Stimulus—response compatibility and automatic response activation: Evidence from psychophysiological studies.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception &Performance,21, 837–854.
Eimer, M. (1999). Facilitatory and inhibitory effects of masked prime stimuli on motor activation and behavioral performance.Acta Psychologica,101, 293–313.
Eimer, M., &Schlaghecken, F. (1998). Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception &Performance,24, 1737–1747.
Eimer, M., Schubö, A., & Schlaghecken, F. (in press). The locus of inhibition in masked priming.Journal of Motor Behaviour.
Eriksen, C. W., Coles, M. G. H., Morris, L. R., &O’Hara, W. P. (1985). An electromyographic examination of response competition.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,23, 165–168.
Eriksen, C. W., &Schultz, D. W. (1979). Information processing in visual search: A continuous flow conception and experimental results.Perception & Psychophysics,25, 249–263.
Falkenstein, M., Hoormann, J., &Hohnsbein, J. (1999). ERP components in go/nogo tasks and their relation to inhibition.Acta Psychologica,101, 267–291.
Fehrer, E., &Raab, E. (1962). Reaction time to stimuli masked by metacontrast.Journal of Experimental Psychology,63, 143–147.
Goolkasian, P. (1997). Size scaling and spatial factors in visual attention.American Journal of Psychology,110, 397–415.
Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., Sirevaag, E. J., Eriksen, C. W., &Donchin, E. (1988). Pre- and post-stimulus activation of response channels: A psychophysiological analysis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,14, 331–344.
Hagenzieker, M. P., &van der Heijden, A. H. C. (1990). Timecourses in visual-information processing: Some theoretical considerations.Psychological Research,52, 5–12.
Hagenzieker, M. P., van der Heijden, A. H. C., &Hagenaar, R. (1990). Time-courses in visual-information processing: Some empirical evidence for inhibition.Psychological Research,52, 13–21.
Houghton, G., &Tipper, S. P. (1994). A model of inhibitory mechanisms in selective attention. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.),Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 53–112). San Diego: Academic Press.
Houghton, G., &Tipper, S. P. (1996). Inhibitory mechanisms on neural and cognitive control: Applications to selective attention and sequential action.Brain & Cognition,30, 20–43.
Jodo, E., &Kayama, Y. (1992). Relation of a negative ERP component to response inhibition in a go/no-go task.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,82, 477–482.
Kaernbach, C. (1991). Simple adaptive testing with the weighted up— down method.Perception & Psychophysics,49, 227–229.
Klotz, W., &Wolff, P. (1995). The effect of masked stimulus on the response to the masking stimulus.Psychological Research,58, 92–101.
Kok, A. (1986). Effects of degradation of visual stimuli on components of the event-related potential (ERP) in go/nogo reaction tasks.Biological Psychology,32, 21–38.
Kopp, B., Rist, F., &Mattler, U. (1996). N200 in the flanker task as a neurobehavioral tool for investigating executive control.Psychophysiology,33, 282–294.
Lie, I. (1980). Visual detection and resolution as a function of retinal locus.Vision Research,20, 967–974.
Logan, G.D., &Cowan, W. B. (1984).On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A theory of an act of control.Psychological Review,91, 295–327.
Marcel, T. (1980). Conscious and preconscious recognition of polysemous words: Locating the selective effects of prior verbal context. In R. S. Nickersen (Ed.),Attention and Performance VIII (pp. 435–457). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
McCormick, P.A. (1997). Orienting attention without awareness.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception& Performance,23, 168–180.
Merikle, P. M., Joordens, S., &Stolz, J. (1995). Measuring the relative magnitude of unconscious influences.Consciousness& Cognition,4, 422–439.
Miller, J. (1991). The flanker compatibility effect as a function of visual angle, attentional focus, visual transients, and perceptual load: A search for boundary conditions.Perception & Psychophysics,49, 270–288.
Miller, J., &Hackley, S. A. (1992). Electrophysiological evidence for temporal overlap among contingent mental processes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,121, 195–209.
Naito, E., &Matsamura, M. (1994). Movement-related potentials associated with motor inhibition as determined by use of a stop-signal paradigm in humans.Cognitive Brain Research,2, 139–146.
Neill, W. T., Valdes.,L. A., &Terry, K. M. (1995). Selective attention and the inhibitory control of cognition. In F. N. Dempster & C. J. Brainerd (Eds.),Interference and inhibition in cognition (pp. 207–261). San Diego: Academic Press.
Neumann, O. (1990). Direct parameter specification and the concept of perception.Psychological Research,52, 207–215.
Neumann, O., &Klotz, W. (1994). Motor responses to nonreportable, masked stimuli: Where is the limit of direct parameter specification? In C. Umiltà & M. Moskovitch (Eds.),Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 123–150). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Bradford Books.
Osman, A., Bashore, T. R., Coles, M.G.H., Donchin, E., &Meyer, D. E. (1992). On the transmission of partial information: Inferences from movement-related brain potentials.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 217–232.
Perry, V. H., &Cowey, A. (1984). Retinal ganglion cells that project to the superior colliculus and pretectum in the macaque monkey.Neuroscience,12, 1125–1137.
Rijsdijk, J. P., Kroon, J. N., &van der Wildt, G. J. (1980). Contrast sensitivity as a function of position on the retina.Vision Research,20, 235–241.
Schlaghecken, F., &Eimer, M. (1997). The influence of subliminally presented primes on response preparation.Sprache & Kognition,16, 166–175.
Schlaghecken, F., &Eimer, M. (2000). A central—peripheral asymmetry inmasked priming.Perception & Psychophysics,62, 1367–1382.
Schlaghecken, F., &Eimer, M. (2001). Partial response activation to masked primes is not dependent on response readiness.Perceptual & Motor Skills,92, 208–222.
Schwarz, W., &Mecklinger, A. (1995). Relationship between flanker identifiability and compatibility effect.Perception& Psychophysics,57, 1045–1052.
Simon, J. R. (1969). Reactions towards the source of stimulation.Journal of Experimental Psychology,81, 174–176.
Smid, H. G.O.M., Mulder, G., &Mulder, L. J. M. (1990). Selective response activation can begin before stimulus recognition is complete: A psychophysiological and error analysis of continuous flow.Acta Psychologica,74, 169–201.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The present research was supported by a grant from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schlaghecken, F., Eimer, M. Motor activation with and without inhibition: Evidence for a threshold mechanism in motor control. Perception & Psychophysics 64, 148–162 (2002). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194564
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194564