Abstract
We investigated how the performance of a color-singleton search (the search for a single odd-colored item among homogeneously colored distractors) left a persistent memory trace (lasting up to six intervening trials or ∼17 sec) that facilitated a subsequent color-singleton search (when the same targetdistractor color combination was repeated). Specifically, we investigated the roles of attention in the encoding and “retrieval” stages of this priming effect by intermixing trials in which the target location was precued by an onset cue. We found that the encoding of both target and distractor colors was automatic in that whether or not observers had to use color in locating the target in the preceding trial did not substantially affect priming. However, priming required that the color-singleton item be attended in the preceding trial. Once a color singleton display was encoded, our results indicated that priming facilitated the direction of attention to the color-singleton target on a subsequent trial. In short, when a color-singleton item happened to be a critical item to be attended in one situation, another color-singleton item defined by the same color combination tended to attract attention in subsequent encounters.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bertelson, P. (1963). S-R relationships and reaction times to new versus repeated signals in a serial task.Journal of Experimental Psychology,65, 478–484.
Bertelson, P. (1965). Serial choice reaction-time as a function of response versus signal-and-response repetition.Nature,206, 217–218.
Bravo, M. J., &Nakayama, K. (1992). The role of attention in different visual-search tasks.Perception & Psychophysics,51, 465–472.
Campbell, K. C., &Proctor, R. W. (1993). Repetition effects with categorizable stimulus and response sets.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 1345–1362.
Cheal, M., &Lyon, D. (1989). Attention effects on form discrimination at different eccentricities.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,41A, 719–746.
Chelazzi, L., Duncan, J., Miller, E. K., &Desimone, R. (1998). Responses of neurons in inferior temporal cortex during memory-guided visual search.Journal of Neurophysiology,80, 2918–2940.
Desimone, R., Wessinger, M., Thomas, L., &Schneider, W. (1990). Attentional control of visual perception: Cortical and subcortical mechanisms.Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology,55, 963–971.
Di Pace, E., Marangolo, P., &Pizzamiglio, L. (1997). Response bias in color priming.Acta Psychologica,95, 3–14.
Driver, J., &Tipper, S. P. (1989). On the nonselectivity of “selective” seeing: Contrasts between interference and priming in selective attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 304–314.
Duncan, J., &Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity.Psychological Review,96, 433–458.
Egeth, H. E., &Yantis, S. (1997). Visual attention: Control, representation, and time course.Annual Review of Psychology,48, 269–297.
Entus, A., &Bindra, D. (1970). Common features of the “repetition” and “same-different” effects in reaction time experiments.Perception & Psychophysics,7, 143–148.
Eriksen, C. W., &Collins, J. F. (1969). Temporal course of selective attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology,80, 254–261.
Eriksen, C. W., &Hoffman, J. E. (1972). Temporal and spatial characteristics of selective encoding from visual displays.Perception & Psychophysics,12, 201–204.
Eriksen, C. W., &Rohrbaugh, J. W. (1970). Some factors determining efficiency of selective attention.American Journal of Psychology,83, 330–342.
Fox, E. (1994). Interference and negative priming from ignored distractors: The role of selection difficulty.Perception & Psychophysics,56, 565–574.
Fox, E. (1995). Pre-cuing target location reduces interference but not negative priming from visual distractors.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,48A, 26–40.
Hillstrom, A. P. (2000). Repetition effects in visual search.Perception & Psychophysics,62, 800–817.
Kornblum, S. (1967). Choice reaction time for repetitions and nonrepetitions: A re-examination of the information hypothesis.Acta Psychologica,27, 178–187.
Kröse, B. J. A., &Julesz, B. (1989). The control and speed of shifts of attention.Vision Research,29, 1607–1619.
LaBerge, D., Legrand, R., &Hobbie, R. K. (1969). Functional identification of perceptual and response biases in choice reaction time.Journal of Experimental Psychology,79, 295–299.
LaBerge, D., Van Gelder, P., &Yellott, J., Jr. (1970). A cueing technique in choice reaction time.Perception & Psychophysics,7, 57–62.
Luck, S. J., Chelazzi, L., Hillyard, S., &Desimone, R. (1997). Neural mechanisms of spatial selective attention in areas V1, V2, and V4 of macaque visual cortex.Journal of Neurophysiology,77, 24–42.
Mackeben, M., &Nakayama, K. (1993). Express attentional shifts.Vision Research,33, 85–90.
Maljkovic, V., &Nakayama, K. (1994). Priming of pop-out I: A role of features.Memory & Cognition,22, 657–672.
Maljkovic, V., &Nakayama, K. (2000). Priming of pop-out: III. A short-term implicit memory system beneficial for rapid target selection.Visual Cognition,7, 571–595.
Mishkin, M., Ungerleider, L. G., &Macko, K. A. (1983). Object vision and spatial vision: Two central pathways.Trends in Neurosciences,6, 414–417.
Moran, J., &Desimone, R. (1985). Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex.Science,229, 782–784.
Nakayama, K., &Mackeben, M. (1989). Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention.Vision Research,29, 1631–1647.
Paquet, L. (2001). Eliminating flanker effects and negative priming in the flankers task: Evidence for early selection.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,8, 301–306.
Paquet, L., &Lortie, C. (1990). Evidence for early selection: Precuing target location reduces interference from same-category distractors.Perception & Psychophysics,48, 382–388.
Pashler, H., &Baylis, G. (1991). Procedural learning: 2. Intertrial repetition effects in speeded-choice tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 33–48.
Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1968). Repetition effects and signal classification strategies in serial choice-response tasks.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,20, 232–239.
Reynolds, J. H., Chelazzi, L., &Desimone, R. (1999). Competitive mechanisms subserve attention in macaque areas V2 and V4.Journal of Neuroscience,19, 1736–1753.
Rovamo, J., &Virsu, V. (1979). Visual resolution, contrast sensitivity, and the cortical magnification factor.Experimental Brain Research,37, 475–494.
Shulman, G. L., Remington, R. W., &McLean, J. P. (1979). Moving attention through physical space.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,5, 522–526.
Simon, J. R. (1988). A ‘priming’ effect in a choice reaction time task.Acta Psychologica,69, 45–60.
Smith, M. C. (1968). Repetition effect and short-term memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology,77, 435–439.
Soetens, E. (1998). Localizing sequential effects in serial choice reaction time with the information reduction procedure.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 547–568.
Suzuki, S., &Cavanagh, P. (1997). Focused attention distorts visual space: An attentional repulsion effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,23, 443–463.
Tanaka, K. (1996). Inferotemporal cortex and object vision.Annual Review of Neuroscience,19, 109–139.
Theeuwes, J. (1991). Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity.Perception & Psychophysics,50, 184–193.
Theeuwes, J. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and form.Perception & Psychophysics,51, 599–606.
Tipper, S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory effects of ignored primes.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,37A, 571–590.
Treisman, A. M., &Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention.Cognitive Psychology,12, 97–136.
Ulrich, R., &Mattes, S. (1996). Does immediate arousal enhance response force in simple reaction time?Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,49A, 972–990.
Yantis, S., &Johnston, J. C. (1990). On the locus of visual selection: Evidence from focused attention tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 135–149.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported by a National Science Foundation Grant SBR-9817643 given to S.S.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Goolsby, B.A., Suzuki, S. Understanding priming of color-singleton search: Roles of attention at encoding and “retrieval”. Perception & Psychophysics 63, 929–944 (2001). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194513
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194513