Abstract
When participants are required to react to a stimulus, reaction times (RTs) are usually reduced when temporal uncertainty about stimulus occurrence is minimized. Contrary to the common assumption attributing this RT benefit solely to the speeding of motor processes, recent evidence suggests that temporal uncertainty might rather influence premotoric processing levels. We employed a backward-masking procedure to further confine the locus of the temporal uncertainty effect. Participants performed a discrimination task and indicated whether a spatial gap within a square was on the right or the left side. In addition to the shorter RTs, visual discrimination accuracy was improved when temporal uncertainty was low. This result demonstrates that temporal uncertainty influences stimulus processing at a perceptual level.
Article PDF
References
Bachmann, T., &Allik, J. (1976). Integration and interruption in the masking of form by form.Perception,5, 79–97.
Bausenhart, K. M., Rolke, B., Hackley, S. A., &Ulrich, R. (2006). The locus of temporal preparation effects: Evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,13, 536–542.
Bonnel, A.-M., Possamaï, C.-A., &Schmitt, M. (1987). Early modulation of visual input: A study of attentional strategies.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,39A, 757–776.
Breitmeyer, B. G. (1984).Visual masking: An integrative approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.
Brunia, C. H. M., &van Boxtel, G. J. M. (2000). Motor preparation. In J. T. Cacioppo, L. G. Tassinary, & G. G. Berntson (Eds.),Handbook of psychophysiology (2nd ed., pp. 507–532). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cheal, M., Lyon, D. R., &Hubbard, D. C. (1991). Does attention have different effects on line orientation and line arrangement discrimination?Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,43A, 825–857.
Correa, A., Lupiáñez, J., &Tudela, P. (2005). Attentional preparation based on temporal expectancy modulates processing at the perceptual level.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,12, 328–334.
Coull, J. T., &Nobre, A. C. (1998). Where and when to pay attention: The neural systems for directing attention to spatial locations and to time intervals as revealed by both PET and fMRI.Journal of Neuroscience,18, 7426–7435.
Grice, G. R. (1968). Stimulus intensity and response evocation.Psychological Review,75, 359–373.
Hackley, S. A., &Valle-Inclán, F. (1998). Automatic alerting does not speed late motoric processes in a reaction-time task.Nature,391, 786–788.
Hackley, S. A., &Valle-Inclán, F. (1999). Accessory stimulus effects on response selection: Does arousal speed decision making?Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,11, 321–329.
Hackley, S. A., &Valle-Inclán, F. (2003). Which stages of processing are speeded by a warning signal?Biological Psychology,64, 27–45.
Hasbroucq, T., Kaneko, H., Akamatsu, M., &Possamaï, C.-A. (1999). The time-course of preparatory spinal and cortico-spinal inhibition: An H-reflex and transcranial magnetic stimulation study in man.Experimental Brain Research,124, 33–41.
Henderson, J. M. (1991). Stimulus discrimination following covert attentional orienting to an exogenous cue.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 91–106.
Hohle, R. H. (1965). Inferred components of reaction times as functions of foreperiod duration.Journal of Experimental Psychology,69, 382–386.
Kahneman, D. (1968). Method, findings, and theory in studies of visual masking.Psychological Bulletin,70, 404–425.
Klemmer, E. T. (1956). Time uncertainty in simple reaction time.Journal of Experimental Psychology,51, 179–184.
Loftus, G. R. (2002). Analysis, interpretation, and visual presentation of experimental data. In H. Pashler & J. Wixted (Eds.),Stevens’ Handbook of experimental psychology: Vol. 4. Methodology in experimental psychology (3rd ed., pp. 339–390). New York: Wiley.
Loveless, N. E. (1973). The contingent negative variation related to preparatory set in a reaction time situation with variable foreperiod.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,35, 369–374.
Luce, R. D. (1986).Response times: Their role in inferring elementary mental organization. New York: Oxford University Press.
Macmillan, N. A., &Creelman, C. D. (1991).Detection theory: A user’s guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Martens, S., &Johnson, A. (2005). Timing attention: Cuing target onset interval attenuates the attentional blink.Memory & Cognition,33, 234–240.
Mattes, S., &Ulrich, R. (1997). Response force is sensitive to the temporal uncertainty of response stimuli.Perception & Psychophysics,59, 1089–1097.
Miller, J., &Reynolds, A. (2003). The locus of redundant-targets and nontargets effects: Evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm.Journal for Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,29, 1126–1142.
Müller-Gethmann, H., Ulrich, R., &Rinkenauer, G. (2003). Locus of the effect of temporal preparation: Evidence from the lateralized readiness potential.Psychophysiology,40, 597–611.
Niemi, P., &Näätänen, R. (1981). Foreperiod and simple reaction time.Psychological Bulletin,89, 133–162.
Pashler, H. [E.] (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory.Psychological Bulletin,116, 220–244.
Pashler, H. E. (1998).The psychology of attention. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pashler, H. [E.], &Johnston, J. C. (1998). Attentional limitations in dual-task performance. In H. [E.] Pashler (Ed.),Attention (pp. 155–189). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R., &Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,109, 160–174.
Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., &Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 849–860.
Sanders, A. F. (1980). Some effects of instructed muscle tension on choice reaction time and movement time. In R. S. Nickerson (Ed.),Attention and performance VIII (pp. 59–74). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Sanders, A. F. (1998).Elements of human performance: Reaction processes and attention in human skill. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Simon, J. R., &Slaviero, D. P. (1975). Differential effects of a foreperiod countdown procedure on simple and choice reaction time.Journal of Motor Behavior,7, 9–14.
Smith, P. L., &Wolfgang, B. J. (2004). The attentional dynamics of masked detection.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,30, 119–136.
Smulders, F. T. Y. (1993).The selectivity of age effects on information processing: Response times and electrophysiology. Unpublished dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Sommer, W., Leuthold, H., &Schubert, T. (2001). Multiple bottlenecks in information processing? An electrophysiological examination.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,8, 81–88.
Sperling, G. (1963). A model for visual memory tasks.Human Factors,5, 19–31.
Spijkers, W. A. (1990). The relation between response-specificity, S-R compatibility, foreperiod duration and muscle-tension in a target aiming task.Acta Psychologica,75, 261–277.
Sternberg, S. (2001). Separate modifiability, mental modules, and the use of pure and composite measures to reveal them.Acta Psychologica,106, 147–246.
Teichner, W. H. (1954). Recent studies of simple reaction time.Psychological Bulletin,51, 128–149.
Turvey, M. T. (1973). On peripheral and central processes in vision: Inferences from an information-processing analysis of masking with patterned stimuli.Psychological Review,80, 1–52.
Woodrow, H. (1914). The effect upon reaction time of variation in the preparatory interval. In J. Angell, H. Warren, J. Watson, & S. Franz (Eds.),The psychological monographs (pp. 16–65). Princeton, NJ: Psychological Review Co.
Yeshurun, Y., &Carrasco, M. (1999). Spatial attention improves performance in spatial resolution tasks.Vision Research,39, 293–306.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This study was supported by Grant RO 3034/1-1 from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rolke, B., Hofmann, P. Temporal uncertainty degrades perceptual processing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 14, 522–526 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194101
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194101