Abstract
Whether or not the capture of visual attention is driven solely by the salience of an attention-capturing stimulus or mediated by top-down control has been a point of contention since Folk, Remington, and Johnston (1992) introduced their contingent involuntary orienting hypothesis, which states that the capture of attention by a salient stimulus depends on its relevance to a feature distinguishing the target from nontargets. Gibson and Kelsey (1998) extended Folk et al.’s (1992) hypothesis by demonstrating that features associated with the appearance of the target display also mediate capture. Although similar to Folk et al. (1992), Gibson and Kelsey’s displaywide contingent orienting hypothesis makes it difficult to demonstrate stimulus-driven capture, because an observer must always use some perceptible feature as a signal of the target display’s appearance; hence, such features could always be mediating capture. The present article reviews and applies the logic of Gibson and Kelsey’s and Folk et al.’s (1992) hypotheses to experiments from the attentional capture literature, and assesses whether previously reported capture effects were mediated by top-down attentional control. It concludes that these capture effects were not stimulus-driven.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrams, R. A., &Christ, S. E. (2003). Motion onset captures attention.Psychological Science,14, 427–432.
Ansorge, U., &Heumann, M. (2003). Top-down contingencies in peripheral cuing: The roles of color and location.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,29, 937–948.
Atchley, P., Kramer, A. F., &Hillstrom, A. (2000). Contingent capture for onsets and offsets: Attention set for perceptual transients.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,26, 594–606.
Bacon, W., &Egeth, H. (1994). Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture.Perception & Psychophysics,55, 485–496.
Bravo, M. J., &Nakayama, K. (1992). The role of attention in different visual-search tasks.Perception & Psychophysics,51, 465–472.
Broadbent, D. E. (1958).Perception and communication. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.
Chastain, G., &Cheal, M. (1998). Automatic versus directed attention with single-element and multiple-element precues.Visual Cognition,5, 339–364.
Chastain, G., &Cheal, M. (2001). Attentional capture with various distractor and target types.Perception & Psychophysics,63, 979–990.
Chastain, G., &Cheal, M., &Kuskova, V. (2002). Inappropri ate capture by diversionary dynamic elements.Visual Cognition,9, 355–381.
Egeth, H. E. (1977). Attention and preattention. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 7, pp. 277–320). San Diego: Academic Press.
Enns, J. T., Austen, E. L., Di Lollo, V., Rauschenberger, R., &Yantis, S. (2001). New objects dominate luminance transients in setting attentional priority.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,27, 1287–1302.
Eriksen, C. W., &St. James, J. D. (1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model.Perception & Psychophysics,40, 225–240.
Eriksen, C. W., &Yeh, Y. Y. (1985). Allocation of attention in the visual field.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,11, 583–597.
Folk, C. L., &Annett, S. (1994). Do locally defined feature discontinuities capture attention?Perception & Psychophysics,56, 277–287.
Folk, C. L., Leber, A. B., &Egeth, H. E. (2002). Made you blink! Contingent attentional capture produces a spatial blink.Perception & Psychophysics,64, 741–753.
Folk, C. L., &Remington, R. W. (1996). When knowledge does not help: Limitations on the flexibility of attentional control. In A. F. Kramer, M. G. M. Coles, & G. D. Logan (Eds.),Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention (pp. 271–295). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Folk, C. L., &Remington, R. W. (1998). Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: Evidence for two forms of attentional capture.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 847–858.
Folk, C. L., &Remington, R. [W.] (1999). Can new objects override attentional control settings?Perception & Psychophysics,61, 727–739.
Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., &Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 1030–1044.
Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., &Johnston, J. C. (1993). Contingent attentional capture: A reply to Yantis (1993).Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 682–685.
Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., &Wright, J. H. (1994). The structure of attentional control: Contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 317–329.
Franconeri, C. M., Hollingworth, A., &Simons, D. J. (2005). Do new objects capture attention?Psychological Science,16, 275–281.
Franconeri, S. L., &Simons, D. J. (2003). Moving and looming stimuli capture attention.Perception & Psychophysics,65, 999–1010.
Franconeri, S. L., Simons, D. J., &Junge, J. A. (2004). Searching for stimulus-driven shifts of attention.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,11, 876–881.
Gibson, B. S. (1996). Visual quality and attentional capture: A challenge to the special role of abrupt onsets.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 1496–1504.
Gibson, B. S., &Amelio, J. (2000). Inhibition of return and attentional control settings.Perception & Psychophysics,62, 496–504.
Gibson, B. S., &Jiang, Y. (1998). Surprise! An unexpected color singleton does not capture attention in visual search.Psychological Science,9, 176–182.
Gibson, B. S., &Kelsey, E. M. (1998). Stimulus-driven attentional capture is contingent on attentional set for displaywide visual features.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 699–706.
Hickey, C., McDonald, J. J., &Theeuwes, J. (2006). Electrophysiological evidence of the capture of visual attention.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,18, 604–613.
Hillstrom, A. P., &Yantis, S. (1994). Visual motion and attentional capture.Perception & Psychophysics,55, 399–411.
Horstmann, G. (2002). Evidence for attentional capture by a surprising color singleton in visual search.Psychological Science,13, 499–505.
Horstmann, G. (2005). Attentional capture by an unannounced color singleton depends on expectation discrepancy.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,31, 1039–1060.
Irwin, D. E., Colcombe, A. M., Kramer, A. F., &Hahn, S. (2000). Attentional and oculomotor capture by onset, luminance and color singletons.Vision Research,40, 1443–1458.
Johnson, J. D., Hutchison, K. A., &Neill, W. T. (2001). Attentional capture by irrelevant color singletons.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,27, 841–847.
Jonides, J. (1981). Voluntary vs. automatic control over the mind’s eye’s movement. In J. [B.] Long & A. [D.] Baddeley (Eds.),Attention and performance IX (pp. 187–203). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Jonides, J., &Yantis, S. (1988). Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention.Perception & Psychophysics,43, 346–354.
Joseph, J. S., &Optican, L. M. (1996). Involuntary attentional shifts due to orientation differences.Perception & Psychophysics,58, 651–665.
Juola, J. F., Koshino, H., &Warner, C. B. (1995). Tradeoffs between attentional effects of spatial cues and abrupt onsets.Perception & Psychophysics,57, 333–342.
Kahneman, D., Treisman, A., &Burkell, J. (1983). The cost of visual filtering.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,9, 510–522.
Kim, M.-S., &Cave, K. R. (1999). Top-down and bottom-up attentional control: On the nature of interference from a salient distractor.Perception & Psychophysics,61, 1009–1023.
Kim, M.-S., &Cave, K. R. (2001). Perceptual grouping via spatial selection in a focused-attention task.Vision Research,41, 611–624.
Lambert, A., Spencer, E., &Mohindra, N. (1987). Automaticity and the capture of attention by a peripheral display change.Current Psychological Research & Reviews,6, 136–147.
Lamy, D. (2005). Temporal expectations modulate attentional capture.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,12, 1112–1119.
Lamy, D., &Egeth, H. E. (2003). Attentional capture in singletondetection and feature-search modes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,29, 1003–1020.
Lamy, D., Leber, A., &Egeth, H. E. (2004). Effects of task relevance and stimulus-driven salience in feature-search mode.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,30, 1019–1031.
Lamy, D., Tsal, Y., &Egeth, H. E. (2003). Does a salient distractor capture attention early in processing?Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,10, 621–629.
Lavie, N. (1995). Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,d21, 451–468.
Leber, A. B., &Egeth, H. E. (2006). It’s under control: Top-down search strategies can override attentional capture.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,13, 132–138.
Martin-Emerson, R., &Kramer, A. F. (1997). Offset transients modulate attentional capture by sudden onsets.Perception & Psychophysics,59, 739–751.
Miller, J. (1989). The control of attention by abrupt visual onsets and offsets.Perception & Psychophysics,45, 567–571.
Neely, J. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limitedcapacity attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,106, 226–254.
Neely, J. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In D. Besner & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.),Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 264–336). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Neely, J. H., & Burnham, B. R. (2004, November).A noncontingent, automatic capture of spatial attention by a static discontinuity. Paper presented at the 45th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Minneapolis, MN.
Neely, J. H., &Kahan, T. A. (2001). Is semantic activation automatic? A critical re-evaluation. In H. L. Roediger III, J. S. Nairne, I. Neath, & A. M. Surprenant (Eds.),The nature of remembering: Essays in honor of Robert G. Crowder (pp. 69–93). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Neisser, U. (1963). Decision-time without reaction-time: Experiments in visual scanning.American Journal of Psychology,76, 376–385.
Pashler, H. (1988). Cross-dimensional interaction and texture segregation.Perception & Psychophysics,43, 307–318.
Peterson, M. S., &Kramer, A. F. (2001). Contextual cueing reduces interference from task-irrelevant onset distractors.Visual Cognition,8, 843–859.
Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,32, 3–25.
Posner, M. I., &Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.),Attention and performance X (pp. 531–556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Posner, M. I., &Snyder, C. R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In R. L. Solso (Ed.),Information processing and cognition: The Loyola symposium (pp. 55–83). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R. R., &Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,109, 160–174.
Pratt, J., Kingstone, A., &Khoe, W. (1997). Inhibition of return in location- and identity-based choice decision tasks.Perception & Psychophysics,59, 964–971.
Pratt, J., &McAuliffe, J. (2001). The effects of onsets and offsets on visual attention.Psychological Research,65, 185–191.
Pratt, J., &McAuliffe, J. (2002). Determining whether attentional control settings are inclusive or exclusive.Perception & Psychophysics,64, 1361–1370.
Pratt, J., Sekuler, A. B., &McAuliffe, J. (2001). The role of attentional set on attentional cueing and inhibition of return.Visual Cognition,8, 33–46.
Rauschenberger, R. (2003a). Attentional capture by auto- and allocues.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,10, 814–842.
Rauschenberger, R. (2003b). When something old becomes something new: Spatiotemporal object continuity and attentional capture.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,29, 600–615.
Remington, R. W., Folk, C. L., &McLean, J. P. (2001). Contingent attentional capture or delayed allocation of attention?Perception & Psychophysics,63, 298–307.
Remington, R. W., Johnston, J. C., &Yantis, S. (1992). Involuntary attentional capture by abrupt onsets.Perception & Psychophysics,51, 279–290.
Richard, C. M., Wright, R. D., &Ward, L. M. (2003). Goal-driven modulation of stimulus-driven attentional capture in multiple-cue displays.Perception & Psychophysics,65, 939–955.
Riggio, L., Bello, A., &Umiltà, C. (1998). Inhibitory and facilitatory effects on cue onset and offset.Psychological Research,61, 107–118.
Samuel, A. G., &Weiner, S. K. (2001). Attentional consequences of object appearance and disappearance.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,27, 1433–1451.
Simons, D. J. (2000). Attentional capture and inattentional blindness.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,4, 147–155.
Snowden, R. J. (2002). Visual attention to color: Parvocellular guidance of attentional resources?Psychological Science,13, 180–184.
Snowden, R. J., Willey, J., &Muir, J. L. (2001). Visuospatial attention: The role of target contrast and task difficulty when assessing the effects of cues.Perception,30, 983–991.
Theeuwes, J. (1990). Perceptual selectivity is task-dependent: Evidence from selective search.Acta Psychologica,74, 81–99.
Theeuwes, J. (1991a). Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity.Perception & Psychophysics,50, 184–193.
Theeuwes, J. (1991b). Exogenous and endogenous control of visual attention: The effect of visual onsets and offsets.Perception & Psychophysics,49, 83–90.
Theeuwes, J. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and form.Perception & Psychophysics,51, 599–606.
Theeuwes, J. (1994). Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: Selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 799–806.
Theeuwes, J. (1996). Perceptual selectivity for color and form: On the nature of the interference effect. In A. F. Kramer, M. G. M. Coles, & G. D. Logan (Eds.),Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention (pp. 297–314). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Theeuwes, J. (2004). Top-down search strategies cannot override attentional capture.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,11, 65–70.
Theeuwes, J., Atchley, P., &Kramer, A. F. (2000). On the time course of top-down and bottom-up control of visual attention. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.),Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 105–124). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Theeuwes, J., &Burger, R. (1998). Attentional control during visual search: The effect of irrelevant singletons.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 1342–1353.
Theeuwes, J., &Chen, C. Y. D. (2005). Attentional capture and inhibition (of return): The effect on perceptual sensitivity.Perception & Psychophysics,67, 1305–1312.
Theeuwes, J., De Vries, G. J., &Godijn, R. (2003). Attentional and oculomotor capture with static singletons.Perception & Psychophysics,65, 735–746.
Theeuwes, J., &Godijn, R. (2001). Attentional and oculomotor capture. In B. S. Gibson & C. L. Folk (Eds.),Attraction, distraction and action: Multiple perspectives on attentional capture (pp. 121–149). New York: Elsevier Science.
Theeuwes, J., &Godijn, R. (2002).Irrelevant singletons capture attention: Evidence from inhibition of return.Perception & Psychophysics,64, 764–770.
Theeuwes, J., Kramer, A. F., Hahn, S., &Irwin, D. E. (1998). Our eyes do not always go where we want them to go: Capture of the eyes by new objects.Psychological Science,9, 379–385.
Theeuwes, J., Kramer, A. F., Hahn, S., Irwin, D. E., &Zelinsky, G. J. (1999). Influence of attentional capture on oculomotor control.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,25, 1595–1608.
Theeuwes, J., Kramer, A. F., &Kingstone, A. (2004). Attentional capture modulates perceptual sensitivity.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,11, 551–554.
Todd, J. T., &Van Gelder, P. (1979). Implications of a transient-sustained dichotomy for the measurement of human performance.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,5, 625–638.
Todd, S., &Kramer, A. F. (1994). Attentional misguidance in visual search.Perception & Psychophysics,56, 198–210.
Treisman, A. M. (1969). Strategies and models of selective attention.Psychological Review,76, 282–299.
Treisman, A. M., &Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention.Cognitive Psychology,12, 97–136.
Treisman, A. [M.], Kahneman, D., &Burkell, J. (1983). Perceptual objects and the cost of filtering.Perception & Psychophysics,33, 527–532.
Treisman, A. [M.], &Souther, J. (1985). Search asymmetry: A diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,114, 285–310.
Turatto, M., &Galfano, G. (2000). Color, form and luminance capture attention in visual search.Vision Research,40, 1639–1643.
Turatto, M., &Galfano, G. (2001). Attentional capture by color without any relevant attentional set.Perception & Psychophysics,63, 286–297.
Turatto, M., Galfano, G., Gardini, S., &Mascetti, G. G. (2004). Stimulus-driven attentional capture: An empirical comparison of display-size and distance methods.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,57A, 297–324.
Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,1, 201–238.
Wolfe, J. M. (1998). What can 1 million trials tell us about visual search?Psychological Science,9, 33–39.
Wolfe, J. M. (2001). Asymmetries in visual search: An introduction.Perception & Psychophysics,63, 381–389.
Wolfe, J. M., Butcher, S. J., Lee, C., &Hyle, M. (2003). Changing your mind: On the contributions of top-down and bottom-up guidance in visual search for feature singletons.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,29, 483–502.
Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., &Franzel, S. L. (1989). Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 419–433.
Wright, R. D., &Richard, C. M. (2003). Sensory mediation of stimulus-driven attentional capture in multiple-cue displays.Perception & Psychophysics,65, 925–938.
Wu, S. C., &Remington, R. W. (2003). Characteristics of covert and overt visual orienting: Evidence from attentional and oculomotor capture.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,29, 1050–1067.
Yantis, S. (1993). Stimulus-driven attentional capture and attentional control settings.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 676–681.
Yantis, S. (1996). Attentional capture in vision. In A. F. Kramer, M. G. M. Coles, & G. D. Logan (Eds.),Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention (pp. 45–76). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Yantis, S. (1998). Objects, attention, and perceptual experience. In R. D. Wright (Ed.),Visual attention (pp. 187–214). New York: Oxford University Press.
Yantis, S. (2000). Goal-directed and stimulus-driven determinants of attentional capture (tutorial). In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.),Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 73–103). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Yantis, S., &Egeth, H. E. (1999). On the distinction between visual salience and stimulus-driven attentional capture.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,25, 661–676.
Yantis, S., &Hillstrom, A. P. (1994). Stimulus-driven attentional capture: Evidence from equiluminant visual objects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 95–107.
Yantis, S., &Jonides, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 610–621.
Yantis, S., &Jonides, J. (1990). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Voluntary versus automatic allocation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 121–134.
Yantis, S., &Jonides, J. (1996). Attentional capture by abrupt onsets: New perceptual objects or visual masking?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 1505–1513.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
An early version of this review was submitted to the faculty at the University at Albany for the qualifying exam requirement in partial fulfillment of the PhD in cognitive psychology.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Burnham, B.R. Displaywide visual features associated with a search display’s appearance can mediate attentional capture. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 14, 392–422 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194082
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194082