Abstract
In three experiments, we investigated whether the mere organization of some elements in the visual field by Gestalt factors into a coherent unit (an object), with no abrupt onset or any other unique transient, could attract attention automatically. Participants viewed a display of nine red and green elements, one of which was the target, and had to identify the target’s color. On some trials, a subset of the elements was grouped by Gestalt factors (collinearity, closure, and symmetry) into an object. The object was task-irrelevant and unpredictive of the target. Performance on trials with an object present in the display was faster than performance on trials with no object for targets in the object area (a benefit) but slower for targets in a nonobject area (a cost). These findings demonstrate that an object by itself can capture attention automatically in a stimulus-driven manner, much as exogenous cues can.
Article PDF
References
Abrams, R. A., &Christ, S. E. (2003). Motion onset captures attention.Psychological Science,14, 427–432.
Arrington, C. M., Carr, T. H., Mayer, A. R., &Rao, S. M. (2000). Neural mechanisms of visual attention: Object-based selection of a region in space.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,12, 106–117.
Baylis, G. C., &Driver, J. (1992). Visual parsing and response competition: The effect of grouping factors.Perception & Psychophysics,51, 145–162.
Carrasco, M., &McElree, B. (2001). Covert attention accelerates the rate of visual information processing.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,98, 5363–5367.
Collie, A., Maruff, P., Yucel, M., Danckert, J., &Currie, J. (2000). Spatiotemporal distribution of facilitation and inhibition of return arising from the reflexive orienting of covert attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,26, 21733–1745.
Desimone, R., &Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.Annual Review of Neuroscience,18, 193–222.
Driver, J., &Baylis, G. (1996). Edge-assignment and figure-ground segmentation in short-term visual matching.Cognitive Psychology,31, 248–306.
Driver, J., Davis, G., Russell, C., Turatto, M., &Freeman, E. (2001). Segmentation, attention and phenomenal visual objects.Cognition,80, 61–95.
Duncan, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,113, 501–517.
Duncan, J., &Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity.Psychological Review,96, 433–458.
Egly, R., Driver, J., &Rafal, R. (1994). Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: Evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,123, 161–177.
Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., &Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 1030–1044.
Franconeri, S. L., Hollingworth, A., &Simons, D. J. (2005). Do new objects capture attention?Psychological Science,16, 275–281.
Freeman, E., Driver, J., Sagi, D., &Zhaoping, L. (2003). Top-down modulation of lateral interactions in early vision: Does attention affect integration of the whole or just perception of the parts?Current Biology,13, 985–989.
Gorea, A., &Julesz, B. (1990). Context superiority in a detection task with line-element stimuli: A low-level effect.Perception,19, 5–16.
Jonides, J. (1981). Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind’s eye movement. In J. [B.] Long & A. [D.] Baddeley (Eds.),Attention and performance IX(pp. 187–203). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kimchi, R., &Razpurker-Apfeld, I. (2004). Perceptual grouping and attention: Not all groupings are equal.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,11, 687–696.
Kovács, I., &Julesz, B. (1993). A closed curve is much more than an incomplete one: Effect of closure in figure-ground segmentation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,90, 7495–7497.
Kramer, A. F., &Jacobson, A. (1991). Perceptual organization and focused attention: The role of objects and proximity in visual processing.Perception & Psychophysics,50, 267–284.
Logan, G. D. (1995). Linguistic and conceptual control of visual spatial attention.Cognitive Psychology,28, 103–174.
Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,32, 3–25.
Posner, M. I., Walker, J. A., Friedrich, F. J., &Rafal, R. D. (1984). Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention.Journal of Neuroscience,4, 1863–1874.
Scholl, B. J. (2001). Objects and attention: The state of the art.Cognition,80, 1–46.
Shiu, L.-P., &Pashler, H. (1995). Spatial attention and vernier acuity.Vision Research,35, 337–343.
Theeuwes, J., de Vries, G.-J., &Godijn, R. (2003). Attentional and oculomotor capture with static singletons.Perception & Psychophysics,65, 735–746.
Vecera, S. P. (2000). Toward a biased competition account of objectbased segregation and attention.Brain & Mind,1, 353–384.
Vecera, S. P., Flevaris, A. V., &Filapek, J. C. (2004). Exogenous spatial attention influences figure-ground assignment.Psychological Science,15, 20–26.
Wascher, E., &Tipper, S. P. (2004). Revealing effects of noninformativespatial cues: An EEG study of inhibition of return. Psychophysiology,41, 716–728.
Wong, E., &Weisstein, N. (1982). A new perceptual context-superiority effect: Line segments are more visible against a figure than against a ground.Science,218, 587–589.
Yantis, S., &Hillstrom, A. P. (1994). Stimulus-driven attentional capture: Evidence from equiluminant visual objects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 95–107.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Part of this research formed A.C.-S.’s M.A. thesis, under R.K.’s supervision. This research was supported in part by Israel Science Foundation Grant 94/06.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kimchi, R., Yeshurun, Y. & Cohen-Savransky, A. Automatic, stimulus-driven attentional capture by objecthood. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 14, 166–172 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194045
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194045