Abstract
The present dual-task study used lateralized readiness potentials (LRPs) and behavioral measures to determine whether response activation for Task 1 and Task 2 can occur in parallel. We also examined whether task similarity (known as dimensional overlap) increases parallel central processing by making it difficult to selectively activate one task set. With dimensional overlap, the behavioral data replicated previous findings of backward correspondence effects: The Task 1 response was influenced by its compatibility with the Task 2 response. This finding suggests parallel response activation. The LRP data supported this conclusion: Task 2 response activation (indexed by the LRP) began before Task 1 central operations had finished. When there was no dimensional overlap, backward correspondence effects could not be measured, but the LRP data confirmed that parallel response activation still occurred. We argue that parallel response activation does occur, perhaps due to accidental activation of Task 2 mapping rules when the intention is to selectively execute Task 1 mapping rules.
Article PDF
References
Coles, M. G. H. (1989). Modern mind-brain reading: Psychophysiology, physiology, and cognition.Psychophysiology,26, 251–269.
Eimer, M. (1998). The lateralized readiness potential as an on-line measure of central response activation processes.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,30, 146–156.
Hommel, B. (1998). Automatic stimulus-response translation in dualtask performance.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 1368–1384.
Kornblum, S., &Lee, J.-W. (1995). Stimulus-response compatibility with relevant and irrelevant stimulus dimensions that do and do not overlap with the response.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 855–875.
Lien, M.-C., &Proctor, R. W. (2000). Multiple spatial correspondence effects on dual-task performance.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,26, 1260–1280.
Lien, M.-C., &Proctor, R. W. (2002). Stimulus-response compatibility and psychological refractory period effects: Implications for response selection.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,9, 212–238.
Logan, G. D., &Schulkind, M. D. (2000). Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: I. Semantic memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,26, 1072–1090.
Mordkoff, J. T., &Gianaros, P. J. (2000). Detecting the onset of the lateralized readiness potential: A comparison of available methods of procedures.Psychophysiology,37, 347–360.
Osman, A., &Moore, C. M. (1993). The locus of dual-task interference: Psychological refractory effects on movement-related brain potentials.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 1292–1312.
Pashler, H. (1984). Processing stages in overlapping tasks: Evidence for a central bottleneck.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 358–377.
Ruthruff, E., Johnston, J. C., & Van Selst, M. (2001). Why practice reduces dual-task interference.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,27, 3–21.
Sangals, J., Roß, L., &Sommer, W. (2004). Time pressure effects on information processing in overlapping tasks: Evidence from the lateralized readiness potential.Acta Psychologica,117, 275–294.
Sommer, W., Leuthold, H., &Schubert, T. (2001). Multiple bottlenecks in information processing? An electrophysiological examination.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,8, 81–88.
Tombu, M., & Jolicœur, P. (2005, July).Assessing output interference after extensive practice. Poster presented at the 15th Annual Meeting of the Canadian Society for Brain, Behaviour and Cognitive Science, Université de Montréal, Canada.
Welford, A. T. (1952). The “psychological refractory period” and the timing of high-speed performance—A review and a theory.British Journal of Psychology,43, 2–19.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by the College of Liberal Arts at Oregon State University, NASA Grant NCC 2-1325, and Grant NSC92-2413-H-194-023 from the National Science Council of Taiwan.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lien, MC., Ruthruff, E., Hsieh, S. et al. Parallel central processing between tasks: Evidence from lateralized readiness potentials. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 14, 133–141 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194040
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194040