Abstract
Three studies examined the impact of stereotype messages on men’s and women’s performance of a mental rotation task involving imagined self-rotations. Experiment 1 established baseline differences between men and women; women made 12% more errors than did men. Experiment 2 found that exposure to a positive stereotype message enhanced women’s performance in comparison with that of another group of women who received neutral information. In Experiment 3, men who were exposed to the same stereotype message emphasizing a female advantage made more errors than did male controls, and the magnitude of error was similar to that for women from Experiment 1. The results suggest that the gender gap in mental rotation performance is partially caused by experiential factors, particularly those induced by sociocultural stereotypes.
Article PDF
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Aronson, J., Lustina, M. J., Good, C., Keough, K., Steele, C. M., &Brown, J. (1999). When White men can’t do math: Necessary and sufficient factors in stereotype threat.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,35, 29–46.
Baenninger, M., &Newcombe, N. (1989). The role of experience in spatial test performance: A meta-analysis.Sex Roles,20, 327–344.
Brown, R. P., &Josephs, R. A. (1999). A burden of proof: Stereotype relevance and gender differences in math performance.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,76, 246–257.
Cadinu, M., Maass, A., Frigerio, S., Impagliazzo, L., &Latinotti, S. (2003). Stereotype threat: The effect of expectancy on performance.European Journal of Social Psychology,33, 267–285.
Campos, A., Pérez-Fabello, M. J., &Gómez-Juncal, R. (2004). Gender and age differences in measured and self-perceived imaging capacity.Personality & Individual Differences,37, 1383–1389.
Casey, M. B. (1996). Gender, sex, and cognition: Considering the interrelationship between biological and environmental factors.Learning & Individual Differences,8, 39–53.
Cohen, J., &Cohen, P. (1983).Applied multiple regression/correlation analyses for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cohen, J. D., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., &Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,25, 257–271.
Connor, J. M., Schackman, M., &Serbin, L. A. (1978). Sex-related differences in response to practice on a visual-spatial test and generalization to a related test.Child Development,49, 24–29.
Connor, J. M., &Serbin, L. A. (1985). Visual-spatial skill: Is it important for mathematics? Can it be taught? In S. F. Chipman, L. R. Brush, & D. M. Wilson (Ed.),Women and mathematics: Balancing the equation (pp. 151–174). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Creem, S. H., Wraga, M., &Proffitt, D. R. (2001). Imagining physically impossible self-rotations: Geometry is more important than gravity.Cognition,81, 41–64.
Easton, R. D., &Sholl, M. J. (1995). Object-array structure, frames of reference, and retrieval of spatial knowledge.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 483–500.
Feingold, A. (1988). Cognitive gender differences are disappearing.American Psychologist,43, 95–103.
Geary, D. C. (1995). Sexual selection and sex differences in spatial cognition.Learning & Individual Differences,7, 289–301.
Johns, M., Schmader, T., &Martens, A. (2005). Knowing is half the battle: Teaching stereotype threat as a means of improving women’s math performance.Psychological Science,16, 175–179.
Kimura, D., &Hampson, E. (1994). Cognitive pattern in men and women is influenced by fluctuations in sex hormones.Current Directions in Psychological Science,3, 57–61.
Koslow, R. E. (1987). Sex-related differences and visual-spatial mental imagery as factors affecting symbolic motor skill acquisition.Sex Roles,17, 521–527.
Levy, B. (1996). Improving memory in old age through implicit selfstereotyping.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,71, 1092–1107.
Leyens, J.-P., Désert, M., Croizet, J.-C., &Darcis, C. (2000). Stereotype threat: Are lower status and history of stigmatization preconditions of stereotype threat?Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin,26, 1189–1199.
Linn, M. C., &Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis.Child Development,56, 1479–1498.
Masters, M. S. (1998). The gender difference on the Mental Rotations Test is not due to performance factors.Memory & Cognition,26, 444–448.
Masters, M. S., &Sanders, B. (1993). Is the gender difference in mental rotation disappearing?Behavior Genetics,23, 337–341.
Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory.Neuropsychologia,9, 97–113.
Presson, C. C. (1982). Strategies in spatial reasoning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,8, 243–251.
Ripley, A. (2005, March 7). Who says a woman can’t be Einstein?Time, pp. 50–60.
Sharps, M. J., Price, J. L., &Williams, J. K. (1994). Spatial cognition and gender: Instructional and stimulus influences on mental image rotation performance.Psychology of Women Quarterly,18, 413–425.
Sharps, M. J., Welton, A. L., &Price, J. L. (1993). Gender and task in the determination of spatial cognitive performance.Psychology of Women Quarterly,17, 71–83.
Shepard, R. N., &Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of threedimensional objects.Science,171, 701–703.
Shih, M., Pittinsky, T. L., &Ambady, N. (1999). Stereotype susceptibility: Identity salience and shifts in quantitative performance.Psychological Science,10, 80–83.
Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., &Quinn, D. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women’s math performance.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,35, 4–28.
Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance.American Psychologist,52, 613–629.
Steele, C. M., &Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,69, 797–811.
Steele, C. M., Spencer, S. J., &Aronson, J. (2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 379–440). San Diego: Academic Press.
Vandenberg, S. G., &Kuse, A. R. (1978). Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization.Perceptual & Motor Skills,47, 599–604.
Voyer, D., Voyer, S., &Bryden, M. P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables.Psychological Bulletin,117, 250–270.
Walton, G. M., &Cohen, G. L. (2003). Stereotype lift.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,39, 456–467.
Willis, S. L., &Schaie, K. W. (1988). Gender differences in spatial ability in old age: Longitudinal and intervention findings.Sex Roles,18, 189–203.
Wraga, M. (2003). Thinking outside the body: An advantage for spatial updating during imagined versus physical self-rotation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,29, 993–1005.
Wraga, M., Creem, S. H., &Proffitt, D. R. (2000). Updating displays after imagined object and viewer rotations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 151–168.
Wraga, M., Helt, M., Jacobs, E., & Sullivan, K. (in press). Neural basis of stereotype-induced shifts in women’s mental rotation performance.Social Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience.
Wraga, M., Shephard, J. M., Church, J. A., Inati, S., &Kosslyn, S. M. (2005). Imagined rotations of self versus objects: An fMRI study.Neuropsychologia,43, 1351–1361.
Zacks, J. M., Vettel, J. M., &Michelon, P. (2003). Imagined viewer and object rotations dissociated with event-related fMRI.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,15, 1002–1018.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03194048.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wraga, M., Duncan, L., Jacobs, E.C. et al. Stereotype susceptibility narrows the gender gap in imagined self-rotation performance. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 13, 813–819 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194002
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194002