Abstract
When a target requires different responses to a relevant and to an irrelevant task in a task-switching paradigm, there is response conflict. This target-induced response conflict was combined with conflict caused by a subliminally presented prime presented prior to the target. We found that target-related conflict reduced prime-induced conflict effects within the same trial. However, target-related conflict modified prime-related conflict effects according to the irrelevant stimulus-response (S-R) rule, but not according to the relevant S-R rule. Moreover, trial-to-trial modulations of the target congruency effect were observed in task repetition trials, but not in task switch trials. These results indicate that conflict resolution mechanisms, at least under the present circumstances, operate in a strictly task-specific manner.
Article PDF
References
Allport, D. A., Styles, E. A., &Hsieh, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Ed.),Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 421–452). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bodner, G. E., &Dypvik, A. T. (2005). Masked priming of number judgments depends on prime validity and task.Memory & Cognition,33, 29–47.
Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., &Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control.Psychological Review,108, 624–652.
Botvinick, M. M., Cohen, J. D., &Carter, C. S. (2004). Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: An update.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,8, 539–546.
Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Le Clec’H, G., Koechlin, E., Mueller, M., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., et al. (1998). Imaging unconscious semantic priming.Nature,395, 597–600.
Eriksen, B. A., &Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task.Perception & Psychophysics,16, 143–149.
Fan, J., Flombaum, J. I., McCandliss, B. D., Thomas, K. M., &Posner, M. I. (2003). Cognitive and brain consequences of conflict.NeuroImage,18, 42–57.
Goodman, L. A. (1970). The multivariate analysis of qualitative data: Interactions among multiple classifications.Journal of the American Statistical Association,65, 226–256.
Goschke, T. (2000). Intentional reconfiguration and involuntary persistence in task set switching. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Ed.),Attention and performance XVIII: Control of cognitive processes (pp. 331–355). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., &Donchin, E. (1992). Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,4, 480–506.
Hautus, M. J. (1995). Corrections for extreme proportions and their biasing effects on estimated values of d’.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,27, 46–51.
Hommel, B. (1997). Interactions between stimulus-stimulus congruence and stimulus-response compatibility.Psychological Research,59, 248–260.
Kiesel, A., Wendt, M., & Peters, A. (in press). Task switching: On the origins of response congruency effects.Psychological Research.
Kunde, W. (2003). Sequential modulations of stimulus-response correspondence effects depend on awareness of response conflict.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,10, 198–205.
Kunde, W., &Stöcker, C. (2002). A Simon effect for stimulus-response duration.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,55A, 581–592.
Kunde, W., &Wühr, P. (2006). Sequential modulations of correspondence effects across spatial dimensions and tasks.Memory & Cognition,34, 356–367.
Mayr, U. (2004). Conflict, consciousness, and control.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,8, 145–148.
Meiran, N. (1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 1423–1442.
Neumann, O., &Klotz, W. (1994). Motor responses to nonreportable, masked stimuli: Where is the limit of direct parameter specification? In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Ed.),Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 123–150). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rogers, R. D., &Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,124, 207–231.
Schneider, W., Eschman, A., &Zuccolotto, A. (2002).E-prime user’s guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools.
Simon, J. R. (1969). Reactions toward the source of stimulation.Journal of Experimental Psychology,81, 174–176.
Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions.Journal of Experimental Psychology,18, 643–662.
Stürmer, B., Leuthold, H., Soetens, E., Schröter, H., &Sommer, W. (2002). Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,28, 1345–1363.
Vorberg, D., Mattler, U., Heinecke, A., Schmidt, T., &Schwarzbach, J. (2003). Different time courses for visual perception and action priming.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,100, 6275–6280.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Funding for this research was provided by Grants Ho 1301 and Ku 1964 from the German Research Foundation to J. H. and W. K.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kiesel, A., Kunde, W. & Hoffmann, J. Evidence for task-specific resolution of response conflict. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 13, 800–806 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194000
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194000