Abstract
Two experiments investigated the capacity demands of stimulus and response priming in a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) task. Three targets were presented in a stream of visual symbols: The first two (T1 and T2) required an unspeeded manual response at the end of the trial, but the third (T3) called for an immediate, speeded manual response. T2 and T3 either were identical (fully compatible), required the same response (response compatible), or required different responses (incompatible). Priming in the fully compatible condition depended strongly on successful identification of the priming stimulus, whereas response-based priming was observed regardless of whether the prime could be reported or not. These findings suggest that stimulus coding and response coding are automatic processes, unaffected by attentional capacity constraints, followed by capacity-limited stimulus consolidation and response selection. Moreover, even though response codes are activated automatically upon stimulus processing, both types of codes act, and affect behavior, independently.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bertelson, P. (1961). Sequential redundancy and speed in a serial two-choice responding task.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,13, 90–102.
Bertelson, P. (1965). Serial choice reaction-time as a function of response versus signal-and-response repetition.Nature,206, 217–218.
Broadbent, D. E., &Broadbent, M. H. P. (1987). From detection to identification: Response to multiple targets in rapid serial visual presentation.Perception & Psychophysics,42, 105–113.
Chun, M. M., &Potter, M. C. (1995). A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 109–127.
Colzato, L. S., Warrens, M. J., &Hommel, B. (2006). Priming and binding in and across perception and action: A correlational analysis of the internal structure of event files.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,59, 1785–1804.
Eimer, M., &Schlaghecken, F. (1998). Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 1737–1747.
Gross, J., Schmitz, F., Schnitzler, I., Kessler, K., Shapiro, K., Hommel, B., &Schnitzler, A. (2004). Modulation of long-range neural synchrony reflects temporal limitations of visual attention in humans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,101, 13050–13055.
Hommel, B. (1998). Automatic stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 1368–1384.
Hommel, B. (2004). Coloring an action: Intending to produce color events eliminates the Stroop effect.Psychological Research,68, 74–90.
Hommel, B. (2005). How much attention does an event file need?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,31, 1067–1082.
Hommel, B., &Eglau, B. (2002). Control of stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance.Psychological Research,66, 260–273.
Jolicœur, P. (1998). Modulation of the attentional blink by on-line response selection: Evidence from speeded and unspeeded Task1 decisions.Memory & Cognition,26, 1014–1032.
Jolicoeur, P., &Dell’Acqua, R. (1998). The demonstration of shortterm consolidation.Cognitive Psychology,36, 138–202.
Jolicœur, P., Tombu, M., Oriet, C., &Stevanovski, B. (2002). From perception to action: Making the connection. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.),Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention and performance XIX (pp. 558–586). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Juola, J. F., Botella, J., &Palacios, A. (2004). Task- and location-switching effects on visual attention.Perception & Psychophysics,66, 1303–1317.
Kanwisher, N. G. (1987). Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation.Cognition,27, 117–143.
Leuthold, H., &Kopp, B. (1998). Mechanisms of priming by masked stimuli: Inferences from event-related brain potentials.Psychological Science,9, 263–269.
Loach, D., &Marí-Beffa, P. (2003). Post-target inhibition: A temporal binding mechanism?Visual Cognition,10, 513–526.
Logan, G. D., &Schulkind, M. D. (2000). Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: I. Semantic memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,26, 1072–1090.
Luck, S. J., Vogel, E. K., &Shapiro, K. L. (1996). Word meanings can be accessed but not reported during the attentional blink.Nature,383, 616–618.
Martens, S., Wolters, G., &van Raamsdonk, M. (2002). Blinks of the mind: Memory effects of attentional processes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,28, 1275–1287.
Neumann, O., &Klotz, W. (1994). Motor responses to non-reportable, masked stimuli: Where is the limit of direct parameter specification? In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.),Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 123–150). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Bradford Books.
Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory.Psychological Bulletin,116, 220–244.
Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., &Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 849–860.
Schneider, W., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention.Psychological Review,84, 1–66.
Shapiro, K. L., Driver, J., Ward, R., &Sorensen, R. E. (1997). Priming from the attentional blink: A failure to extract visual tokens but not visual types.Psychological Science,8, 95–100.
Soetens, E., Boer, L. C., &Hueting, J. E. (1985). Expectancy or automatic facilitation? Separating sequential effects in two-choice reaction time.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,11, 598–616.
Stoet, G., &Hommel, B. (1999). Action planning and the temporal binding of response codes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,25, 1625–1640.
Vogel, E. K., Luck, S. J., &Shapiro, K. L. (1998). Electrophysiological evidence for a postperceptual locus of suppression during the attentional blink.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 1656–1674.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Akyürek, E.G., Hommel, B. Stimulus and response priming in rapid serial visual presentation: Evidence for a dissociation. Perception & Psychophysics 69, 1152–1161 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193952
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193952