Abstract
Most systematic studies of human decision making approach the subject from a cost analysis point of view and assume that people make the highest utility choice. Very few articles investigate subjective decision making, such as that involving preference, although such decisions are very important for our daily functioning. We have argued (Shimojo, Simion, Shimojo, & Scheier, 2003) that an orienting bias effectively leads to the preference decision by means of a positive feedback loop involving mere exposure and preferential looking. The illustration of this process is a continually increasing gaze bias toward the eventual choice, which we call the gaze cascade effect. In the present study, we interrupt the natural process of preference selection, but we show that gaze behavior does not change even when the stimuli are removed from observers’ visual field. This demonstrates that once started, the involvement of orienting in decision making cannot be stopped and that orienting acts independently of the presence of visual stimuli. We also show that the cascade effect is intrinsically linked to the decision itself and is not triggered simply by a tendency to look at preferred targets.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bechara, A. H., Damasio, H., &Damasio, A. R. (2000). Emotion, decision making and the orbitofrontal cortex.Cerebral Cortex,10, 295–307.
Birch, E. E., Shimojo, S., &Held, R. (1985). Preferential-looking assessment of fusion and stereopsis in infants aged 1–6 months.Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science,26, 366–370.
Damasio, A. R. (1996). The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B,351, 1413–1420.
Fantz, R. L. (1964). Visual experience in infants: Decreased attention to familiar patterns relative to novel ones.Science,146, 668–670.
Kunst-Wilson, W. R., &Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized.Science,207, 557–558.
Moreland, R. L., &Zajonc, R. B. (1977). Is stimulus recognition a necessary condition for the occurrence of exposure effects?Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,35, 191–199.
Moreland, R. L., &Zajonc, R. B. (1982). Exposure effects in person perception: Familiarity, similarity, and attraction.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,18, 395–415.
Porges, S. W. (1995). Orienting in a defensive world: Mammalian modifications of our evolutionary heritage. A polyvagal theory.Psychophysiology,32, 301–318.
Posner, M. I., Pothbart, M. K., &Digirolamo, G. J. (1999). Development of brain networks for orienting to novelty.Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deiat. Im. I. P. Pavlova,49, 715–22.
Shimojo, S., Simion, C., Shimojo, E., &Scheier, C. (2003). Gaze bias both reflects and influences preference.Nature Neuroscience,6, 1317–1322.
Simion, C., &Shimojo, S. (2006). Early interactions between orienting, visual sampling and decision making in facial preference.Vision Research,46, 3331–3335.
Sokolov, E. N. (1963). Higher nervous functions: The orienting reflex.Annual Review of Physiology,25, 545–580.
Sokolov, E. N. (1990). The orienting response, and future directions of its development.Pavlovian Journal of Biological Science,25, 142–150.
Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,9(2), 1–27.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Simion, C., Shimojo, S. Interrupting the cascade: Orienting contributes to decision making even in the absence of visual stimulation. Perception & Psychophysics 69, 591–595 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193916
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193916