Abstract
Using a hybrid paradigm of a contextual cuing task and a probe detection task, we tested whether or not contextually new objects can be prioritized in visual search. After several hundred visual search practice trials with repeated and nonrepeated layouts, an additional distractor that was contextually new was presented in the repeated layouts. The results showed that detection of probe dots appearing at the location of a search target was faster in the repeated than in the nonrepeated layouts. More importantly, detection of probe dots at the new object locations was as fast as that of probe dots at the target locations in repeated layouts, suggesting that the attentional system implicitly prioritizes the processing of a location where a change in contextual information has occurred.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Awh, E., &Pashler, H. (2000). Evidence for split attentional foci.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,26, 834–846.
Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox.Spatial Vision,10, 433–436.
Castiello, U., &Umiltà, C. (1992). Splitting focal attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 837–848.
Chun, M. M. (2000). Contextual cueing of visual attention.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,4, 170–178.
Chun, M. M., &Jiang, Y. (1998). Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention.Cognitive Psychology,36, 28–71.
Fiser, J., &Aslin, R. N. (2001). Unsupervised statistical learning of higher-order spatial structures from visual scenes.Psychological Science,12, 499–504.
Fiser, J., &Aslin, R. N. (2002). Statistical learning of higher-order temporal structure from visual shape sequences.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,28, 458–467.
Godijn, R., &Theeuwes, J. (2003). Parallel allocation of attention prior to the execution of saccade sequences.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,29, 882–896.
Gordon, R. D. (2004). Attentional allocation during the perception of scenes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,30, 760–777.
Hahn, S., &Kramer, A. F. (1998). Further evidence for the division of attention between noncontiguous locations.Visual Cognition,5, 217–256.
Henderson, J. M., Weeks, P. A., &Hollingworth, A. (1999). The effects of semantic consistency on eye movements during complex scene viewing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,25, 210–228.
Hillstrom, A. P., &Yantis, S. (1994). Visual motion and attentional capture.Perception & Psychophysics,55, 399–411.
Hollingworth, A., &Henderson, J. M. (1998). Does consistent scene context facilitate object perception?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,127, 398–415.
Johnston, W. A., Schwarting, I. S., &Hawley, K. J. (1996). Novel pop-out, perceptual inhibition, and the stability-plasticity dilemma. In A. F. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles, & G. D. Logan (Eds.),Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention (pp. 315–335). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Jonides, J., &Yantis, S. (1988). Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention.Perception & Psychophysics,43, 346–354.
Kim, M. S., &Cave, K. R. (1995). Spatial attention in visual search for features and feature conjunctions.Psychological Science,6, 376–380.
Klein, R. M. (1988). Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search.Nature,334, 430–431.
Koshino, H., Warner, C. B., &Juola, J. F. (1992). Relative effectiveness of central, peripheral, and abrupt-onset cues in visual attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,45A, 609–631.
Kramer, A. F., &Hahn, S. (1995). Splitting the beam: Distribution of attention over noncontiguous regions of the visual field.Psychological Science,6, 381–386.
Maljkovic, V., &Nakayama, K. (2000). Priming of pop-out: III. A short-term implicit memory system beneficial for rapid target selection.Visual Cognition,7, 571–595.
Pelli, D. G. (1997). The Video Toolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies.Spatial Vision,10, 437–442.
Peterson, M. S., &Kramer, A. F. (2001a). Attentional guidance of the eyes by contextual information and abrupt onsets.Perception & Psychophysics,63, 1239–1249.
Peterson, M. S., &Kramer, A. F. (2001b). Contextual cueing reduces interference from task-irrelevant onset distractors.Visual Cognition,8, 843–859.
Reber, A. S. (1989). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,118, 219–235.
Reicher, G. M. (1969). Perceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus material.Journal of Experimental Psychology,81, 274–280.
Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., &Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants.Science,274, 1926–1928.
Theeuwes, J. (1994). Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: Selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 799–806.
Theeuwes, J., Kramer, A. F., Halm, S., &Irwin, D. E. (1998). Our eyes do not always go where we want them to go: Capture of the eyes by new objects.Psychological Science,9, 379–385.
Van Selst, M., &Jolicoeur, P. (1994). A solution to the effect of sample size on outlier elimination.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,47A, 631–650.
Watson, D. G., &Humphreys, G. W. (1997). Visual marking: Prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects.Psychological Review,104, 90–122.
Watson, D. G., &Humphreys, G. W. (2000). Visual marking: Evidence for inhibition using a probe-dot detection paradigm.Perception & Psychophysics,62, 471–481.
Weisstein, N., &Harris, C. S. (1974). Visual detection of line segments: An object-superiority effect.Science,186, 752–755.
Yantis, S. (1993). Stimulus-driven attentional capture and attentional control settings.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 676–681.
Yantis, S., &Hillstrom, A. P. (1994). Stimulus-driven attentional capture: Evidence from equiluminant visual objects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 95–107.
Yantis, S., &Jonides, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 601–621.
Yantis, S., &Jonides, J. (1990). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Voluntary versus automatic allocation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 121–134.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by research fellowships to H.O. from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science for Young Scientists.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ogawa, H., Kumada, T. Attentional prioritization to contextually new objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 13, 543–548 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193883
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193883