Abstract
The spatial framework model proposes that people use the extensions of their body axes as a reference frame for encoding spatial layouts in memory, and that the physical and functional properties of our bodies and the world determine the accessibility of egocentric locations from memory representations. The present experiment provides evidence that spatial framework results can be obtained even with perceptual scenes that contain no objects to be held in memory. Using a paradigm in which participants interpreted direction and distance information to follow a mental path within a checkerboard grid, the present study shows that spatial framework results are obtained when reasoning occurs from a perspective that is misaligned with respect to the physical reference frame of the participant. The theoretical implications of these results are discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Avraamides, M. N. (2003). Spatial updating of environments described in texts.Cognitive Psychology,47, 402–431.
Avraamides, M. N., &Carlson, R. A. (2003). Egocentric organization of spatial activities in imagined navigation.Memory & Cognition,31, 252–261.
Avraamides, M. N., &Kelly, J. W. (2005). Imagined perspectivechanging within and across novel environments. In C. Freksa, M. Knauff, B. Krieg-Brückner, B. Nebel, & T. Barkowsky (Eds.),Spatial cognition IV: Reasoning, action, interaction (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3343, pp. 245–258). Berlin: Springer.
Avraamides, M. N., Klatzky, R. L., Loomis, J. M., &Golledge, R. G. (2004). Use of cognitive versus perceptual heading during imagined locomotion depends on the response mode.Psychological Science,15, 403–408.
Bryant, D. J., Tversky, B., &Franklin, N. (1992). Internal and external spatial frameworks for representing described scenes.Journal of Memory & Language,31, 74–98.
Clark, H. H. (1973). Space, time, semantics, and the child. In T. E. Moore (Ed.),Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 27–63). New York: Academic Press.
De Vega, M., Rodrigo, M. J., &Zimmer, H. (1996). Pointing and labeling directions in egocentric frameworks.Journal of Memory & Language,35, 821–839.
Franklin, N., &Tversky, B. (1990). Searching imagined environments.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,119, 63–76.
Franklin, N., Tversky, B., &Coon, V. (1992). Switching points of view in spatial mental models.Memory & Cognition,20, 507–518.
Hintzman, D., O’Dell, C., &Arndt, D. (1981). Orientation in cognitive maps.Cognitive Psychology,13, 149–206.
May, M. (2004). Imaginal perspective switches in remembered environments: Transformation versus interference accounts.Cognitive Psychology,48, 163–206.
Mou, W., Zhang, K., &McNamara, T. P. (2004). Frames of reference in spatial memories acquired from language.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,30, 171–180.
Presson, C. C., &Montello, D. R. (1994). Updating after rotational and translational body movements: Coordinate structure of perspective space.Perception,23, 1447–1455.
Rieser, J. J. (1989). Access to knowledge of spatial structure at novel points of observation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 1157–1165.
Shepard, R. N., &Hurwitz, S. (1984). Upward direction, mental rotation, and discrimination of left and right turns in maps.Cognition,18, 161–193.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Avraamides, M.N., Sofroniou, S.G. Spatial frameworks in imagined navigation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 13, 510–515 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193878
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193878