Abstract
Perceptual grouping is the process by which elements in the visual image are aggregated into larger and more complex structures, i.e., “objects.” This paper reports a study of the spatial factors and time-course of the development of objects over the course of the first few hundred milliseconds of visual processing. The methodology uses the now well-established idea of an “object benefit” for certain kinds of tasks (here, faster within-object than between-objects probe comparisons) to test what the visual system in fact treats as an object at each point during processing. The study tested line segment pairs in a wide variety of spatial configurations at a range of exposure times, in each case measuring the strength of perceptual grouping as reflected in the magnitude of the object benefit. Factors tested included nonaccidental properties such as collinearity, cotermination, and parallelism; contour relatability; Gestalt factors such as symmetry and skew symmetry, and several others, all tested at fine (25 msec) time-slices over the course of processing. The data provide detailed information about the comparative strength of these factors in inducing grouping at each point in processing. The result is a vivid picture of the chronology of object formation, as objects progressively coalesce, with fully bound visual objects completed by about 200 msec of processing.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Adelson, E. H. (1993). Perceptual organization and the judgment of brightness.Science,262, 2042–2044.
Barenholtz, E., &Feldman, J. (2003). Visual comparisons within and between object parts: Evidence for a single-part superiority effect.Vision Research,43, 1655–1666.
Barlow, H. (1994). What is the computational goal of the neocortex? In C. Koch & J. L. Davis (Eds.),Large-scale neuronal theories of the brain (pp. 1–22). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Baylis, G. C. (1994). Visual attention and objects: Two-object cost with equal convexity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 208–212.
Behrmann, M., Zemel, R. S., &Mozer, M. C. (1998). Object-based attention and occlusion: Evidence from normal participants and a computational model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 1011–1036.
Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition by components: A theory of human image understanding.Psychological Review,94, 115–147.
Boselie, F., &Wouterlood, D. (1989). The minimum principle and visual pattern completion.Psychological Research,351, 93–101.
Caelli, T. M., &Umansky, J. (1976). Interpolation in the visual system.Vision Research,16, 1055–1060.
Claessens, P. M., &Wagemans, J. (2005). Perceptual grouping in Gabor lattices: Proximity and alignment.Perception & Psychophysics,67, 1446–1459.
Clowes, M. B. (1971). On seeing things.Artificial Intelligence,2, 79–116.
Compton, B. J., &Logan, G. D. (1993). Evaluating a computational model of perceptual grouping by proximity.Perception & Psychophysics,53, 403–421.
Davis, G., &Holmes, A. (2005). Reversal of object-based benefits in visual attention.Visual Cognition,12, 817–846.
Duncan, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,113, 501–517.
Enns, J. T., &Rensink, R. A. (1991). Preattentive recovery of threedimensional orientation from line drawings.Psychological Review,98, 335–351.
Feldman, J. (1997a). Curvilinearity, covariance, and regularity in perceptual groups.Vision Research,37, 2835–2848.
Feldman, J. (1997b). Regularity-based perceptual grouping.Computational Intelligence,13, 582–623.
Feldman, J. (1999). The role of objects in perceptual grouping.Acta Psychologica,102, 137–163.
Feldman, J. (2001). Bayesian contour integration.Perception & Psychophysics,63, 1171–1182.
Feldman, J. (2003a). Perceptual grouping by selection of a logically minimal model.International Journal of Computer Vision,55, 5–25.
Feldman, J. (2003b). What is a visual object?Trends in Cognitive Sciences,7, 252–256.
Feldman, J. (2007).Bayes and the simplicity principle in perception. Manuscript under review.
Field, D. J., Hayes, A., &Hess, R. F. (1993). Contour integration by the human visual system: Evidence for a local “association field.”Vision Research,33, 173–193.
Geisler, W. S., Perry, J. S., Super, B. J., &Gallogly, D. P. (2001). Edge co-occurrence in natural images predicts contour grouping performance.Vision Research,41, 711–724.
Geisler, W. S., &Super, B. J. (2000). Perceptual organization of twodimensional patterns.Psychological Review,107, 677–708.
Gilchrist, A. L. (1977). Perceived lightness depends on perceived spatial arrangement.Science,195, 185–187.
Guttman, S. E., Sekuler, A. B., &Kellman, P. J. (2003). Temporal variations in visual completion: A reflection of spatial limits.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,29, 1211–1227.
Hatfield, G., &Epstein, W. (1985). The status of the minimum principle in the theoretical analysis of visual perception.Psychological Bulletin,97, 155–186.
Hochberg, J., &McAlister, E. (1953). A quantitative approach to figural “goodness.”Journal of Experimental Psychology,46, 361–364.
Jepson, A., &Richards, W. A. (1992). What makes a good feature? In L. Harris & M. Jenkin (Eds.),Spatial vision in humans and robots (pp. 89–125). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jolicoeur, P., Ullman, S., &Mackay, M. (1986). Curve tracing: a possible basic operation in the perception of spatial relations.Memory & Cognition,14, 129–140.
Jolicoeur, P., Ullman, S., &Mackay, M. (1991). Visual curve tracing properties.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 997–1022.
Kanizsa, G. (1979).Organization in vision: Essays on Gestalt perception. New York: Praeger.
Kellman, P. J., &Shipley, T. F. (1991). A theory of visual interpolation in object perception.Cognitive Psychology,23, 141–221.
Kersten, D., Mamassian, P., &Yuille, A. (2004). Object perception as Bayesian inference.Annual Review of Psychology,55, 271–304.
Kimchi, R. (1998). Uniform connectedness and grouping the perceptual organization of hierarchical patterns.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 1105–1118.
Kimchi, R. (2000). The perceptual organization of visual objects: A microgenetic analysis.Vision Research,40, 1333–1347.
Kimchi, R., &Hadad, B.-S. (2002). Influence of past experience on perceptual grouping.Psychological Science,13, 41–47.
Kubovy, M., &Wagemans, J. (1995). Grouping by proximity and multistability in dot lattices: A quantitative gestalt theory.Psychological Science,6, 225–234.
Kukkonen, H. T., Foster, D. H., Wood, J. R., Wagemans, J., &van Gool, L. (1996). Qualitative cues in the discrimination of affinetransformed minimal patterns.Perception,25, 195–206.
Landy, M. S., Maloney, L. T., Johnston, E. B., &Young, M. (1995). Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: In defense of weak fusion.Vision Research,35, 389–412.
Leeuwenberg, E. L. J. (1971). A perceptual coding language for visual and auditory patterns.American Journal of Psychology,84, 307–349.
Lowe, D. G. (1987). Three-dimensional object recognition from single two-dimensional images.Artificial Intelligence,31, 355–395.
Mack, A., Tang, B., Tuma, R., Kahn, S., &Rock, I. (1992). Perceptual organization and attention.Cognitive Psychology,24, 475–501.
Moore, C. M., Yantis, S., &Vaughan, B. (1998). Object-based visual selection: Evidence from perceptual completion.Psychological Science,9, 104–110.
Murray, R. F., Sekuler, A. B., &Bennett, P. J. (2001). Time course of amodal completion revealed by a shape discrimination task.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,8, 713–720.
Pack, C. C., Berezovskii, V. K., &Born, R. T. (2001). Dynamic properties of neurons in cortical area MT and anaesthetized macaque monkeys.Nature,414, 905–908.
Palmer, S., &Rock, I. (1994). Rethinking perceptual organization: The role of uniform connectedness.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,1, 29–55.
Parent, P., &Zucker, S. W. (1989). Trace inference, curvature consistency, and curve detection.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis & Machine Intelligence,11, 823–839.
Pizlo, Z., Salach-Golyska, M., &Rosenfeld, A. (1997). Curve detection in a noisy image.Vision Research,37, 1217–1241.
Poston, T., &Stewart, I. N. (1978).Catastrophe theory and its applications. London: Pitman.
Pratt, J., &Sekuler, A. B. (2001). The effects of occlusion and past experience on the allocation of object-based attention.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,8, 721–727.
Prinzmetal, W., &Banks, W. (1977). Good continuation affects visual detection.Perception & Psychophysics,21, 389–395.
Rauschenberger, R., &Yantis, S. (2001). Masking unveils pre-amodal completion representation in visual search.Nature,410, 369–372.
Rensink, R. A., &Enns, J. T. (1998). Early completion of occluded objects.Vision Research,38, 2489–2505.
Reynolds, R. I. (1978). The microgenetic development of the Ponzo and Zöllner illusions.Perception & Psychophysics,23, 6.
Ringach, D. L., &Shapley, R. (1996). Spatial and temporal properties of illusory contours and amodal boundary completion.Vision Research,36, 3037–3050.
Rock, I. (1983).The logic of perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Roelfsema, P. R., Scholte, H. S., &Spekreijse, H. (1999). Temporal constraints on the grouping of contour segments into spatially extended objects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,39, 1509–1529.
Scholl, B. J. (2001). Objects and attention: The state of the art.Cognition,80, 1–46.
Sekuler, A. B., &Palmer, S. E. (1992). Perception of partly occluded objects: a microgenetic analysis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,121, 95–111.
Sekuler, A. B., Palmer, S. E., &Flynn, C. (1994). Local and global processes in visual completion.Psychological Science,5, 260–267.
Shimojo, S., Silverman, G. H., &Nakayama, K. (1988). An occlusionrelated mechanism of depth perception based on motion and interocular sequence.Nature,333, 265–268.
Singh, M., &Hoffman, D. D. (1999). Completing visual contours: The relationship between relatability and minimizing inflections.Perception & Psychophysics,61, 943–951.
Smits, J. T., Vos, P. G., &Oeffelen, M. P. Van. (1985). The perception of a dotted line in noise: A model of good continuation and some experimental results.Spatial Vision,1, 163–177.
Thorpe, S., Fize, D., &Marlot, C. (1996). Speed of processing in the human visual system.Nature,381, 3.
Treisman, A. (1982). Perceptual grouping and attention in visual search for features and for objects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,8, 194–214.
Ullman, S. (1976). Filling-in the gaps: The shape of subjective contours and a model for their generation.Biological Cybernetics,25, 1–6.
Wagemans, J. (1992). Perceptual use of nonaccidental properties.Canadian Journal of Psychology,46, 236–279.
Wagemans, J. (1993). Skewed symmetry: A nonaccidental property used to perceive visual forms.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 364–380.
Wagemans, J. (1995). Detection of visual symmetries.Spatial Vision,9, 9–32.
Wagemans, J. (1997). Characteristics and models of human symmetry detection.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,1, 346–352.
Wagemans, J., van Gool, L., Lamote, C., &Foster, D. H. (2000). Minimal information to determine affine shape equivalence.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,26, 443–4468.
Witkin, A. P., &Tenenbaum, J. M. (1983). On the role of structure in vision. In J. Beck, B. Hope, & A. Rosenfeld (Eds.),Human and machine vision (pp. 481–543). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Zemel, R. S., Behrmann, M., Mozer, M. C., &Bavelier, D. (2002). Experience-dependent perceptual grouping and object-based attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,28, 202–217.
Zucker, S. W., Stevens, K. A., &Sander, P. (1983). The relation between proximity and brightness similarity in dot patterns.Perception & Psychophysics,34, 513–522.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Support was provided by NSF Grant SBR-9875175 and NIH (NEI) Grant EY15888.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Feldman, J. Formation of visual “objects” in the early computation of spatial relations. Perception & Psychophysics 69, 816–827 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193781
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193781