Abstract
We examined how closely the underlying cognitive processing in a visual search task guides eye movements by comparing two different search tasks. In the extended search task, participants searched for an O in eight clusters of Landolt Cs with varying gap widths (four characters per cluster, arranged to look like words in text). In the single-cluster task, participants searched a single cluster (identical to the ones in the extended search). The key manipulation was gap size; although gap orientation for the distractors varied within a cluster, gap size was constant within a cluster but differed in size from cluster to cluster. The principal findings were that (1) gaze durations in the extended search were almost completely a function of the difficulty of the cluster (i.e., the gap size of the Cs) and (2) the effect of gap size on gaze durations in the extended search was very similar to its effect on response times in the single-cluster search. Thus, it appears that eye movements in the search task are determined almost exclusively by the ongoing cognitive processing on that cluster.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bertera, J. H., &Rayner, K. (2000). Eye movements and the span of the effective stimulus in visual search.Perception & Psychophysics,62, 576–585.
Cave, K. R., &Zimmerman, J. M. (1997). Flexibility in spatial attention before and after practice.Psychological Science,8, 399–403.
Duncan, J., &Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity.Psychological Review,96, 433–458.
Findlay, J. M. (1995). Visual search: Eye movements and peripheral vision.Optometry & Vision Science,72, 461–466.
Findlay, J. M. (1997). Saccade target selection during visual search.Vision Research,37, 617–631.
Findlay, J. M., Brown, V., &Gilchrist, I. D. (2001). Saccade target selection in visual search: The effect of information from the previous fixation.Vision Research,41, 87–95.
Findlay, J. M., &Gilchrist, I. D. (1998). Eye guidance and visual search. In G. Underwood (Ed.),Eye guidance in reading and scene perception (pp. 295–312). Oxford: Elsevier.
Fischer, M. H. (1999). An investigation of attention allocation during sequential eye movement tasks.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,52A, 649–677.
Greene, H. H., &Rayner, K. (2001a). Eye-movement control in direction-coded visual search.Perception,30, 147–157.
Greene, H. H., &Rayner, K. (2001b). Eye movements and familiarity effects in visual search.Vision Research,41, 3763–3773.
Henderson, J. M., &Ferreira, F. (1990). Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: Implications for attention and eye movement control.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 417–429.
Hooge, I. T. C., &Erkelens, C. J. (1999). Peripheral vision and oculomotor control during visual search.Vision Research,39, 1567–1575.
Kim, M., &Cave, K. R. (1995). Spatial attention in visual search for features and feature conjunctions.Psychological Science,6, 376–380.
Loschky, L. C., McConkie, G. W., Yang, J., &Miller, M. E. (2005). The limits of visual resolution in natural scene viewing.Visual Cognition,12, 1057–1092.
McConkie, G. W., &Rayner, K. (1975). The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading.Perception & Psychophysics,17, 578–586.
Morrison, R. E. (1984). Manipulation of stimulus onset delay in reading: Evidence for parallel programming of saccades.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 667–682.
Motter, B. C., &Belky, E. J. (1998). The guidance of eye movements during active visual search.Vision Research,38, 1805–1815.
Nuthmann, A., Engbert, R., &Kliegl, R. (2005). Mislocated fixations during reading and the inverted optimal viewing position effect.Vision Research,45, 2201–2217.
Pollatsek, A., Reichle, E. D., &Rayner, K. (2006). Tests of the E-Z Reader model: Exploring the interface between cognition and eyemovement control.Cognitive Psychology,52, 1–56.
Rayner, K. (1995). Eye movements and cognitive processes in reading, visual search, and scene perception. In J. M. Findlay, R. Walker, & R. W. Kentridge (Eds.),Eye movement research: Mechanisms, processes and applications (pp. 3–22). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research.Psychological Bulletin,124, 372–422.
Rayner, K., &Bertera, J. H. (1979). Reading without a fovea.Science,206, 468–469.
Rayner, K., &Fisher, D. L. (1987). Letter processing during eye fixations in visual search.Perception & Psychophysics,42, 87–100.
Rayner, K., Warren, T., Juhasz, B. J., &Liversedge, S. P. (2004). The effect of plausibility on eye movements in reading.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,30, 1290–1301.
Rayner, K., Well, A. D., Pollatsek, A., &Bertera, J. H. (1982). The availability of useful information to the right of fixation during reading.Perception & Psychophysics,31, 537–550.
Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., Fisher, D. L., &Rayner, K. (1998). Towards a model of eye movement control in reading.Psychological Review,105, 125–157.
Reichle, E. D., Rayner, K., &Pollatsek, A. (2003). The E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,26, 445–526.
Schneider, W., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention.Psychological Review,84, 1–66.
Scialfa, C. T., &Joffe, K. M. (1998). Response times and eye movements in feature and conjunction search as a function of target eccentricity.Perception & Psychophysics,60, 1067–1082.
Shen, J., Reingold, E. M., Pomplun, M., &Williams, D. E. (2003). Saccadic selectivity during visual search: The influence of central processing difficulty. In J. Hyönä, R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds.),The mind’s eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 65–88). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Staub, A., &Rayner, K. (2007). Eye movements and on-line comprehension processes. In G. Gaskell (Ed.),Oxford handbook of psycholinguisitics (pp. 327–342). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Treisman, A. M., &Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention.Cognitive Psychology,12, 97–136.
Wolfe, J. M. (1998). Visual search. In H. Pashler (Ed.),Attention (pp. 13–73). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., &Franzel, S. L. (1989). Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 419–433.
Zelinsky, G. J. (1996). Using eye saccades to assess the selectivity of search movements.Vision Research,36, 2177–2187.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant HD26765 from the National Institutes of Health. C.C.W. was supported as a postdoctoral fellow on Grant MH16745 while at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Williams, C.C., Pollatsek, A. Searching for an O in an array of Cs: Eye movements track moment-to-moment processing in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics 69, 372–381 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193758
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193758