Abstract
Two experiments demonstrate that the perceived durations of sounds as long as 1 sec are influenced by the sounds’ amplitude envelopes, extending Schlauch, Ries, and DiGiovanni’s (2001) observations on sounds of 200-msec duration. Sounds with a monotonic decay (i.e., damped sounds) are heard as substantially shorter than both steady sounds and those with a monotonic increase of level (i.e., ramped sounds). Neither a reaction time (Experiments 1 and 2) nor a staircase (Experiment 2) procedure supported a sensory explanation for these different subjective durations. The results are compatible with the suggestion of Stecker and Hafter (2000) that listeners exclude part of the tails of damped sounds in the computation of their subjective durations.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akeroyd, M. A., &Patterson, R. D. (1995). Discrimination of wideband noises modulated by a temporally asymmetric function.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,98, 2466–2474.
Bressan, P. (2006). The place of white in a world of grays: A doubleanchoring theory of lightness perception.Psychological Review,113, 526–553.
Canévet, G. (1986). Estimation de sonie pour de sons purs à variation monotone de niveau.Acustica,62, 256–264.
Canévet, G., &Scharf, B. (1990). The loudness of sounds that increase and decrease continuously in level.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,88, 2136–2142.
Canévet, G., Teghtsoonian, R., &Teghtsoonian, M. (2003). A comparison of loudness change in signals that continuously rise and fall in amplitude.Acta Acustica United With Acustica,89, 339–345.
Darwin, C. J. (1984). Perceiving vowels in the presence of another sound: Constraints on formant perception.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,76, 1636–1647.
Darwin, C. J., &Sutherland, N. S. (1984). Grouping frequency components of vowels: When is a harmonic not a harmonic?Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36A, 193–208.
Di Lollo, V., Enns, J. T., Yantis, S., &Dechief, L. G. (2000). Response latencies to the onset and offset of visual stimuli.Perception & Psychophysics,62, 218–225.
Garner, W. R. (1953). An informational analysis of absolute judgments of loudness.Journal of Experimental Psychology,46, 373–380.
Gaver, W. W. (1993). What in the world do we hear? An ecological approach to auditory event perception.Ecological Psychology,5, 1–29.
Gilchrist, A., Kossyfidis, C., Bonato, F., Agostini, T., Cataliotti, J., Li, X., et al. (1999). An anchoring theory of lightness perception.Psychological Review,106, 795–834.
Grassi, M. (2003). Differenza nella durata percettiva di suoni crescenti o calanti in intensità: Permanenza o decurtamento?Giornale Italiano di Psicologia,30, 659–663.
Grassi, M. (2005). Do we hear size or sound? Balls dropped on plates.Perception & Psychophysics,67, 274–284.
Irino, T., &Patterson, R. D. (1996). Temporal asymmetry in the auditory system.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,99, 2316–2331.
Levitt, H. (1971). Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,49, 467–477.
Neuhoff, J. G. (1998). Perceptual bias for rising tones.Nature,395, 123–124.
Neuhoff, J. G. (2001). An adaptive bias in the perception of looming auditory motion.Ecological Psychology,13, 87–110.
Patterson, R. D. (1994a). The sound of a sinusoid: Spectral models.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,96, 1409–1418.
Patterson, R. D. (1994b). The sound of a sinusoid: Time-interval models.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,96, 1419–1428.
Patterson, R. D., Allerhand, M. H., &Giguére, C. (1995). Timedomain modeling of peripheral auditory processing: A modular architecture and a software platform.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,98, 1890–1894.
Patterson, R. D., &Irino, T. (1998). Modeling temporal asymmetry in the auditory system.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,104, 2967–2979.
Phillips, D. P., Hall, S. E., &Boehnke, S. E. (2002). Central auditory onset responses, and temporal asymmetries in auditory perception.Hearing Research,167, 192–205.
Schlauch, R. S. (1992). A cognitive influence on the loudness of tones that change continuously in level.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,92, 758–765.
Schlauch, R. S., Ries, D. T., &DiGiovanni, J. J. (2001). Duration discrimination and subjective duration for ramped and damped sounds.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,109, 2880–2887.
Seifritz, E., Neupahoff, J. G., Bilecen, D., Scheffler, K., Mustovic, H., Schächinger, H., et al. (2002). Neural processing of auditory looming in the human brain.Current Biology,12, 2147–2151.
Stecker, G. C., &Hafter, E. R. (2000). An effect of temporal asymmetry on loudness.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,107, 3358–3368.
Teghtsoonian, R., Teghtsoonian, M., &Canévet, G. (2000). The perception of waning signals: Decruitment in loudness and perceived size.Perception & Psychophysics,62, 637–646.
Teghtsoonian, R., Teghtsoonian, M., &Canévet, G. (2005). Sweep-induced acceleration in loudness change and the “bias for rising intensities.”Perception & Psychophysics,67, 699–712.
Wang, X., Lu, T., &Liang, L. (2003). Cortical processing of temporal modulations.Speech Communication,41, 107–121.
Wright, B. A., Buonomano, D. V., Mahncke, H. W., &Merzenich, M. M. (1997). Learning and generalization of auditory temporalinterval discrimination in humans.Journal of Neuroscience,17, 3956–3963.
Zera, J., &Green, D. M. (1993). Detecting temporal onset and offset asynchrony in multicomponent complexes.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,93, 1038–1052.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Experiment 2 was conducted while M.G. was a Marie Curie fellow at the University of Sussex (EC Contract HTMP-CT-2001-00234).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grassi, M., Darwin, C.J. The subjective duration of ramped and damped sounds. Perception & Psychophysics 68, 1382–1392 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193737
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193737