Abstract
In experiments examining inhibition of return (IOR), it is common practice to present a second cue at fixation during the cue—target interval. The purpose of this fixation cue is to reorient attention away from the cued location to ensure that the facilitative effects of spatial attention do not obscure IOR. However, despite their frequent use, relatively little is known about the relationship between fixation cues and IOR. In the present experiments, we examined the role of fixation cues by manipulating their presence in tasks that either did or did not require target identification. When the participants were required to either detect (Experiment 1A) or localize (Experiment 2A) a target, the magnitude of IOR was unaffected by the presence of a fixation cue. In contrast, when the participants were required to identify a target (Experiments 1B, 2B, and 3), IOR was observed only when a fixation cue was presented. This result was obtained regardless of the type of response that was required (two-alternative forced choice or go/no go). The effectiveness of the fixation cue in revealing IOR in these tasks is consistent with its putative role in reorienting attention away from the cued location.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berger, A., Henik, A., &Rafal, R. (2005). Competition between endogenous and exogenous orienting of visual attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,134, 207–221.
Birmingham, E., Visser, T. A. W., Snyder, J. J., & Kingstone, A. (2006).Inhibition of return: Unraveling a paradox. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Castel, A. D., Chasteen, A. L., Scialfa, C. T., &Pratt, J. (2003). Adult age differences in the time course of inhibition of return.Journals of Gerontology,58B, P256-P259.
Cheal, M., &Chastain, G. (1999). Inhibition of return: Support for generality of the phenomenon.Journal of General Psychology,126, 375–390.
Cheal, M., &Chastain, G. (2002). Timing of facilitatory and inhibitory effects of visual attention.Visual Cognition,9, 969–1002.
Collie, A., Maruff, P., Yucel, M., Danckert, J., &Currie, J. (2000). Spatiotemporal distribution of facilitation and inhibition of return arising from the reflexive orienting of covert attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,26, 1733–1745.
Danziger, S., &Kingstone, A. (1999). Unmasking the inhibition of return phenomenon.Perception & Psychophysics,61, 1024–1037.
Eimer, M. (1994). An ERP study on visual spatial priming with peripheral onsets.Psychophysiology,31, 154–163.
Faust, M. E., &Balota, D. A. (1997). Inhibition of return and visuo-spatial attention in healthy older adults and individuals with dementia of the Alzheimer type.Neuropsychology,11, 13–29.
Fernandez-Duque, D., &Posner, M. I. (1997). Relating the mechanisms of orienting and alerting.Neuropsychologia,35, 477–486.
Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., &Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 1030–1044.
Fox, E., &de Fockert, J.-W. (2001). Inhibitory effects of repeating color and shape: Inhibition of return or repetition blindness?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,27, 798–812.
Fox, E., Russo, R., &Dutton, K. (2002). Attentional bias for threat: Evidence for delayed disengagement from emotional faces.Cognition & Emotion,16, 355–379.
Handy, T. C., Jha, A. P., &Mangun, G. R. (1999). Promoting novelty in vision: Inhibition of return modulates perceptual-level processing.Psychological Science,10, 157–161.
Hopfinger, J. B., &Mangun, G. R. (1998). Reflexive attention modulates processing of visual stimuli in human extrastriate cortex.Psychological Science,9, 441–447.
Ivanoff, J., &Klein, R. M. (2001). The presence of a nonresponding effector increases inhibition of return.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,8, 307–314.
Jonides, J. (1981). Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind’s eye’s movement. In J. [B.] Long & A. [D.] Baddeley (Eds.),Attention and performance IX (pp. 187–203). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Juola, J. F., Koshino, H., &Warner, C. B. (1995). Tradeoffs between attentional effects of spatial cues and abrupt onsets.Perception & Psychophysics,57, 333–342.
Khatoon, S., Briand, K. A., &Sereno, A. B. (2002). The role of response in spatial attention: Direct versus indirect stimulus—response mappings.Vision Research,42, 2693–2708.
Kingstone, A., &Pratt, J. (1999). Inhibition of return is composed of attentional and oculomotor processes.Perception & Psychophysics,61, 1046–1054.
Klein, R. M. (2000). Inhibition of return.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,4, 138–147.
Klein, R. M., Castel, A. D., &Pratt, J. (2006). The effects of memory load on the time course of inhibition of return.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,13, 294–299.
Klein, R. M., &Taylor, T. L. (1994). Categories of cognitive inhibition, with reference to attention. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.),Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 113–150). San Diego: Academic Press.
Loftus, G. R., &Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,1, 476–490.
Lupiáňez, J., Decaix, C., Siéroff, E., Chokron, S., Milliken, B., &Bartolomeo, P. (2004). Independent effects of endogenous and exogenous spatial cueing: Inhibition of return at endogenously attended target locations.Experimental Brain Research,159, 447–457.
Lupiáňez, J., Milán, E. G., Tornay, F. J., Madrid, E., &Tudela, P. (1997). Does IOR occur in discrimination tasks? Yes, it does, but later.Perception & Psychophysics,59, 1241–1254.
Lupiáňez, J., &Milliken, B. (1999). Inhibition of return and the attentional set for integrating versus differentiating information.Journal of General Psychology,126, 392–418.
Lupiáňez, J., Milliken, B., Solano, C., Weaver, B., &Tipper, S. P. (2001). On the strategic modulation of the time course of facilitation and inhibition of return.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,54A, 753–773.
MacPherson, A. C., Klein, R. M., &Moore, C. (2003). Inhibition of return in children and adolescents.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,85, 337–351.
McDonald, J. J., & Ward, L. M. (2003, April).Crossmodal consequences of involuntary spatial attention and inhibition of return. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Cognitive Neuroscience Society, New York.
McDonald, J. J., Ward, L. M., &Kiehl, K. A. (1999). An event-related brain potential study of inhibition of return.Perception & Psychophysics,61, 1411–1423.
Milliken, B., Lupiáňez, J., Roberts, M., &Stevanovski, B. (2003). Orienting in space and time: Joint contributions to exogenous spatial cuing effects.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,10, 877–883.
Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,32, 3–25.
Posner, M. I., &Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.),Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531–556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Posner, M. I., Rafal, R. D., Choate, L. S., &Vaughan, J. (1985). Inhibition of return: Neural basis and function.Cognitive Neuropsychology,2, 211–228.
Pratt, J., &Abrams, R. A. (1999). Inhibition of return in discrimination tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,25, 229–242.
Pratt, J., Adam, J., &O’Donnell, C. (2005). Response selection influences inhibition of return.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,17, 319–328.
Pratt, J., &Fischer, M. H. (2002). Examining the role of the fixation cue in inhibition of return.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,56, 294–301.
Pratt, J., Kingstone, A., &Khoe, W. (1997). Inhibition of return in location- and identity-based choice decision tasks.Perception & Psychophysics,59, 964–971.
Prime, D. J. (2004).Electrophysiological investigations of inhibition of return across tasks. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
Prime, D. J., Tata, M. S., &Ward, L. M. (2003). Event-related potential evidence for attentional inhibition of return in audition.NeuroReport,14, 393–397.
Prime, D. J., &Ward, L. M. (2002). Auditory frequency-based inhibition differs from spatial IOR.Perception & Psychophysics,64, 771–784.
Prime, D. J., &Ward, L. M. (2004). Inhibition of return from stimulus to response.Psychological Science,15, 272–276.
Prime, D. J., &Ward, L. M. (2006). Cortical expressions of inhibition of return.Brain Research,1072, 161–174.
Reuter-Lorenz, P. A., Jha, A. P., &Rosenquist, J. N. (1996). What is inhibited in inhibition of return?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 367–378.
Riggio, L., Bello, A., &Umiltà, C. (1998). Inhibitory and facilitatory effects of cue onset and offset.Psychological Research,61, 107–118.
Ro, T., Pratt, J., &Rafal, R. D. (2000). Inhibition of return in saccadic eye movements.Experimental Brain Research,130, 264–268.
Shipp, S. (2004). The brain circuitry of attention.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,8, 223–230.
Spence, C., &Driver, J. (1998). Inhibition of return following an auditory cue: The role of central reorienting events.Experimental Brain Research,118, 352–360.
Tata, M. S., Prime, D. J., McDonald, J. J., &Ward, L. M. (2001). Transient spatial attention modulates distinct components of the auditory ERP.NeuroReport,12, 3679–3682.
Taylor, T. L., &Klein, R. M. (1998a). Inhibition of return to color: A replication and nonextension of Law, Pratt, and Abrams (1995).Perception & Psychophysics,60, 1452–1456.
Taylor, T. L., &Klein, R. M. (1998b). On the causes and effects of inhibition of return.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,5, 625–643.
Taylor, T. L., &Klein, R. M. (2000). Visual and motor effects in inhibition of return.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,26, 1639–1656.
Wright, R. D., &Richard, C. M. (2000). Location cue validity affects inhibition of return of visual processing.Vision Research,40, 2351–2358.
Wright, R. D., &Ward, L. M. (1998). The control of visual attention. In R. D. Wright (Ed.),Visual attention (pp. 132–186). New York: Oxford University Press.
Yantis, S. (1996). Attentional capture in vision. In A. F. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles, & G. D. Logan (Eds.),Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention (pp. 45–76). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) Discovery Grants to L.M.W. and T.A.W.V.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Prime, D.J., Visser, T.A.W. & Ward, L.M. Reorienting attention and inhibition of return. Perception & Psychophysics 68, 1310–1323 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193730
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193730