Abstract
Kristjánsson, Wang, and Nakayama (2002) demonstrated that visual search for conjunctively defined targets can be substantially expedited (“primed”) when target and distractor features are repeated on consecutive trials. Two experiments were conducted to examine whether the search response time (RT) facilitation on target-present trials results from repetition of target-defining features, distractor features, or both. The experiments used a multiple conjunctive search paradigm (adapted from Kristjánsson et al., 2002), in which the target and distractor features were varied (i.e., repeated) independently of each other across successive trials. The RT facilitation was numerically largest when both target and distractor features were repeated, but not significantly larger than that when only distractor features were repeated. This indicates that cross-trial priming effects in conjunctive visual search result mainly from the repetition of distractor, rather than target, features.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bacon, W. F., &Egeth, H. E. (1997). Goal-directed guidance of attention: Evidence from conjunctive visual search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,23, 948–961.
Bravo, M. J., &Nakayama, K. (1992). The role of attention in different visual-search tasks.Perception & Psychophysics,51, 465–472.
Driver, J., McLeod, P., &Dienes, Z. (1992). Motion coherence and conjunction search: Implications for guided search theory.Perception & Psychophysics,51, 79–85.
Duncan, J., &Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity.Psychological Review,96, 433–458.
Duncan, J., &Humphreys, G. W. (1992). Beyond the search surface: Visual search and attentional engagement.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 578–588.
Egeth, H. E., Virzi, R. A., &Garbart, H. (1984). Searching for conjunctively defined targets.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 32–39.
Enns, J. T., &Rensink, R. A. (1991). Preattentive recovery of threedimensional orientation from line drawings.Psychological Review,98, 335–351.
Friedman-Hill, S. R., &Wolfe, J. M. (1995). Second-order parallel processing: Visual search for the odd item in a subset.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 531–551.
He, Z. J., &Nakayama, K. (1992). Surfaces versus features in visual search.Nature,359, 231–233.
Hillstrom, A. P. (2000). Repetition effects in visual search.Perception & Psychophysics,62, 800–817.
Humphreys, G. W., &Müller, H. J. (1993). SEarch via Recursive Rjection (SERR): A connectionist model of visual search.Cognitive Psychology,25, 43–110.
Kaptein, N. A., Theeuwes, J., &van der Heijden, A. H. C. (1995). Search for a conjunctively defined target can be selectively limited to a color-defined subset of elements.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 1053–1069.
Karni, A., &Sagi, D. (1993). The time course of learning a visual skill.Nature,365, 250–252.
Kingstone, A., &Bischof, W. F. (1999). Perceptual grouping and motion coherence in visual search.Psychological Science,10, 151–156.
Kristjánsson, Á., Wang, D., &Nakayama, K. (2002). The role of priming in conjunctive visual search.Cognition,85, 37–52.
Maljkovic, V., &Nakayama, K. (1994). Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features.Memory & Cognition,22, 657–672.
Maljkovic, V., &Nakayama, K. (1996). Priming of pop-out: II. The role of position.Perception & Psychophysics,58, 977–991.
Maljkovic, V., &Nakayama, K. (2000). Priming of pop-out: III. A short-term implicit memory system beneficial for rapid target selection.Visual Cognition,7, 571–595.
McPeek, R. M., Maljkovic, V., &Nakayama, K. (1999). Saccades require focal attention and are facilitated by a short-term memory system.Vision Research,39, 1555–1566.
Müller, H. J., Heller, D., &Ziegler, J. (1995). Visual search for singleton feature targets within and across feature dimensions.Perception & Psychophysics,57, 1–17.
Müller, H. J., Krummenacher, J., & Heller, D. (2004). Dimensionspecific intertrial facilitation in visual search for pop-out targets: Evidence for a top-down modulable visual short-term memory effect.Visual Cognition,11, 577–602.
Müller, H. J., Reimann, B., &Krummenacher, J. (2003). Visual search for singleton feature targets across dimensions: Stimulusand expectancy-driven effects in dimensional weighting.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,29, 1021–1035.
Nakayama, K., &Silverman, G. H. (1986). Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions.Nature,320, 264–265.
Pollmann, S., Weidner, R., Müller, H. J., & von Cramon, D. Y. (in press). Neural correlates of visual dimension weighting.Visual Cognition.
Ramachandran, V. S. (1988). Perception of shape from shading.Nature,331, 163–166.
Segalowitz, S. J., &Graves, R. E. (1990). Suitability of IBM XT, AT, and PS/2 keyboard, mouse, and game port as response devices in reaction time paradigms.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,22, 283–289.
Treisman, A., &Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention.Cognitive Psychology,12, 97–136.
Treisman, A., &Sato, S. (1990). Conjunction search revisited.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 459–478.
von Mühlenen, A., &Müller, H. J. (2001). Visual search for motion-form conjunctions: Is form discriminated within the motion system?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,27, 707–718.
Wang, D., Kristjánsson, Á., &Nakayama, K. (2001).Efficient visual search without top-down or bottom-up guidance: A putative role for perceptual organization (Tech. Rep. No. 26). Columbus: Ohio State University, Center for Cognitive Science.
Wang, D., Kristjánsson, Á., &Nakayama, K. (2005). Efficient visual search without top-down or bottom-up guidance.Perception & Psychophysics,67, 239–253.
Weidner, R., Pollmann, S., Müller, H. J., &von Cramon, D. Y. (2002). Top-down controlled visual dimension weighting: An eventrelated fMRI study.Cerebral Cortex,12, 318–328.
Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided search 2.0: A revised model of visual search.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,1, 202–238.
Wolfe, J. M. (1998). Visual search. In H. Pashler (Ed.),Attention (pp. 13–73). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., &Franzel, S. L. (1989). Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 419–433.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Grant FOR 480/1-1.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Geyer, T., Müller, H.J. & Krummenacher, J. Cross-trial priming in visual search for singleton conjunction targets: Role of repeated target and distractor features. Perception & Psychophysics 68, 736–749 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193697
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193697