Abstract
Visual perspective taking can be used to determine where objects are located relative to another agent, or whether the agent can see a particular object. Four experiments indicated that different processes provide these different kinds of information. When participants were asked to report whether an object was to the left or to the right of another agent, response times (RTs) increased with increasing angular distance between the participant and the agent, suggesting that participants mentally transformed their perspective to align it with that of the agent. For visibility judgments, RTs were independent of the angle between the participant and the agent but increased with the distance between the agent and the object, suggesting that participants traced the agent’s line of sight. Together, these data suggest that perspective taking encompasses at least two qualitatively different computational processes: one that updates the viewer’s imagined perspective, and one that traces a line of sight.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abed, F. (1991). Cultural influences on visual scanning patterns.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,22, 525–534.
Amorim, M.-A. (2003). “What is my avatar seeing?”: The coordination of “out-of-body” and “embodied” perspectives for scene recognition across views.Visual Cognition,10, 157–199.
Amorim, M.-A., Glasauer, S., Corpinot, K., &Berthoz, A. (1997). Updating an object’s orientation and location during nonvisual navigation: A comparison between two processing modes.Perception & Psychophysics,59, 404–418.
Amorim, M.-A., &Stucchi, N. (1997). Viewer- and object-centered mental explorations of an imagined environment are not equivalent.Cognitive Brain Research,5, 229–239.
Amorim, M.-A., Trumbore, B., &Chogyen, P. L. (2000). Cognitive repositioning inside a desktop VE: The constraints introduced by first-versus third-person imagery and mental representation richness.Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments,9, 165–186.
Baldassi, S., &Burr, D. C. (2004). “Pop-out” of targets modulated in luminance or colour: The effect of intrinsic and extrinsic uncertainty.Vision Research,44, 1227–1233.
Brunet, E., Sarfati, Y., Hardy-Bayle, M. C., &Decety, J. (2000). A PET investigation of the attribution of intentions with a nonverbal task.NeuroImage,11, 157–166.
Carlson, L. A., &Logan, G. D. (2001). Using spatial terms to select an object.Memory & Cognition,29, 883–892.
Carlson, L. A., &van Deman, S. R. (2004). The space in spatial language.Journal of Memory & Language,51, 418–436.
Creem, S. H., Downs, T. H., Wraga, M., Proffitt, D. R., &Downs, J. H., III (2001). An fMRI study of imagined self-rotation.Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience,1, 239–249.
Decety, J., &Chaminade, T. (2003). Neural correlates of feeling sympathy.Neuropsychologia,41, 127–138.
Denis, M., Gonçalves, M.-R., &Memmi, D. (1995). Mental scanning of visual images generated from verbal descriptions: Towards a model of image accuracy.Neuropsychologia,33, 1511–1530.
Flavell, J. H., Everett, B. A., Croft, K., &Flavell, E. R. (1981). Young children’s knowledge about visual perception: Further evidence for the Level 1-Level 2 distinction.Developmental Psychology,17, 99–103.
Heeley, D. W., Buchanan-Smith, H. M., Cromwell, J. A., &Wright, J. S. (1997). The oblique effect in orientation acuity.Vision Research,37, 235–242.
Huttenlocher, J., &Presson, C. C. (1979). The coding and transformation of spatial information.Cognitive Psychology,11, 375–394.
Juurmaa, J., &Lehtinen-Railo, S. (1994). Visual experience and access to spatial knowledge.Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness,88, 157–170.
Kelly, J. W., Beall, A. C., &Loomis, J. M. (2004). Perception of shared visual space: Establishing common ground in real and virtual environments.Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments,13, 442–450.
Kosslyn, S. M. (1973). Scanning visual images: Some structural implications.Perception & Psychophysics,14, 90–94.
Logan, G. D., &Compton, B. J. (1996). Distance and distraction effects in the apprehension of spatial relations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 159–172.
Logan, G. D., &Sadler, D. D. (1996). A computational analysis of the apprehension of spatial relations. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. F. Garrett (Eds.),Language and space (pp. 493–529). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Nachshon, I., Shefler, G. E., &Samocha, D. (1977). Directional scanning as a function of stimulus characteristics, reading habits, and directional set.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,8, 83–99.
Presson, C. C. (1982). Strategies in spatial reasoning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,8, 243–251.
Presson, C. C., &Montello, D. R. (1994). Updating after rotational and translational body movements: Coordinate structure of perspective space.Perception,23, 1447–1455.
Ruby, P., &Decety, J. (2001). Effect of subjective perspective taking during simulation of action: A PET investigation of agency.Nature Neuroscience,4, 546–550.
Salatas, H., &Flavell, J. H. (1976). Perspective taking: The development of two components of knowledge.Child Development,47, 103–109.
Sebanz, N., &Frith, C. (2004). Beyond simulation? Neural mechanisms for predicting the actions of others.Nature Neuroscience,7, 5–6.
Shelton, A. L., &McNamara, T. P. (2001). Systems of spatial reference in human memory.Cognitive Psychology,43, 274–310.
Simons, D. J., &Wang, R. F. (1998). Perceiving real-world viewpoint changes.Psychological Science,9, 315–320.
Vogeley, K., May, M., Ritzl, A., Falkai, P., Zilles, K., &Fink, G. R. (2004). Neural correlates of first-person perspective as one constituent of human self-consciousness.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,16, 817–827.
Wang, R. F., &Simons, D. J. (1999). Active and passive scene recognition across views.Cognition,70, 191–210.
Wraga, M., Creem, S. H., &Proffitt, D. R. (2000). Updating displays after imagined object and viewer rotations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 151–168.
Yaniv, I., &Shatz, M. (1990). Heuristics of reasoning and analogy in children’s visual perspective taking.Child Development,61, 1491–1501.
Zacks, J. M., Mires, J., Tversky, B., &Hazeltine, E. (2000). Mental spatial transformations of objects and perspective.Spatial Cognition & Computation,2, 315–332.
Zacks, J. M., Vettel, J. M., &Michelon, P. (2003). Imagined viewer and object rotations dissociated with event-related fMRI.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,15, 1002–1018.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Michelon, P., Zacks, J.M. Two kinds of visual perspective taking. Perception & Psychophysics 68, 327–337 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193680
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193680