Abstract
Although previous studies have consistently reported different forgetting rates for true and false memory when tested with recall, studies comparing the rates of decay for true and false recognition have reported inconsistent results. The present study attempted to clarify this inconsistency by comparing forgetting rates for true and false recognition in addition to addressing methodological differences among the previous studies. Recognition of list items and critical lures was assessed at six delays (2, 5, 10, 15, and 20 min, and 2 days). A comparison of power function slopes across item type provided evidence of slope differences such that false recognition decayed more quickly than true recognition, which is inconsistent with predictions from activation/ source-monitoring and fuzzy trace theories.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brainerd, C. J., &Reyna, V. F. (2005).The science of false memory. New York: Oxford University Press.
Brainerd, C. J., Reyna, V. F., &Brandse, E. (1995). Are children’s false memories more persistent then their true memories?Psychological Science,6, 359–364.
Brainerd, C. J., Reyna, V. F., &Mojardin, A. H. (1999). Conjoint recognition.Psychological Review,106, 160–179.
Coane, J. H., &McBride, D. M. (2006). The role of test structure in creating false memories.Memory & Cognition,34, 1026–1036.
Collins, A. M., &Loftus, E. F. (1975). Spreading-activation theory of semantic memory.Psychological Review,82, 407–428.
Deese, J. (1959). On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions on immediate recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology,58, 17–22.
Dodd, M. D., Sheard, E. D., &MacLeod, C. M. (2006). Re-exposure to studied items at test does not influence false recognition.Memory,14, 115–126.
Gallo, D. A., McDermott, K. B., Percer, J. M., &Roediger, H. L., III (2001). Modality effects in false recall and false recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 339–353.
Hicks, J. L., &Starns, J. J. (2006). The roles of associative strength and source memorability in the contextualization of false memory.Journal of Memory & Language,54, 39–53.
Israel, L., &Schacter, D. L. (1997). Pictorial encoding reduces false recognition of semantic associates.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 577–581.
Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., &Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring.Psychological Bulletin,114, 3–28.
Lampinen, J. M., &Schwartz, R. M. (2000). The impersistence of false memory persistence.Memory,8, 393–400.
Loftus, G. R. (1985). Evaluating forgetting curves.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,11, 397–406.
Macmillan, N. A., &Creelman, C. D. (2005).Detection theory: A user’s guide (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Marsh, E. J., McDermott, K. B., &Roediger, H. L., III (2004). Does test-induced priming play a role in the creation of false memories?Memory,12, 44–55.
McBride, D. M., & Coane, J. H. (2002). False memory norms. Unpublished manuscript, Illinois State University.
McBride, D. M., Coane, J. H., &Raulerson, B. A., III (2006). An investigation of false memory in perceptual implicit tasks.Acta Psychologica,123, 240–260.
McDermott, K. B. (1996). The persistence of false memories in list recall.Journal of Memory & Language,35, 212–230.
Miller, M. B., &Wolford, G. L. (1999). Theoretical commentary: The role of criterion shift in false memory.Psychological Review,106, 398–405.
Neuschatz, J. S., Payne, D. G., Lampinen, J. M., &Toglia, M. P. (2001). Assessing the effectiveness of warnings and the phenomenological characteristics of false memories.Memory,9, 553–571.
Payne, D. G., Elie, C. J., Blackwell, J. M., &Neuschatz, J. S. (1996). Memory illusions: Recalling, recognizing, and recollecting events that never occurred.Journal of Memory & Language,35, 261–285.
Reyna, V. F., &Brainerd, C. J. (1995). Fuzzy trace theory: An interim synthesis.Learning & Individual Differences,7, 1–75.
Robinson, K. J., &Roediger, H. L., III (1997). Associative processes in false recall and false recognition.Psychological Science,8, 231–237.
Roediger, H. L., III,Balota, D. A., &Watson, J. M. (2001). Spreading activation and arousal of false memories. In H. L. Roediger III, J. S. Nairne, I. Neath, & A. M. Surprenant (Eds.),The nature of remembering: Essays in honor of Robert G. Crowder (pp. 95–115). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Roediger, H. L., III, &McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 803–814.
Roediger, H. L., III,Watson, J. M., McDermott, K. B., &Gallo, D. A. (2001). Factors that determine false recall: A multiple regression analysis.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,8, 385–407.
Rubin, D. C., &Wenzel, A. E. (1996). One hundred years of forgetting: A quantitative description of retention.Psychological Review,103, 734–760.
Seamon, J. G., Luo, C. R., Kopecky, J. J., Price, C. A., Rothschild, L., Fung, N. S., &Schwartz, M. A. (2002). Are false memories more difficult to forget than accurate memories? The effect of retention interval on recall and recognition.Memory & Cognition,30, 1054–1064.
Stadler, M. A., Roediger, H. L., III, &McDermott, K. B. (1999). Norms for word lists that create false memories.Memory & Cognition,27, 494–500.
Thapar, A., &McDermott, K. B. (2001). False recall and false recognition induced by presentation of associated words: Effects of retention interval and level of processing.Memory & Cognition,29, 424–432.
Toglia, M. P., Neuschatz, J. S., &Goodwin, K. A. (1999). Recall accuracy and illusory memories: When more is less.Memory,7, 233–256.
Wixted, J. T. (2004). The psychology and neuroscience of forgetting.Annual Review of Psychology,55, 235–269.
Wixted, J. T., &Ebbesen, E. B. (1991). On the form of forgetting.Psychological Science,2, 409–415.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Colbert, J.M., McBride, D.M. Comparing decay rates for accurate and false memories in the DRM paradigm. Memory & Cognition 35, 1600–1609 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193494
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193494