Skip to main content
Log in

Cognitive complexity effects in perceptual classification are dissociable

  • Published:
Memory & Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It has been proposed that a procedural-based classification system mediates the learning of informationintegration categories, whereas a hypothesis-testing system mediates the learning of rule-based categories. Ashby, Ell and Waldron (2003) provided support for this claim by showing that a button switch introduced during classification transfer adversely affected information-integration but not rule-based performance. Nosofsky, Stanton and Zaki (2005) showed that increasing “cognitive complexity” can lead to button switch costs on rule-based performance. They argue that “cognitive complexity,” and not the existence of separable classification systems, accounts for Ashby et al.’s empirical dissociation. The present study shows that experimental manipulations that increase “cognitive complexity” often have dissociable effects on information-integration and rule-based classification that are predicted a priori from the processing characteristics associated with the procedural-based and hypothesis-testing systems. These results suggest that manipulations of “cognitive complexity” can be dissociated, suggesting that “cognitive complexity” in not a unitary construct that affects a single psychological process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashby, F. G., Alfonso-Reese, L. A., Turken, A. U., &Waldron, E. M. (1998). A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning.Psychological Review,105, 442–481.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, F. G., &Casale, M. (2003). The cognitive neuroscience of implicit category learning. In L. Jimenez (Ed.),Attention and implicit learning (pp. 108–141). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, F. G., Ell, S. W., &Waldron, E. M. (2003). Procedural learning in perceptual categorization.Memory & Cognition,31, 1114–1125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, F. G., &Gott, R. E. (1988). Decision rules in the perception and categorization of multidimensional stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 33–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, F. G., &Maddox, W. T. (2005). Human category learning.Annual Review of Psychology,56, 149–178.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, F. G., Noble, S., Filoteo, J. V., Waldron, E. M., &Ell, S. W. (2003). Category learning deficits in Parkinson’s disease.Neuropsychology,17, 115–124.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, F. G., &O’Brien, J. B. (2005). Category learning and multiple memory systems.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,9, 83–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. L., &Nosofsky, R. M. (2003). An extension of the exemplarbased random-walk model to separable-dimension stimuli.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,47, 150–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, M. A., &Kruschke, J. K. (1998). Rules and exemplars in category learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,127, 107–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filoteo, J. V., Maddox, W. T., &Davis, J. D. (2001a). A possible role of the striatum in linear and nonlinear category learning: Evidence from patients with Huntington’s disease.Behavioral Neuroscience,115, 786–798.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Filoteo, J. V., Maddox, W. T., &Davis, J. D. (2001b). Quantitative modeling of category learning in amnesic patients.Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society,7, 1–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Filoteo, J. V., Maddox, W. T., Salmon, D. P., &Song, D. D. (2005). Information-integration category learning in patients with striatal dysfunction.Neuropsychology,19, 212–222.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Filoteo, J. V., Maddox, W. T., Simmons, A. N., Ing, A. D., Cagigas, X. E., Matthews, S., et al. (2005). Cortical and subcortical brain regions involved in rule-based category learning.NeuroReport,16, 111–115.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keri, S. (2003). The cognitive neuroscience of category learning.Brain Research Reviews,43, 85–109.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maddox, W. T., &Ashby, F. G. (2004). Dissociating explicit and procedural-learning based systems of perceptual category learning.Behavioural Processes,66, 309–332.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maddox, W. T., &Filoteo, J. V. (2001). Striatal contributions to category learning: Quantitative modeling of simple linear and complex nonlinear rule learning in patients with Parkinson’s disease.Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society,7, 710–727.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, R. J., &White, N. M. (1993). A triple dissociation of memory systems: Hippocampus, amygdala, and dorsal striatum.Behavioral Neuroscience,107, 3–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, R. J., &White, N. M. (1994). Parallel information processing in the water maze: Evidence for independent memory systems involving dorsal striatum and hippocampus.Behavioral & Neural Biology,61, 260–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, C. E., Shohamy, D., Gluck, M. A., Grossman, S., Onlaor, S., &Kapur, N. (2003). Dissociating medial temporal and basal ganglia memory systems with a latent learning task.Neuropsychologia,41, 1919–1928.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nomura, E. M., Maddox, W. T., Filoteo, J. V., Ing, A. D., Gitelman, D. R., Parrish, T. B., Mesulam, M. M.,et al. (in press). Neural correlates of rule-based and information-integration category learning.Cerebral Cortex.

  • Nosofsky, R. M., Palmeri, T. J., &McKinley, S. C. (1994). A ruleplus-exception model of classification learning.Psychological Review,101, 53–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nosofsky, R. M., Stanton, R. D., &Zaki, S. R. (2005). Procedural interference in perceptual classification: Implicit learning or cognitive complexity?Memory & Cognition,33, 1256–1271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Packard, M. G., &McGaugh, J. L. (1992). Double dissociation of fornix and caudate nucleus lesions on two radial maze tasks: Evidence for multiple memory systems.Behavioral Neuroscience,106, 439–446.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Poldrack, R. A., Clark, J., Pare-Blagoev, E. J., Shohamy, D., Creso Moyano, J., Myers, C., et al. (2001). Interactive memory systems in the human brain.Nature,414, 546–550.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Poldrack, R. A., &Packard, M. G. (2003). Competition among multiple memory systems: Converging evidence from animal and human brain studies.Neuropsychologia,41, 245–251.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Poldrack, R. A., Prabhakaran, S. C. A., &Gabrieli, J. D. (1999). Striatal activation during acquisition of a cognitive skill.Neuropsychology,13, 564–574.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reber, P. J., Gitelman, D. R., Parrish, T. B., &Mesulam, M. M. (2003). Dissociating explicit and implicit category knowledge with fMRI.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,15, 574–583.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reber, P. J., Stark, C. E., &Squire, L. R. (1998). Cortical areas supporting category learning identified using functional MRI.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,95, 747–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seger, C. A., &Cincotta, C. M. (2002). Striatal activity in concept learning.Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience,2, 149–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seger, C. A., &Cincotta, C. M. (2005). The roles of the caudate nucleus in human classification learning.Journal of Neuroscience,25, 2941–2951.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. E., Patalano, A. L., &Jonides, J. (1998). Alternative strategies of categorization.Cognition,65, 1657–1196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willingham, D. B., Wells, L. A., Farrell, J. M., &Stemwedel, M. E. (2000). Implicit motor sequence learning is represented in response locations.Memory & Cognition,28, 366–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. Todd Maddox.

Additional information

This research was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grants R01 MH59196 and AFOSR FA9550-06-1-0204 to W.T.M.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maddox, W.T., Lauritzen, J.S. & Ing, A.D. Cognitive complexity effects in perceptual classification are dissociable. Memory & Cognition 35, 885–894 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193463

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193463

Keywords

Navigation