Abstract
Thegeneration effect refers to the finding that subjects who generate information (e.g., produce synonyms) remember the information better than they do material that they simply read. Meta-analytic techniques were used to summarize 445 effect sizes over 86 studies, thereby assessing the magnitude and 11 potential moderators of the generation effect. The size of the generation effect across the 86 studies was .40—a benefit of almost half a standard deviation of generation over reading. The variability of the effect size due to moderator type was substantial, and we attempted to use this information to clarify several theories that have been proposed to explain the generation effect.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Begg, I., Vinski, E., Frankovich, L., &Holgate, B. (1991). Generating makes words memorable, but so does effective reading.Memory & Cognition,19, 487–497.
Brown, A. S., &Mitchell, D. B. (1991). Age differences in retrieval consistency and response dominance.Journal of Gerontology,46, P332-P339.
Brown, J. C., Niinikoski, J., &Duke, L. W. (1993). Generation effect and frequency judgment in young and elderly adults.Experimental Aging Research,19, 147–164.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Burns, D. J. (1992). The consequences of generation.Journal of Memory & Language,31, 615–633.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Burns, D. J. (1996). The item-order distinction and the generation effect: The importance of order information in long-term memory.American Journal of Psychology,109, 567–580.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Burns, D. J., Curti, E. T., &Lavin, J. C. (1993). The effects of generation on item and order retention in immediate and delayed recall.Memory & Cognition,21, 846–852.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Buyer, L. S., &Dominowski, R. L. (1989). Retention of solutions: It is better to give than to receive.American Journal of Psychology,102, 353–363.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Carroll, M., &Nelson, T. O. (1993). Failure to obtain a generation effect during naturalistic learning.Memory & Cognition,21, 361–366.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Chechile, R. A., &Soraci, S. A., Jr. (1999). Evidence for a multipleprocess account of the generation effect.Memory,7, 483–508.
Christensen-Szalanski, J. J., &Willham, C. F. (1991). The hindsight bias: A meta-analysis.Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes,48, 147–168.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Clark, S. E. (1995). The generation effect and the modeling of associations in memory.Memory & Cognition,23, 442–455.
Cone, J. D., &Foster, S. L. (1991). Training in measurement: Always the bridesmaid.American Psychologist,46, 653–654.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Crutcher, R. J., &Healy, A. F. (1989). Cognitive operations and the generation effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 669–675.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)deWinstanley, P. A., &Bjork, E. L. (1997). Processing instructions and the generation effect: A test of the multifactor transferappropriate processing theory.Memory,5, 401–421.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)deWinstanley, P. A., &Bjork, E. L. (2004). Processing strategies and the generation effect: Implications for making a better reader.Memory & Cognition,32, 945–955.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Dick, M. B., Kean, M.-L., &Sands, D. (1989). Memory for internally generated words in Alzheimer-type dementia: Breakdown in encoding and semantic memory.Brain & Cognition,9, 88–108.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Donaldson, W., &Bass, M. (1980). Relational information and memory for problem solutions.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,19, 26–35.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Fiedler, K., Lachnit, H., Fay, D., &Krug, C. (1992). Mobilization of cognitive resources and the generation effect.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,45A, 149–171.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Flory, P., &Pring, L. (1995). The effects of data-driven and conceptually driven generation of study items on direct and indirect measures of memory.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,48A, 153–165.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Gardiner, J. M. (1988). Generation and priming effects in word-fragment completion.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 495–501.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Gardiner, J. M. (1989). A generation effect in memory without awareness.British Journal of Psychology,80, 163–168.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Gardiner, J. M., &Arthurs, F. S. (1982). Encoding context and the generating effect in multitrial free-recall learning.Canadian Journal of Psychology,36, 527–531.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Gardiner, J. M., Dawson, A. J., &Sutton, E. A. (1989). Specificity and generality of enhanced priming effects for self-generated study items.American Journal of Psychology,102, 295–305.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Gardiner, J. M., Gregg, V. H., &Hampton, J. A. (1988). Word frequency and generation effects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 687–693.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Gardiner, J. M., &Hampton, J. A. (1985). Semantic memory and the generation effect: Some tests of the lexical activation hypothesis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,11, 732–741.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Gardiner, J. M., &Hampton, J. A. (1988). Item-specific processing and the generation effect: Support for a distinctiveness account.American Journal of Psychology,101, 495–504.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Gardiner, J. M., &Rowley, J. M. C. (1984). A generation effect with numbers rather than words.Memory & Cognition,12, 443–445.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Ghatala, E. S. (1983). When does internal generation facilitate memory for sentences?American Journal of Psychology,96, 75–83.
Glass, G. V. (1977). Integrating findings: The meta-analysis of research.Review of Research in Education,5, 351–379.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Glisky, E. L., &Rabinowitz, J. C. (1985). Enhancing the generation effect through repetition of operations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,11, 193–205.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Graf, P. (1981). Reading and generating normal and transformed sentences.Canadian Journal of Psychology,35, 293–308.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Greenwald, A. G., &Johnson, M. M. (1989). The generation effect extended: Memory enhancement for generation cues.Memory & Cognition,17, 673–681.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Grosofsky, A., Payne, D. G., &Campbell, K. D. (1994). Does the generation effect depend upon selective displaced rehearsal?American Journal of Psychology,107, 53–68.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Hara, K., Neumann, E., &Tajika, H. (1989). Effects of word versus nonword rehearsal frequency on the generation effect.Psychologia,32, 230–235.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Hertel, P. T. (1989). The generation effect: A reflection of cognitive effort?Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,27, 541–544.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Hirshman, E., &Bjork, R. A. (1988). The generation effect: Support for a two-factor theory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 484–494.
Hunter, J. E., &Schmidt, F. L. (1990).Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Jacoby, L. L. (1978). On interpreting the effects of repetition: Solving a problem versus remembering a solution.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,17, 649–667.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Jacoby, L. L. (1983). Remembering the data: Analyzing interactive processes in reading.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,22, 485–508.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Java, R. I. (1994). States of awareness following word stem completion.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,6, 77–92.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Java, R. I. (1996). Effects of age on state of awareness following implicit and explicit word-association tasks.Psychology & Aging,11, 108–111.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Johns, E. E., &Swanson, L. G. (1988). The generation effect with nonwords.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 180–190.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Johnson, M. K., Raye, C. L., Foley, H. J., &Foley, M. A. (1981). Cognitive operations and decision bias in reality monitoring.American Journal of Psychology,94, 37–64.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Johnson, M. M., Schmitt, F. A., &Pietrukowicz, M. (1989). The memory advantages of the generation effect: Age and process differences.Journal of Gerontology,44, P91-P94.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Kane, J. H., &Anderson, R. C. (1978). Depth of processing and interference effects in the learning and remembering of sentences.Journal of Educational Psychology,70, 626–635.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Kinoshita, S. (1989). Generation enhances semantic processing? The role of distinctiveness in the generation effect.Memory & Cognition,17, 563–571.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Liu, I.-M., &Lee, Y.-S. (1990). Memorial consequences of generating words and non-words.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,42A, 255–278.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Lutz, J., Briggs, A., &Cain, K. (2003). An examination of the value of the generation effect for learning new material.Journal of General Psychology,130, 171–188.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)MacLeod, C. M., &Daniels, K. A. (2000). Direct versus indirect tests of memory: Directed forgetting meets the generation effect.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,7, 354–359.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)McClelland, A. G., &Pring, L. (1991). An investigation of crossmodality effects in implicit and explicit memory.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,43A, 19–33.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)McDaniel, M. A., Riegler, G. L., &Waddill, P. J. (1990). Generation effects in free recall: Further support for a three-factor theory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 789–798.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)McDaniel, M. A., Waddill, P. J., &Einstein, G. O. (1988). A contextual account of the generation effect: A three-factor theory.Journal of Memory & Language,27, 521–536.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)McElroy, L. A. (1987). The generation effect with homographs: Evidence for postgeneration processing.Memory & Cognition,15, 148–153.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)McElroy, L. A., &Slamecka, N. J. (1982). Memorial consequences of generating nonwords: Implications for semantic-memory interpre tations of the generation effect.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,21, 249–259.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)McFarland, C. E., Jr.,Frey, T. J., &Rhodes, D. D. (1980). Retrieval of internally versus externally generated words in episodic memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,19, 210–225.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)McFarland, C. E., Jr.,Warren, L. R., &Crockard, J. (1985). Memory for self-generated stimuli in young and old adults.Journal of Gerontology,40, 205–207.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)McNamara, D. S., &Healy, A. F. (1995). A procedural explanation of the generation effect: The use of an operand retrieval strategy for multiplication and addition problems.Journal of Memory & Language,34, 399–416.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)McNamara, D. S., &Healy, A. F. (2000). A procedural explanation of the generation effect for simple and difficult multiplication problems and answers.Journal of Memory & Language,43, 652–679.
Mitchell, D. B., Hunt, R. R., &Schmitt, F. A. (1986). The generation effect and reality monitoring: Evidence from dementia and normal aging.Journal of Gerontology,41, 79–84.
Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D., &Franks, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,16, 519–533.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Mulligan, N. W. (2001). Generation and hypermnesia.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 436–450.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Mulligan, N. W. (2002a). The emergent generation effect and hypermnesia: Influences of semantic and nonsemantic generation tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,28, 541–554.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Mulligan, N. W. (2002b). The generation effect: Dissociating enhanced item memory and disrupted order memory.Memory & Cognition,30, 850–861.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Mulligan, N. W., &Duke, M. D. (2002). Positive and negative generation effects, hypermnesia, and total recall time.Memory & Cognition,30, 1044–1053.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Nairne, J. S., Pusen, C., &Widner, R. L., Jr. (1985). Representation in the mental lexicon: Implications for theories of the generation effect.Memory & Cognition,13, 183–191.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Nairne, J. S., Riegler, G. L., &Serra, M. (1991). Dissociative effects of generation on item and order retention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 702–709.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Nairne, J. S., &Widner, R. L., Jr. (1987). Generation effects with nonwords: The role of test appropriateness.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 164–171.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Nairne, J. S., &Widner, R. L., Jr. (1988). Familiarity and lexicality as determinants of the generation effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 694–699.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Nicolas, S., &Tardieu, H. (1996). The generation effect in a wordstem completion task: The influence of conceptual processes.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,8, 405–424.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Olofsson, U., &Nilsson, L.-G. (1992). The generation effect in primed word-fragment completion reexamined.Psychological Research,54, 103–109.
O’Neill, W., Roy, L., &Tremblay, R. (1993). A translation-based generation effect in bilingual recall and recognition.Memory & Cognition,21, 488–495.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Payne, D. G., Neely, J. H., &Burns, D. J. (1986). The generation effect: Further tests of the lexical activation hypothesis.Memory & Cognition,14, 246–252.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Pesta, B. J., Sanders, R. E., &Murphy, M. D. (1999). A beautiful day in the neighborhood: What factors determine the generation effect for simple multiplication problems?Memory & Cognition,27, 106–115.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Pesta, B. J., Sanders, R. E., &Nemec, R. J. (1996). Older adults’ strategic superiority with mental multiplication: A generation effect assessment.Experimental Aging Research,22, 155–169.
Peynircioĝlu, Z. F. (1989). The generation effect with pictures and nonsense figures.Acta Psychologica,70, 153–160.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Peynircioĝlu, Z. F., &Mungan, E. (1993). Familiarity, relative distinctiveness, and the generation effect.Memory & Cognition,21, 367–374.
Pring, L. (1988). The “reverse-generation” effect: A comparison of memory performance between blind and sighted children.British Journal of Psychology,79, 387–400.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Rabinowitz, J. C. (1989). Judgments of origin and generation effects: Comparisons between young and elderly adults.Psychology & Aging,4, 259–268.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Rabinowitz, J. C., &Craik, F. I. M. (1986). Specific enhancement effects associated with word generation.Journal of Memory & Language,25, 226–237.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Reardon, R., Durso, F. T., Foley, M. A., &McGahan, J. R. (1987). Expertise and the generation effect.Social Cognition,5, 336–348.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Schmidt, S. R. (1990). A test of resource-allocation explanations of the generation effect.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,28, 93–96.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Schmidt, S. R. (1992). Evaluating the role of distinctiveness in the generation effect.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,44A, 237–260.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Schmidt, S. R., &Cherry, K. (1989). The negative generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon.Memory & Cognition,17, 359–369.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Schweickert, R., McDaniel, M. A., &Riegler, G. (1994). Effects of generation on immediate memory span and delayed unexpected free recall.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,47A, 781–804.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Serra, M., &Nairne, J. S. (1993). Design controversies and the generation effect: Support for an item-order hypothesis.Memory & Cognition,21, 34–40.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Slamecka, N. J., &Fevreiski, J. (1983). The generation effect when generation fails.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,22, 153–163.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Slamecka, N. J., &Graf, P. (1978). The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,4, 592–604.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Slamecka, N. J., &Katsaiti, L. T. (1987). The generation effect as an artifact of selective displaced rehearsal.Journal of Memory & Language,26, 589–607.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Smith, R. W., &Healy, A. F. (1998). The time-course of the generation effect.Memory & Cognition,26, 135–142.
Smith, S. M., &Vela, E. (2001). Environmental context-dependent memory: A review and meta-analysis.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,8, 203–220.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Soloway, R. M. (1986). No generation effect without semantic activation.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,24, 261–262.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Soraci, S. A., Jr.,Carlin, M. T., Chechile, R. A., Franks, J. J., Wills, T., &Watanabe, T. (1999). Encoding variability and cuing in generative processing.Journal of Memory & Language,41, 541–559.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Soraci, S. A., Jr.,Franks, J. J., Bransford, J. D., Chechile, R. A., Belli, R. F., Carr, M., &Carlin, M. (1994). Incongruous item generation effects: A multiple-cue perspective.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 67–78.
Steffens, M. C., &Erdfelder, E. (1998). Determinants of positive and negative generation effects in free recall.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,51A, 705–733.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Taconnat, L., &Isingrini, M. (2004). Cognitive operations in the generation effect on a recall test: Role of aging and divided attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,30, 827–837.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Thompson, C. P., &Barnett, C. (1981). Memory for product names: The generation effect.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,18, 241–243.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Toth, J. P., &Hunt, R. R. (1990). Effect of generation on a wordidentification task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 993–1003.
Tyler, S. W., Hertel, P. T., McCallum, M. C., &Ellis, H. C. (1979). Cognitive effort and memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,5, 607–617.
Viswesvaran, C., &Schmidt, F. L. (1992). A meta-analytic comparison of the effectiveness of smoking cessation methods.Journal of Applied Psychology,77, 554–561.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Watkins, M. J., &Sechler, E. S. (1988). Generation effect with an incidental memorization procedure.Journal of Memory & Language,27, 537–544.
(indicates work included in meta-analysis)Widner, R. L., Jr. (1995). Associative spread as a mediating variable in the generation effect.Memory,3, 1–19.
ba]Zacks, R. T., Hasher, L., &Li, K. Z. H. (2000). Human memory. In F. I. M. Craik & T. A. Salthouse (Eds.),Handbook of aging and cognition (pp. 293–357). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Note—This article was accepted by the previous editorial team, when Colin M. MacLeod was Editor.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bertsch, S., Pesta, B.J., Wiscott, R. et al. The generation effect: A meta-analytic review. Memory & Cognition 35, 201–210 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193441
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193441