Abstract
Manual and oculomotor measures of sequence learning were examined on the serial reaction time (SRT) task. Participants were assigned into four groups differing on response modality (manual, oculomotor) and trial type (sequence, pseudorandom). The pattern of manual RTs replicated previous studies. Frequency of anticipatory eye movements followed similar patterns as RTs. Participants made many anticipations, even in pseudorandom blocks, and frequency of anticipations did not depend on presence of concurrent manual responses. Excluding participants with explicit awareness did not change results. Anticipations were negatively related to RTs in both incidental and intentional learning. Anticipations were positively related to sequence recall in intentional, but not incidental, learning. Results suggest that (1) anticipatory eye movements reflected sequence learning and (2) participants made overt and covert shifts of visuospatial attention to likely stimulus locations prior to stimulus onset, whether or not they made manual responses and whether or not there was a sequence.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beldarrain, M. G., Grafman, J., Pascual-Leone, A., &Garcia-Monco, J. C. (1999). Procedural learning is impaired in patients with prefrontal lesions.Neurology,52, 1853–1860.
Buchner, A., &Steffens, M. C. (2001). Simultaneous learning of different regularities in sequence learning tasks: Limits and characteristics.Psychological Research,65, 71–80.
Froehlich, A. L., Herbranson, W. T., Loper, J. D., Wood, D. M., &Shimp, C. P. (2004). Anticipating by pigeons depends on local statistical information in a serial response time task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,133, 31–45.
Grafton, S. T., Hazeltine, E., &Ivry, R. B. (1998). Abstract and effector-specific representations of motor sequences identified with PET.Journal of Neuroscience,18, 9420–9428.
Helmuth, L. L., Mayr, U., &Daum, I. (2000). Sequence learning in Parkinson’s disease: A comparison of spatial-attention and number-response sequences.Neuropsychologia,38, 1443–1451.
Heyes, C. M., &Foster, C. L. (2002). Motor learning by observation: Evidence from a serial reaction time task.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,55A, 593–607.
Hoffman, J., Martin, C., &Schilling, A. (2003). Unique transitions between stimuli and responses in SRT tasks: Evidence for the primacy of response predictions.Psychological Research,67, 160–173.
Howard, J. H., Jr.,Mutter, S. A., &Howard, D. V. (1992). Serial pattern learning by event observation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 1029–1039.
Huettel, S. A., Mack, P. B., &McCarthy, G. (2002). Perceiving patterns in random series: Dynamic processing of sequence in prefrontal cortex.Nature Neuroscience,5, 485–490.
Karatekin, C. (2001). Developmental disorders of attention. In C. A. Nelson & M. Luciana (Eds.),Handbook of developmental cognitive neuroscience (pp. 561–576). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kawashima, R., Tanji, J., Okada, K., Sugiura, M., Sato, K., Kinomura, S., et al. (1998). Oculomotor sequence learning: A positron emission tomography study.Experimental Brain Research,122, 1–8.
Keele, S. W., Ivry, R., Mayr, U., Hazeltine, E., &Heuer, H. (2003). The cognitive and neural architecture of sequence representation.Psychological Review,110, 316–339.
Keele, S. W., Jennings, P., Jones, S., Caulton, D., &Cohen, A. (1995). On the modularity of sequence representation.Journal of Motor Behavior,27, 17–30.
Kelly, S. W., &Burton, A. M. (2001). Learning complex sequences: No role for observation?Psychological Research,65, 15–23.
Koch, I., &Hoffman, J. (2000). Patterns, chunks, and hierarchies in serial reaction-time tasks.Psychological Research,63, 22–35.
Land, M. F., &Furneaux, S. (1997). The knowledge base of the oculomotor system.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B,352, 1231–1239.
Lee, D. (2000). Learning of spatial and temporal patterns in sequential hand movements.Cognitive Brain Research,9, 35–39.
Mayr, U. (1996). Spatial attention and implicit sequence learning: Evidence for independent learning of spatial and nonspatial sequences.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 350–364.
Miyashita, K., Rand, M. K., Miyachi, S., &Hikosaka, O. (1996). Anticipatory saccades in sequential procedural learning in monkeys.Journal of Neurophysiology,76, 1361–1366.
Nattkemper, D., &Prinz, W. (1997). Stimulus and response anticipation in a serial reaction task.Psychological Research,60, 98–112.
Nissen, M. J., &Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures.Cognitive Psychology,19, 1–32.
Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,32, 3–25.
Posner, M. I., &Rothbart, M. K. (1992). Attentional mechanisms and conscious experience. In A. D. Milner & M. D. Rugg (Eds.),The neuropsychology of consciousness (pp.91–1111). San Diego: Academic Press.
Remillard, G. (2003). Pure perceptual-based sequence learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,29, 581–597.
Rüsseler, J., Hennighausen, E., Münte, T. F., &Rösler, F. (2003). Differences in incidental and intentional learning of sensorimotor sequences as revealed by event-related brain potentials.Cognitive Brain Research,15, 116–126.
Schvaneveldt, R. W., &Gomez, R. L. (1998). Attention and probabilistic sequence learning.Psychological Research,61, 175–190.
Seger, C. A. (1997). Two forms of sequential implicit learning.Consciousness & Cognition,6, 108–131.
Shin, J. C., &Ivry, R. B. (2002). Concurrent learning of temporal and spatial sequences.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,28, 445–457.
Stadler, M. A. (1989). On learning complex procedural knowledge.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 1061–1069.
Thomas, K. M., &Nelson, C. A. (2001). Serial reaction time learning in preschool- and school-age children.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,79, 364–387.
Tubau, E., &López-Moliner, J. (2004). Spatial interference and response control in sequence learning: The role of explicit knowledge.Psychological Research,68, 55–63.
Wilkinson, L., &Shanks, D. R. (2004). Intentional control and implicit sequence learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,30, 354–369.
Willingham, D. B. (1999). Implicit motor sequence learning is not purely perceptual.Memory & Cognition,27, 561–572.
Willingham, D. B., Nissen, M. J., &Bullemer, P. (1989). On the development of procedural knowledge.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 1424–1430.
Ziessler, M. (1994). The impact of motor responses on serial-pattern learning.Psychological Research,57, 30–41.
Ziessler, M. (1998). Response-effect learning as a major component of implicit serial learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 962–978.
Ziessler, M., &Nattkemper, D. (2001). Learning of event sequences is based on response-effect learning: Further evidence from a serial reaction task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 595–613.
Zirngibl, C., &Koch, I. (2002). The impact of response mode on implicit and explicit sequence learning.Experimental Psychology,49, 153–162.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Marcus, D.J., Karatekin, C. & Markiewicz, S. Oculomotor evidence of sequence learning on the serial reaction time task. Memory & Cognition 34, 420–432 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193419
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193419