Abstract
We investigated the hypothesis that mixing costs in task shifting reflect the sequential selection of task components (e.g., stimulus categories) during task execution. This proposition was supported by Hübner, Futterer, and Steinhauser (2001), who showed that the amount of mixing costs depends on the number of mixed task components (e.g., stimulus level and judgment). However, their results could also be explained by a task set selection account, because task components and task sets were confounded. In Experiments 1 and 2, we compared conditions in which either the number of task sets varied and the number of mixed task components was constant or vice versa. Only the number of mixed task components was predictive for the mixing costs. In Experiment 3, we replicated the additivity of mixing costs from level and judgment mixing. Our results suggest that the mixing costs reflect a selection strategy in which interference is reduced in a stepwise manner.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allport, A., Styles, E. A., &Hsieh, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.),Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 421–452). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Bradford Books.
De Jong, R. (2000). An intention-activation account of residual switch costs. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.),Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 357–376). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
De Jong, R. (2001). Adult age differences in goal activation and goal maintenance.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,13, 71–89.
Dixon, P. (1981). Algorithms and selective attention.Memory & Cognition,9, 177–184.
Dixon, P., &Just, M. A. (1986). A chronometric analysis of strategy preparation in choice reactions.Memory & Cognition,14, 488–500.
Hübner, R. (2000). Attention shifting between global and local target levels: The persistence of level-repetition effects.Visual Cognition,7, 465–484.
Hübner, R., Futterer, T., &Steinhauser, M. (2001). On attentional control as a source of residual shift costs: Evidence from twocomponent task shifts.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 640–653.
Keele, S. W., &Rafal, R. (2000). Deficits of task set in patients with left prefrontal cortex lesions. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.),Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 627–651). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kleinsorge, T., &Heuer, H. (1999). Hierarchical switching in a multidimensional task space.Psychological Research,62, 300–312.
Kray, J., &Lindenberger, U. (2000). Adult age differences in task switching.Psychology & Aging,15, 126–147.
Loftus, G. R., &Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,1, 476–490.
Mayr, U. (2001). Age differences in the selection of mental sets: The role of inhibition, stimulus ambiguity, and response-set overlap.Psychology & Aging,16, 96–109.
Mayr, U., &Keele, S. W. (2000). Changing internal constraints on action: The role of backward inhibition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,129, 4–26.
Meiran, N. (2000). Modeling cognitive control in task-switching. Psychological Research,63, 234–249.
Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception.Cognitive Psychology,9, 353–383.
Norman, D. A., &Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behaviour. In R. J. Davidson, G. E. Schwartz, & D. Shapiro (Eds.),Consciousness and self-regulation (Vol. 4, pp. 1–18). New York: Plenum.
Rogers, R. D., &Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,124, 207–231.
Rogers, R. D., Sahakian, B. J., Hodges, J. R., Polkey, C. E., Kennard, C., &Robbins, T. W. (1998). Dissociating executive mechanisms of task control following frontal lobe damage and Parkinson’s disease.Brain,121, 815–842.
Ruthruff, E., Remington, R. W., &Johnston, J. C. (2001). Switching between simple cognitive tasks: The interaction of top-down and bottom-up factors.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,27, 1404–1419.
Salthouse, T. A., Fristoe, N., McGuthry, K. E., &Hambrick, D. Z. (1998). Relation of task switching to speed, age, and fluid intelligence.Psychology & Aging,13, 445–461.
Schuch, S., &Koch, I. (2003). The role of response selection for inhibition of task sets in task shifting.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,29, 92–105.
Steinhauser, M., & Hübner, R. (in press). Automatic activation of task-specific representations in task-shifting.Memory & Cognition.
Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders’ method.Acta Psychologica,30, 276–315.
Ward, L. M. (1982). Determinants of attention to local and global features of visual forms.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,8, 562–581.
Waszak, F., Hommel, B., &Allport, A. (2003). Task-switching and long-term priming: Role of episodic stimulus-task bindings in taskshift costs.Cognitive Psychology,46, 361–413.
Wylie, G., &Allport, A. (2000). Task switching and the measurement of “switch costs.”Psychological Research,63, 212–233.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant Hu 432/8-1 to the second author from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Steinhauser, M., Hübner, R. Mixing costs in task shifting reflect sequential processing stages in a multicomponent task. Memory & Cognition 33, 1484–1494 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193380
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193380