Abstract
Deep encoding, relative to shallow encoding, has been shown to increase the probability of false memories in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm (Thapar & McDermott, 2001; Toglia, Neuschatz, & Goodwin, 1999). In two experiments, we showed important limitations on the generalizability of this phenomenon; these limitations are clearly predicted by existing theories regarding the mechanisms underlying such false memories (e.g., Roediger, Watson, McDermott, & Gallo, 2001). Specifically, asking subjects to attend to phonological relations among lists of phonologically associated words (e.g.,weep, steep, etc.) increased the likelihood of false recall (Experiment 1) and false recognition (Experiment 2) of a related, nonpresented associate (e.g.,sleep), relative to a condition in which subjects attended to meaningful relations among the words. These findings occurred along with a replication of prior findings (i.e., a semantic encoding task, relative to a phonological encoding task, enhanced the likelihood of false memory arising from a list of semantically associated words), and they place important constraints on theoretical explanations of false memory.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anisfeld, M. (1969). False recognition produced by semantic and phonetic relations under two presentation rates.Psychonomic Science,17, 366–367.
Balota, D. A., Black, S. R., &Cheney, M. (1992). Automatic and attentional priming in young and older adults: Reevaluation of the twoprocess model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 485–502.
Collins, A. M., &Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing.Psychological Review,82, 407–428.
Coltheart, V. (1977). Recognition errors after incidental learning as a function of different levels of processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,3, 437–444.
Craik, F. I. M., &Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,11, 671–684.
Davies, G. M., &Cubbage, A. (1976). Attribute coding at different levels of processing.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,28, 653–660.
Deese, J. (1959). On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology,58, 17–22.
Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., Owen, P. D., &Coté, N. C. (1990). Encoding and recall of texts: The importance of material appropriate processing.Journal of Memory & Language,29, 566–581.
Intraub, H., &Nicklos, S. (1985). Levels of processing and picture memory: The physical superiority effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,11, 284–298.
Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., &Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring.Psychological Bulletin,114, 3–28.
McDaniel, M. A., &Einstein, G. O. (1989). Material-appropriate processing: A contextualist approach to reading and studying strategies.Educational Psychology Review,1, 113–145.
McDermott, K. B., &Watson, J. M. (2001). The rise and fall of false recall: The impact of presentation duration.Journal of Memory & Language,45, 160–176.
Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D., &Franks, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,16, 519–533.
Neely, J. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,106, 226–254.
Parkin, A. J. (1983). The relationship between orienting tasks and the structure of memory traces: Evidence from false recognition.British Journal of Psychology,74, 61–69.
Reyna, V. F., &Brainerd, C. J. (1995). Fuzzy trace theory: An interim synthesis.Learning & Individual Differences,7, 1–75.
Rhodes, M. G., &Anastasi, J. S. (2000). The effects of a levels-ofprocessing manipulation on false recall.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,7, 158–162.
Roediger, H. L., III, &McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 803–814.
Roediger, H. L., III,Watson, J. M., McDermott, K. B., &Gallo, D. A. (2001). Factors that determine false recall: A multiple regression analysis.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,8, 385–407.
Schacter, D. L., Verfaellie, M., &Anes, M. D. (1997). Illusory memories in amnesic patients: Conceptual and perceptual false recognition.Neuropsychology,11, 331–342.
Sommers, M. S., &Lewis, B. P. (1999). Who really lives next door: Creating false memories with phonological neighbors.Journal of Memory & Language,40, 83–108.
Thapar, A., &McDermott, K. B. (2001). False recall and false recognition induced by presentation of associated words: Effects of retention interval and level of processing.Memory & Cognition,29, 424–432.
Toglia, M. P., Neuschatz, J. S., &Goodwin, K. A. (1999). Recall accuracy and illusory memories: When more is less.Memory,7, 233–256.
Watson, J. M., Balota, D. A., &Roediger, H. L., III (2003). Creating false memories with hybrid lists of semantic and phonological associates: Over-additive false memories produced by converging associative networks.Journal of Memory & Language,49, 95–118.
Wright, J., Ciccone, D. S., &Brelsford, J. W. (1977). Selective encoding processes in recognition.British Journal of Psychology,68, 289–295.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The work reported in this article was supported by a grant from NIMH to K.B.M. (MH62514R03).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chan, J.C.K., McDermott, K.B., Watson, J.M. et al. The importance of material-processing interactions in inducing false memories. Memory & Cognition 33, 389–395 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193057
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193057