Abstract
It recently has been established within the laboratory that the attentional probe methodology not only can sensitively assess the threat attentional bias associated with anxiety vulnerability, but also can be configured to yield training tasks capable of modifying emotional vulnerability by manipulating such attentional selectivity. In order to appraise and exploit the potential practical applications of such procedures, it is desirable that clinical investigators without specialist equipment should become able to deliver such tasks within field settings. The present research program involved development of a fully customizable attentional probe software package, that delivers assessment and training versions of the probe task across the Internet. Two experimental studies served to validate the assessment and training efficacy of resulting probe task variants, completed remotely by GAD sufferers and nonclinical populations using their own computers. We advise fellow researchers how to freely download this software package for use within their own investigations.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amir, N., Selvina, A., Elias, J., & Rousseau, G. (2002).Manipulation of information processing bias in anxiety: Malleability of attention and interpretation biases. Presented at the 36th Annual Convention of the Association for Advancement of Behavior Therapy, Reno, NV.
Andersson, G., Bergstrom, J., Carlbring, P., &Lindefors, N. (2005). The use of the internet in the treatment of anxiety disorders.Current Opinion in Psychiatry,18, 73–77.
Antony, M. M., Bieling, P. J., Cox, B. J., Enns, M. W., &Swinson, R. P. (1998). Psychometric Properties of the 42-Item and 21-Item Versions of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales in Clinical Groups and a Community Sample.Psychological Assessment,10, 176–181.
Birnbaum, M. H. (2004). Human research and data collection via the internet.Annual Review of Psychology,55, 803–832.
Bradley, B. P., Mogg, K., White, J., Groom, C., &deBono, J. (1999). Attentional bias for emotional faces in generalised anxiety disorder.British Journal of Clinical Psychology,38, 267–278.
Brown, T. A., Chorpita, B. F., &Barlow, D. H. (1998). Structural relationships among dimensions of the DSM-IV anxiety and mood disorders and dimensions of negative affect, positive affect, and autonomic arousal.Journal of Abnormal Psychology,107, 179–192.
Crawford, J. R., &Henry, J. D. (2003). The Depression Anxiety Stress Scales: Normative data and latent structure in a large nonclinical sample.British Journal of Clinical Psychology,42, 111–131.
Devineni, T., &Blanchard, E. B. (2005). A randomized controlled trial of an Internet-based treatment for chronic headache.Behaviour Research & Therapy,43, 277–292.
Kučera, H., &Francis, W. N. (1967).Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
Lovibond, P. F., & Lovibond, S. H. (1993).Manual for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS). Psychology Foundation Monograph.
Lovibond, P. F., &Lovibond, S. H. (1995). The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories.Behaviour Research & Therapy,33, 335–343.
Luce, K. H., Osborne, M. I., Winzelberg, A. J., Das, S., Abascal, Liana, B., et al. (2005). Application of an algorithm-driven protocol to simultaneously provide universal and targeted prevention programs.International Journal of Easting Disorders,37, 220–226.
MacLeod, C., &Mathews, A. (1988). Anxiety and allocation of attention to threat.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,40A, 653–670.
MacLeod, C., Mathews, A., &Tata, P. (1986). Attentional bias in emotional disorders.Journal of Abnormal Psychology,95, 15–20.
MacLeod, C., &Rutherford, E. M. (2004). Information-processing approaches: Assessing the selective functioning of attention, interpretation, and retrieval. In R. G. Heimberg, C. L. Turk, & D. S. Mennin (Eds.),Generalized anxiety disorder: Advances in research and practice. New York: Guilford.
MacLeod, C., Rutherford, E. M., Campbell, L., Ebsworthy, G., &Holker, L. (2002). Selective attention and emotional vulnerability: Assessing the causal basis of their association through the experimental manipulation of attentional bias.Journal of Abnormal Psychology,111, 107–123.
Mathews, A. (2004). On the malleability of emotional encoding.Behaviour Research & Therapy,42, 1019–1036.
Mathews, A., &MacLeod, C. (2002). Induced processing biases have causal effects on anxiety.Cognition & Emotion,16, 331–354.
Mathews, A., &MacLeod, C. (2005). Cognitive approaches to the emotional disorders.Annual Review of Clinical Psychology,1, 167–195.
Mogg, K., &Bradley, B. P. (2005). Attentional bias in generalized anxiety disorder versus depressive disorder.Cognitive Therapy & Research,29, 29–45.
Pineles, S. L., &Mineka, S. (2005). Attentional biases to internal and external sources of potential threat in social anxiety.Journal of Abnormal Psychology,114, 314–318.
Vasey, M. W., Hazen, R., & Schmidt, N. B. (2002).Attentional retraining for chronic worry and GAD. Presented at the 36th Annual Convention of the Association for Advancement of Behavior Therapy, Reno, NV.
Yiend, J., &Mathews, A. (2001). Anxiety and attention to threatening pictures.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,54A, 665–681.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was partly supported by an Australian Research Council grant to C.M. We thank Andrew Mathews for his thoughtful feedback on an earlier draft of this article
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Colin, M., Lih, Y.S., Elizabeth, M.R. et al. Internet-delivered assessment and manipulation of anxiety-linked attentional bias: Validation of a free-access attentional probe software package. Behavior Research Methods 39, 533–538 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193023
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193023