Abstract
Recent research suggests that exemplar models of classification are disconfirmed by the finding of extreme prototype-enhancement effects and steep typicality gradients in a version of the prototype-learning paradigm. We argue that these results are due to learning-during-transfer effects and not to the abstraction of a prototype from the training instances. In the standard version of the paradigm, observers are flooded with multiple presentations of the prototype and its low distortions during transfer. In a modified transfer condition, we instead present multiple instances of an arbitrary high distortion and low distortions of that high distortion. An extreme “high-distortion enhancement effect” is observed. Also, there is a flattening of the typicality gradient associated with the standard patterns (prototype, low distortions, and standard high distortions). The results provide dramatic evidence of the role of learning during transfer in this task and force a reevaluation of the dominant current interpretation of the steep typicality gradient.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ashby, F. G., &Maddox, W. T. (2005). Human category learning.Annual Review of Psychology,56, 149–178.
Bozoki, A., Grossman, M., &Smith, E. E. (2006). Can patients with Alzheimer’s disease learn a category implicitly?Neuropsychologia,44, 816–827.
Busemeyer, J. R., Dewey, G. I., &Medin, D. L. (1984). Evaluation of exemplar-based generalization and the abstraction of categorical information.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,10, 638–648.
Gureckis, T. M., &Love, B. C. (2006). Bridging levels: Using a cognitive model to connect brain and behavior in category learning. In R. Sun (Ed.),Proceedings of the 28th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 315–320). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Heit, E. (1994). Models of the effects of prior knowledge on category learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 1264–1282.
Hintzman, D. L. (1986). “Schema abstraction” in a multiple-trace memory model.Psychological Review,93, 411–428.
Hock, H. S., Tromley, C., &Polmann, L. (1988). Perceptual units in the acquisition of visual categories.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 75–84.
Homa, D., Sterling, S., &Trepel, L. (1981). Limitations of exemplarbased generalization and the abstraction of categorical information.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,7, 418–439.
Homa, D., &Vosburgh, R. (1976). Category breadth and the abstraction of prototypical information.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,2, 322–330.
Ichikawa, S. (1985). Quantitative and structural factors in the judgment of pattern complexity.Perception & Psychophysics,38, 101–109.
Juslin, P., Jones, S., Olsson, H., &Winman, A. (2003). Cue abstraction and exemplar memory in categorization.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,29, 924–941.
Kinder, A., &Shanks, D. R. (2001). Amnesia and the declarative/nondeclarative distinction: A recurrent network model of classification, recognition, and repetition priming.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,13, 648–669.
Knowlton, B. J., &Squire, L. R. (1993). The learning of categories: Parallel brain systems for item memory and category knowledge.Science,262, 1747–1749.
Kolodny, J. A. (1994). Memory processes in classification learning: An investigation of amnesic performance in categorization of dot patterns and artistic styles.Psychological Science,5, 164–169.
Lamberts, K., &Shapiro, L. (2002). Exemplar models and categoryspecific effects. In E. M. E. Forde & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.),Category specificity in brain and mind (pp. 291–314). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
Love, B. C., &Gureckis, T. M. (2007). Models in search of a brain.Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience,7, 90–108.
Medin, D. L., &Schaffer, M. M. (1978). Context theory of classification learning.Psychological Review,85, 207–238.
Nosofsky, R. M. (1986). Attention, similarity, and the identification- categorization relationship.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,115, 39–57.
Nosofsky, R. M., &Zaki, S. R. (1998). Dissociations between categorization and recognition in amnesic and normal individuals: An exemplar-based interpretation.Psychological Science,9, 247–255.
Nosofsky, R. M., &Zaki, S. R. (2002). Exemplar and prototype models revisited: Response strategies, selective attention, and stimulus generalization.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,28, 924–940.
Palmeri, T. J., &Flanery, M. A. (1999). Learning about categories in the absence of training: Profound amnesia and the relationship between perceptual categorization and recognition memory.Psychological Science,10, 526–530.
Palmeri, T. J., &Flanery, M. A. (2002). Memory systems and perceptual categorization. In B. H. Ross (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 41, pp. 141–189). San Diego: Academic Press.
Posner, M. I., Goldsmith, R., &Welton, K. E., Jr. (1967). Perceived distance and the classification of distorted patterns.Journal of Experimental Psychology,73, 28–38.
Posner, M. I., &Keele, S. W. (1968). On the genesis of abstract ideas.Journal of Experimental Psychology,77, 353–363.
Ramsey, J. L., Langlois, J. H., &Marti, N. C. (2005). Infant categorization of faces: Ladies first.Developmental Review,25, 212–246.
Reber, P. J., Stark, C. E., &Squire, L. R. (1998). Contrasting cortical activity associated with category memory and recognition memory.Learning & Memory,5, 420–428.
Reed, J. M., Squire, L. R., Patalano, A. L., Smith, E. E., &Jonides, J. (1999). Learning about categories that are defined by object-like stimuli despite impaired declarative memory.Behavioral Neuroscience,113, 411–419.
Reed, S. K. (1972). Pattern recognition and categorization.Cognitive Psychology,3, 382–407.
Rhodes, G., &Jeffery, L. (2006). Adaptive norm-based coding of facial identity.Vision Research,46, 2977–2987.
Shepard, R. N. (1987). Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science.Science,237, 1317–1323.
Shin, H. J., &Nosofsky, R. M. (1992). Similarity-scaling studies of dot-pattern classification and recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,121, 278–304.
Smith, E. E. (in press). The case for implicit category learning.Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience.
Smith, J. D. (2002). Exemplar theory’s predicted typicality gradient can be tested and disconfirmed.Psychological Science,13, 437–442.
Smith, J. D. (2005). Wanted: A new psychology of exemplars.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,59, 47–53.
Smith, J. D., &Minda, J. P. (2001). Journey to the center of the category: The dissociation in amnesia between categorization and recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 984–1002.
Smith, J. D., &Minda, J. P. (2002). Distinguishing prototype-based and exemplar-based processes in dot-pattern category learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,28, 800–811.
Smith, J. D., Murray, M. J., Jr., &Minda, J. P. (1997). Straight talk about linear separability.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 659–680.
Storms, G. (2004). Exemplar models in the study of natural language concepts. In B. H. Ross (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 1–39). New York: Academic Press.
Strange, W., Keeney, T., Kessel, F., &Jenkins, J. (1970). Abstraction over time of prototypes from distortions of random dot patterns: A replication.Journal of Experimental Psychology,83, 508–510.
Zaki, S. R. (2004). Is categorization performance really intact in amnesia? A meta-analysis.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,11, 1048–1054.
Zaki, S. R., &Nosofsky, R. M. (2001). A single-system interpretation of dissociations between recognition and categorization in a task in volving object-like stimuli.Cognitive. Affective. & Behavioral Neuroscience,1, 344–359.
Zaki, S. R., &Nosofsky, R. M. (2004). False prototype enhancement effects in dot pattern categorization.Memory & Cognition,32, 390–398.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
This research was supported by NIMH Grant R01 MH48494 to Indiana University.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zaki, S.R., Nosofsky, R.M. A high-distortion enhancement effect in the prototype-learning paradigm: Dramatic effects of category learning during test. Mem Cogn 35, 2088–2096 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192940
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192940