Abstract
A central problem of face identification is forming stable representations from entities that vary—both in a rigid and nonrigid manner—over time, under different viewing conditions, and with altering appearances. Three experiments investigated the underlying mechanism that is more flexible than has often been supposed. The experiments used highly familiar faces that were first inspected as configurally manipulated versions. When participants had to select the veridical version (known from TV/media/movies) out of a series of gradually altered versions, their selections were biased toward the previously inspected manipulated versions. This adaptation effect (face identity aftereffect, Leopold, Rhodes, Müller, & Jeffery, 2005) was demonstrated even for a delay of 24h between inspection and test phase. Moreover, the inspection of a specific image version of a famous person not only changed the veridicality decision of the same image, but also transferred to other images of this person as well. Thus, this adaptation effect is apparently not based on simple pictorial grounds, but appears to have a rather structural basis. Importantly, as indicated by Experiment 3, the adaptation effect was not based on a simple averaging mechanism or an episodic memory effect, but on identity-specific information.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baddeley, A. D. (1998).Human memory: Theory and practice (rev. ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Benson, P. J., &Perrett, D. I. (1993). Extracting prototypical facial images from exemplars.Perception,22, 257–262.
Benson, P. J., &Perrett, D. I. (1994). Visual processing of facial distinctiveness.Perception,23, 75–93.
Bower, G. H., Thompson-Schill, S., &Tulving, E. (1994). Reducing retroactive interference: An interference analysis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 51–66.
Bruce, V. (1994). Stability from variation: The case of face recognition.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,47A, 5–28.
Bruce, V., Doyle, T., Dench, N., &Burton, M. (1991). Remembering facial configurations.Cognition,38, 109–144.
Bruce, V., Henderson, Z., Newman, C., &Burton, A. M. (2001). Matching identities of familiar and unfamiliar faces caught on CCTV images.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied,7, 207–218.
Bruce, V., &Young, A. (1986). Understanding face recognition.British Journal of Psychology,77, 305–327.
Carbon, C.-C., &Leder, H. (2005a). Face adaptation: Changing stable representations of familiar faces within minutes?Advances in Cognitive Psychology,1, 1–7.
Carbon, C.-C., &Leder, H. (2005b). When feature information comes first! Early processing of inverted faces.Perception,34, 1117–1134.
Carbon, C.-C., &Leder, H. (2006a). The Mona Lisa effect: Is “our” Lisa fame or fake?Perception,35, 411–414.
Carbon, C.-C., &Leder, H. (2006b). When faces are heads: Viewdependent recognition of faces altered relationally or componentially.Swiss Journal of Psychology,65, 245–252.
Cohen, J. D., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., &Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: A new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,25, 257–271.
Collishaw, S. M., &Hole, G. J. (2000). Featural and configurational processes in the recognition of faces of different familiarity.Perception,29, 893–909.
DiGirolamo, G. J., &Hintzman, D. L. (1997). First impressions are lasting impressions: A primacy effect in memory for repetitions.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 121–124.
Drosopoulos, S., Wagner, U., &Born, J. (2005). Sleep enhances explicit recollection in recognition memory.Learning & Memory,12, 44–51.
Duarte, A., Ranganath, C., Winward, L., Hayward, D., &Knight, R. T. (2004). Dissociable neural correlates for familiarity and recollection during the encoding and retrieval of pictures.Cognitive Brain Research,18, 255–272.
Faulkner, T. F., Rhodes, G., Palermo, R., Pellicano, E., &Ferguson, D. (2002). Recognizing the un-real McCoy: Priming and the modularity of face recognition.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,9, 327–334.
Goldstein, A. G., &Chance, J. E. (1980). Memory for faces and schema theory.Journal of Psychology,105, 47–59.
Hreczko, T. A., &Farkas, L. G. (1994). Norms of the craniofacial asymmetries in North American Caucasians. In L. G. Farkas (Ed.),Anthropometry of the head and face (2nd ed., pp. 359–380). New York: Raven.
Jacoby, L. L., Toth, J. P., &Yonelinas, A. P. (1993). Separating conscious and unconscious influences of memory: Measuring recollection.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,122, 139–154.
Köhler, W., &Wallach, H. (1944). Figural aftereffects: An investigation of visual processes.Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society,88, 269–357.
Leder, H., &Bruce, V. (2000). When inverted faces are recognized: The role of configural information in face recognition.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,53A, 513–536.
Leder, H., &Carbon, C.-C. (2005). When context hinders! Learn-test compatibility in face recognition.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,58A, 235–250.
Leder, H., &Carbon, C.-C. (2006). Face-specific configural processing of relational information.British Journal of Psychology,97, 19–29.
Lee, K., Byatt, G., &Rhodes, G. (2000). Caricature effects, distinctiveness, and identification: Testing the face-space framework.Psychological Science,11, 379–385.
Leopold, D. A., O’Toole, A. J., Vetter, T., &Blanz, V. (2001). Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects.Nature Neuroscience,4, 89–94.
Leopold, D. A., Rhodes, G., Müller, K.-M., &Jeffery, L. (2005). The dynamics of visual adaptation to faces.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B,272, 897–904.
Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence.Psychological Review,87, 252–271.
Miller, J. K., Westerman, D. L., &Lloyd, M. E. (2004). Are first impressions lasting impressions? An exploration of the generality of the primacy effect in memory for repetitions.Memory & Cognition,32, 1305–1315.
Mondloch, C. J., Le Grand, R., &Maurer, D. (2002). Configural face processing develops more slowly than featural face processing.Perception,31, 553–566.
Rajaram, S., &Geraci, L. (2000). Conceptual fluency selectively influences knowing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 1070–1074.
Rhodes, G., Jeffery, L., Watson, T. L., Jaquet, E., Winkler, C., &Clifford, C. W. (2004). Orientation-contingent face aftereffects and implications for face-coding mechanisms.Current Biology,14, 2119–2123.
Rossion, B., Schiltz, C., Robaye, L., Pirenne, D., &Crommelinck, M. (2001). How does the brain discriminate familiar and unfamiliar faces? A PET study of face categorical perception.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,13, 1019–1034.
Schwaninger, A., Carbon, C.-C., &Leder, H. (2003). Expert face processing: Specialization and constraints. In G. Schwarzer & H. Leder (Eds.),The development of face processing (pp. 81–97). Göttingen: Hogrefe & Huber.
Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and semantic memory. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.),Organization of memory (pp. 381–403). New York: Academic Press.
Tulving, E. (1985). How many memory systems are there?American Psychologist,40, 385–398.
Valentine, T., &Bruce, V. (1986a). The effects of distinctiveness in recognising and classifying faces.Perception,15, 525–535.
Valentine, T., &Bruce, V. (1986b). Recognizing familiar faces: The role of distinctiveness and familiarity.Canadian Journal of Psychology,40, 300–305.
Webster, M. A., Kaping, D., Mizokami, Y., &Duhamel, P. (2004). Adaptation to natural facial categories.Nature,428, 557–561.
Webster, M. A., &MacLin, O. H. (1999). Figural aftereffects in the perception of faces.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,6, 647–653.
Westerman, D. L., Lloyd, M. E., &Miller, J. K. (2002). The attribution of perceptual fluency in recognition memory: The role of expectation.Journal of Memory & Language,47, 607–617.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carbon, CC., Strobach, T., Langton, S.R.H. et al. Adaptation effects of highly familiar faces: Immediate and long lasting. Mem Cogn 35, 1966–1976 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192929
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192929