Abstract
It is commonly assumed that as short-term memory tasks become more difficult, a transient phonological trace that supports recall loses its fidelity. Recall can still be achieved through a process calledredintegration, where long-term phonological or lexical knowledge is used to reconstruct the memory trace. In the present research, we explored age-related differences in the redintegration process by having older and younger participants study lists under different levels of task difficulty. As a means of examining the redintegration process, in Experiment 1, semantic similarity was manipulated, and in Experiment 2, phonological similarity was varied. The results show that similarity effects can be accurately predicted from knowledge of task difficulty with item scoring, but not with order scoring. The results support the redintegration perspective and indicate that although there may be differences in the absolute level of recall across age groups, the redintegration process is identical for younger and older participants.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Baddeley, A. D. (1986).Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bopp, K. L., &Verhaeghen, P. (2005). Aging and verbal memory span: A meta-analysis.Journals of Gerontology,60B, 223–233.
Brown, G. D. A., &Hulme, C. (1995). Modeling item length effects in memory span: No rehearsal needed?Journal of Memory & Language,34, 594–621.
Brown, G. D. A., Neath, I., &Chater, N. (2007). A temporal ratio model of memory.Psychological Review,114, 539–576.
Burgess, N., &Hitch, G. J. (1996). A connectionist model of STM for serial order. In S. E. Gathercole (Ed.),Models of short-term memory (pp. 51–71). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
Colom, R., Shih, P. C., Flores-Mendoza, C., &Quiroga, M. A. (2006). The real relationship between short-term memory and working memory.Memory,14, 804–813.
Cowan, N. (1995).Attention and memory: An integrated framework. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cowan, N. (1999). An embedded-process model of working memory. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.),Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 62–101). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Craik, F. I. M., &Byrd, M. (1982). Aging and cognitive deficits: The role of attentional resources. In F. I. M. Craik & S. Trehub (Eds.),Aging and cognitive processes (pp. 191–211). New York: Plenum.
Engle, R. W., Kane, M. J., &Tuholski, S. W. (1999). Individual differences in working memory capacity and what they tell us about controlled attention, general fluid intelligence, and functions of the prefrontal cortex. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.),Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 102–134). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Fallon, A. B., Groves, K., &Tehan, G. (1999). Phonological similarity and trace degradation in the serial recall task: When CAT helps RAT, but not MAN.International Journal of Psychology,34, 301–307.
Hasher, L., &Zacks, H. T. (1988). Working memory, comprehension, and aging: A review and a new view. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 22, pp. 193–225). San Diego: Academic Press.
Henson, R. N. A. (1998). Short-term memory for serial order: The start- end model.Cognitive Psychology,36, 73–137.
Hulme, C., Roodenrys, S., Schweickert, R., Brown, G. D. A., Martin, M., &Stuart, G. (1997). Word frequency effects on short-term memory tasks: Evidence for a redintegration process in immediate serial recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 1217–1232.
Kausler, D. H. (1994).Learning and memory in normal aging. San Diego: Academic Press.
Kramer, A. F., Hahn, S., &Gopher, D. (1999). Task coordination and aging: Explorations of executive control processes in the task switching paradigm.Acta Psychologica,101, 339–378.
Mayr, U., Spieler, D. H., &Kliegel, R. (2001).Aging and executive control. Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
McEvoy, C. L., &Nelson, D. L. (1982). Category name and instance norms for 106 categories of various sizes.American Journal of Psychology,95, 581–634.
Nairne, J. S. (1990). A feature model of immediate memory.Memory & Cognition,18, 251–269.
Nairne, J. S., &Kelley, M. R. (1999). Reversing the phonological similarity effect.Memory & Cognition,27, 45–53.
Neath, I., &Brown, G. D. A. (2006). SIMPLE: Further applications of a local distinctiveness model of memory. In B. H. Ross (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 46, pp. 201–243). San Diego: Academic Press.
Nimmo, L. M., &Roodenrys, S. (2004). Investigating the phonological similarity effect: Syllable structure and the position of common phonemes.Journal of Memory & Language,50, 245–258.
Oberauer, K. (2001). Removing irrelevant information from working memory: A cognitive aging study with the modified Sternberg task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 948–957.
Oberauer, K. (2005a). Binding and inhibition in working memory: Individual and age differences in short-term recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,134, 368–387.
Oberauer, K. (2005b). Control of the contents of working memory—A comparison of two paradigms and two age groups.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,31, 714–728.
Oberauer, K., &Kliegl, R. (2001). Beyond resources: Formal models of complexity effects and age differences in working memory.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,13, 187–215.
Page, M. P. A., &Norris, D. (1998). The primacy model: A new model of immediate serial recall.Psychological Review,105, 761–781.
Poirier, M., &Saint-Aubin, J. (1995). Memory for related and unrelated words: Further evidence of the influence of semantic factors in immediate serial recall.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,48A, 384–404.
Rouleau, N., &Belleville, S. (1996). Irrelevant speech effect in aging: An assessment of inhibitory processes in working memory.Journals of Gerontology,51B, 356–363.
Saint-Aubin, J., &Poirier, M. (1999a). The influence of long-term memory factors on immediate serial recall: An item and order analysis.International Journal of Psychology,34, 347–352.
Saint-Aubin, J., &Poirier, M. (1999b). Semantic similarity and immediate serial recall: Is there a detrimental effect on order information?Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,52A, 367–394.
Salthouse, T. A. (1996). Processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition.Psychological Review,103, 403–428.
Schweikert, R. (1993). A multinomial processing tree model for degradation and redintegration in immediate recall.Memory & Cognition,21, 168–175.
Schweickert, R., Chen, S., &Poirier, M. (1999). Redintegration and the useful lifetime of the verbal memory representation.International Journal of Psychology,34, 447–453.
Surprenant, A. M., Neath, I., &Brown, G. D. A. (2006). Modeling age-related differences in immediate memory using SIMPLE.Journal of Memory & Language,55, 572–586.
Tehan, G., &Humphreys, M. S. (1995). Transient phonemic codes and immunity to proactive interference.Memory & Cognition,23, 181–191.
Tolan, G. A., &Tehan, G. (1999). Determinants of short-term forgetting: Decay, retroactive interference or proactive interference?International Journal of Psychology,34, 285–292.
Walker, I., &Hulme, C. (1999). Concrete words are easier to recall than abstract words: Evidence for a semantic contribution to shortterm serial recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,25, 1256–1271.
Walling, J. R., McEvoy, C. L., Oth, J. E., &Nelson, D. L. (1984).Rhyme category norms. Unpublished manuscript, University of South Florida, Tampa.
Wechsler, D. (2001).WTAR technical manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by a USQ postgraduate scholarship to the first author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Neale, K., Tehan, G. Age and redintegration in immediate memory and their relationship to task difficulty. Mem Cogn 35, 1940–1953 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192927
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192927