Abstract
This study assessed the impact of a conscious imitation goal on phonetic convergence during conversational interaction. Twelve pairs of unacquainted talkers participated in a conversational task designed to elicit between-talker repetitions of the same lexical items. To assess the degree to which the talkers exhibited phonetic convergence during the conversational task, these repetitions were used to elicit perceptual similarity judgments provided by separate sets of listeners. In addition, perceptual measures of phonetic convergence were compared with measures of articulation rates and vowel formants. The sex of the pair of talkers and a talker’s role influenced the degree of phonetic convergence, and perceptual judgments of phonetic convergence were not consistently related to individual acoustic-phonetic attributes. Therefore, even with a conscious imitative goal, situational factors were shown to retain a strong influence on phonetic form in conversational interaction.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, A. H., Bader, M., Bard, E. G., Boyle, E., Doherty, G., Garrod, S., et al. (1991). The HCRC Map Task Corpus.Language & Speech,34, 351–366.
Apple, W., Streeter, L. A., &Krauss, R. M. (1979). Effects of pitch and speech rate on personal attributions.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,37, 715–727. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.5.715
Bard, E. G., Anderson, A. H., Sotillo, C., Aylett, M., Doherty-Sneddon, G., &Newlands, A. (2000). Controlling the intelligibility of referring expressions in dialogue.Journal of Memory & Language,42, 1–22.
Bilous, F. R., &Krauss, R. M. (1988). Dominance and accommodation in the conversational behaviours of same- and mixed-gender dyads.Language & Communication,8, 183–194. doi:10.1016/0271-5309(88)90016-X
Bourhis, R. Y., &Giles, H. (1977). The language of intergroup distinctiveness. In H. Giles (Ed.),Language, ethnicity and intergroup relations (pp. 119–135). London: Academic Press.
Browman, C. P., &Goldstein, L. (1991). Gestural structures: Distinctiveness, phonological processes, and historical change. In I. G. Mattingly & M. Studdert-Kennedy (Eds.),Modularity and the motor theory of speech perception (pp. 313–338). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Brown, B. L., Strong, W. J., &Rencher, A. C. (1974). Fifty-four voices from two: The effects of simultaneous manipulations of rate, mean fundamental frequency, and variance of fundamental frequency on ratings of personality from speech.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,55, 313–318. doi:10.1121/1.1914504
Byrd, D. (1994). Relations of sex and dialect to reduction.Speech Communication,15, 39–54. doi:10.1016/0167-6393(94)90039-6
Clopper, C. G., Conrey, B., &Pisoni, D. B. (2005). Effects of talker gender on dialect categorization.Journal of Language & Social Psychology,24, 182–206. doi:10.1177/0261927X05275741
Delvaux, V., &Soquet, A. (2007). The influence of ambient speech on adult speech productions through unintentional imitation.Phonetica,64, 145–173.
Eckert, P. (2008). Variation and the indexical field.Journal of Sociolinguistics,12, 453–476.
Eckert, P., &McConnell-Ginet, S. (1999). New generalizations and explanations in language and gender research.Language in Society,28, 185–201.
Fowler, C. A., Brown, J. M., Sabadini, L., &Weihing, J. (2003). Rapid access to speech gestures in perception: Evidence from choice and simple response time tasks.Journal of Memory & Language,49, 396–413.
Fowler, C. A., &Housum, J. (1987). Talkers’ signaling of “new” and “old” words in speech and listeners’ perception and use of the distinction.Journal of Memory & Language,26, 489–504. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(87)90136-7
Fowler, C. A., Levy, E., &Brown, J. M. (1997). Reductions of spoken words in certain discourse contexts.Journal of Memory & Language,37, 24–40. doi:10.1006/jmla.1996.2504
Gentilucci, M., &Bernardis, P. (2007). Imitation during phoneme production.Neuropsychologia,45, 608–615.
Giles, H. (1973). Accent mobility: A model and some data.Anthropological Linguistics,15, 87–109.
Giles, H., Coupland, J., &Coupland, N. (Eds.). (1991).Contexts of accommodation: Developments in applied sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goldinger, S. D. (1998). Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access.Psychological Review,105, 251–279.
Gregory, S. W., &Webster, S. (1996). A nonverbal signal in voices of interview partners effectively predicts communication accommodation and social status perceptions.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,70, 1231–1240. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.6.1231
Grosjean, F., &Lane, H. (1976). How the listener integrates the components of speaking rate.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,2, 538–543. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.2.4.538
Jungers, M. K., &Hupp, J. M. (2009). Speech priming: Evidence for rate persistence in unscripted speech.Language & Cognitive Processes,24, 611–624. doi:10.1080/01690960802602241
Kraljic, T., Brennan, S. E., &Samuel, A. G. (2008). Accommodating variation: Dialects, idiolects, and speech processing.Cognition,107, 54–81.
Kraljic, T., Samuel, A. G., &Brennan, S. E. (2008). First impressions and last resorts: How listeners adjust to speaker variability.Psychological Science,19, 332–338.
Labov, W. (1974). Linguistic change as a form of communication. In A. Silverstein (Ed.),Human communication: Theoretical explorations (pp. 221–256). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Labov, W. (1986). Sources of inherent variation in the speech process. In J. S. Perkell & D. H. Klatt (Eds.),Invariance and variability in speech processes (pp. 402–425). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Labov, W. (2006). A sociolinguistic perspective on sociophonetic research.Journal of Phonetics,34, 500–515.
Labov, W., Ash, S., &Boberg, C. (2006).The atlas of North American English: Phonetics, phonology and sound change. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Liberman, A. M. (1996).Speech: A special code. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Miller, J. L., &Grosjean, F. (1981). How the components of speaking rate influence perception of phonetic segments.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,7, 208–215. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.7.1.208
Mitterer, H., &Ernestus, M. (2008). The link between speech perception and production is phonological and abstract: Evidence from the shadowing task.Cognition,109, 168–173. doi:10.1016/ j.cognition.2008.08.002
Namy, L. L., Nygaard, L. C., &Sauerteig, D. (2002). Gender differences in vocal accommodation: The role of perception.Journal of Language & Social Psychology,21, 422–432.
Nearey, T. M. (1989). Static, dynamic, and relational properties in vowel perception.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,85, 2088–2113.
Pardo, J. S. (2006). On phonetic convergence during conversational interaction.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,119, 2382–2393.
Pardo, J. S. (2010). Expressing oneself in conversational interaction. In E. Morsella (Ed.),Expressing oneself/expressing one’s self: Communication, cognition, language, and identity (pp. 183–196). New York: Psychology Press.
Pardo, J. S., &Remez, R. E. (2006). The perception of speech. In M. Traxler & M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.),The handbook of psycholinguistics (2nd ed., pp. 201–248). New York: Academic Press.
Peterson, G. E., &Barney, H. L. (1952). Control methods used in a study of the vowels.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,24, 175–184.
Pickering, M. J., &Garrod, S. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,27, 169–226.
Pickering, M. J., &Garrod, S. (2007). Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension?Trends in Cognitive Sciences,11, 105–110.
Pisoni, D. B., &Tash, J. (1974). Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories.Perception & Psychophysics,15, 285–290.
Putnam, W. B., &Street, R. L., Jr. (1984). The conception and perception of noncontent speech performance: Implications for speech-accommodation theory.International Journal of the Sociology of Language,46, 97–114.
Richardson, M. J., Marsh, K. L., Isenhower, R. W., Goodman, J. R. L., &Schmidt, R. C. (2007). Rocking together: Dynamics of intentional and unintentional interpersonal coordination.Human Movement Science,26, 867–891. doi:10.1016/j.humov.2007.07.002
Rizzolatti, G., &Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system.Annual Review of Neuroscience,27, 169–192.
Schmidt, R. C., Richardson, M. J., Arsenault, C., &Galantucci, B. (2007). Visual tracking and entrainment to an environmental rhythm.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,33, 860–870. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.33.4.860
Shepard, C. A., Giles, H., &Le Poire, B. A. (2001). Communication accommodation theory. In W. P. Robinson & H. Giles (Eds.),The new handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 33–56). New York: Wiley.
Shockley, K., Sabadini, L., &Fowler, C. A. (2004). Imitation in shadowing words.Perception & Psychophysics,66, 422–429.
Street, R. L., Jr. (1984). Speech convergence and speech evaluation in fact-finding interviews.Human Communication Research,11, 139–169.
Thomas, E. R., & Kendall, T. (2007). NORM: The vowel normalization and plotting suite. [Online resource: http://ncslaap.lib.ncsu.edu/ tools/norm/]
Thomas, E. R., Kendall, T., Yeager-Dror, M., &Kretzschmar, W. (2007).Two things sociolinguists should know: Software packages for vowel normalization, and accessing linguistic atlas data. Paper presented at Workshop at New Ways of Analyzing Variation (NWAV) 36. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
Thomson, R., Murachver, T., &Green, J. (2001). Where is the gender in gendered language?Psychological Science,12, 171–175. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00329
Vallabha, G. K., &Tuller, B. (2004). Perceptuomotor bias in the imitation of steady-state vowels.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,116, 1184–1197.
Wilson, M., &Wilson, T. P. (2005). An oscillator model of the timing of turn-taking.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,12, 957–968.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Completion of this project was supported in part by Grant 0545133 from the National Science Foundation to J.S.P. at Barnard College.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pardo, J.S., Jay, I.C. & Krauss, R.M. Conversational role influences speech imitation. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 72, 2254–2264 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196699
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196699