Abstract
How constant is the Weber fraction (WF) for brief time intervals? This question was assessed in three experiments with two base durations (BDs), 0.2 and 1 sec, and with different ways of estimating the WF. In Experiment 1, the psychometric functions were drawn on the basis of 4, 8, or 12 comparison intervals with the shortest to longest duration ranges being kept constant. The results revealed no effect of the number of intervals, but the WF (threshold/BD) was significantly lower at 0.2 sec. In Experiment 2, the comparison intervals were distributed over three duration ranges. There was no range effect, and the WF was generally lower at 0.2 sec than at 1 sec. In Experiment 3, one condition allowed a comparison of the BD with the same range between the shortest and longest comparison intervals. Once again, the WF was lower at 0.2 sec than at 1 sec. Overall, the results reveal (1) that increasing the number of comparison intervals or the duration range does not seem to affect the value of the WF and (2) that the WF is lower at 0.2 sec than at 1 sec, which is inconsistent with the scalar property of some timing models.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bizo, L. A., Chu, J. Y. M., Sanabria, F., & Killeen, P. R. (2006). The failure of Weber’s law in time perception and production. Behavioural Processes, 71, 201–210. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2005.11.006
Buonomano, D. V. (2007). The biology of time across different scales. Nature Chemical Biology, 3, 594–597.
Church, R. M. (2003). A concise introduction to the scalar timing theory. In W. H. Meck (Ed.), Functional and neural mechanisms of interval timing (pp. 3–22). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Church, R. M., & Gibbon, J. (1982). Temporal generalization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 8, 165–186. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.8.2.165
Cobb, P. W. (1932). Weber’s law and Fechnerian muddle. Psychological Review, 39, 533–551. doi:10.1037/h0073327
Ehrlé, N., & Samson, S. (2005). Auditory discrimination of anisochrony: Influence of the tempo and musical backgrounds of listeners. Brain & Cognition, 58, 133–147. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2004.09.014
Ferrara, A., Lejeune, H., & Wearden, J. H. (1997). Changing sensitivity to duration in human scalar timing: An experiment, a review, and some possible explanations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50B, 217–237. doi:10.1080/713932654
Fraisse, P. (1978). Time and rhythm perception. In E. Carterette & M. Friedman (Eds.), Handbook of perception VIII (pp. 203–254). New York: Academic Press.
Getty, D. J. (1975). Discrimination of short temporal intervals: A comparison of two models. Perception & Psychophysics, 18, 1–8.
Gibbon, J. (1977). Scalar expectancy theory and Weber’s law in animal timing. Psychological Review, 84, 279–325.
Gibbon, J. (1991). Origins of scalar timing. Learning & Motivation, 22, 3–38. doi:10.1016/0023-9690(91)90015-Z
Gibbon, J., Church, R. M., & Meck, W. H. (1984). Scalar timing in memory. In J. Gibbon & L. Allen (Eds.), Timing and time perception (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 423, pp. 52–77). New York: New York Academy of Sciences. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1984.tb23417.x
Gilden, D. L., & Marusich, L. R. (2009). Contraction of time in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Neuropsychology, 23, 265–269. doi:10.1037/a0014553
Grondin, S. (2001). From physical time to the first and second moments of psychological time. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 22–44. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.1.22
Grondin, S. (2008). Methods for studying psychological time. In S. Grondin (Ed.), Psychology of time (pp. 51–74). Bingley, U.K.: Emerald Group.
Grondin, S. (2010). Timing and time perception: A review of recent behavioral and neuroscience findings and theoretical directions. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 561–582.
Grondin, S., Bisson, N., & Gagnon, C. (2009). Temporal processing, range effect, and Weber fraction. In M. Elliott & S. Antonijevic (Eds.), Fechner Day 2009: Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Psychophysics (pp. 293–298). Galway, Ireland: International Society for Psychophysics.
Grondin, S., Meilleur-Wells, G., & Lachance, R. (1999). When to start explicit counting in a time-intervals discrimination task: A critical point in the timing process by humans. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 993–1004. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.25.4.993
Halpern, A. R., & Darwin, C. J. (1982). Duration discrimination in a series of rhythmic events. Perception & Psychophysics, 31, 86–89.
Holway, A. H., & Pratt, C. C. (1936). The Weber-ratio for intensive discrimination. Psychological Review, 43, 322–340. doi:10.1037/ h0059748
Ivry, B., & Schlerf, J. (2008). Dedicated and intrinsic models of time perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 273–280. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.04.002
Jantzen, K. J., Steinberg, F. L., & Kelso, J. A. S. (2005). Functional MRI reveals the existence of modality and coordination-dependent timing networks. NeuroImage, 25, 1031–1042.
Johnston, A., Arnold, D. H., & Nishida, S. (2006). Spatially localized distortions of event time. Current Biology, 16, 472–479.
Jones, M. R. (1976). Time, our lost dimension: Toward a new theory of perception, attention, and memory. Psychological Review, 83, 323–355. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.83.5.323
Jones, M. R., & Boltz, M. (1989). Dynamic attending and responses to time. Psychological Review, 96, 459–491. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.96.3.459
Jones, M. R., & McAuley, J. D. (2005). Time judgments in global temporal contexts. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 398–417.
Karmarkar, U. R., & Buonomano, D. V. (2007). Timing in the absence of clocks: Encoding time in neural network states. Neuron, 53, 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.01.006
Killeen, P. R., & Weiss, N. A. (1987). Optimal timing and the Weber function. Psychological Review, 94, 455–468. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.94.4.455
Large, E. W., & Jones, M. R. (1999). The dynamics of attending: How we track time-varying events. Psychological Review, 106, 119–159.
Lavoie, P., & Grondin, S. (2004). Information processing limitations as revealed by temporal discrimination. Brain & Cognition, 54, 198–200. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2004.02.039
Masin, S. (2009). The (Weber’s) law that never was. In M. Elliott & S. Antonijevic (Eds.), Fechner Day 2009: Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Psychophysics (pp. 441–446). Galway, Ireland: International Society for Psychophysics.
McAuley, J. D., & Jones, M. R. (2003). Modeling effects of rhythmic context on perceived duration: A comparison of interval and entrain ment approaches to short-interval timing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 1102–1125. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.29.6.1102
Meck, W. H. (Ed.) (2003). Functional and neural mechanisms of internal timing. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Morgan, M. J., Watamaniuk, S. N. J., & McKee, S. P. (2000). The use of an implicit standard for measuring discrimination thresholds. Vision Research, 40, 2341–2349. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00093-6
Rammsayer, T. H. (2008). Neuropharmacological approaches to human timing. In S. Grondin (Ed.), Psychology of time (pp. 295–320). Bingley, U.K.: Emerald Group.
Wearden, J. H. (2003). Applying the scalar timing model to human time psychology: Progress and challenges. In H. Helfrich (Ed.), Time and mind II (pp. 21–39). Goettingen, Germany: Hogrefe & Huber.
Wearden, J. H., & Ferrara, A. (1995). Stimulus spacing effects in temporal bisection by humans. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48B, 289–310. doi:10.1080/14640749508401454
Wearden, J. H., & Ferrara, A. (1996). Stimulus range effects in temporal bisection by humans. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49B, 24–44. doi:10.1080/713932615
Wearden, J. H., & Grindrod, R. (2003). Manipulating decision processes in the human scalar timing system. Behavioural Processes, 61, 47–56.
Wearden, J. H., & Lejeune, H. (2008). Scalar properties in human timing: Conformity and violations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 569–587. doi:10.1080/17470210701282576
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grondin, S. Unequal Weber fractions for the categorization of brief temporal intervals. Atten Percept Psychophys 72, 1422–1430 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.5.1422
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.5.1422