Abstract
People react more quickly and more accurately to stimuli presented in locations corresponding to the response, as compared with noncorresponding locations, even when stimulus location is irrelevant (Simon effect [SE]). The explanation that SEs are caused by the automatic priming of a corresponding response has been questioned, because of the many exceptions to the effect. We replicated practice-induced and sequential modulations of the SE in two experiments—first, by training participants with blocks of location-relevant stimuli, and second, by mixing location-relevant and location-irrelevant trials. The decrease of the SE with incompatible training was relatively permanent in the blocked experiment, whereas the effect was temporary in the mixed experiment. The difference was caused by a more permanent reversal of the SE after incongruent trials, showing that sequential modulations depend on long-term practice effects. We suggest that there is a formation of a contralateral longterm memory stimulus-response link in blocked conditions and that short-term and long-term memory links are primed by preceding events.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barber, P., & O’Leary, M. (1997). The relevance of salience: Towards an activation account of irrelevant stimulus-response compatibility effects. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.), Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility (pp. 135–172). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Berry, C. J., Shanks, D. R., & Henson, R. N. A. (2008). A singlesystem account of the relationship between priming, recognition, and fluency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 34, 97–111.
Colzato, L. S., Raffone, A., & Hommel, B. (2006). What do we learn from binding features? Evidence for multilevel feature integration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 32, 705–716.
Hommel, B. (1993). The relationship between stimulus processing and response selection in the Simon task: Evidence for a temporal overlap. Psychological Research, 55, 280–290.
Hommel, B., & Prinz, W. (eds.) (1997). Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Hommel, B., Proctor, R., & Vu, K.-P. L. (2004). A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychological Research, 68, 1–17.
Iani, C., Rubichi, S., Gherri, E., & Nicoletti, R. (2009). Co occurrence of sequential and practice effects in the Simon task: Evidence for two independent mechanisms affecting response selection. Memory & Cognition, 37, 358–367.
Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility—A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253–270.
Kornblum, S., & Stevens, G. (2002). Sequential effect of dimensional overlap: Findings and issues. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention and performance XIX (pp. 9–54). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Leuthold, H., & Schröter, H. (2006). Electrophysiological evidence for response priming and conflict regulation in the auditory Simon task. Brain Research, 1097, 167–180.
Logan, G. D. (1980). Attention and automaticity in Stroop and priming tasks: Theory and data. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 523–553.
Logan, G. D., & Zbrodoff, N. J. (1979). When it helps to be misled: Facilitative effects of increasing the frequency of conflicting stimuli in a Stroop-like task. Memory & Cognition, 7, 166–174.
Marble, J. G., & Proctor, R. W. (2000). Mixing location-relevant and location-irrelevant choice-reaction tasks: Influences of location mapping on the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 1515–1533.
Mordkoff, J. T. (1998). The gating of irrelevant information in selectiveattention tasks. Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society, 3, 21.
Notebaert, W., & Soetens, E. (2003). An auditory attention shift primes a corresponding response. Psychological Research, 67, 253–260.
Notebaert, W., Soetens, E., & Melis, A. (2001). Sequential analysis of a Simon task—Evidence for an attention-shift account. Psychological Research, 65, 170–184.
Proctor, R. W., & Lu, C.-H. (1999). Processing irrelevant location information: Practice and transfer effects in choice-reaction tasks. Memory & Cognition, 27, 63–77.
Proctor, R. W., Marble, J. G., & Vu, K.-P. L. (2000). Mixing incompatibly mapped location-relevant trials with location-irrelevant trials: Effects of stimulus mode on the reverse Simon effect. Psychological Research, 64, 11–24.
Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K.-P. L. (2002). Eliminating, magnifying, and reversing spatial compatibility effects with mixed location-relevant trials. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention and performance XIX (pp. 443–473). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Proctor, R. W., Vu, K.-P. L., & Marble, J. G. (2003). Mixing locationrelevant and irrelevant tasks: Spatial compatibility effects eliminated by stimuli that share the same spatial codes. Visual Cognition, 10, 15–50.
Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002a). E-Prime reference guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools.
Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002b). E-Prime user’s guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools.
Simon, J. R. (1990). The effects of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrative perspective (pp. 31–86). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Simon, J. R., & Rudell, A. P. (1967). Auditory S-R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 300–304.
Soetens, E., Boer, L. C., & Hueting, J. E. (1985). Expectancy or automatic facilitation? Separating sequential effects in two-choice reac tion time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 11, 598–616.
Soetens, E., Casaer, S., D’Hooge, R., & Hueting, J. (1995). Effect of amphetamine on long-term retention of verbal material. Psychopharmacology, 119, 155–162.
Stoet, G., & Hommel, B. (1999). Action planning and the temporal binding of response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 1625–1640.
Stoffels, E. J., Van der Molen, M. W., & Keuss, P. G. J. (1989). An additive factor analysis of the effect(s) of location cues associated with auditory stimuli on stages of information processing. Acta Psychologica, 70, 161–197.
Stoffer, T. H., & Yakin, A. R. (1994). The functional role of attention for spatial coding in the Simon effect. Psychological Research, 56, 151–162.
Stürmer, B., Leuthold, H., Soetens, E., Schröter, H., & Sommer, W. (2002). Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 1345–1363.
Tagliabue, M., Zorzi, M., & Umiltà, C. (2002). Cross-modal remapping influences the Simon effect. Memory & Cognition, 30, 18–23.
Tagliabue, M., Zorzi, M., Umiltà, C., & Bassignani, F. (2000). The role of long-term memory and short-term-memory links in the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 648–670.
Ullsperger, M., Bylsma, L. M., & Botvinick, M. M. (2005). The conflict adaptation effect: It’s not just priming. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 5, 467–472.
Valle-Inclán, F., Hackley, S. A., & de Labra, C. (2002). Does stimulus- driven response activation underlie the Simon effect? In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention and performance XIX (pp. 474–493). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Van Duren, L. L., & Sanders, A. F. (1988). On the robustness of the additive factors stage structure in blocked and mixed choice reaction designs. Acta Psychologica, 69, 83–94.
Vu, K.-P. L. (2007). Influences on the Simon effect of prior practice with spatially incompatible mappings: Transfer within and between horizontal and vertical dimensions. Memory & Cognition, 35, 1463–1471.
Vu, K.-P. L., & Proctor, R. W. (2008). Age differences in response selection for pure and mixed stimulus-response mappings and tasks. Acta Psychologica, 129, 49–60.
Vu, K.-P. L., Proctor, R. W., & Urcuioli, P. (2003). Transfer effects of incompatible location-relevant mappings on a subsequent visual or auditory Simon task. Memory & Cognition, 31, 1146–1152.
Wühr, P., & Ansorge, U. (2005). Exploring trial-by-trial modulations of the Simon effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 705–731.
Zorzi, M., & Umiltà, C. (1995). A computational model of the Simon effect. Psychological Research, 58, 193–205.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Soetens, E., Maetens, K. & Zeischka, P. Practice-induced and sequential modulations of the Simon effect. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 72, 895–911 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.4.895
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.4.895