Abstract
To what extent can human observers process visual information that is not currently the focus of attention? We evaluated the extent to which unattended visual information (i.e., that which appears on the neglected side of space in individuals with hemispatial neglect) is perceptually organized and influences the perceptual processing of information on the attended side. To examine this, patients (and matched controls) judged whether successive, complex checkerboard stimuli (targets), presented entirely to their intact side of space, were the same or different. Concurrent with this demanding task, irrelevant distractor elements appeared on the unattended side and either changed or retained their perceptual grouping on successive displays, independently of changes in the ipsilesional task-relevant target. Changes in the grouping of the unattended task-irrelevant distractor elements produced congruency effects on the attended target-change judgment to the same extent in the neglect patients as in the control participants, and this was true even in those patients with severe attentional deficits. These results suggest that some perceptual processes, such as grouping, can operate in the absence of attention.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bahrami, B., Lavie, N., & Rees, G. (2007). Attentional load modulates responses of human primary visual cortex to invisible stimuli. Current Biology, 17, 509–513.
Behrmann, M., Barton, J. J. S., Watt, S., & Black, S. E. (1997). Impaired visual search in patients with unilateral neglect: An oculographic analysis. Neuropsychologia, 35, 1445–1458.
Behrmann, M., Moscovitch, M., Black, S. E., & Mozer, M. (1990). Perceptual and conceptual factors underlying neglect dyslexia: Two contrasting case studies. Brain, 113, 1163–1183.
Berti, A., & Rizzolatti, G. (1992). Is neglect a theoretically coherent unit? Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 4, 111–114.
Biederman, I., Rabinowitz, J. C., Glass, A. L., & Stacy, E. W., Jr. (1974). On the information extracted from a glance at a scene. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103, 597–600.
Boutsen, L., & Humphreys, G. W. (2000). Axis-based grouping reduces visual extinction. Neuropsychologia, 38, 896–905.
Brooks, J. L., Wong, Y., & Robertson, L. C. (2005). Crossing the midline: Reducing attentional deficits via interhemispheric interactions. Neuropsychologia, 43, 572–582.
Cartwright-Finch, U., & Lavie, N. (2007). The role of perceptual load in inattentional blindness. Cognition, 102, 321–340.
Chertkow, H., Bub, D. N., & Seidenberg, M. (1989). Priming and semantic memory loss in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain & Language, 36, 420–446.
Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002). Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 201–215.
Di Russo, F., Aprile, T., Spitoni, G., & Spinelli, D. (2007). Impaired visual processing of contralesional stimuli in neglect patients: A visual- evoked potential study. Brain, 131, 842–854.
Driver, J., Baylis, G. C., & Rafal, R. D. (1992). Preserved figure-ground segregation and symmetry perception in visual neglect. Nature, 360, 73–75.
Driver, J., Davis, G., Russell, C., Turatto, M., & Freeman, E. (2001). Segmentation, attention, and phenomenal visual objects. Cognition, 80, 61–95.
Driver, J., & Halligan, P. W. (1991). Can visual neglect operate in object-centered co-ordinates? An affirmative single-case study. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 8, 475–496.
Enns, J. T., & Kingstone, A. (1995). Access to global and local properties in visual search for compound stimuli. Psychological Science, 6, 283–291.
Esterman, M., McGlinchey-Berroth, R., Alexander, M. P., & Milberg, W. (2002). Triangular backgrounds shift line bisection performance in hemispatial neglect: The critical point. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 8, 721–726.
Farah, M. J., Wallace, M. A., & Vecera, S. P. (1993). “What” and “where” in visual attention: Evidence from the neglect syndrome. In I. H. Robertson & J. C. Marshall (Eds.), Unilateral neglect: Clinical and experimental studies (pp. 123–137). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Friedman-Hill, S. R., Robertson, L. C., Desimone, R., & Ungerleider, L. G. (2003). Posterior parietal cortex and the filtering of distractors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 4263–4268.
Friedrich, F. J., Egly, R., Rafal, R. D., & Beck, D. (1998). Spatial attention deficits in humans: A comparison of superior parietal and temporal-parietal junction lesions. Neuropsychology, 12, 193–207.
Gainotti, G., De Luca, L., Figliozzi, F., & Doricchi, F. (2009). The influence of distracters, stimulus duration and hemianopia on first saccade in patients with unilateral neglect. Cortex, 45, 506–516.
Gilchrist, I. D., Humphreys, G. W., & Riddoch, M. J. (1996). Grouping and extinction: Evidence for low-level modulation of visual selection. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 13, 1223–1256.
Grill-Spector, K., & Kanwisher, N. (2005). Visual recognition: As soon as you know it is there, you know what it is. Psychological Science, 16, 152–160.
Hillis, A. E. (2006). Neurobiology of unilateral spatial neglect. Neuroscientist, 12, 153–163.
Humphreys, G. W., Kyllingsbæk, S., Watson, D. G., Olivers, C. N. L., Law, I., & Paulson, O. B. (2004). Parieto-occipital areas involved in efficient filtering in search: A time course analysis of visual marking using behavioural and functional imaging procedures. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 610–635.
Humphreys, G. W., & Riddoch, M. J. (1994). Attention to withinobject and between-object spatial representations: Multiple sites for visual selection. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 11, 207–241.
Karnath, H.-O., & Fetter, M. (1995). Ocular space exploration in the dark and its relation to subjective and objective body orientation in neglect patients with parietal lesions. Neuropsychologia, 33, 371–377.
Kimchi, R., & Peterson, M. A. (2008). Figure-ground segmentation can occur without attention. Psychological Science, 19, 660–668.
Kimchi, R., & Razpurker-Apfeld, I. (2004). Perceptual grouping and attention: Not all groupings are equal. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 687–696.
Kumada, T., & Humphreys, G. W. (2001). Lexical recovery from extinction: Interactions between visual form and stored knowledge modulate visual selection. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 18, 465–478.
Làdavas, E., Carletti, M., & Gori, G. (1994). Automatic and voluntary orienting of attention in patients with visual neglect: Horizontal and vertical dimensions. Neuropsychologia, 32, 1195–1208.
Làdavas, E., Petronio, A., & Umiltà, C. (1990). The deployment of visual attention in the intact field of hemineglect patients. Cortex, 26, 307–317.
Làdavas, E., Shallice, T., & Zanella, M. T. (1997). Preserved semantic access in neglect dyslexia. Neuropsychologia, 35, 257–270.
Làdavas, E., Umiltà, C., & Mapelli, D. (1997). Lexical and semantic processing in the absence of word reading: Evidence from neglect dyslexia. Neuropsychologia, 35, 1075–1085.
Làdavas, E., Umiltà, C., Ziani, P., Brogi, A., & Minarini, M. (1993). The role of right side objects in left side neglect: A dissociation between perceptual and directional motor neglect. Neuropsychologia, 31, 761–773.
Lamy, D., Segal, H., & Ruderman, L. (2006). Grouping does not require attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 17–31.
Lavie, N. (1995). Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 451–468.
Lavie, N., & Robertson, I. H. (2001). The role of perceptual load in neglect: Rejection of ipsilesional distractors is facilitated with higher central load. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 867–876.
Lavie, N., & Tsal, Y. (1994). Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 183–197.
Li, F. F., VanRullen, R., Koch, C., & Perona, P. (2002). Rapid natural scene categorization in the near absence of attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99, 9596–9601.
Mack, A., & Rock, I. (1998). Inattentional blindness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Mack, A., Tang, B., Tuma, R., Kahn, S., & Rock, I. (1992). Perceptual organization and attention. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 475–501.
Mattingley, J. B., Davis, G., & Driver, J. (1997). Preattentive fillingin of visual surfaces in parietal extinction. Science, 275, 671–674.
McGlinchey-Berroth, R., Milberg, W. P., Verfaellie, M., Alexander, M., & Kilduff, P. T. (1993). Semantic processing in the neglected visual field: Evidence from a lexical decision task. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 10, 79–108.
Merikle, P. M., Smilek, D., & Eastwood, J. D. (2001). Perception without awareness: Perspectives from cognitive psychology. Cognition, 79, 115–134.
Moore, C. M., & Egeth, H. (1997). Perception without attention: Evidence of grouping under conditions of inattention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 339–352.
Moran, J., & Desimone, R. (1985). Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex. Science, 229, 782–784.
Motter, B. C. (1994). Neural correlates of feature selective memory and pop-out in extrastriate area V4. Journal of Neuroscience, 14, 2190–2199.
Mozer, M. C., & Behrmann, M. (1990). On the interaction of selective attention and lexical knowledge: A connectionist account of neglect dyslexia. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2, 96–123.
Parton, A., Malhotra, P., & Husain, M. (2004). Hemispatial neglect. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 75, 13–21.
Phillips, W. A. (1974). On the distinction between sensory storage and short-term visual memory. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 283–290.
Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R., & Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 160–174.
Posner, M. I., Walker, J. A., Friedrich, F. J., & Rafal, R. D. (1984). Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention. Journal of Neuroscience, 4, 1863–1874.
Potter, M. C., & Fox, L. F. (2009). Detecting and remembering simultaneous pictures in a rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 35, 28–38.
Rees, G., Frith, C. D., & Lavie, N. (1997). Modulating irrelevant motion perception by varying attentional load in an unrelated task. Science, 278, 1616–1619.
Rees, G., Wojciulik, E., Clarke, K., Husain, M., Frith, C., & Driver, J. (2000). Unconscious activation of visual cortex in the damaged right hemisphere of a parietal patient with extinction. Brain, 123, 1624–1633.
Reynolds, J. H., Chelazzi, L., & Desimone, R. (1999). Competitive mechanisms subserve attention in macaque areas V2 and V4. Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 1736–1753.
Reynolds, J. H., & Heeger, D. J. (2009). The normalization model of attention. Neuron, 61, 168–185.
Ro, T., & Rafal, R. D. (1996). Perception of geometric illusions in hemispatial neglect. Neuropsychologia, 34, 973–978.
Rorden, C., Mattingley, J. B., Karnath, H.-O., & Driver, J. (1997). Visual extinction and prior entry: Impaired perception of temporal order with intact motion perception after unilateral parietal damage. Neuropsychologia, 35, 421–433.
Russell, C., & Driver, J. (2005). New indirect measures of “inattentive” visual grouping in a change-detection task. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 606–623.
Shomstein, S., & Yantis, S. (2006). Parietal cortex mediates voluntary control of spatial and nonspatial auditory attention. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 435–439.
Torralba, A. (2003). Modeling global scene factors in attention. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 20, 1407–1418.
Vandenberghe, R., Geeraerts, S., Molenberghs, P., Lafosse, C., Vandenbulcke, M., Peeters, K., et al. (2005). Attentional responses to unattended stimuli in human parietal cortex. Brain, 128, 2843–2857.
Vuilleumier, P., Armony, J. L., Clarke, K., Husain, M., Driver, J., & Dolan, R. J. (2002). Neural response to emotional faces with and without awareness: Event-related f MRI in a parietal patient with visual extinction and spatial neglect. Neuropsychologia, 40, 2156–2166.
Vuilleumier, P., Sagiv, N., Hazeltine, E., Poldrack, R. A., Swick, D., Rafal, R. D., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2001). Neural fate of seen and unseen faces in visuospatial neglect: A combined eventrelated functional MRI and event-related potential study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98, 3495–3500.
Walker, S., Stafford, P., & Davis, G. (2008). Ultra-rapid categorization requires visual attention: Scenes with multiple foreground objects. Journal of Vision, 8(4, Art. 21), 1–12.
Wilson, B. A., Cockburn, J., & Halligan, P. W. (1987). Behavioural Inattention Test. Bury St. Edmunds: Thames Valley Test Co.
Wolfe, J. M., Horowitz, T. S., & Michod, K. O. (2007). Is visual attention required for robust picture memory? Vision Research, 47, 955–964.
Yantis, S., Schwarzbach, J., Serences, J. T., Carlson, R. L., Steinmetz, M. A., Pekar, J. J., & Courtney, S. M. (2002). Transient neural activity in human parietal cortex during spatial attention shifts. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 995–1002.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported by National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Grant No. NS07391-09 to S.S. and National Institute of Mental Health Grant No. MH54246 to M.B.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shomstein, S., Kimchi, R., Hammer, M. et al. Perceptual grouping operates independently of attentional selection: Evidence from hemispatial neglect. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 72, 607–618 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.3.607
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.3.607