Abstract
Perceptual grouping is usually defined by principles that associate distinct elements by virtue of image properties, such as proximity, similarity, and occurrence within common regions. What role does learning play in forming a perceptual group? This study provides evidence that learning of shape associations leads to perceptual grouping. Subjects were repeatedly exposed to pairs of unique shapes that co-occurred within a common region. The common region cue was later removed in displays composed of these shapes, and the subjects searched the display for two adjacent shapes of the same color. The subjects were faster at locating the color repetition when the adjacent shapes with the same color came from the same trained groups than when they were composed of two shapes from different trained groups. The effects were perceptual in nature: Learned pairings produced spatial distortions similar to those observed for groups defined by perceptual similarity. A residual grouping effect was observed even when the shapes in the trained group switched their relative positions but was eliminated when each shape was inverted. These results indicate that statistical co-occurrence with explicit grouping cues may form an important component of perceptual organization, determining perceived scene structure solely on the basis of past experience.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beck, D. M., & Palmer, S. E. (2002). Top-down influences on perceptual grouping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 1071–1084. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.28.5.1071
Brady, M. J., & Kersten, D. (2003). Bootstrapped learning of novel objects. Journal of Vision, 3, 413–422. doi:10.1167/3.6.2
Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1998). Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory for visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 28–71. doi:10.1006/cogp.1998.0681
Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1999). Top-down attentional guidance based on implicit learning of visual covariation. Psychological Science, 10, 360–365. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00168
Coren, S., & Girgus, J. S. (1980). Principles of perceptual organization and spatial distortion: The gestalt illusions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 6, 404–412. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.6.3.404
Dodd, M. D., & Pratt, J. (2005). Allocating visual attention to grouped objects. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17, 481–497. doi:10.1080/09541440440000122
Esterman, M., Prinzmetal, W., & Robertson, L. (2004). Categorization influences illusory conjunctions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 681–686.
Fiser, J., & Aslin, R. N. (2001). Unsupervised statistical learning of higher-order spatial structures from visual scenes. Psychological Science, 12, 499–504. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00392
Gottschaldt, K. (1926). Über den Einfluss der Erfahrung auf die Wahrnehmung von Figuren. Psychologische Forschung, 8, 1–87.
Ivry, R. B., & Prinzmetal, W. (1991). Effect of feature similarity on illusory conjunctions. Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 105–116.
Jolicoeur, P. (1985). The time to name disoriented natural objects. Memory & Cognition, 13, 289–303.
Kimchi, R., & Hadad, B. S. (2002). Influence of past experience on perceptual grouping. Psychological Science, 13, 41–47. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00407
Kubovy, M., & Wagemans, J. (1995). Grouping by proximity and multistability in dot lattices: A quantitative Gestalt theory. Psychological Science, 6, 225–234. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00597.x
Marino, A. C., & Scholl, B. J. (2005). The role of closure in defining the “objects” of object-based attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 1140–1149.
Marr, D. (1982). Vision. San Francisco: Freeman.
Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Palmer, S. E. (1992). Common region: A new principle of perceptual grouping. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 436–447. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(92)90014-S
Palmer, S. E., & Beck, D. M. (2007). The repetition discrimination task: An objective method for studying perceptual grouping. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 68–78.
Palmer, S. E., & Rock, I. (1994). Rethinking perceptual organization: The role of uniform connectedness. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 29–55.
Peterson, M. A., & Gibson, B. S. (1994). Must figure—ground organization precede object recognition? An assumption in peril. Psychological Science, 5, 253–259.
Peterson, M. A., Harvey, E. M., & Weidenbacher, H. J. (1991). Shape-recognition contributions to figure—ground reversal: Which route counts? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 1075–1089. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00622.x
Prinzmetal, W., & Keysar, B. (1989). A functional theory of illusory conjunctions and neon colors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 165–190. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.118.2.165
Prinzmetal, W., & Millis-Wright, M. (1984). Cognitive and linguistic factors affect visual feature integration. Cognitive Psychology, 16, 305–340. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(84)90012-4
Prinzmetal, W., Treiman, R., & Rho, S. H. (1986). How to see a reading unit. Journal of Memory & Language, 25, 461–475. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(86)90038-0
Roelfsema, P. R. (2006). Cortical algorithms for perceptual grouping. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 29, 203–227. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.112939
Treisman, A. (1982). Perceptual grouping and attention in visual search for features and for objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 8, 194–214. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.8.2.194
Treisman, A., & Schmidt, H. (1982). Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 107–141. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(82)90006-8
Turk-Browne, N. B., Jungé, J. A., & Scholl, B. J. (2005). The automaticity of visual statistical learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 552–564. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.134.4.552
Ullman, S. (2007). Object recognition and segmentation by a fragment-based hierarchy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 58–64. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.009
Vickery, T. J. (2008). Induced perceptual grouping. Psychological Science, 19, 693–701. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02144.x
Vickery, T. J., & Jiang, Y. V. (2009). How associative groups are and are not formed. Manuscript in preparation.
Wertheimer, M. (1923). Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt. II. Psychologische Forschung, 4, 301-350. [Partial translation in W. D. Ellis (Ed.) (1950). A sourcebook of Gestalt psychology (pp. 71–81). New York: Humanities Press]
Yin, R. K. (1969). Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 141–145. doi:10.1037/h0027474
Zemel, R. S., Behrmann, M., Mozer, M. C., & Bavelier, D. (2002). Experience-dependent perceptual grouping and object-based attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 202–217. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.28.1.202
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was funded by a grant from Harvard University’s Ditmar Fund to T.J.V.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vickery, T.J., Jiang, Y.V. Associative grouping: Perceptual grouping of shapes by association. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 71, 896–909 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.71.4.896
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.71.4.896