Abstract
Natural images can be classified so rapidly that it has been suggested that their analysis is based on a first single pass of processing activity through the visuomotor system. We tested this theory in a visuomotor priming task in which speeded pointing responses were performed toward one of two target images containing a prespecified stimulus (e.g., animal vs. nonanimal, ellipse vs. rectangle). Target pictures were preceded by prime pictures of the same or an opposite category, linked to either the same or an opposite pointing response. We found that pointing trajectories were initially controlled by the primes alone, but independently of information in the actual targets. Our data indicate that prime and target signals remained strictly sequential throughout all processing stages, meeting unprecedentedly stringent behavioral criteria for feedforward processing (rapid-chase criteria). Our findings suggest that visuomotor priming effects capture the output of the very first pass of information through the visuomotor system, before output is affected by recurrent information.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bacon-Macé, N., Kirchner, H., Fabre-Thorpe, M., & Thorpe, S. J. (2007). Effects of task requirements on rapid natural scene processing: From common sensory encoding to distinct decisional mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 33, 1013–1026. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.33.5.1013
Bacon-Macé, N., Macé, M. J.-M., Fabre-Thorpe, M., & Thorpe, S. J. (2005). The time course of visual processing: Backward masking and natural scene categorisation. Vision Research, 45, 1459–1469. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2005.01.004
Bakeman, R., & McArthur, D. (1996). Picturing repeated measures: Comments on Loftus, Morrison, and others. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 584–589.
Bullier, J. (2001). Integrated model of visual processing. Brain Research Reviews, 36, 96–107. doi:10.1016/S0165-0173%2801%2900085-6
Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Le Clec’H, G., Koechlin, E., Mueller, M., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., et al. (1998). Imaging unconscious semantic priming. Nature, 395, 597–600. doi:10.1038/26967
DiLollo, V., Enns, J. T., & Rensink, R. A. (2000). Competition for consciousness among visual events: The psychophysics of reentrant visual processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 481–507. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.129.4.481
Eimer, M., & Schlaghecken, F. (1998). Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 1737–1745. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.24.6.1737
Evans, K. K., & Treisman, A. (2005). Perception of objects in natural scenes: Is it really attention-free? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 31, 1476–1492. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.31.6.1476
Fahrenfort, J. J., Scholte, H. S., & Lamme, V. A. F. (2007). Masking disrupts reentrant processing in human visual cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1488–1497. doi:10.1162/jocn.2007.19.9.1488
Geusebroek, J. M., Burghouts, G. J., & Smeulders, A. W. M. (2005). The Amsterdam library of object images. International Journal of Computer Vision, 61, 103–112. doi:10.1023/B:VISI.0000042993.50813.60
Hegdé, J. (2008). Time course of visual perception: Coarse-to-fine processing and beyond. Progress in Neurobiology, 84, 405–439. doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2007.09.001
JaŚkowski, P., & Ślósarek, M. (2007). How important is a prime’s gestalt for subliminal priming? Consciousness & Cognition, 16, 485–497. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2006.06.005
Kirchner, H., & Thorpe, S. J. (2006). Ultra-rapid object detection with saccadic eye movements: Visual processing speed revisited. Vision Research, 46, 1762–1776. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2005.10.002
Lamme, V. A. F. (2002). Neural mechanisms of visual awareness: A linking proposition. Brain & Mind, 1, 385–406. doi:10.1023/A:1011569019782
Lamme, V. A. F., Rodriguez-Rodriguez, V., & Spekreijse, H. (1999). Separate processing dynamics for texture elements, boundaries and surfaces in primary visual cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 9, 406–413. doi:10.1093/cercor/9.4.406
Lamme, V. A. F., & Roelfsema, P. R. (2000). The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing. Trends in Neurosciences, 23, 571–579. doi:10.1016/S0166-2236(00)01657-X
Lamme, V. A. F., Zipser, K., & Spekreijse, H. (2002). Masking interrupts figure-ground signals in V1. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 1044–1053. doi:10.1162/089892902320474490
Lleras, A., & Enns, J. T. (2004). Negative compatibility or object updating? A cautionary tale of mask-dependent priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 475–493. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.133.4.475
Merigan, W. H., & Maunsell, J. H. R. (1993). How parallel are the primate visual pathways? Annual Review of Neuroscience, 16, 369–402. doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.16.030193.002101
Neumann, O. (1990). Direct parameter specification and the concept of perception. Psychological Research, 52, 207–215. doi:10.1007/BF00877529
Neumann, O., & Klotz, W. (1994). Motor responses to nonreportable, masked stimuli: Where is the limit of direct parameter specification? In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 124–150). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pascual-Leone, A., & Walsh, V. (2001). Fast backprojections from the motion to the primary visual area necessary for visual awareness. Science, 292, 510–512. doi:10.1126/science.1057099
Ro, T., Breitmeyer, B., Burton, P., Singhal, N. S., & Lane, D. (2003). Feedback contributions to visual awareness in human occipital cortex. Current Biology, 11, 1038–1041. doi:10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00337-3
Roelfsema, P. R., Tolboom, M., & Khayat, P. S. (2007). Different processing phases for features, figures, and selective attention in primary visual cortex. Neuron, 56, 785–792. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.10.006
Rousselet, G. A., Macé, M. J.-M., & Fabre-Thorpe, M. (2003). Is it an animal? Is it a human face? Fast processing in upright and inverted natural scenes. Journal of Vision, 3, 440–455. doi:10.1167/3.6.5
Schmidt, T. (2002). The finger in flight: Real-time motor control by visually masked color stimuli. Psychological Science, 13, 112–118. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00421
Schmidt, T., Niehaus, S., & Nagel, A. (2006). Primes and targets in rapid chases: Tracing sequential waves of motor activation. Behavioral Neuroscience, 120, 1005–1016. doi:10.1037/0735-7044.120.5.1005
Schmidt, T., & Seydell, A. (2008). Visual attention amplifies response priming of pointing movements to color targets. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 443–455. doi:10.3758/PP.70.3.443
Schmidt, T., & Vorberg, D. (2006). Criteria for unconscious cognition: Three types of dissociation. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 489–504.
Serre, T., Oliva, A., & Poggio, T. (2007). A feedforward architecture accounts for rapid categorization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 6424–6429. doi:10.1073/pnas.0700622104
Thorpe, S. J., Fize, D., & Marlot, C. (1996). Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature, 381, 520–522. doi:10.1038/381520a0
Tong, F. (2003). Primary visual cortex and visual awareness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 219–229. doi:10.1038/nrn1055
Ulrich, R., & Miller, J. (2001). Using the jackknife-based scoring method for measuring LRP onset effects in factorial designs. Psychophysiology, 38, 816–827. doi:10.1111/1469-8986.3850816
VanRullen, R., Delorme, A., & Thorpe, S. J. (2001). Feed-forward contour integration in primary visual cortex based on asynchronous spike propagation. Neurocomputing, 38–40, 1003–1009.
VanRullen, R., Gautrais, J., Delorme, A., & Thorpe, S. J. (1998). Face processing using one spike per neuron. Biological Systems, 48, 229–239. doi:10.1016/S0303-2647(98)00070-7
VanRullen, R., & Koch, C. (2003). Visual selective behaviour can be triggered by a feed-forward process. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 209–217. doi:10.1162/089892903321208141
VanRullen, R., & Thorpe, S. J. (2001). Is it a bird? Is it a plane? Ultra-rapid visual categorisation of natural and artifactual objects. Perception, 30, 655–668. doi:10.1068/p3029
VanRullen, R., & Thorpe, S. J. (2002). Surfing a spike wave down the ventral stream. Vision Research, 42, 2593–2615. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00298-5
Vath, N., & Schmidt, T. (2007). Tracing sequential waves of rapid visuomotor activation in lateralized readiness potentials. Neuroscience, 145, 197–208. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.11.044
Velleman, P. F. (1980). Definition and comparison of robust nonlinear data smoothing algorithms. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 75, 609–615.
Verleger, R., JaŚkowski, P., Aydemir, A., van der Lubbe, R., & Groen, M. (2004). Qualitative differences between conscious and nonconscious processing? On inverse priming induced by masked arrows. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 494–515. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.133.4.494
Vorberg, D., Mattler, U., Heinecke, A., Schmidt, T., & Schwarzbach, J. (2003). Different time courses for visual perception and action priming. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 6275–6280. doi:10.1073/pnas.0931489100
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by the German Research Foundation, Grant Schm1671/1 to T.S.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schmidt, T., Schmidt, F. Processing of natural images is feedforward: A simple behavioral test. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 71, 594–606 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.71.3.594
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.71.3.594