Abstract
If an irrelevant visual event, such as a nonpredictive cue, is presented prior to a target, performance is impaired when the target appears at the cued location relative to when it is presented at an uncued location. This phenomenon, referred to as inhibition of return, can be found at multiple spatial locations when each is cued in succession. The present study examined the effect of successively cuing the same spatial location. Results suggested that additional inhibition occurred when more than one cue appeared at a single location at longer intercue intervals, but not at shorter intervals. These findings suggest that total inhibition to respond to targets at a spatial location reflects a summation of facilitatory and inhibitory factors generated by the presentation of each cue.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrams, R. A., & Pratt, J. (1996). Spatially diffuse inhibition affects multiple locations: A reply to Tipper, Weaver, and Watson (1996). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 1294–1298.
Birmingham, E., & Pratt, J. (2005). Examining inhibition of return with onset and offset cues in the multiple-cuing paradigm. Acta Psychologica, 118, 101–121.
Brodeur, D. A., & Enns, J. T. (1997). Covert visual orienting across the life span. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51, 20–35.
Chica, A. B., Lupiáñez, J., & Bartolomeo, P. (2006). Dissociating inhibition of return from endogenous orienting of spatial attention: Evidence from detection and discrimination tasks. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23, 1015–1034.
Coward, R. S., Poliakoff, E., O’Boyle, D. J., & Lowe, C. (2004). The contribution of nonocular response inhibition to visual inhibition of return. Experimental Brain Research, 155, 124–128.
Danziger, S., & Kingstone, A. (1999). Unmasking the inhibition of return phenomenon. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1024–1037.
Danziger, S., Kingstone, A., & Snyder, J. J. (1998). Inhibition of return to successively stimulated locations in a sequential visual search paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 1467–1475.
Dodd, M. D., Castel, A. D., & Pratt, J. (2003). Inhibition of return with rapid serial shifts of attention: Implications for memory and visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 1126–1135.
Fernandez-Duque, D., & Posner, M. I. (1997). Relating the mechanisms of orienting and alerting. Neuropsychologia, 35, 477–486.
Gellatly, A., Cole, G., Fox, C., & Johnson, M. (2003). Response inhibition can affect reaction time to abrupt-onset visual displays. Perception, 32, 1377–1391.
Handy, T. C., Jha, A. P., & Mangun, G. R. (1999). Promoting novelty in vision: Inhibition of return modulates perceptual-level processing. Psychological Science, 10, 157–161.
Harvey, N. (1980). Non-informative effects of stimuli functioning as cues. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 413–425.
Hunt, A. R., & Kingstone, A. (2003). Inhibition of return: Dissociating attentional and oculomotor components. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 1068–1074.
Ivanoff, J., & Klein, R. M. (2001). The presence of a nonresponding effector increases inhibition of return. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 307–314.
Jonides, J., & Irwin, D. E. (1981). Capturing attention. Cognition, 10, 145–150.
Klein, R. M. (1988). Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search. Nature, 334, 430–431.
Klein, R. M. (2000). Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 138–147.
Klein, R. M., & MacInnes, W. J. (1999). Inhibition of return is a foraging facilitator in visual search. Psychological Science, 10, 790–801.
Lupiáñez, J., Milliken, B., Solano, C., Weaver, B., & Tipper, S. P. (2001). On the strategic modulation of the time course of facilitation and inhibition of return. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 753–773.
MacPherson, A. C., Klein, R. M., & Moore, C. (2003). Inhibition of return in children and adolescents. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 85, 337–351.
Masson, M. E. J., & Loftus, G. R. (2003). Using confidence intervals for graphically based data interpretation. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 203–220.
Maylor, E. A., & Hockey, R. (1987). Effects of repetition on the facilitatory and inhibitory components of orienting in visual space. Neuropsychologia, 25, 41–54.
Nakayama, K., & Mackeben, M. (1989). Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention. Vision Research, 29, 1631–1647.
Ogawa, H., Takeda, Y., & Yagi, A. (2002). Inhibitory tagging on randomly moving objects. Psychological Science, 13, 125–129.
Paul, M. A., & Tipper, S. P. (2003). Object-based representations facilitate memory for inhibitory processes. Experimental Brain Research, 148, 283–289.
Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3–25.
Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531–556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Pratt, J., & Abrams, R. A. (1995). Inhibition of return to successively cued spatial locations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 1343–1353.
Pratt, J., & Chasteen, A. L. (2007). Examining inhibition of return with multiple sequential cues in younger and older adults. Psychology & Aging, 22, 404–409.
Prime, D. J., Visser, T. A. W., & Ward, L. M. (2006). Reorienting attention and inhibition of return. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 1310–1323.
Rafal, R. D., Calabresi, P. A., Brennan, C. W., & Sciolto, T. K. (1989). Saccade preparation inhibits reorienting to recently attended locations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 673–685.
Riggio, L., Bello, A., & Umiltà, C. (1998). Inhibitory and facilitatory effects of cue onset and offset. Psychological Research, 61, 107–118.
Snyder, J. J., & Kingstone, A. (2000). Inhibition of return and visual search: How many separate loci are inhibited? Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 452–458.
Snyder, J. J., & Kingstone, A. (2001). Inhibition of return at multiple locations in visual search: When you see it and when you don’t. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 1221–1237.
Snyder, J. J., & Kingstone, A. (2007). Inhibition of return at multiple locations and its impact on visual search. Visual Cognition, 15, 238–256.
Tassinari, G., Aglioti, S., Chelazzi, L., Peru, A., & Berlucchi, G. (1994). Do peripheral noninformative cues induce early facilitation of target detection? Vision Research, 34, 179–189.
Tipper, S., Weaver, B., & Watson, F. (1996). Inhibition of return to successively cued spatial locations: Commentary on Pratt and Abrams (1995). tJournal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 1289–1293.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was sponsored by a research grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Visser, T.A.W., Barnes, D. The impact of multiple irrelevant visual events at the same spatial location on inhibition. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 71, 392–402 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.71.2.392
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.71.2.392