Abstract
Four experiments are reported that test a multistream model of visual word recognition, which associates letter-level and word-level processing channels with three known visual processing streams isolated in macaque monkeys: the magno-dominated (MD) stream, the interblob-dominated (ID) stream, and the blob-dominated (BD) stream (Van Essen & Anderson, 1995). We show that mixing the color of adjacent letters of words does not result in facilitation of response times or error rates when the spatial-frequency pattern of a whole word is familiar. However, facilitation does occur when the spatial-frequency pattern of a whole word is not familiar. This pattern of results is not due to different luminance levels across the different-colored stimuli and the background because isoluminant displays were used. Also, the mixed-case, mixed-hue facilitation occurred when different display distances were used (Experiments 2 and 3), so this suggests that image normalization can adjust independently of object size differences. Finally, we show that this effect persists in both spaced and unspaced conditions (Experiment 4)—suggesting that inappropriate letter grouping by hue cannot account for these results. These data support a model of visual word recognition in which lower spatial frequencies are processed first in the more rapid MD stream. The slower ID and BD streams may process some lower spatial frequency information in addition to processing higher spatial frequency information, but these channels tend to lose the processing race to recognition unless the letter string is unfamiliar to the MD stream—as with mixed-case presentation.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, M. J. (1979). Models of word recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 133–176.
Allen, P. A., & Emerson, P. L. (1991). Holism revisited: Evidence for parallel independent word-level and letter-level processors during word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 489–511.
Allen, P. A., & Madden, D. J. (1990). Evidence for a parallel input serial analysis model of word processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 48–64.
Allen, P. A., Madden, D. J., Weber, T. A., & Groth, K. E. (1993). Influence of age and processing stage on visual word recognition. Psychology & Aging, 8, 274–282.
Allen, P. A., Smith, A. F., Groth, K. E., Pickle, J. L., Grabbe, J. W., & Madden, D. J. (2002). Differential age effects for case and hue mixing in visual word recognition. Psychology & Aging, 17, 622–635.
Allen, P. A., Smith, A. F., Lien, M.-C., Grabbe, J., & Murphy, M. D. (2005). Evidence for an activation locus of the word-frequency effect in lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 31, 713–721.
Allen, P. A., Smith, A. F., Lien, M.-C., Weber, T. A., & Madden, D. J. (1997). Word frequency effects at brief exposure durations: Comment on Paap and Johansen (1994). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 1792–1797.
Allen, P. A., Wallace, B., & Weber, T. A. (1995). Influence of case type, word frequency, and exposure duration on visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 914–934.
Balota, D. A., & Spieler, D. H. (1998). The utility of item-level analyses in model evaluation: A reply to Seidenberg and Plaut. Psychological Science, 9, 238–240.
Bar, M. (2004). Visual objects in context. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 617–629.
Bar, M., Kassam, K. S., Ghuman, A. S., Boshyan, J., Schmid, A. M., Dale, A. M., et al. (2006). Top-down facilitation of visual recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 449–454.
Bush, A. L. H., Allen, P. A., Kaut, K. P., & Ogrocki, P. K. (2007). Influence of mild cognitive impairment on visual word recognition. Aging, Neuropsychology, & Cognition, 14, 329–352.
Carr, T. H., & Pollatsek, A. (1985). Recognizing printed words: A look at current models. In D. Besner, T. G. Waller, & G. E. MacKinnon (Eds.), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice (Vol. 5, pp. 1–82). San Diego: Academic Press.
Cattell, J. M. (1886). The time taken up by cerebral operations. Mind, 11, 220–242.
Coltheart, M., & Freeman, R. (1974). Case alternation impairs word identification. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 3, 102–104.
Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204–256.
De Valois, R. L., & De Valois, K. K. (1990). Spatial vision. New York: Oxford University Press.
Dobkins, K. R., Gunther, K. L., & Peterzell, D. H. (2000). What covariance mechanisms underlie green/red equiluminance, luminance contrast sensitivity and chromatic (green/red) contrast sensitivity? Vision Research, 40,613–6288.
Gervais, M. J., Harvey, L. O., Jr., & Roberts, J. O. (1984). Identification confusions among letters of the alphabet. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 10, 655–666.
Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518–565.
Healy, A. F. (1976). Detection errors on the word the: Evidence for reading units larger than letters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 2, 235–242.
Humphreys, G. W., Mayall, K., & Cooper, A. C. G. (2003). The PIG in sPrInG: Evidence on letter grouping from the reading of buried words. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 939–946.
Jordan, T. R. (1990). Presenting words without interior letters: Superiority over single letters and influence of postmask boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 893–909.
Jordan, T. R. (1995). Perceiving exterior letters of words: Differential influences of letter-fragment and non-letter-fragment masks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 512–530.
Jordan, T. R., & Bevan, K. M. (1994). Word superiority over isolated letters: The neglected case of forward masking. Memory & Cognition, 22, 133–144.
Jordan, T. R., & Bevan, K. M. (1996). Position-specific masking and the word—letter phenomenon: Reexamining the evidence from the Reicher—Wheeler paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 1416–1433.
Jordan, T. R., Sherman, S. M., & Tonkin, R. P. (2007). Constructing isoluminant stimuli for word recognition research: A precautionary study. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 494–501.
Jordan, T. R., Thomas, S. M., Patching, G. R., & Scott-Brown, K. C. (2003). Assessing the importance of letter pairs in initial, exterior, and interior positions in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 883–893.
Kelly, D. H. (1979). Motion and vision: II. Stabilized spatio-temporal threshold surface. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 69, 1340–1349.
Kučera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of presentday American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
Kveraga, K., Boshyan, J., & Bar, M. (2007). Magnocellular projections as the trigger of top-down facilitation in recognition. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 13232–13240.
Legge, G. E., Pelli, D. G., Rubin, G. S., & Schleske, M. M. (1985). Psychophysics of reading: I. Normal vision. Vision Research, 25, 239–252.
Lehmkuhle, S., Garzia, R. P., Turner, L., Hash, T., & Baro, J. A. (1993). A defective visual pathway in children with reading disability. New England Journal of Medicine, 328, 989–996.
Li, F. F., VanRullen, R., Koch, C., & Perona, P. (2002). Rapid natural scene categorization in the near absence of attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99, 9596–9601.
Livingstone, M. S., & Hubel, D. H. (1987). Psychophysical evidence for separate channels for the perception of form, color, movement, and depth. Journal of Neuroscience, 7, 3416–3468.
Madden, D. J., Turkington, T. G., Coleman, R. E., Provenzale, J. M., DeGrado, T. R., & Hoffman, J. M. (1996). Adult age differences in regional cerebral blood flow during visual word identification: Evidence from H 152 O PET. NeuroImage, 3, 127–142.
Mayall, K., & Humphreys, G. W. (1996). Case mixing and the task-sensitive disruption of lexical processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 278–294.
Mayall, K., Humphreys, G. W., Mechelli, A., Olson, A., & Price, C. J. (2001). The effects of case mixing on word recognition: Evidence from a PET study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 844–853.
Mayall, K., Humphreys, G. W., & Olson, A. (1997). Disruption to word or letter processing? The origins of case-mixing effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 1275–1286.
McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375–407.
Merigan, W. H., Byrne, C. E., & Maunsell, J. H. R. (1991). Does primate motion perception depend on the magnocellular pathway? Journal of Neuroscience, 11, 3422–3429.
Merigan, W. H., & Maunsell, J. H. R. (1993). How parallel are the primate visual pathways? Annual Review of Neuroscience, 16, 369–402.
O’Brien, B. A., Mansfield, J. S., & Legge, G. E. (2000). The effect of contrast on reading speed in dyslexia. Vision Research, 40, 1921–1935.
Orban, G. A., Van Essen, D. [C.], & Vanduffel, W. (2004). Comparative mapping of higher visual areas in monkeys and humans. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 315–324.
Parish, D. H., & Sperling, G. (1991). Object spatial frequencies, retinal spatial frequencies, noise, and the efficiency of letter discrimination. Vision Research, 31, 1399–1415.
Patching, G. R., & Jordan, T. R. (2005). Assessing the role of different spatial frequencies in word perception by good and poor readers. Memory & Cognition, 33, 961–971.
Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Zorzi, M. (2007). Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: The CDP+ model of reading aloud. Psychological Review, 114, 273–315.
Petersen, S. E., Fox, P. T., Snyder, A. Z., & Raichle, M. E. (1990). Activation of extrastriate and frontal cortical areas by visual words and word-like stimuli. Science, 249, 1041–1044.
Peterzell, D. H., & Teller, D. Y. (2000). Spatial frequency tuned co-variance channels for red—green and luminance-modulated gratings: Psychophysical data from human adults. Vision Research, 40, 417–430.
Pillsbury, W. B. (1897). A study in apperception. American Journal of Psychology, 8, 315–393.
Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56–115.
Raab, D. H. (1962). Statistical facilitation of simple reaction times. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, 24, 574–590.
Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1989). The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Reicher, G. M. (1969). Perceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus material. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 275–280.
Schiller, P. H., Logothetis, N. K., & Charles, E. R. (1991). Parallel pathways in the visual system: Their role in perception at isolumi nance. Neuropsychologia, 29, 433–441.
Schneider, W. (1988). Micro Experimental Laboratory: An integrated system for IBM PC compatibles. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 20, 206–217.
Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523–568.
Skottun, B. C. (2000). The magnocellular deficit theory of dyslexia: The evidence from contrast sensitivity. Vision Research, 40, 111–127.
Skottun, B. C. (2001). Is dyslexia caused by a visual deficit? Vision Research, 41, 3069–3070.
Spieler, D. H., & Balota, D. A. (2000). Factors influencing word naming in younger and older adults. Psychology & Aging, 15, 225–231.
Van Essen, D. C., & Anderson, C. H. (1995). Information processing strategies and pathways in the primate visual system. In S. F. Zornetzer, J. L. Davis, C. Lau, & T. McKenna (Eds.), An introduction to neural and electronic networks (2nd ed., pp. 45–76). San Diego: Academic Press.
Van Essen, D. C., Anderson, C. H., & Felleman, D. J. (1992). Information processing in the primate visual system: An integrated systems perspective. Science, 255, 419–423.
Van Essen, D. C., & DeYoe, E. A. (1995). Concurrent processing in the primate visual cortex. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 383–400). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wheeler, D. D. (1970). Processes in word recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 1, 59–85.
Zorzi, M., Houghton, G., & Butterworth, B. (1998). Two routes or one in reading aloud? A connectionist dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 1131–1161.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by NIH/NIA Grant AG-09282 to the first author.
Note—Accepted by the previous editorial team, when Thomas H. Carr was Editor.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Allen, P.A., Smith, A.F., Lien, MC. et al. A multistream model of visual word recognition. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 71, 281–296 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.71.2.281
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.71.2.281