Abstract
It has been shown that transient attention enhances spatial resolution, but is the effect of transient attention on spatial resolution modulated by the size of the attentional cue? Would a gradual increase in the size of the cue lead to a gradual decrement in spatial resolution? To test these hypotheses, we used a texture segmentation task in which performance depends on spatial resolution, and systematically manipulated the size of the attentional cue: A bar of different lengths (Experiment 1) or a frame of different sizes (Experiments 2–3) indicated the target region in a texture segmentation display. Observers indicated whether a target patch region (oriented line elements in a background of an orthogonal orientation), appearing at a range of eccentricities, was present in the first or the second interval. We replicated the attentional enhancement of spatial resolution found with small cues; attention improved performance at peripheral locations but impaired performance at central locations. However, there was no evidence of gradual resolution decrement with large cues. Transient attention enhanced spatial resolution at the attended location when it was attracted to that location by a small cue but did not affect resolution when it was attracted by a large cue. These results indicate that transient attention cannot adapt its operation on spatial resolution on the basis of the size of the attentional cue.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Balz, G. W., & Hock, H. S. (1997). The effect of attentional spread on spatial resolution. Vision Research, 37, 1499–1510.
Bergen, J. R., & Julesz, B. (1983). Parallel versus serial processing in rapid pattern discrimination. Nature, 303, 696–698.
Carrasco, M., Evert, D. L., Chang, I., & Katz, S. M. (1995). The eccentricity effect: Target eccentricity affects performance on conjunction searches. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 1241–1261.
Carrasco, M., & Frieder, K. S. (1997). Cortical magnification neutralizes the eccentricity effect in visual search. Vision Research, 37, 63–82.
Carrasco, M., Ling, S., & Read, S. (2004). Attention alters appearance. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 308–313.
Carrasco, M., Loula, F., & Ho, Y.-X. (2006). How attention enhances spatial resolution: Evidence from selective adaptation to spatial frequency. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 1004–1012.
Carrasco, M., McLean, T. L., Katz, S. M., & Frieder, K. S. (1998). Feature asymmetries in visual search: Effects of display duration, target eccentricity, orientation and spatial frequency. Vision Research, 38, 347–374.
Carrasco, M., Penpeci-Talgar, C., & Eckstein, M. (2000). Spatial covert attention increases contrast sensitivity across the CSF: Support for signal enhancement. Vision Research, 40, 1203–1215.
Carrasco, M., Williams, P. E., & Yeshurun, Y. (2002). Covert attention increases spatial resolution with or without masks: Support for signal enhancement. Journal of Vision, 2, 467–479.
Carrasco, M., & Yeshurun, Y. (1998). The contribution of covert attention to the set-size and eccentricity effects in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 673–692.
Castiello, U., & Umiltà, C. (1990). Size of the attentional focus and efficiency of processing. Acta Psychologica, 73, 195–209.
Cheal, M., & Lyon, D. R. (1991). Central and peripheral precuing of forced-choice discrimination. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 859–880.
Cheal, M., & Lyon, D. R. (1992). Benefits from attention depend on the target type in location-precued discrimination. Acta Psychologica, 81, 243–267.
Cohen, J. D., Mac Whinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25, 257–271.
Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002). Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 201–215.
Davis, E. T., Kramer, P., & Graham, N. (1983). Uncertainty about spatial frequency, spatial position, or contrast of visual patterns. Perception & Psychophysics, 33, 20–28.
Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review Neuroscience, 18, 193–222.
De Valois, R. L., & De Valois, K. K. (1988). Spatial vision. New York: Oxford University Press.
Eckstein, M. P. (1998). The lower efficiency for conjunctions is due to noise and not serial attentional processing. Psychological Science, 9, 111–118.
Eriksen, C. W. (1990). Attentional search of the visual field. In D. Brogan (Ed.), Visual search (pp. 3–19). London: Taylor & Francis.
Eriksen, C. W., & St. James, J. D. (1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 225–240.
Eriksen, C. W., & Yeh, Y. (1985). Allocation of attention in the visual field. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 11, 583–597.
Foley, J. M., & Schwarz, W. (1998). Spatial attention: Effect of position uncertainty and number of distractor patterns on the threshold-versus-contrast function for contrast discrimination. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 15, 1036–1047.
Giordano, A. M., McElree, B., & Carrasco, M. (2004). On the automaticity and flexibility of covert attention [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 4(8), 627a.
Golla, H., Ignashchenkova, A., Haarmeier, T., & Thier, P. (2004). Improvement of visual acuity by spatial cueing: A comparative study in human and non-human primates. Vitision Research, 44, 1589–1600.
Goto, M., Toriu, T., & Tanahashi, J. (2001). Effect of size of attended area on contrast sensitivity function. Vision Research, 41, 1483–1487.
Graham, N. V. S. (1989). Visual pattern analyzers. New York: Oxford University Press.
Greenwood, P. M., & Parasuraman, R. (2004). The scaling of spatial attention in visual search and its modification in healthy aging. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 3–22.
Gurnsey, R., Pearson, P., & Day, D. (1996). Texture segmentation along the horizontal meridian: Nonmonotonic changes in performance with eccentricity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 738–757.
Hock, H. S., Balz, G. W., & Smollon, W. (1998). Attentional control of spatial scale: Effects on self-organized motion patterns. Vision Research, 38, 3743–3758.
Hübner, R. (2000). Attention shifting between global and local target levels: The persistence of level-repetition effects. Visual Cognition, 7, 465–484.
Joffe, K. M., & Scialfa, C. T. (1995). Texture segmentation as a function of eccentricity, spatial frequency, and target size. Spatial Vision, 9, 325–342.
Jonides, J. (1981). Voluntary vs. automatic control over the mind’s eye’s movement. In J. Long & A. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX (pp. 187–204). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kehrer, L. (1989). Central performance drop on perceptual segregation tasks. Spatial Vision, 4, 45–62.
Kehrer, L. (1997). The central performance drop in texture segmentation: A simulation based on spatial filter model. Biological Cybernetics, 77, 297–305.
Kinchla, R. A. (1980). The measurement of attention. In R. S. Nickerson (Ed.), Attention and performance VIII (pp. 213–238). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kinchla, R. A., Solis-Macias, V., & Hoffman, J. (1983). Attending to different levels of structure in a visual image. Perception & Psychophysics, 33, 1–10.
LaBerge, D., Brown, V., Carter, M., Bash, D., & Hartley, A. (1991). Reducing the effects of adjacent distractors by narrowing attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 65–76.
Lamb, M. R., & Yund, E. W. (1996). Spatial frequency and attention: Effects of level-, target-, and location-repetition on the processing of global and local forms. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 363–373.
Lee, D. K., Itti, L., Koch, C., & Braun, J. (1999). Attention activates winner-take-all competition among visual filters. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 375–381.
Ling, S., & Carrasco, M. (2006). Sustained and transient covert attention enhance the signal via different contrast response functions. Vision Research, 46, 1210–1220.
Lu, Z. L., & Dosher, B. A. (1998). External noise distinguishes attention mechanisms. Vision Research, 38, 1183–1198.
Luck, S. J., Chelazzi, L., Hillyard, S. A., & Desimone, R. (1997). Neural mechanisms of spatial selective attention in areas V1, V2, and V4 of macaque visual cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 77, 24–42.
Mayfrank, L., Kimmig, H., & Fischer, B. (1987). The role of attention in the preparation of visually guided saccadic eye movements in man. In J. K. O’Regan & A. Lévy-Schoen (Eds.), Eye movements: From physiology to cognition (pp. 37–45). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Moran, J., & Desimone, R. (1985). Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex. Science, 229, 782–784.
Morgan, M. J., Ward, R. M., & Castet, E. (1998). Visual search for a tilted target: Tests of spatial uncertainty models. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51A, 347–370.
Müller, H. J., & Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: Time course of activation and resistance to interruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 315–330.
Müller, N. G., Bartelt, O. A., Donner, T. H., Villringer, A., & Brandt, S. A. (2003). A physiological correlate of the “zoom lens” of visual attention. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 3561–3565.
Nakayama, K., & Mackeben, M. (1989). Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention. Vision Research, 29, 1631–1646.
Palmer, J. (1994). Set-size effects in visual search: The effect of attention is independent of the stimulus for simple tasks. Vision Research, 34, 1703–1721.
Pestilli, F., & Carrasco, M. (2005). Contrast sensitivity is enhanced at cued and impaired at uncued locations. Vision Research, 45, 1867–1875.
Phillips, G. C., & Wilson, H. R. (1984). Orientation bandwidths of spatial mechanisms measured by masking. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 1, 226–232.
Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3–25.
Potechin, C., & Gurnsey, R. (2003). Backward masking is not required to elicit the central performance drop. Spatial Vision, 16, 393–406.
Remington, R. W., Johnston, J. C., & Yantis, S. (1992). Involuntary attentional capture by abrupt onsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 279–290.
Reynolds, J. H., & Chelazzi, L. (2004). Attentional modulation of visual processing. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 611–647.
Reynolds, J. H., & Desimone, R. (1999). The role of neural mechanisms of attention in solving the binding problem. Neuron, 24, 19–25.
Robertson, L. C., Egly, R., Lamb, M. R., & Kerth, L. (1993). Spatial attention and cuing to global and local levels of hierarchical structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 471–487.
Rosen, A. C., Rao, S. M., Caffarra, P., Scaglioni, A., Bobholz, J. A., Woodley, S. J., et al. (1999). Neural basis of endogenous and exogenous spatial orienting: A functional MRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 135–152.
Saarinen, J., & Julesz, B. (1991). The speed of attentional shifts in the visual field. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 88, 1812–1814.
Sagi, D., & Julesz, B. (1987). Short-range limitation on detection of feature differences. Spatial Vision, 2, 39–49.
Shaw, M. L. (1984). Division of attention among spatial locations: A fundamental difference between detection of letters and detection of luminance increments. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 109–120). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Shulman, G. L., & Wilson, J. (1987). Spatial frequency and selective attention to local and global information. Perception, 16, 89–101.
Solomon, J. A., Lavie, N., & Morgan, M. J. (1997). Contrast discrimination function: Spatial cuing effects. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 14, 2443–2448.
Sperling, G., & Dosher, B. A. (1986). Strategy and optimization in human information processing. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance (Vol. 1, chap. 2, pp. 1–65). New York: Wiley.
Talgar, C. P., & Carrasco, M. (2002). Vertical meridian asymmetry in spatial resolution: Visual and attentional factors. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 714–722.
Tsal, Y. (1983). Movements of attention across the visual field. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 9, 523–530.
Ward, L. M. (1982). Determinants of attention to local and global features of visual forms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 8, 562–581.
Yantis, S. (1996). Attentional capture in vision. In A. F. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles, & G. D. Logan (Eds.), Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention (pp. 45–76). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Yeshurun, Y., & Carrasco, M. (1998). Attention improves or impairs visual performance by enhancing spatial resolution. Nature, 396, 72–75.
Yeshurun, Y., & Carrasco, M. (1999). Spatial attention improves performance in spatial resolution tasks. Vision Research, 39, 293–306.
Yeshurun, Y., & Carrasco, M. (2000). The locus of attentional effects in texture segmentation. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 622–627.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant 2001169 from the United States—Israel Binational Science Foundation (BSF), Jerusalem, Israel, to Y.Y. and M.C.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yeshurun, Y., Carrasco, M. The effects of transient attention on spatial resolution and the size of the attentional cue. Perception & Psychophysics 70, 104–113 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/PP.70.1.104
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PP.70.1.104