Abstract
An experiment is described in which it was demonstrated that relative judgments of the more probable of two statements are quicker if the statements are both probable rather than improbable. For judgments of the less probable, the reverse result was obtained. This phenomenon is discussed in relation to various theories of judgment and choice. A theory is presented which assumes that judgment involves a relation between a stimulus and a word and follows Thurstone’s notion that stimuli differ in their discrirninal dispersions. This new theory is shown to be consistent with recent results in psycholinguistics.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
ARTHUR, A. Z. ‘Cross-over’ effect and subjective intensity. British Journal of Psychology. 1965, 56, 477–478.
AUDLEY, R. J. A stochastic model for individual choice behavior. Psychological Review, 1960, 67, 1–15.
AUDLEY, R. J., & WALLIS, C. P. Response instructions and the speed of relative Judgments, I. Some experiments on brightness discrimination. British Journal of Psychology. 1964, 55, 59–73.
AUDLEY, R. J., & WALLIS, C. P. ‘Cross-over’ effect: A reply to Arthur. British Journal of Psychology. 1965, 56, 479–482.
CLARK, H. H. Linguistic processes in deductive reasoning. Psychological Review. 1969a, 76, 387–404.
CLARK, H. H. Influence of language on solving three-term series problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1969b, 82, 205–215.
CLARK, H. H., & CARD, S. K. Role of semantics in remembering comparative sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1969, 82, 545–553.
DE SOTO, C. B., LONDON, M., & HANDEL, S. Social reasoning and spatial paralogic, Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 1965, 2, 513–521.
GUILFORD, J. P.Psychometric methods. New York; McGraw-Hill, 1954.
HELSON, H.Adaptation-level theory. New York: Harper & Row. 1964.
JOHNSON, D. M.The psychology of thought and judgment. New York: Harper. 1955.
KELLOGG, W. N. The time of judgment in psycho-metric measures. American Journal of Psychology. 1931, 43, 65–86.
SHIPLEY, W. C., COFFIN, J. I., & HADSELL, K. C. Reaction time in judgment of color preference. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1945, 35, 206–215.
SHIPLEY, W. C., NORRIS, E. D., & ROBERTS, M. L. The effect of changed polarity of set on decision time of affective judgments, Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1946, 36, 237–243.
THURSTONE, L. L. Psychophysical analysis. American Journal of Psychology. 1927, 38, 368–389.
WALLIS, C. R., & AUDLEY, R. J. Response instructions and the speed of relative judgments. II. Pitch discrimination. British Journal of Psychology. 1964, 55, 121–132.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This article is based on part of a dissertation submitted to the Department of Psychology. University of Sheffield. England. in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the PhD degree. The author would like to express his appreciation to Mr. J. K. Clarkson for his encouragement and assistance.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Marks, D.F. Relative judgment: A phenomenon and a theory. Perception & Psychophysics 11, 156–160 (1972). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210364
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210364