Abstract
Investigations of context-dependent recognition, a phenomenon in which recognition is better for items studied and tested with the same rather than different context, have shown serious inconsistencies. A simple organization of (1) contextual cues, distinguishing between local context (specific cues) and global context (general cues), and (2) stimulus familiarity, distinguishing between novel and familiar stimuli, reduces much of this variability. In two experiments, changes in both local context (descriptive label) and global context (environment) were manipulated in order to examine their effects on recognition memory for faces that differed in familiarity. Changes in local context impaired recognition of both unfamiliar and familiar faces; changes in environmental context impaired recognition only of unfamiliar faces. These results are consistent with the many failures to find impaired recognition of verbal stimuli under changed environmental contexts, and they suggest that stimulus familiarity is a critical parameter modulating environmental context effects.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Baddeley, A., &Woodhead, M. (1982). Depth of processing, context and face recognition.Canadian Journal of Psychology,36, 148–164.
Beales, S. A., &Parkin, A. J. (1984). Context and facial memory: The influence of different processing strategies.Human Learning,3, 257–264.
Bjork, R. A., &Richardson-Klavehn, A. (1989). On the puzzling relationship between environmental context and human memory. In C. Izawa (Ed.),Current issues in cognitive processes: The Tulane Flowerree Symposium on Cognition (pp. 313–344). Hillsdale, NJ: Eribaum.
Bower, G. H. (1981), Mood and memory.American Psychologist,36, 129–148.
Bower, G. H., Monteiro, K. P., &Gilligan, S. G. (1978). Emotional mood as a context for learning and recall.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,17, 573–585.
Canas, J. J., &Nelson, D. L. (1986). Recognition and environmental context: The effect of testing by phone.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,24, 407–409.
Cann, A., &Ross, D. (1989). Olfactory stimuli as context cues in human memory.American Journal of Psychology,102, 91–102.
Davies, G., &Milne, A. (1982). Recognising faces in and out of context.Current Psychological Research,2, 235–246.
Diamond, R., &Carey, S. (1986). Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,115, 107–117.
Eich, J. E. (1980). The cue-dependent nature of state-dependent retrieval.Memory & Cognition,8, 157–173.
Eich, [J.] E., &Metcalfe, J. (1989). Mood dependent memory for internal versus external events.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 443–455.
Feenan, K., &Snodgrass, J. G. (1990). The effect of context on discrimination and bias in recognition memory for pictures and words.Memory & Cognition,18, 515–527.
Fernandez, A., &Glenberg, A. M. (1985). Changing environmental context does not reliably affect memory.Memory & Cognition,13, 333–345.
Gage, D., &Safer, M. A. (1985). Hemispheric differences in the mood state-dependent effect for recognition of emotional faces.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,11, 752–763.
Gillund, G., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. Psychological Review, 91, 1-67. Glenberg, A. M. (1979). Component-levels theory of the effects of spacing of repetitions on recall and recognition.Memory & Cognition,2, 95–112.
Godden, D. R., &Baddeley, A. D. (1975). Context dependency in two natural environments: On land and underwater.British Journal of Psychology,66, 325–331.
Godden, D. R., &Baddeley, A. D. (1980). When does context influence recognition memory?British Journal of Psychology,91, 99–104.
Hastie, R., Park, B., &Weber, R. (1984). Social memory. In R. S. Wyer, Jr.,& T. K. Snill (Eds.),Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 2, pp. 151–212). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Light, L. L., &Carter-Sobell, L. (1970). Effects of changed semantic context on recognition memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,9, 1–11.
Lubow, R. E., Rifkin, B., &Alek, M. (1976). The context effect: The relationship between stimulus pre-exposure and environmental pre-exposure determines subsequent learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,2, 38–47.
Malpass, R., &Devine, P. G. (1981). Guided memory in eyewitness identification.Journal of Applied Psychology,66, 343–350.
Memon, A., &Bruce, V. (1985). Context effects in episodic studies of verbal and facial memory: A review.Current Psychological Research & Reviews,4, 349–369.
Mensink, G., &Raaijmakers, J. G. (1988). A model for interference and forgetting.Psychological Review,95, 434–455.
Raaijmakers, J. G., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1981). Search of associative memory.Psychological Review,88, 93–134.
Salasoo, A., Shiffrin, R. M., &Feustel, T. C. (1985). Building permanent memory codes: Codification and repetition effects in word identification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,114, 50–77.
Smith, S. M. (1985). Environmental context and recognition memory reconsidered.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,23, 173–176.
Smith, S. M. (1986). Environmental context-dependent recognition memory using a short-term memory task for input.Memory & Cognition,14, 347–354.
Smith, S. M. (1988). Environmental context effects on memory. In G. M. Davies & D. M. Thomson (Eds.),Memory in context: Context in memory (pp. 13–34). New York: Wiley.
Smith, S. M., Glenberg, A., &Bjork, R. A. (1978). Environmental context and human memory.Memory & Cognition,6, 342–353.
Smith, S. M., &Rothkopf, E. Z. (1984). Contextual enrichment and distribution of practice in the classroom.Cognition & Instruction,1, 341–358.
Spear, N. (1978).The processing of memories: Forgetting and retention. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Thomson, D. M., Robertson, S., &Vogt, R. (1982). Person recognition: The effect of context.Human Learning,1, 137–154.
Tiberghien, G. (1986). Context effects in recognition memory of faces: Some theoretical problems. In H. Ellis, M. Jeeves, F. Newcombe, & A. Young (Eds.),Aspects of face processing (pp. 88–104). Boston: Nijhoff.
Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and semantic memory. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.),Organization of memory (pp. 382–404). New York: Academic Press.
Tulving, E., &Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory.Psychological Review,80, 353–370.
Underwood, B. J., &Humphreys, M. (1979). Context change and the role of meaning in word recognition.American Journal of Psychology,92, 577–609.
Valentine, T., &Bruce, V. (1986). The effect of race, inversion, and encoding activity upon face recognition.Acta Psychologica,61, 259–273.
Watkins, M., Ho, E., &Tulving, E. (1976). Context effects in recognition memory for faces.Journalof Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,15, 505–517.
Weingartner, H., Miller, H., &Murphy, D. L. (1977). Mood state dependent retrieval of verbal associations.Journal of Abnormal Psychology,86, 276–284.
Winograd, E., &Rivers-Bulkeley, N. T. (1977). Effects of changing context on remembering faces.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,3, 397–405.
Wippich, W., Mecklenbrauker, S., &Hoffmann, I. (1985). Skripte in fremder oder vertrauter Umgebung: Kontexteffekte beim Behalten.Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Psychologie,44, 43–55.
Wyer, R. S., Jr., &Srull, T. K. (1986). Human cognition in its social context.Psychological Review,93, 322–359.
Yin, R. K. (1969). Looking at upside-down faces.Journal of Experimental Psychology,81, 141–145.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dalton, P. The role of stimulus familiarity in context-dependent recognition. Mem Cogn 21, 223–234 (1993). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202735
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202735