Next Article in Journal
Three Experimental Common High-Risk Procedures: Emission Characteristics Identification and Source Intensity Estimation in Biosafety Laboratory
Previous Article in Journal
Auditing the Audits: A Systematic Review on Different Procedures in Telemedicine
Previous Article in Special Issue
Does It Matter Who You Provide Care for? Mental Health and Life Satisfaction in Young Adult Carers Associated with Type of Relationship and Illness Category—A National Student Survey
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 20
Issue 5
10.3390/ijerph20054485
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Mental Health Is a Family Affair—Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Associations between Mental Health Problems in Parents and Children during the COVID-19 Pandemic

by
Markus Stracke
1,*,
Miriam Heinzl
1,
Anne Dorothee Müller
2,
Kristin Gilbert
1,
Anne Amalie Elgaard Thorup
2,3,
Jean Lillian Paul
4,5 and
Hanna Christiansen
1
1
Department of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, Philipps University Marburg, 35032 Marburg, Germany
2
Research Unit, Child and Adolescent Mental Health Center, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
3
Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
4
Mental Health Research Program, The Village, Ludwig Boltzmann Gesellschaft, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
5
Division of Psychiatry I, Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Medical University Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(5), 4485; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20054485
Submission received: 17 January 2023 / Revised: 22 February 2023 / Accepted: 28 February 2023 / Published: 2 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Effects of Parental Physical and Mental Illness on Children and Adolescents)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
As a multidimensional and universal stressor, the COVID-19 pandemic negatively affected the mental health of children, adolescents, and adults worldwide. In particular, families faced numerous restrictions and challenges. From the literature, it is well known that parental mental health problems and child mental health outcomes are associated. Hence, this review aims to summarize the current research on the associations of parental mental health symptoms and child mental health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. We conducted a systematic literature search in Web of Science (all databases) and identified 431 records, of which 83 articles with data of over 80,000 families were included in 38 meta-analyses. A total of 25 meta-analyses resulted in significant small to medium associations between parental mental health symptoms and child mental health outcomes (r = 0.19 to 0.46, p < 0.05). The largest effects were observed for the associations of parenting stress and child mental health outcomes. A dysfunctional parent–child interaction has been identified as a key mechanism for the transmission of mental disorders. Thus, specific parenting interventions are needed to foster healthy parent–child interactions, to promote the mental health of families, and to reduce the negative impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic.

1. Introduction

Worldwide, the lives of children, adolescents, and adults have been impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic over the past two years [1]. To contain the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and to prevent the collapse of the healthcare system, governments around the globe have imposed numerous public health measures and (lockdown) restrictions [2], thus radically changing almost all areas of life for almost everybody [1,3].
Characterized by (1) its global character and unclear duration, (2) its impact on multiple areas of life, (3) experiencing feelings of loss of control and helplessness, (4) its systemic impact on society, and (5) limited or blocked access to protective factors, the COVID-19 pandemic has been described as a multidimensional and universal stressor [3,4,5]. According to the transactional stress model [6], stressful situations lead to negative consequences (such as mental health problems) if the resources of an individual are not sufficient to react to the stressor. According to vulnerability stress models, e.g., [7], the development of psychopathology depends on the interaction of stressful events and pre-existing vulnerabilities in balance with protecting factors, buffering systems, and resilience. Thus, it has been argued that during the COVID-19 pandemic, especially vulnerable groups, such as people with pre-existing mental illnesses, could be susceptible to the negative impacts of the pandemic on their mental health [4,5,8]. In line with this, studies revealed that pre-existing mental health problems in adults [9,10], as well as in children and adolescents [11], are a significant risk factor for mental health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic. In a cohort study with individuals with pre-existing mental illness, 60% of the participants reported that their mental health had worsened during the pandemic [12]. Further, in a continuously growing number of studies, the negative effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of adults—for systematic reviews and meta-analyses, see [13,14,15,16]—as well as children and adolescents—for systematic reviews and meta-analyses, see [11,17,18,19,20]—are now well documented. For adults, meta-analyses have revealed heightened prevalence rates of anxiety (15.15% to 32.6%) and depression (15.97% to 31.4%) [13,15,21], as well as heightened prevalence rates of anxiety (25.2% to 34.5%) and depression (20.5% to 41.7%) for children and adolescents [19,20], in the course of the pandemic.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, families, in particular, faced numerous challenges. Due to the closure of schools and childcare facilities, leisure time activities, and places providing social support, the routines of families were disrupted. From one day to the next, families were required to adjust to quarantine and social distancing and to re-organize their everyday lives, thus potentially stressing all family members [1]. Parents had to manage all childcare as well as schooling demands, while still meeting their other requirements (job, household, etc.). In comparison to adults without caregiving responsibilities, higher rates of mental health problems were reported for parents and caregivers during the COVID-19 pandemic [22].
Whereas we refer in this article to the experience of stress in different life domains (e.g., daily routines, household, work, financial, health) as general stress, parenting stress is understood as a specific form of stress, experienced only by parents. Parenting stress relates specifically to the demands of being a parent and the interaction with one or more children [23]. In line with the transactional stress model [6], parenting stress occurs when the experienced demands of being a parent exceed the perceived resources as a parent. Parenting stress has been frequently associated with negative child outcomes, such as internalizing and externalizing symptoms, as well as children’s depression and anxiety (r = 0.15 to 0.37) [24,25,26], and was found to be higher during the COVID-19 pandemic [27,28].
From the literature, it is also well known that parental mental health problems and child mental health outcomes are associated [29,30,31]. Meta-analyses revealed small associations between children’s inter- and externalizing symptoms and maternal and paternal psychopathology (r = 0.14 to 0.18) [30], as well as maternal and paternal depression (r = 0.19 to 0.24) [29,30,31]. Furthermore, children of parents with a mental illness (COPMI) have a higher risk of developing a mental disorder themselves [32,33,34]. For COPMI, a lifetime risk of developing a serious mental disorder between 41% and 77%, with subclinical symptoms occurring more often and earlier in life, is reported [35].
In an integrated model explaining how the COVID-19 pandemic has affected families, Prime et al. [36] postulated that social disruptions due to the pandemic led to higher levels of psychological distress in caregivers, which, moderated by changes in the relationship quality of all family members, affected child adjustment, especially in families with pre-existing vulnerabilities. Consistently, in a pre-COVID-19 sample, positive associations between parents’ general stress and children’s internalizing and externalizing symptoms were found that were partially mediated by family conflict [37].
Taken together, families with pre-existing mental illness, and specifically children of parents with a mental illness, constitute an especially vulnerable group to the potential negative consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic. As specific studies on COPMI during the COVID-19 pandemic are sparse, e.g., [38], we aimed to address this gap by systematically investigating the association of parental and child mental health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The current study summarizes the available research on the associations of parental mental health symptoms (psychopathology, depression, anxiety, general stress, parenting stress) and child mental health outcomes (psychopathology, internalizing symptoms, depression, anxiety, externalizing symptoms, general stress) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our research questions are as follows:
(1)
Are parental mental health problems prior to the COVID-19 pandemic associated with child mental health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic?
(2)
Are current parental mental health symptoms associated with child mental health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic?
(3)
Are parents’ general stress levels associated with child mental health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic?
(4)
Is parenting stress associated with child mental health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic?

2. Methods

To answer our research questions, we conducted a systematic review [39]. The review followed the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines [40] and was registered in PROSPERO, registration number CRD42021273376.

2.1. Literature Search

We conducted a systematic literature search in Web of Science (all databases) on 25 May 2022. The search terms included terms on parental mental illness or stress, the COVID-19 pandemic, and child mental health outcomes. The full search strategy is provided in the Supplementary Material, Table S1. The search was limited to articles published between 2020 and 25 May 2022. Original studies reporting on the association of parental mental health problems or stress and child mental health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic were included. No further in- or exclusion criteria were applied.

2.2. Study Selection

All abstracts were screened by two authors separately (M.S. and M.H.). Disagreements were resolved by discussion and by involving a third author (H.C.) until a consensus was reached. The full texts of the remaining articles were assessed for eligibility by two authors separately (M.S. and M.H.). Again, disagreements were resolved by discussion and by involving a third author (H.C.) until a consensus was reached.

2.3. Data Extraction

In order to address the research questions, the following information was extracted from the included studies: author(s), year of publication, title, country, study design (e.g., online survey, cross-sectional), parent/child report, study period, study participants (sample size, gender distribution, children’s age), measurement of parental mental health problems, measurement of parents’ general stress, measurement of parenting stress, measurement of children’s mental health outcomes, association of parental mental health problems/stress and children’s mental health outcomes. The data were either extracted by M.S. or M.H. and, afterwards, double-checked by the other (M.S. or M.H.). For meta-analytic calculations, Pearson’s product–moment correlation r was used. If results from more than one measurement point were reported in a study, data on the first COVID-19 measurement point were extracted. If studies reported only adjusted correlations or results from (multivariate or hierarchical) regression analyses, the corresponding authors were contacted and asked to provide Pearson’s product–moment correlations r. In case of Spearman’s rho correlations, these were transformed into a Pearson’s product–moment correlation using the formula by Rupinski and Dunlap [41]. If studies reported more than one correlation for a domain of interest, the correlations were extracted separately and later combined into a single correlation. For this, the correlations were transformed into Fisher’s z scores and averaged (arithmetic mean). Afterwards, the average was inversely z-transformed back into a Pearson’s product–moment correlation r. This procedure was applied to combine (1) correlations that were reported on the item level into internalizing/externalizing symptom scales, (2) correlations reported for subscales of different internalizing/externalizing symptoms into internalizing/externalizing symptom scales, (3) correlations for internalizing and externalizing symptoms into one general psychopathology scale (for children), and (4) correlations for different symptoms into one general psychopathology scale (for adults).

2.4. Risk of Bias

Two authors (M.S. and M.H.) evaluated the quality and risk of bias of the included studies using the AXIS tool [42], which is a standardized and robust critical appraisal tool to assess the quality and risk of bias of cross-sectional studies. Since only cross-sectional data were extracted from longitudinal studies, we also used the AXIS tool for the quality assessment of the longitudinal studies. Again, disagreements were resolved by discussion and by involving a third author (H.C.) until a consensus was reached. The information from the AXIS tool was condensed into a final risk of bias rating for each study: low (18–20), medium (14–17), or high (0–13) risk of bias [43].

2.5. Systematic Synthesis and Statistical Analysis

To synthesize the results of the included studies, we structured them according to the types of parental and child mental health problems. Studies reporting on more than one parental mental health problem or child mental health outcome were included in each respective section. Since we included many studies that reported a range of different effect sizes, we decided not to present each study more comprehensively, but to statistically summarize the available evidence [44]. Thus, wherever possible, meta-analyses, which are considered to be the highest level of evidence [45], were computed to combine the different effect sizes of the included studies. Meta-analyses were calculated with the free online meta-analysis tool Meta-Mar [46,47]. As proposed for small numbers of studies and heterogeneity, the random effect model based on the inverse variance approach with Knapp–Hartung adjustment [48,49] was used. No covariates were included in the model. Correlations were Fisher’s z-transformed, weighted by sample size, and combined. The overall Fisher’s z score was afterwards inversely z-transformed back into a Pearson’s product–moment correlation r. Overall, effects were interpreted according to Cohen [50]. Heterogeneity was tested using the Q test, the T2 statistic, and the I2 statistic and interpreted according to Higgins et al. [51]. Fail-safe N was calculated for all significant meta-analyses according to Rosenthal’s approach [52].

3. Results

The literature search yielded overall 431 records. After the removal of duplicates, 430 abstracts were screened, and 285 records were excluded. The full texts of the remaining 145 articles were screened for eligibility. Finally, a total of 83 articles were allocated to the four research questions and included in the analyses. See Figure 1 for the PRISMA flow chart [40].
Data on 86,658 parents and more than 82,312 children were examined in this review. The median number of parents per study was 306.5 (range: 21 to 29,202) and of children was 297 (range: 26 to 29,202). The included studies were mainly from North America (32 studies; 27 of which were from the USA), Europe (31 studies; 14 of which were from Italy), and Asia (15 studies; five of which were from China). Fifty studies were designed as cross-sectional, whereas 33 studies reported longitudinal data. The included studies were conducted between January 2020 and April 2021, but most studies reported data that were collected in April or May 2020 (42 studies each). The age range of included children and adolescents was between 0 and 21 years (M = 9.18). Since children’s mean age was not reported in all studies, we also coded age categories (children < 12 years, adolescent ≥ 12 years). A total of 39 studies focused on children, 15 studies on adolescents, and 29 studies reported data on both children and adolescents. In 59 studies, child/adolescent outcomes were reported only by parents, in two studies only by adolescents, and in 22 studies by both parents and children/adolescents. A detailed description of the study characteristics of all included studies can be found in the Supplementary Material Table S2.
Reported parental mental health problems were categorized into prior parental psychopathology (four studies), prior parental depressive symptoms (five studies), current parental psychopathology (34 studies), current parental depressive symptoms (31 studies), current parental anxiety symptoms (25 studies), parents’ current general stress (39 studies), and current parenting stress (18 studies). Reported child mental health outcomes were categorized into children’s psychopathology (45 studies), children’s internalizing symptoms (42 studies), children’s depressive symptoms (14 studies), children’s anxiety symptoms (19 studies), children’s externalizing symptoms (34 studies), and children’s current general stress (13 studies).
The most commonly used measures of parental mental health symptoms were the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (12 studies), the Patient Health Questionnaire (11 studies), and the Depression–Anxiety–Stress Scale (nine studies). Parents’ current general stress was mostly assessed with ad hoc developed items (14 studies) or the Perceived Stress Scale (nine studies). Parenting stress was mostly assessed with the Parental Stress Scale and the Parenting Stress Index (each seven studies). The most commonly used measures for child mental health symptoms were the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (27 studies) and the Child Behavior Checklist (14 studies). Children’s current general stress was mostly assessed with the Perceived Stress Scale (five studies) or with ad hoc developed items (four studies) (for details, see Supplementary Material, Table S3).
Most studies were rated as having a medium risk of bias (69 studies) according to the AXIS tool (see Supplementary Material, Table S4). The most commonly raised concerns were that (1) some of the risk factors and outcome variables were not measured with trialed, piloted, or previously published instruments (58 studies); (2) the sample size was not justified (65 studies); and (3) concerns about a possible non-response bias were raised. This was either because no information about non-responders was given (71 studies), no measures were undertaken to address and categorize non-responders (69 studies), or because no response rate was reported or the response rate raised concerns about non-response bias (62 studies).
To avoid redundancy, the results are presented summarized for each research question. Details on all observed overall effects are displayed in Table 1. A summary of the observed significant effects can be found in Table 2.

3.1. Research Question 1: Are Parental Mental Health Problems Prior to the COVID-19 Pandemic Associated with Child Mental Health Outcomes during the COVID-19 Pandemic?

The association of parental mental health problems prior to the COVID-19 pandemic and child mental health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic was investigated in eight studies [53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60]. Nine meta-analyses were conducted that resulted in overall small effects (r = 0.09 to 0.29, p = 0.01 to 0.30) with low to high heterogeneity. Due to the small number of included studies in the meta-analyses concerning this research question (k ≤ 4 for all meta-analyses), only the meta-analysis on the association between prior parental depressive symptoms and current children’s internalizing symptoms reached statistical significance (r = 0.19, p = 0.01). For this meta-analysis, no heterogeneity was observed (Q = 0.27, p = 0.87, I2 = 0.0%).

3.2. Research Question 2: Are Current Parental Mental Health Symptoms Associated with Child Mental Health Outcomes during the COVID-19 Pandemic?

A possible association between parental mental health symptoms and child outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic was investigated in 54 studies [28,53,54,55,56,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106]. Eighteen meta-analyses resulted in overall small to medium effects (r = 0.22 to 0.39, p < 0.001 to p = 0.20) with significant medium to high heterogeneity (Q = 14.33 to 226.39, p < 0.05, I2 = 46.1 to 97.2%). Again, due to the small number of included studies in some of the meta-analyses, three meta-analyses (parental psychopathology/parental depressive symptoms/parental anxiety symptoms and children’s general stress; all k ≤ 5) did not reach statistical significance.

3.3. Research Question 3: Are Parents’ General Stress Levels Associated with Child Mental Health Outcomes during the COVID-19 Pandemic?

The association between parents’ general stress and child outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic was investigated in 39 studies [54,58,60,61,66,68,72,74,76,78,79,83,90,91,93,94,95,98,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127]. Six meta-analyses were conducted that revealed statistically significant overall small to medium effects (r = 0.29 to 0.34, p < 0.001). For all these meta-analyses, significantly high heterogeneity was observed (Q = 29.68 to 433.74, p < 0.001, I2 = 76.4 to 95.6%).

3.4. Research Question 4: Is Parenting Stress Associated with Child Mental Health Outcomes during the COVID-19 Pandemic?

The association between parenting stress and child outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic was investigated in 18 studies [28,55,64,66,82,85,95,96,107,122,123,128,129,130,131,132,133,134]. Five meta-analyses revealed overall medium to high effects (r = 0.36 to 0.51, p < 0.001 to p = 0.28) with medium to high heterogeneity. Again, due to the small number of included studies (k = 2), two meta-analyses (parenting stress and children’s depressive symptoms/children’s general stress) did not reach statistical significance. For the three meta-analyses that reached statistical significance, significant medium to high heterogeneity was observed (Q = 15.83 to 95.89, p < 0.05, I2 = 55.8 to 93.7%).

4. Discussion

As a multidimensional and universal stressor [3,4,5], the COVID-19 pandemic has had and still has negative effects on the mental health of children, adolescents, and adults worldwide [11,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. Pre-existing mental health problems were found to be a significant risk factor for mental health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic [9,11]. In particular, families were faced with numerous challenges due to the imposed public health measures and (lockdown) restrictions. From the literature, it is well known that parental mental health problems and child mental health outcomes are associated [29,30,31], and that COPMI have a higher risk of developing a mental disorder themselves [32,33,34]. Thus, it was hypothesized that COPMI would be especially susceptible to the negative effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. In light of this, specific studies concerning COPMI during the COVID-19 pandemic were found to be very sparse, e.g., [38]. The aim of the current study was thus to address this research gap by systematically summarizing the current research on the associations between parental mental health symptoms and child mental health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic.
With respect to research question 1 on the association of parental mental health problems prior to the COVID-19 pandemic and child mental health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic, we found a small but significant association between parental depression prior to the COVID-19 pandemic and children’s internalizing symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic (r = 0.19). This finding is in line with pre-pandemic data, which also found small, but significant, associations between maternal (r = 0.23) [29] as well as paternal depression (r = 0.24) [31] and child internalizing symptoms. Within the first research question, eight more meta-analyses were calculated, which resulted in overall small effects. Due to the small number of included studies (k ≤ 4), these meta-analyses did not reach statistical significance.
Regarding the association of current parental mental health symptoms and child mental health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic (research question 2), small to medium effects were observed. Parental psychopathology (r = 0.27 to 0.36), parental depressive symptoms (r = 0.25 to 0.39), and parental anxiety symptoms (r = 0.22 to 0.31) correlated significantly with children’s mental health outcomes (psychopathology, internalizing symptoms, depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and externalizing symptoms) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Although of larger magnitude, our findings are again in line with pre-pandemic data that found small effects for the association of parental psychopathology, as well as parental depression, and children’s internalizing and externalizing symptoms and general psychopathology (r = 0.14 to 0.24) [29,30,31]. Within the second research question, three more meta-analyses were calculated, which resulted in overall medium effects. Due to the small number of included studies (k ≤ 5), these meta-analyses did not reach statistical significance, though.
For research question 3 on the association of parents’ general stress and child mental health outcomes (psychopathology, internalizing symptoms, depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and externalizing symptoms) during the COVID-19 pandemic, significant small to medium effects were observed (r = 0.29 to 0.34). This finding is also in line with pre-pandemic data that report similar correlations of medium magnitude (r = 0.35) for the association between parents’ general stress and children’s internalizing and externalizing symptoms [37].
Regarding the association of parenting stress with child mental health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic (research question 4), significant medium effects were observed. Parenting stress correlated significantly with children’s psychopathology as well as children’s internalizing and externalizing symptoms (r = 0.44 to 0.46). Although of larger magnitude, our findings are again in line with pre-pandemic research, where small to medium associations (r = 0.15 to 0.31) between parenting stress and children’s internalizing and externalizing symptoms were reported [24,25]. Within research question 4, two more meta-analyses were calculated, which, again due to the small number of included numbers (k = 2), did not reach statistical significance.
Taken together, we were able to replicate pre-pandemic findings that parental mental health problems are associated with children’s mental health outcomes [24,25,26,29,30,31,37] and to show that the COVID-19 pandemic, as a multidimensional and universal stressor, intensifies pre-existing and already known risk mechanisms, such as the transgenerational transmission of mental disorders (TTMD) [35]. Thereby, we can add to the strong, empirical evidence that not only parental depression but any parental mental health problem should be seen and understood as a family affair [135]. While it is clear from the literature that COPMI can be seen as the next generation of people with a mental illness [32], they are often overseen by policy makers, researchers, and the society at large, resulting in invisibility, e.g., [136]. The low number of specific studies concerning COPMI and family mental health indicates that COPMI were also forgotten at large during the COVID-19 pandemic, and their heightened needs in view of a long-lasting, multidimensional stressor were severely neglected by societies and politics [3].
In our meta-analyses, the largest effects were found for the association of parenting stress and child mental health outcomes. This finding fits well with existing theoretical models concerning the TTMD [35], as well as the conceptual framework of family well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic [36]. The TTMD identifies the parent–child interaction as a key mechanism for the transmission of mental disorders [35]. Consistently, Prime et al. [36] postulated that the association between heightened caregiver distress (due to the COVID-19 pandemic) and child outcomes is moderated by the parent–child relationship quality. In line with these models, Chung et al. [137] showed that the negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic increased parenting stress and in turn reduced parent–child relationship quality. Similarly, Spinelli et al. [122] found that the association of the negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on children’s symptomatology was mediated by parents’ general stress as well as parenting stress. Babore et al. [28] also reported that the association between parents’ psychopathology and children’s symptomatology was mediated by parenting stress. Furthermore, Cohodes et al. [112] demonstrated that parents who effectively dealt with children’s negative emotions and maintained stable home routines were able to buffer the negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on children’s symptomatology. On the other hand, if parenting stress and parental anxiety were reported to be high, the COVID-19 pandemic had a more negative impact on children’s symptomatology [112].
Given that the pre-pandemic literature has shown that parental psychopathology and parenting stress are related [138] and that parent–child interactions, as well as parenting skills, are impaired for parents with a mental illness compared to parents without a mental illness [139,140], it is likely that parents with a mental illness were especially stressed by the COVID-19 pandemic and, hence, families with a parent with a mental illness were less able to buffer the negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on their children. Thus, the lockdown restrictions, which led to the closure of schools, childcare facilities, and leisure time activities, might have been and might still be especially detrimental for COPMI, since those external buffering systems were also no longer available.

4.1. Limitations

In light of our research findings, several limitations have to be considered. First, most of the studies included in our meta-analyses report cross-sectional data. Thus, causality is not clear. Although we argue that parental mental health problems impact child and adolescent mental health, this relationship could also be the other way around, with child health affecting parental mental health as well [36,53,65]. Second, most child and adolescent mental health outcomes were reported by the parents. Thus, the report might be biased by their perceptions and their own psychopathology or mental health status [141]. Third, heterogeneity was found to be medium or high for all significant meta-analyses (except for the one regarding research question 1). Due to the low number of included studies in many meta-analyses, we were not able to conduct moderator analyses, but further research should investigate moderators such as age [124], sex, lockdown duration [11], and months into the pandemic [91]. Fourth, most studies were rated as having a medium risk of bias. Thus, results might be biased, and more high-quality longitudinal studies are needed to draw definite conclusions.

4.2. Implications for Research and Practice

Our findings have several implications for further research as well as for clinical practice. To better understand the role of the parent–child interaction in the TTMD, subsequent studies should further investigate the association between parenting stress and parental as well as children’s psychopathology. A better understanding of this association will help in creating better-tailored interventions for COPMI. Since mental health should always be understood as a family affair, clinical interventions to reduce the negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of children, adolescents, and parents should target three different levels: the children and adolescents, the parents, and the whole family. On the one hand, specific interventions, e.g., with methods from cognitive–behavioral therapy as the current treatment of choice for mental disorders in general [142], are needed to improve the mental health of children, adolescents, and parents. On the other hand, interventions need to target the whole family. The enhancement of parenting skills has been found to be a significant mediator in improving child outcomes [143] and is, therefore, already an important aspect of prevention programs for COPMI [144,145,146]. During the COVID-19 pandemic, international initiatives [147] or low-threshold interventions such as “Families Under Pressure” [148,149] also aimed to enhance parenting skills, to promote healthy parent–child interactions, and, thereby, to buffer the negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on children’s symptomatology.

5. Conclusions

To our knowledge, this is the first study summarizing the current research on the association of parental mental health symptoms and child mental health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. In line with pre-pandemic studies, we found significant associations between parental mental health problems or stress and child mental health outcomes. Our findings demonstrate that it is of the utmost importance to not assess the negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of children, adolescents, and adults separately, since the mental health problems of family members are interconnected and likely to affect each other. Since the largest effects were found for the association of parenting stress and child mental health outcomes, besides separate interventions promoting the mental health of children, adolescents, and parents, also specific parenting interventions are needed to foster family health and parent–child interactions, to promote the mental health of families, and to reduce the negative impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijerph20054485/s1, Table S1: Search strategy in Web of Science (all databases); Table S2: Overview of included studies; Table S3: Overview of included studies—variables and instruments; Table S4: Quality assessment of included studies.

Author Contributions

M.S., M.H., A.D.M., K.G., A.A.E.T., J.L.P. and H.C. conceptualized the study. M.S. and M.H. conducted the literature search, data extraction, and risk of bias rating. M.S. conducted all analyses and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the revision of the final version of the manuscript and approved the submitted version. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This paper was written within the COMPARE-family-research project. COMPARE-family is funded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) (01GL1748B). Open Access funding provided by the Open Acess Publishing Fund of Philipps-Universität Marburg with support of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

None of the authors have any conflicts of interest to report.

References

  1. Fegert, J.M.; Vitiello, B.; Plener, P.L.; Clemens, V. Challenges and burden of the Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic for child and adolescent mental health: A narrative review to highlight clinical and research needs in the acute phase and the long return to normality. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry Ment. Health 2020, 14, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. World Health Organization. WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashbord. Available online: https://covid19.who.int/ (accessed on 15 February 2023).
  3. Wirkner, J.; Christiansen, H.; Knaevelsrud, C.; Lüken, U.; Wurm, S.; Schneider, S.; Brakemeier, E.-L. Mental Health in Times of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Eur. Psychol. 2021, 26, 310–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Brakemeier, E.-L.; Wirkner, J.; Knaevelsrud, C.; Wurm, S.; Christiansen, H.; Lueken, U.; Schneider, S. Die COVID-19-Pandemie als Herausforderung für die psychische Gesundheit. Z. Für Klin. Psychol. Und Psychother. 2020, 49, 1–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gruber, J.; Prinstein, M.J.; Clark, L.A.; Rottenberg, J.; Abramowitz, J.S.; Albano, A.M.; Aldao, A.; Borelli, J.L.; Chung, T.; Davila, J.; et al. Mental health and clinical psychological science in the time of COVID-19: Challenges, opportunities, and a call to action. Am. Psychol. 2021, 76, 409–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Lazarus, R.S.; Folkman, S. Stress, Appraisal, and Coping; Springer Publishing Company: New York, NY, USA, 1984. [Google Scholar]
  7. Wittchen, H.-U.; Hoyer, J. Klinische Psychologie & Psychotherapie; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  8. Holmes, E.A.; O’Connor, R.C.; Perry, V.H.; Tracey, I.; Wessely, S.; Arseneault, L.; Ballard, C.; Christensen, H.; Cohen Silver, R.; Everall, I.; et al. Multidisciplinary research priorities for the COVID-19 pandemic: A call for action for mental health science. Lancet Psychiatry 2020, 7, 547–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Adhanom Ghebreyesus, T. Addressing mental health needs: An integral part of COVID-19 response. World Psychiatry Off. J. World Psychiatr. Assoc. (WPA) 2020, 19, 129–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Neelam, K.; Duddu, V.; Anyim, N.; Neelam, J.; Lewis, S. Pandemics and pre-existing mental illness: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain Behav. Immun.-Health 2021, 10, 100177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Panchal, U.; Salazar de Pablo, G.; Franco, M.; Moreno, C.; Parellada, M.; Arango, C.; Fusar-Poli, P. The impact of COVID-19 lockdown on child and adolescent mental health: Systematic review. Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 2021, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lewis, K.J.S.; Lewis, C.; Roberts, A.; Richards, N.A.; Evison, C.; Pearce, H.A.; Lloyd, K.; Meudell, A.; Edwards, B.M.; Robinson, C.A.; et al. The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health in individuals with pre-existing mental illness. BJPsych Open 2022, 8, e59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cénat, J.M.; Blais-Rochette, C.; Kokou-Kpolou, C.K.; Noorishad, P.-G.; Mukunzi, J.N.; McIntee, S.-E.; Dalexis, R.D.; Goulet, M.-A.; Labelle, P.R. Prevalence of symptoms of depression, anxiety, insomnia, posttraumatic stress disorder, and psychological distress among populations affected by the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychiatry Res. 2021, 295, 113599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Santomauro, D.F.; Mantilla Herrera, A.M.; Shadid, J.; Zheng, P.; Ashbaugh, C.; Pigott, D.M.; Abbafati, C.; Adolph, C.; Amlag, J.O.; Aravkin, A.Y.; et al. Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet 2021, 398, 1700–1712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wu, T.; Jia, X.; Shi, H.; Niu, J.; Yin, X.; Xie, J.; Wang, X. Prevalence of mental health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Affect. Disord. 2021, 281, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Xiong, J.; Lipsitz, O.; Nasri, F.; Lui, L.M.W.; Gill, H.; Phan, L.; Chen-Li, D.; Iacobucci, M.; Ho, R.; Majeed, A.; et al. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health in the general population: A systematic review. J. Affect. Disord. 2020, 277, 55–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Jones, E.A.K.; Mitra, A.K.; Bhuiyan, A.R. Impact of COVID-19 on Mental Health in Adolescents: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 2470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Meherali, S.; Punjani, N.; Louie-Poon, S.; Abdul Rahim, K.; Das, J.K.; Salam, R.A.; Lassi, Z.S. Mental Health of Children and Adolescents Amidst COVID-19 and Past Pandemics: A Rapid Systematic Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 3432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Panda, P.K.; Gupta, J.; Chowdhury, S.R.; Kumar, R.; Meena, A.K.; Madaan, P.; Sharawat, I.K.; Gulati, S. Psychological and Behavioral Impact of Lockdown and Quarantine Measures for COVID-19 Pandemic on Children, Adolescents and Caregivers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Trop. Pediatr. 2021, 67, fmaa122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Racine, N.; McArthur, B.A.; Cooke, J.E.; Eirich, R.; Zhu, J.; Madigan, S. Global Prevalence of Depressive and Anxiety Symptoms in Children and Adolescents During COVID-19: A Meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2021, 175, 1142–1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, X.; Zhu, M.; Zhang, R.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, C.; Liu, P.; Feng, Z.; Chen, Z. Public mental health problems during COVID-19 pandemic: A large-scale meta-analysis of the evidence. Transl. Psychiatry 2021, 11, 384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Czeisler, M.É.; Rohan, E.A.; Melillo, S.; Matjasko, J.L.; DePadilla, L.; Patel, C.G.; Weaver, M.D.; Drane, A.; Winnay, S.S.; Capodilupo, E.R.; et al. Mental Health Among Parents of Children Aged <18 Years and Unpaid Caregivers of Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic—United States, December 2020 and February–March 2021. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2021, 70, 879–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Abidin, R.R. The Determinants of Parenting Behavior. J. Clin. Child Psychol. 1992, 21, 407–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Anthony, L.G.; Anthony, B.J.; Glanville, D.N.; Naiman, D.Q.; Waanders, C.; Shaffer, S. The relationships between parenting stress, parenting behaviour and preschoolers’ social competence and behaviour problems in the classroom. Infant Child Dev. Int. J. Res. Pract. 2005, 14, 133–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Costa, N.M.; Weems, C.F.; Pellerin, K.; Dalton, R. Parenting Stress and Childhood Psychopathology: An Examination of Specificity to Internalizing and Externalizing Symptoms. J. Psychopathol. Behav. Assess. 2006, 28, 113–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Rodriguez, C.M. Association Between Independent Reports of Maternal Parenting Stress and Children’s Internalizing Symptomatology. J. Child Fam. Stud. 2011, 20, 631–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Dillmann, J.; Sensoy, Ö.; Schwarzer, G. Parental perceived stress and its consequences on early social-emotional child development during COVID-19 pandemic. J. Early Child. Res. 2022, 20, 524–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Babore, A.; Trumello, C.; Lombardi, L.; Candelori, C.; Chirumbolo, A.; Cattelino, E.; Baiocco, R.; Bramanti, S.M.; Viceconti, M.L.; Pignataro, S.; et al. Mothers’ and Children’s Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown: The Mediating Role of Parenting Stress. Child Psychiatry Hum. Dev. 2021, 54, 134–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Goodman, S.H.; Rouse, M.H.; Connell, A.M.; Broth, M.R.; Hall, C.M.; Heyward, D. Maternal depression and child psychopathology: A meta-analytic review. Clin. Child Fam. Psychol. Rev. 2011, 14, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Connell, A.M.; Goodman, S.H. The association between psychopathology in fathers versus mothers and children’s internalizing and externalizing behavior problems: A meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 2002, 128, 746–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kane, P.; Garber, J. The relations among depression in fathers, children’s psychopathology, and father-child conflict: A meta-analysis. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 2004, 24, 339–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Rasic, D.; Hajek, T.; Alda, M.; Uher, R. Risk of mental illness in offspring of parents with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder: A meta-analysis of family high-risk studies. Schizophr. Bull. 2014, 40, 28–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. van Santvoort, F.; Hosman, C.; Janssens, J.; van Doesum, K.; Reupert, A.; van Loon, L. The Impact of Various Parental Mental Disorders on Children’s Diagnoses: A Systematic Review. Clin. Child Fam. Psychol. Rev. 2015, 18, 281–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Thorup, A.A.E.; Laursen, T.M.; Munk-Olsen, T.; Ranning, A.; Mortensen, P.B.; Plessen, K.J.; Nordentoft, M. Incidence of child and adolescent mental disorders in children aged 0–17 with familial high risk for severe mental illness—A Danish register study. Schizophr. Res. 2018, 197, 298–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Hosman, C.; van Doesum, K.; van Santvoort, F. Prevention of emotional problems and psychiatric risks in children of parents with a mental illness in the Netherlands: I. The scientific basis to a comprehensive approach. Aust. e-J. Adv. Ment. Health 2009, 8, 250–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Prime, H.; Wade, M.; Browne, D.T. Risk and resilience in family well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. Am. Psychol. 2020, 75, 631–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Jones, J.H.; Call, T.A.; Wolford, S.N.; McWey, L.M. Parental Stress and Child Outcomes: The Mediating Role of Family Conflict. J. Child Fam. Stud. 2021, 30, 746–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhou, T.; Chen, W.; Liu, X.; Wu, T.; Wen, L.; Yang, X.; Hou, Z.; Chen, B.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, C.; et al. Children of parents with mental illness in the COVID-19pandemic: A cross-sectional survey in China. Asian J. Psychiatry 2021, 64, 102801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Higgins, J.P.; Thomas, J.; Chandler, J.; Cumpston, M.; Li, T.; Page, M.J.; Welch, V.A. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 6.3 (Updated February 2022). Available online: www.training.cochrane.org/handbook (accessed on 15 February 2023).
  40. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. PLoS Med. 2021, 18, e1003583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Rupinski, M.T.; Dunlap, W.P. Approximating Pearson Product-Moment Correlations from Kendall’s Tau and Spearman’s Rho. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 1996, 56, 419–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Downes, M.J.; Brennan, M.L.; Williams, H.C.; Dean, R.S. Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS). BMJ Open 2016, 6, e011458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Höhne, E.; van der Meer, A.S.; Kamp-Becker, I.; Christiansen, H. A systematic review of risk and protective factors of mental health in unaccompanied minor refugees. Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 2022, 31, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Borenstein, M.; Hedges, L.V.; Higgins, J.P.; Rothstein, H.R. Introduction to Meta-Analysis; Wiley: Chichester, UK, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  45. Haidich, A.B. Meta-analysis in medical research. Hippokratia 2010, 14, 29–37. [Google Scholar]
  46. Beheshti, A. Meta-Mar: Free Online Meta-Analysis Calculator. Available online: https://www.meta-mar.com/ (accessed on 25 October 2022).
  47. Beheshti, A.; Chavanon, M.-L.; Christiansen, H. Emotion dysregulation in adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry 2020, 20, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Knapp, G.; Hartung, J. Improved tests for a random effects meta-regression with a single covariate. Stat. Med. 2003, 22, 2693–2710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. IntHout, J.; Ioannidis, J.P.A.; Borm, G.F. The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method for random effects meta-analysis is straightforward and considerably outperforms the standard DerSimonian-Laird method. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2014, 14, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Cohen, J. A power primer. Psychol. Bull. 1992, 112, 155–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Higgins, J.P.T.; Thompson, S.G.; Deeks, J.J.; Altman, D.G. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003, 327, 557–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Rosenthal, R. The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychol. Bull. 1979, 86, 638–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Black, S.R.; Evans, M.L.; Aaron, L.; Brabham, D.R.; Kaplan, R.M. Covariance Between Parent and Child Symptoms Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic. J. Pediatr. Psychol. 2021, 46, 1182–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Doan, S.N.; Ding, M.; Burniston, A.B.; Smiley, P.A.; Chow, C.M.; Liu, C.H. Changes in Maternal Depression and Children’s Behavior Problems: Investigating the Role of COVID-19-Related Stressors, Hair Cortisol, and Dehydroepiandrosterone. Clin. Psychol. Sci. 2022, 10, 1098–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Feurer, C.; Granros, M.; Calentino, A.E.; Suor, J.H.; Patel, K.; Burkhouse, K.L. The interplay of stress and electrocortical reactivity to reward in the prospective prediction of depression symptoms during COVID-19. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2021, 140, 124–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Fogarty, A.; Brown, S.; Gartland, D.; Mensah, F.; Seymour, M.; Savopoulos, P.; FitzPatrick, K.; Papadopoullos, S.; Giallo, R. Psychosocial factors associated with adolescent depressive and anxiety symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int. J. Behav. Dev. 2022, 46, 308–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Fosco, G.M.; Sloan, C.J.; Fang, S.; Feinberg, M.E. Family vulnerability and disruption during the COVID-19 pandemic: Prospective pathways to child maladjustment. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry Allied Discip. 2022, 63, 47–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Hollenstein, T.; Colasante, T.; Lougheed, J.P. Adolescent and Maternal Anxiety Symptoms Decreased but Depressive Symptoms Increased before to during COVID-19 Lockdown. J. Res. Adolesc. Off. J. Soc. Res. Adolesc. 2021, 31, 517–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Köhler-Dauner, F.; Buchheim, A.; Hildebrand, K.; Mayer, I.; Clemens, V.; Ziegenhain, U.; Fegert, J.M. Maternal attachment representation, the risk of increased depressive symptoms and the influence on children’s mental health during the SARS-CoV-2-pandemic. J. Child Fam. Stud. 2022, 31, 392–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Lengua, L.J.; Thompson, S.F.; Kim, S.G.; Rosen, M.L.; Rodman, A.; Kasparek, S.; Mayes, M.; Zalewski, M.; Meltzoff, A.; McLaughlin, K.A. Maternal mental health mediates the effects of pandemic-related stressors on adolescent psychopathology during COVID-19. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry Allied Discip. 2022, 63, 1544–1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Achterberg, M.; Dobbelaar, S.; Boer, O.D.; Crone, E.A. Perceived stress as mediator for longitudinal effects of the COVID-19 lockdown on wellbeing of parents and children. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 2971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Akgül, G.; Atalan Ergin, D. Adolescents’ and parents’ anxiety during COVID-19: Is there a role of cyberchondriasis and emotion regulation through the internet? Curr. Psychol. 2021, 40, 4750–4759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Bianco, F.; Levante, A.; Petrocchi, S.; Lecciso, F.; Castelli, I. Maternal Psychological Distress and Children’s Internalizing/Externalizing Problems during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Moderating Role Played by Hypermentalization. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 10450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Borbás, R.; Fehlbaum, L.V.; Dimanova, P.; Negri, A.; Arudchelvam, J.; Schnider, C.B.; Raschle, N.M. Mental well-being during the first months of COVID-19 in adults and children: Behavioral evidence and neural precursors. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 17595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Browne, D.T.; Wade, M.; May, S.S.; Jenkins, J.M.; Prime, H. COVID-19 disruption gets inside the family: A two-month multilevel study of family stress during the pandemic. Dev. Psychol. 2021, 57, 1681–1692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Buechel, C.; Nehring, I.; Seifert, C.; Eber, S.; Behrends, U.; Mall, V.; Friedmann, A. A cross-sectional investigation of psychosocial stress factors in German families with children aged 0–3 years during the COVID-19 pandemic: Initial results of the CoronabaBY study. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry Ment. Health 2022, 16, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Crescentini, C.; Feruglio, S.; Matiz, A.; Paschetto, A.; Vidal, E.; Cogo, P.; Fabbro, F. Stuck Outside and Inside: An Exploratory Study on the Effects of the COVID-19 Outbreak on Italian Parents and Children’s Internalizing Symptoms. Front. Psychol. 2020, 11, 586074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Daks, J.S.; Peltz, J.S.; Rogge, R.D. Psychological flexibility and inflexibility as sources of resiliency and risk during a pandemic: Modeling the cascade of COVID-19 stress on family systems with a contextual behavioral science lens. J. Context. Behav. Sci. 2020, 18, 16–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Dollberg, D.G.; Hanetz-Gamliel, K. Mediation-Moderation Links Between Mothers’ ACEs, Mothers’ and Children’s Psychopathology Symptoms, and Maternal Mentalization During COVID-19. Front. Psychiatry 2022, 13, 837423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Dubois-Comtois, K.; Suffren, S.; St-Laurent, D.; Milot, T.; Lemelin, J.-P. Child Psychological Functioning During the COVID-19 Lockdown: An Ecological, Family-Centered Approach. J. Dev. Behav. Pediatr. 2021, 42, 532–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Feinberg, M.E.; Mogle, J.A.; Lee, J.-K.; Tornello, S.L.; Hostetler, M.L.; Cifelli, J.A.; Bai, S.; Hotez, E. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Parent, Child, and Family Functioning. Fam. Process 2022, 61, 361–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Ferraro, L.; La Cascia, C.; Daino, M.; Tripoli, G.; Maniaci, G.; Santorio, C.; Seminerio, F.; Lo Baido, R.; La Barbera, D. Children and Families’ mental health during the first COVID-19 lockdown in Italy. Mediterr. J. Clin. Psychol. 2021, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Foley, S.; Badinlou, F.; Brocki, K.C.; Frick, M.A.; Ronchi, L.; Hughes, C. Family Function and Child Adjustment Difficulties in the COVID-19 Pandemic: An International Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 11136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Fong, H.X.; Cornish, K.; Kirk, H.; Ilias, K.; Shaikh, M.F.; Golden, K.J. Impact of the COVID-19 Lockdown in Malaysia: An Examination of the Psychological Well-Being of Parent-Child Dyads and Child Behavior in Families With Children on the Autism Spectrum. Front. Psychiatry 2021, 12, 733905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Frigerio, A.; Nettuno, F.; Nazzari, S. Maternal mood moderates the trajectory of emotional and behavioural problems from pre- to during the COVID-19 lockdown in preschool children. Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 2022, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Glynn, L.M.; Davis, E.P.; Luby, J.L.; Baram, T.Z.; Sandman, C.A. A predictable home environment may protect child mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. Neurobiol. Stress 2021, 14, 100291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Hails, K.A.; Petts, R.A.; Hostutler, C.A.; Simoni, M.; Greene, R.; Snider, T.C.; Riley, A.R. COVID-19 distress, negative parenting, and child behavioral problems: The moderating role of parent adverse childhood experiences. Child Abus. Negl. 2022, 130, 105450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Khoury, J.E.; Kaur, H.; Gonzalez, A. Parental Mental Health and Hostility Are Associated With Longitudinal Increases in Child Internalizing and Externalizing Problems During COVID-19. Front. Psychol. 2021, 12, 706168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Kim, S.J.; Lee, S.; Han, H.; Jung, J.; Yang, S.J.; Shin, Y. Parental Mental Health and Children’s Behaviors and Media Usage during COVID-19-Related School Closures. J. Korean Med. Sci. 2021, 36, e184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Lee, S.J.; Ward, K.P.; Chang, O.D.; Downing, K.M. Parenting activities and the transition to home-based education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Child. Youth Serv. Rev. 2021, 122, 105585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Li, M.; Li, L.; Wu, F.; Cao, Y.; Zhang, H.; Li, X.; Zou, J.; Guo, Z.; Kong, L. Perceived family adaptability and cohesion and depressive symptoms: A comparison of adolescents and parents during COVID-19 pandemic. J. Affect. Disord. 2021, 287, 255–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Low, N.; Mounts, N.S. Economic stress, parenting, and adolescents’ adjustment during the COVID-19 pandemic. Fam. Relat. 2022, 71, 90–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Maggio, M.G.; Stagnitti, M.C.; Calatozzo, P.; Cannavò, A.; Bruschetta, D.; Foti Cuzzola, M.; Manuli, A.; Pioggia, G.; Calabrò, R.S. What about the Consequences of the Use of Distance Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic? A Survey on the Psychological Effects in Both Children and Parents. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 12641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Marchetti, D.; Fontanesi, L.; Di Giandomenico, S.; Mazza, C.; Roma, P.; Verrocchio, M.C. The Effect of Parent Psychological Distress on Child Hyperactivity/Inattention During the COVID-19 Lockdown: Testing the Mediation of Parent Verbal Hostility and Child Emotional Symptoms. Front. Psychol. 2020, 11, 567052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Marzilli, E.; Cerniglia, L.; Tambelli, R.; Trombini, E.; de Pascalis, L.; Babore, A.; Trumello, C.; Cimino, S. The COVID-19 Pandemic and Its Impact on Families’ Mental Health: The Role Played by Parenting Stress, Parents’ Past Trauma, and Resilience. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 11450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. McArthur, B.A.; Racine, N.; McDonald, S.; Tough, S.; Madigan, S. Child and family factors associated with child mental health and well-being during COVID-19. Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 2021, 32, 223–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. McMahon, J.; Gallagher, E.A.; Walsh, E.H.; O’Connor, C. Experiences of remote education during COVID-19 and its relationship to the mental health of primary school children. Ir. Educ. Stud. 2021, 40, 457–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Morban, H.; Demian, A.; Massiel Méndez, J.; Sosa, C. Efecto Spillover en los cuidadores de infantes de 1.5 a 5 años durante la pandemia del COVID-19. Pediatría (Asunción) 2020, 47, 64–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Moulin, F.; El-Aarbaoui, T.; Bustamante, J.J.H.; Héron, M.; Mary-Krause, M.; Rouquette, A.; Galéra, C.; Melchior, M. Risk and protective factors related to children’s symptoms of emotional difficulties and hyperactivity/inattention during the COVID-19-related lockdown in France: Results from a community sample. Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 2021, 31, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Penner, F.; Elzaki, Y.; Contreras, H.T.; Santos, R.P.; Sarver, D.E. Behavioral, Affective, and Cognitive Parenting Mechanisms of Child Internalizing and Externalizing Problems during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Res. Child Adolesc. Psychopathol. 2022, 50, 1121–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Polónyiová, K.; Belica, I.; Celušáková, H.; Janšáková, K.; Kopčíková, M.; Szapuová, Ž.; Ostatníková, D. Comparing the impact of the first and second wave of COVID-19 lockdown on Slovak families with typically developing children and children with autism spectrum disorder. Autism Int. J. Res. Pract. 2022, 26, 1046–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Radanović, A.; Micić, I.; Pavlović, S.; Krstić, K. Don’t Think That Kids Aren’t Noticing: Indirect Pathways to Children’s Fear of COVID-19. Front. Psychol. 2021, 12, 635952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Rizeq, J.; Korczak, D.J.; Cost, K.T.; Anagnostou, E.; Charach, A.; Monga, S.; Birken, C.S.; Kelley, E.; Nicolson, R.; Burton, C.L.; et al. Vulnerability pathways to mental health outcomes in children and parents during COVID-19. Curr. Psychol. 2021, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Robertson, E.L.; Piscitello, J.; Schmidt, E.; Mallar, C.; Davidson, B.; Natale, R. Longitudinal transactional relationships between caregiver and child mental health during the COVID-19 global pandemic. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry Ment. Health 2021, 15, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Romero, E.; López-Romero, L.; Domínguez-Álvarez, B.; Villar, P.; Gómez-Fraguela, J.A. Testing the Effects of COVID-19 Confinement in Spanish Children: The Role of Parents’ Distress, Emotional Problems and Specific Parenting. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 6975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Russell, B.S.; Hutchison, M.; Tambling, R.; Tomkunas, A.J.; Horton, A.L. Initial Challenges of Caregiving During COVID-19: Caregiver Burden, Mental Health, and the Parent-Child Relationship. Child Psychiatry Hum. Dev. 2020, 51, 671–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Saddik, B.; Hussein, A.; Albanna, A.; Elbarazi, I.; Al-Shujairi, A.; Temsah, M.-H.; Saheb Sharif-Askari, F.; Stip, E.; Hamid, Q.; Halwani, R. The psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on adults and children in the United Arab Emirates: A nationwide cross-sectional study. BMC Psychiatry 2021, 21, 224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Shelleby, E.C.; Pittman, L.D.; Bridgett, D.J.; Keane, J.; Zolinski, S.; Caradec, J. Associations between local COVID-19 case rates, pandemic-related financial stress and parent and child functioning. J. Fam. Psychol. 2022, 36, 932–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Spencer, A.E.; Oblath, R.; Dayal, R.; Loubeau, J.K.; Lejeune, J.; Sikov, J.; Savage, M.; Posse, C.; Jain, S.; Zolli, N.; et al. Changes in psychosocial functioning among urban, school-age children during the COVID-19 pandemic. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry Ment. Health 2021, 15, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Sun, J.; Singletary, B.; Jiang, H.; Justice, L.M.; Lin, T.-J.; Purtell, K.M. Child behavior problems during COVID-19: Associations with parent distress and child social-emotional skills. J. Appl. Dev. Psychol. 2022, 78, 101375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Syed, S.E.; Khan, N.M.; Ahmed, H.U. Emotional and Behavioural Changes in Children and Adolescents and Their Association With Parental Depression During COVID-19 Pandemic: A Pilot Study in Bangladesh. East Asian Arch. Psychiatry Off. J. Hong Kong Coll. Psychiatr. 2022, 32, 11–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Wang, C.; Cheong, Y.; Zhu, Q.; Havewala, M.; Ye, Y. Parent work-life conflict and adolescent adjustment during COVID-19: Mental health and parenting as mediators. J. Fam. Psychol. 2022, 36, 325–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Zhang, X. Household Chaos and Caregivers’ and Young Children’s Mental Health during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mediation Model. J. Child Fam. Stud. 2022, 31, 1547–1557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Zhang, Y.; Zhan, N.; Zou, J.; Xie, D.; Liu, M.; Geng, F. The transmission of psychological distress and lifestyles from parents to children during COVID-19. J. Affect. Disord. 2022, 303, 74–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Zhou, T.; Bian, X.; Zhang, K.; Zheng, S.; Lin, Y.; Zheng, H.; Liu, J.; Finan, J. Maternal Anxiety Symptoms and Chinese Adolescents’ Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Protective Role of Adolescents’ Self-Compassion. Front. Psychiatry 2022, 13, 837846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Zhou, X.; Shein, B.W.; Khalil, A.; Duncan, R.J. Parent and child adjustment dual trajectories at the beginning of the COVID-19 syndemic. Fam. Process 2022. [CrossRef]
  107. Berry, A.; Burke, T.; Carr, A. The impact of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic on parents of children with externalising difficulties in ireland: A longitudinal cohort study. Int. J. Clin. Pract. 2021, 75, e14941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Blackwell, C.K.; Mansolf, M.; Sherlock, P.; Ganiban, J.; Hofheimer, J.A.; Barone, C.J.; Bekelman, T.A.; Blair, C.; Cella, D.; Collazo, S.; et al. Youth Well-being During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Pediatrics 2022, 149, e2021054754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Büber, A.; Aktaş Terzioğlu, M. Caregiver’s reports of their children’s psychological symptoms after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic and caregiver’s perceived stress in Turkey. Nord. J. Psychiatry 2022, 76, 215–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Chan, R.C.H. Dyadic associations between COVID-19-related stress and mental well-being among parents and children in Hong Kong: An actor–partner interdependence model approach. Fam. Process 2022, 61, 1730–1748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Chartier, S.; Delhalle, M.; Baiverlin, A.; Blavier, A. Parental peritraumatic distress and feelings of parental competence in relation to COVID-19 lockdown measures: What is the impact on children’s peritraumatic distress? Eur. J. Trauma Dissociation 2021, 5, 100191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Cohodes, E.M.; McCauley, S.; Gee, D.G. Parental Buffering of Stress in the Time of COVID-19: Family-Level Factors May Moderate the Association Between Pandemic-Related Stress and Youth Symptomatology. Res. Child Adolesc. Psychopathol. 2021, 49, 935–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Corbett, B.A.; Muscatello, R.A.; Klemencic, M.E.; Schwartzman, J.M. The impact of COVID-19 on stress, anxiety, and coping in youth with and without autism and their parents. Autism Res. Off. J. Int. Soc. Autism Res. 2021, 14, 1496–1511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Davidson, B.; Schmidt, E.; Mallar, C.; Mahmoud, F.; Rothenberg, W.; Hernandez, J.; Berkovits, M.; Jent, J.; Delamater, A.; Natale, R. Risk and resilience of well-being in caregivers of young children in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Transl. Behav. Med. 2021, 11, 305–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. de Vet, S.M.; Vrijhof, C.I.; van der Veek, S.M.C.; Pieplenbosch, J.M.; van Bakel, H.J.A.; Vermeer, H.J. Child Care in Times of COVID-19: Predictors of Distress in Dutch Children and Parents When Re-entering Center-Based Child Care After a 2-Month Lockdown. Front. Psychol. 2021, 12, 718898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Donker, M.H.; Mastrotheodoros, S.; Branje, S. Development of parent-adolescent relationships during the COVID-19 pandemic: The role of stress and coping. Dev. Psychol. 2021, 57, 1611–1622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Essler, S.; Christner, N.; Paulus, M. Longitudinal Relations Between Parental Strain, Parent-Child Relationship Quality, and Child Well-Being During the Unfolding COVID-19 Pandemic. Child Psychiatry Hum. Dev. 2021, 52, 995–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Liang, Z.; Mazzeschi, C.; Delvecchio, E. The Impact of Parental Stress on Italian Adolescents’ Internalizing Symptoms during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Longitudinal Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 8074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Orgilés, M.; Espada, J.P.; Delvecchio, E.; Francisco, R.; Mazzeschi, C.; Pedro, M.; Morales, A. Anxiety and Depressive Symptoms in Children and Adolescents during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Transcultural Approach. Psicothema 2021, 33, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Russell, B.S.; Tomkunas, A.J.; Hutchison, M.; Tambling, R.R.; Horton, A.L. The Protective Role of Parent Resilience on Mental Health and the Parent-Child Relationship During COVID-19. Child Psychiatry Hum. Dev. 2022, 53, 183–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Singletary, B.; Schmeer, K.K.; Purtell, K.M.; Sayers, R.C.; Justice, L.M.; Lin, T.-J.; Jiang, H. Understanding family life during the COVID-19 shutdown. Fam. Relat. 2022, 71, 475–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Spinelli, M.; Lionetti, F.; Pastore, M.; Fasolo, M. Parents’ Stress and Children’s Psychological Problems in Families Facing the COVID-19 Outbreak in Italy. Front. Psychol. 2020, 11, 1713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Thibodeau-Nielsen, R.B.; Palermo, F.; White, R.E.; Wilson, A.; Dier, S. Child Adjustment During COVID-19: The Role of Economic Hardship, Caregiver Stress, and Pandemic Play. Front. Psychol. 2021, 12, 716651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Tso, W.W.Y.; Wong, R.S.; Tung, K.T.S.; Rao, N.; Fu, K.W.; Yam, J.C.S.; Chua, G.T.; Chen, E.Y.H.; Lee, T.M.C.; Chan, S.K.W.; et al. Vulnerability and resilience in children during the COVID-19 pandemic. Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 2020, 31, 161–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Westrupp, E.M.; Bennett, C.; Berkowitz, T.; Youssef, G.J.; Toumbourou, J.W.; Tucker, R.; Andrews, F.J.; Evans, S.; Teague, S.J.; Karantzas, G.C.; et al. Child, parent, and family mental health and functioning in Australia during COVID-19: Comparison to pre-pandemic data. Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 2021, 32, 317–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Yakşi, N.; Eroğlu, M.; Özdemir, M. COVID-19: Predictors of Depression and Anxiety Among High School Students. Cyprus Turk. J. Psychiatry Psychol. 2021, 3, 192–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Zhang, L.; Cui, Z.; Sasser, J.; Carvalho, C.; Oshri, A. Family stress during the pandemic worsens the effect of adverse parenting on adolescent sleep quality. Child Abus. Negl. 2022, 123, 105390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Andrés-Romero, M.P.; Flujas-Contreras, J.M.; Fernández-Torres, M.; Gómez-Becerra, I.; Sánchez-López, P. Analysis of Psychosocial Adjustment in the Family During Confinement: Problems and Habits of Children and Youth and Parental Stress and Resilience. Front. Psychol. 2021, 12, 647645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Cusinato, M.; Iannattone, S.; Spoto, A.; Poli, M.; Moretti, C.; Gatta, M.; Miscioscia, M. Stress, Resilience, and Well-Being in Italian Children and Their Parents during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 8297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Giannotti, M.; Mazzoni, N.; Bentenuto, A.; Venuti, P.; de Falco, S. Family adjustment to COVID-19 lockdown in Italy: Parental stress, coparenting, and child externalizing behavior. Fam. Process 2021, 61, 745–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Giannotti, M.; Mazzoni, N.; Facchini, M.; de Falco, S.; Venuti, P.; Iandolo, G. Determinants of maternal stress during COVID-19 outbreak in Italy and Spain: A cross-cultural investigation. J. Fam. Psychol. 2022, 36, 827–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Lionetti, F.; Spinelli, M.; Moscardino, U.; Ponzetti, S.; Garito, M.C.; Dellagiulia, A.; Aureli, T.; Fasolo, M.; Pluess, M. The interplay between parenting and environmental sensitivity in the prediction of children’s externalizing and internalizing behaviors during COVID-19. Dev. Psychopathol. 2022, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Mensi, M.M.; Capone, L.; Rogantini, C.; Orlandi, M.; Ballante, E.; Borgatti, R. COVID-19-related psychiatric impact on Italian adolescent population: A cross-sectional cohort study. J. Commun. Psychol. 2021, 49, 1457–1469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Zambrana, K.A.; Hart, K.C. Riesgo Y Resiliencia: Exploring the Role of Parenting Stress and Self-efficacy on Young Latino Children’s Well-being and Home Learning Experiences during COVID-19. J. Lat. Educ. 2022, 21, 212–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Faraone, S.V.; Biederman, J. Depression: A family affair. Lancet 1998, 351, 158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Gray, B.; Robinson, C.; Seddon, D. Invisible Children: Young Carers of Parents with Mental Health Problems—The Perspectives of Professionals. Child Adolesc. Ment. Health 2008, 13, 169–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Chung, G.; Lanier, P.; Wong, P.Y.J. Mediating Effects of Parental Stress on Harsh Parenting and Parent-Child Relationship during Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic in Singapore. J. Fam. Violence 2022, 37, 801–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Daundasekara, S.S.; Beauchamp, J.E.S.; Hernandez, D.C. Parenting stress mediates the longitudinal effect of maternal depression on child anxiety/depressive symptoms. J. Affect. Disord. 2021, 295, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. van Loon, L.M.A.; van de Ven, M.O.M.; van Doesum, K.T.M.; Witteman, C.L.M.; Hosman, C.M.H. The Relation Between Parental Mental Illness and Adolescent Mental Health: The Role of Family Factors. J. Child Fam. Stud. 2014, 23, 1201–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Leinonen, J.A.; Solantaus, T.S.; Punamäki, R.-L. Parental mental health and children’s adjustment: The quality of marital interaction and parenting as mediating factors. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry Allied Discip. 2003, 44, 227–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Kroes, G.; Veerman, J.W.; de Bruyn, E.E. Bias in Parental Reports? Eur. J. Psychol. Assess. 2003, 19, 195–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Lambert, M.J. Outcome in psychotherapy: The past and important advances. Psychotherapy 2013, 50, 42–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  143. Compas, B.E.; Champion, J.E.; Forehand, R.; Cole, D.A.; Reeslund, K.L.; Fear, J.; Hardcastle, E.J.; Keller, G.; Rakow, A.; Garai, E.; et al. Coping and parenting: Mediators of 12-month outcomes of a family group cognitive-behavioral preventive intervention with families of depressed parents. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 2010, 78, 623–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  144. Compas, B.E.; Forehand, R.; Keller, G.; Champion, J.E.; Rakow, A.; Reeslund, K.L.; McKee, L.; Fear, J.M.; Colletti, C.J.M.; Hardcastle, E.; et al. Randomized controlled trial of a family cognitive-behavioral preventive intervention for children of depressed parents. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 2009, 77, 1007–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  145. Stracke, M.; Gilbert, K.; Kieser, M.; Klose, C.; Krisam, J.; Ebert, D.D.; Buntrock, C.; Christiansen, H. COMPARE Family (Children of Mentally Ill Parents at Risk Evaluation): A Study Protocol for a Preventive Intervention for Children of Mentally Ill Parents (Triple P, Evidence-Based Program That Enhances Parentings Skills, in Addition to Gold-Standard CBT With the Mentally Ill Parent) in a Multicenter RCT-Part II. Front. Psychiatry 2019, 10, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Müller, A.D.; Gjøde, I.C.T.; Eigil, M.S.; Busck, H.; Bonne, M.; Nordentoft, M.; Thorup, A.A.E. VIA Family-a family-based early intervention versus treatment as usual for familial high-risk children: A study protocol for a randomized clinical trial. Trials 2019, 20, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Cluver, L.; Lachman, J.M.; Sherr, L.; Wessels, I.; Krug, E.; Rakotomalala, S.; Blight, S.; Hillis, S.; Bachman, G.; Green, O.; et al. Parenting in a time of COVID-19. Lancet 2020, 395, e64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Maudsley Charity. Families Under Pressure. Available online: https://maudsleycharity.org/familiesunderpressure/ (accessed on 17 December 2022).
  149. Schneider, S.; Christiansen, H.; Büttner, M. Familien Unter Druck. Available online: https://www.familienunterdruck.de/ (accessed on 10 January 2023).
Ijerph 20 04485 g001 550
Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram.
Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram.
Ijerph 20 04485 g001
Table
Table 1. Summary of meta-analytic results on associations between parental variables prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic and children’s mental health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Table 1. Summary of meta-analytic results on associations between parental variables prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic and children’s mental health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Research QuestionParental VariableChild OutcomeMeta-Analytic Results
kor95% CIzp-ValueQI2T2Fail-Safe N
1. Are parental mental health problems prior to the COVID-19 pandemic associated with child mental health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic?Psy-pathol Psy-pathol23510.23(−0.85; 0.94)1.960.304.65, p = 0.0378.5%0.022
Psy-patholInt symp47540.18(−0.07; 0.40)2.280.1113.30, p < 0.0177.4%0.019
Psy-patholDep symp24030.16(−0.29; 0.56)4.530.140.53, p = 0.470.0%0
Psy-patholAnx symp24030.09(−0.03; 0.21)9.610.070.04, p = 0.850.0%0
Psy-patholExt symp23510.23(−0.49; 0.76)3.870.161.25, p = 0.2620.2%0.002
Dep sympPsy-pathol21880.29(−0.73; 0.91)3.040.201.65, p = 0.2039.5%0.007
Dep sympInt symp33340.19(0.11; 0.28)9.650.010.27, p = 0.870.0%012
Dep sympDep symp35820.23(−0.10; 0.51)3.030.094.51, p = 0.1055.6%0.009
Dep sympExt symp21880.20(−0.37; 0.67)4.380.140.40, p = 0.530.0%0
2. Are current parental mental health symptoms associated with child mental health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic?Psy-patholPsy-pathol2511,8830.36(0.31; 0.42)12.26<0.001226.39, p < 0.00189.4%0.02012,464
Psy-patholInt symp2314,3480.36(0.30; 0.42)10.90<0.001213.80, p < 0.00189.7%0.02311,478
Psy-patholDep symp865400.27(0.16; 0.37)5.93<0.00157.00, p < 0.00187.7%0.0141076
Psy-patholAnx symp760180.27(0.19; 0.34)8.26<0.00125.15, p < 0.00176.1%0.006823
Psy-patholExt symp1891030.32(0.24; 0.38)8.84<0.001151.49, p < 0.00188.8%0.0215140
Psy-patholGen stress512140.31(−0.01; 0.57)2.710.05367.76, p < 0.00194.1%0.065
Dep sympPsy-pathol1856920.39(0.32; 0.44)12.26<0.001100.62, p < 0.00183.1%0.0154935
Dep sympInt symp1683570.28(0.24; 0.33)12.89<0.00135.01, p < 0.0157.2%0.0042751
Dep sympDep symp1114,9580.27(0.17; 0.37)5.75<0.001196.72, p < 0.00194.9%0.0232075
Dep sympAnx symp862750.25(0.21; 0.30)11.96<0.00114.33, p < 0.0551.1%0.002856
Dep sympExt symp1340180.27(0.22; 0.33)10.62<0.00122.26, p = 0.0346.1%0.0031194
Dep sympGen stress39230.39(−0.47; 0.87)1.900.2071.37, p < 0.00197.2%0.130
Anx sympPsy-pathol1241100.31(0.25; 0.38)9.89<0.00143.49, p < 0.00174.7%0.0081535
Anx sympInt symp1514,5710.30(0.23; 0.36)9.85<0.001152.43, p < 0.00190.8%0.0105098
Anx sympDep symp656130.22(0.08; 0.35)4.07<0.0141.34, p < 0.00187.9%0.015481
Anx sympAnx symp965490.26(0.20; 0.33)8.91<0.00136.32, p < 0.00178.0%0.0061138
Anx sympExt symp935170.23(0.17; 0.28)8.80<0.00118.32, p = 0.0256.3%0.004510
Anx sympGen stress39230.33(−0.41; 0.81)1.910.2034.72, p < 0.00194.2%0.088
3. Are parents’ general stress levels associated with child mental health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic?Gen stressPsy-pathol2038,9910.34(0.29, 0.39)13.24<0.001433.74, p < 0.00195.6%0.01218,997
Gen stressInt symp2140,0840.31(0.27, 0.35)14.37<0.00187.39, p < 0.00177.1%0.00712,548
Gen stressDep symp1052430.30(0.21; 0.39)7.39<0.00150.19, p < 0.00182.1%0.0141510
Gen stressAnx symp849130.32(0.22; 0.41)7.33<0.00129.68, p < 0.00176.4%0.0121124
Gen stressExt symp1736,8440.31(0.27, 0.35)17.37<0.001161.94, p < 0.00190.1%0.00410,637
Gen stressGen stress1341100.29(0.18, 0.39)5.49<0.001139.59, p < 0.00191.4%0.0331659
4. Is parenting stress associated with child mental health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic?Par stressPsy-pathol942130.44(0.33, 0.54)8.32<0.00143.82, p < 0.00181.7%0.0202387
Par stressInt symp733070.46(0.26, 0.63)5.18<0.0195.89, p < 0.00193.7%0.0591315
Par stressDep symp22510.36(−0.95; 0.99)2.160.284.30, p = 0.0476.7%0.047
Par stressExt symp840790.45(0.39, 0.50)16.37<0.00115.83, p = 0.0355.8%0.0022354
Par stressGen stress216820.51(−0.12, 0.85)10.380.063.67, p = 0.0672.8% 0.004
anx symp, anxiety symptoms; dep symp, depressive symptoms; ext symp, externalizing symptoms; gen stress, general stress; I2, Higgins’ and Thompson’s I2 statistic; int symp, internalizing symptoms; k, number of studies included in meta-analysis; o, number of observations; Q, Cochran’s Q statistic; p, p-value; par stress, parenting stress; psy-pathol, psychopathology; r, Pearson’s product–moment correlation; CI, confidence interval; Fail-safe N for significant meta-analyses calculated using Rosenthal’s approach; T2, tau-squared statistic; z, Z value.
Table
Table 2. Summary of significant meta-analytic results on associations between parental variables prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic and children’s mental health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Table 2. Summary of significant meta-analytic results on associations between parental variables prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic and children’s mental health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Child Variables
(all during the COVID-19 pandemic)
PsychopathologyInternalizing symptomsDepressive symptomsAnxiety symptomsExternalizing symptomsGeneral stress
Parental variables(1) Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic
Depressive symptoms 0.19
(2) During the COVID-19 pandemic
Psychopathology0.360.360.270.270.32
Depressive symptoms0.390.280.270.250.27
Anxiety symptoms0.310.300.220.260.23
General stress0.340.310.300.320.310.29
Parenting stress0.440.46 0.45
Numbers are Pearson’s product–moment correlations r; all specified correlations were significant with p < 0.05.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Stracke, M.; Heinzl, M.; Müller, A.D.; Gilbert, K.; Thorup, A.A.E.; Paul, J.L.; Christiansen, H. Mental Health Is a Family Affair—Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Associations between Mental Health Problems in Parents and Children during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 4485. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20054485

AMA Style

Stracke M, Heinzl M, Müller AD, Gilbert K, Thorup AAE, Paul JL, Christiansen H. Mental Health Is a Family Affair—Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Associations between Mental Health Problems in Parents and Children during the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023; 20(5):4485. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20054485

Chicago/Turabian Style

Stracke, Markus, Miriam Heinzl, Anne Dorothee Müller, Kristin Gilbert, Anne Amalie Elgaard Thorup, Jean Lillian Paul, and Hanna Christiansen. 2023. "Mental Health Is a Family Affair—Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Associations between Mental Health Problems in Parents and Children during the COVID-19 Pandemic" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20, no. 5: 4485. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20054485

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop