Next Article in Journal
Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis as a Complication after Gadolinium-Containing Contrast Agents: A Rapid Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Ten-Year Trend Analysis of Mortality Due to External Causes of Injury in People with Disabilities, South Korea, 2008–2017
Previous Article in Journal
Is Stress in Contact Centers Inevitable?
Previous Article in Special Issue
Disparities in Accessing Sexual and Reproductive Health Services at the Intersection of Disability and Female Adolescence in Tanzania
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 18
Issue 6
10.3390/ijerph18062991
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Diseases Costs and Impact of the Caring Role on Informal Carers of Children with Neuromuscular Disease

by
Alicia Aurora Rodríguez
*,
Óscar Martínez
,
Imanol Amayra
,
Juan Francisco López-Paz
,
Mohammad Al-Rashaida
,
Esther Lázaro
,
Patricia Caballero
,
Manuel Pérez
,
Sarah Berrocoso
,
Maitane García
,
Paula María Luna
,
Paula Pérez-Núñez
and
Nicole Passi
Neuro-e-Motion Research Team, Faculty of Psychology and Education, University of Deusto, Av. Universidades, 24, 48007 Bilbao, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(6), 2991; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18062991
Submission received: 26 January 2021 / Revised: 9 March 2021 / Accepted: 10 March 2021 / Published: 15 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Disability and Healthcare Disparities)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This study aims to evaluate the costs of informal care for children with neuromuscular disease and evaluate how physical and psychological health is associated with socio-demographic variables. A cross sectional design was used with a convenience sample of 110 carers that participated in this study. Participants were recruited from Spanish hospitals and rare diseases organizations. Economic costs and sociodemographic aspects were assessed using the economic costs questionnaire and the sociodemographic questionnaire. Physical and psychological health was evaluated using the CarerQol-7D, PHQ-15, Barthel Index, Zarit Overload Scale and Satisfaction with Life Scale. Carers of children with neuromuscular disease spent a large percentage of their annual income in physical therapy, psychological care and speech therapy. Informal costs differed according to the degree of dependency of the child. These were higher in those caregivers whose child under their care presented low functional independence. The loss of work productivity was related to marital status, use of professional services and the child’s dependency. Finally, carers who were female, single or separated and without a job showed worse physical and psychological health. The results highlighted that carers have to face a number of high costs because of the non-existence of social protection and due to the child’s diagnosis.

1. Background

Neuromuscular diseases (NMDs) are an heterogeneous group of diagnoses that are genetic and usually hereditary. Their worldwide prevalence ranges from 7.1 to 26.5 per 100,000 people [1]. NMDs most important characteristics include progressive loss of muscular strength, atrophy or hypertrophy, fatigue, myalgia, muscular rigidity and the degeneration of all the muscles and nerves that control them [2]. At an early age, they need specific care, which is fundamentally provided by their relatives who are usually women [3].
Caring for a child with an NMD can have a serious impact on the carer’s life, with chronic stress being one of the most important problem that they have to face [4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. Studies conducted by Picci et al. [11] have indicated that parents of children with NMDs have more anxiety and physical problems than those whose children are affected by other, more prevalent diseases. Besides, the physical, psychological and social quality of life (QoL) of the carer of a person with an NMD is also undermined by the overload they feel [12,13,14].
Many of the carers are vulnerable, since tackling a family member’s disease not only carries a physical and/or psychological burden, but also results in a series of economic costs derived from the disease, the degree of disability and its progression [15,16,17,18].
The economic coverage of the health system in Spain is high. People with NMD have access to almost every health service (except psychologists, physiotherapists, psychomotor educators, aquatic therapists, equine therapists and speech therapists). Furthermore, most of the drugs are covered by social security [19]. However, the low functional independence and the economic and social burden caused by NMD also makes it difficult for the health system to address them [20]. Likewise, a broad associative movement has been developed in Spain. For years, the organizations and federations of people with NMD in Spain have played an important role in the development of actions aimed at improving care and research in NMD [20].
The economic costs arising from informal care have been identified as one of the main factors to be faced by carers [17,18,21,22]. These costs are very high in NMDs [23,24].
Several studies divide the costs associated with NMD into four main categories: (a) direct medical costs (e.g., hospitalizations, visits to doctors or other health professionals, medical tests and evaluations, medication); (b) direct non-medical costs (e.g., disbursements related to non-medical aid); (c) costs associated with informal care (i.e., paid and unpaid informal care by the primary carer); (d) indirect costs (i.e., production losses for the patient and the primary carer due to absenteeism and reduced productivity during working time) [25,26,27,28,29].
Few studies include an assessment of indirect costs, making their estimation more difficult. Landfeldt et al. [27] indicated that 47% of the costs associated with the disease were derived from informal care and indirect costs, which represented a significant proportion of the total cost related to it [30].
Moreover, it has been observed that, while the economic burden increases in families of children with NMDs, QoL and psychological health decrease in these families [12,31,32,33].
When health expenditure increases, the economic calculations applied to health become particularly important. The nature of countries’ economies often means that economic support is provided for institutional care but not so much for home care, resulting in very few services being available free of charge. This directly affects families and, consequently, carers, who often have no choice but to provide informal home care [34,35].
The economic importance and the financial impact of NMDs in Europe have not yet been sufficiently investigated. According to Schepelmann et al. [36], most studies have focused on QoL rather than on economic data. Studies aimed at calculating the cost of a disease are useful for distributing resources, as they indicate which components have a greater role in the overall cost and make it possible to produce an economic evaluation of the possible interventions for primary, secondary and tertiary prevention [37,38]. The assessment of NMDs’ economic burden is very useful for setting intervention priorities and evaluating the effectiveness of therapeutic strategies [39]. It is important to implement these studies in order to reveal the real impact of a disease, which gives rise to a line of work to measure the loss of social welfare and move towards research for the assessment of health technology. Ultimately, their implementation would provide important information to the agents in charge of allocating health and social resources [40]. This study takes into consideration the needs described in previous research on carers and the absence of assessment of the economic impact that looking after children with NMDs has on carers’ psychological health. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the cost of informal care in the families of children with NMDs and the economic support provided by institutions. Additionally, how physical and psychological health (QoL, burden, satisfaction with life and somatic symptoms) is associated with sociodemographic variables, and how institutions provide economic support to these families.

2. Method

Sample

A cross-sectional survey was carried out on carers of children with NMD. A total of 110 parents of children with NMDs participated in the study. A convenience sample of 110 people out of 200 who were contacted by associations and hospitals was used. Participants were recruited from two hospitals (Basurto University Hospital and Cruces University Hospital) and from the Spanish Federation of Neuromuscular Diseases.
The inclusion criteria were as follows: (a) being a parent of a child diagnosed with an NMD; (b) being over 18 years of age; (c) being a resident in Spain and having Spanish as one of their main languages; (d) having children under their care who were under 18 years of age.
The exclusion criteria were as follows: (a) being a parent of a child with any psychological or psychiatric diagnosis not secondary to an NMD; (b) presence of uncompensated sensory deficits that prevent the administration of the evaluation protocol; (c) illiteracy.

3. Measures

3.1. Sociodemographic Data

The first instrument was a 17-item ad hoc questionnaire, which collected the participants’ sociodemographic data (e.g., sex, age, academic level, type of employment and marital status).

3.2. Economic Data

The questionnaire of economic costs associated with care was included and had 248 items (technical aids the family had to buy, money spent in activities aimed at improving the health of the child and the carer, time spent in these activities and loss of work productivity). This questionnaire is supported by studies conducted with people with NMD [30,31,35,36,40].

3.3. Somatic Symptomatology

The PHQ-15 [41] was used to assess the somatic symptomatology associated with care. This questionnaire consists of 15 items referring to 15 possible physical problems that may have affected carers during the previous 4 weeks. Studies such as that by Ros, Comas and Garcia-Garcia [42] have demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha 0.78). In the current study, the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.88.

3.4. Carer’s Overload

The Zarit Overload Scale [43] was used to assess the overload that participants may feel due to the caring experience. This assesses the workload of carers with dependents and determines the burden that the carer experiences in an overall score. It consists of 22 items, measured on a five-point Likert-type response scale. It has been shown to have a good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha 0.91) [44]. In the current study, the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.90.

3.5. Satisfaction with Life

The Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) was employed to assess satisfaction in the life of the carer [45]. SWLS measures the individual’s level of satisfaction with life at that moment in time. It includes five questions and each question is rated on a 7-point scale (1 = not agree at all with the item, 7 = strongly agree). The possible range of this scale is from 1–7 per question. Cronbach’s alpha was 0.89 [46]. In the Spanish version, a high internal consistency of the scale has been demonstrated, with Cronbach’s alpha coefficients ranging from 0.79 to 0.89 [47]. In the current study, the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.88.

3.6. Quality of Life

QoL was assessed using the CarerQol [48]. This measures care-related QoL and consists of 7 items. The values of the CarerQol-7D ranged between 0.59 and 0.81. ICCs of the CarerQol7D had values between 0.55 and 0.94 [49]. Well-being (CarerQol-VAS) is measured in terms of happiness using an analog visual scale (VAS) with the “completely unhappy” and “completely happy” endpoints. Subjective burden (CarerQol-7D) is measured in seven dimensions: self-realization, relationship with the patient, mental health, economic problems, activities of daily living, external support and physical health [50]. The CarerQol-7D had a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.641 [51] in one study and a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.62 in another study [52]. In the current study, the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.63.

3.7. Level of Functional Independence

The Barthel Index [53] was used to assess the level of functional independence in personal activities of daily living. The internal consistency of the test ranged between 0.86 and 0.92 [54]. In the current study, the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.87.

4. Procedure

The researchers contacted the managers of hospitals and different NMD organizations in Spain by e-mail or phone to recruit potential participants. Two hospitals (the University Hospital of Basurto and the University Hospital of Cruces) and Spanish Federation of Neuromuscular Diseases agreed to recruit participants. After approval, all potential participants were sent an email that included the background information about the study, a consent form and a link to the survey. Surveys were sent to the participants with the assistance of Qualtrics. The protocol lasted approximately one hour (60 ± 20 min). Each participant signed an informed consent form. The research was approved by the Responsible Ethics Commission (Ref: ETK-39/18-19) and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Statistical Analysis

First, descriptive analyses were carried out on the annual direct social and health costs that the family (carer) of a child with an NMD had to bear. Second, the percentage of family income used to pay for direct costs was evaluated. To calculate the percentage of the family income that was used to cover each of the costs, the following equation formula was used: annual service cost-annual public funding received/income of the annual family unit.
Third, the replacement method was used to carry out cost analyses of informal care. The substitution or replacement method [55] was used, since it is a method widely used by researchers in Spain [56,57]. The technique involves assessing care hours spent by using the market price of a similar substitute service. In this case, the market price that would have to be paid for the service they provided free of charge was used as the valuation criterion. Therefore, this would be the expense in terms of formal care that society would have to pay in case the informal carer was unable to provide those services. The overall care hours were assessed on the basis of home carers’ hourly market wage rate, according to their collective agreement for the year 2018 [57]. Fourth, the loss of work productivity was analyzed by asking the participants directly.
Descriptive statistics were used to describe the participants. Continuous variables (e.g., sex or age) were described by mean and standard deviation, and categorical variables by frequency and percentage. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to test a normality of the outcome variables. Data were analyzed with the Mann–Whitney U test, Chi-Square and Kruskal–Wallis test. A p value of smaller than 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. IBM SPSS Statistics 26.0 was used for all analyses.

5. Results

One hundred and ten carers participated in this study: 91 women (82.8%) (average age 44.67 ± 7.25) and 19 men (17.2%) (average age 47.42 ± 11.07). Table 1 shows the data related to the sample distribution according to the type of NMD suffered by the affected child, marital status, academic level and employment status. At first, we carried out a study with carers of children with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), so this is why most children suffered DMD in this sample. The participants’ average years of education was 14.94 ± 6.91; their average number of children was 1.87 ± 0.97; the average age of the children with an NMD was 12.75 ± 6.56. Women represented the majority percentage of participants, and most of them had severely dependent children.

5.1. Social and Health Costs

It is relevant to note that all children go to a public health service, but parents also can go to a private health service, if they want. However, a public alternative does not exist in the case of physiotherapy. The highest annual of social and health expenses were the fees of a number of professionals; those were as follows: physiotherapists, external carers, speech therapists, private doctors, psychologists and aquatic therapies (see Table 2). The annual cost of technical aids was EUR 51,002.40 ± 102,974.38.

5.2. Physical and Mental Costs

Regarding the costs related to the physical and mental care of the carer, the greatest economic expense was associated with fees paid to visits with private doctors, fitness center fees, physiotherapy and psychological care, respectively (see Table 2).

5.3. Percentage of Family Income

A total of 97 people answered the question about the average monthly income per family unit. The average was EUR 3145.88 ± 3725.82 per month; the average income per year was EUR 37,750.63 ± 44,709.86.
Overall, the highest percentage of the household income was used to cover fees for physiotherapy, psychological care and speech therapy, with physiotherapy being the most dominant, respectively. The percentage of the family income spent on professionals for the physical and mental care of the carers of children with NMDs was to private doctors and physiotherapy, while the largest part of the income was used to cover private doctor fees (see Table 3).

5.4. Cost of Informal Care per Person with NMD

The replacement method was used to carry out cost analyses of informal care. The minimum hourly rate for live-in carers established by the Spanish Ministry of Employment, Migration and Social Security in 2018 was taken as reference. This rate was EUR 5.76 per hour. The average number of hours spent on the child’s care per week was 46.75 ± 31.33.
The average costs of informal care per person with NMD were established according to the level of disability and the differences between the three groups (mild, moderate and severe dependence) were statistically significant. The cost was higher in the case of children with an NMD who had severe disability (see Table 4).

5.5. Work Status

An evaluation was carried out of how many carers were working at the time of the survey, or if they had been working during the previous 12 months. Sixty-five carers either were working or had worked for the previous 12 months, and 45 were not working at the time or had not worked for the previous 12 months. Nine of those who worked before had to leave their jobs because of their child’s disease.

5.6. Inferential Statistics

The Chi-square test showed that fewer married carers left their employment than carers who lived alone, χ2(4) = 14.78, p = 0.005. The test also showed that those carers who did not go to a psychologist were less likely to leave their job than those who saw a psychologist, χ2(1) = 5.90, p = 0.023. There exists a relationship between the degree of dependence of the child and the carer leaving work, χ2(2) = 7.22, p = 0.027. Finally, those carers who had not visited a private doctor were less likely to leave their job than those who had visited a private doctor, χ2(1) = 7.07, p = 0.008.
The analysis of sociodemographic and clinical variables indicated differences between men and women in the somatic symptom score (p = 0.019); between the carer’s marital status and the carer’s overload scores (p = 0.019) and QoL (p = 0.012); between the occupation of the carer and the carer overload scores (p = 0.014), QoL (p = 0.007) and somatic symptoms (p = 0.013); between leaving employment and the carer’s overload (p = 0.032); between the use of psychological care for the carer and QoL (p = 0.003) and somatic symptoms (p = 0.001); between the use of physiotherapy services for the carer and QoL (p = 0.026), somatic symptoms (p = 0.022) and carer’s overload (p = 0.028) (see Table 5 and Table 6).

6. Discussion

The study results showed that the most important costs that caregivers of children with NMD must face is because of the non-existence of social protection and due to the child’s diagnosis. Moreover, this study found that carers need more public funding to ensure that they can have access to health services. Informal carers of NMDs spent higher number of hours than carers of people with other chronic disease [58]. On the other hand, these results indicate that carers of children with severe disability have higher levels of needs, and their increase is associated with economic costs. Our study also found that female, single or separated and unemployed carers showed worse physical and psychological health.
Study findings showed that informal care represents a major contribution to improving the QoL of people suffering from the disease; however, this type of care is not remunerated, even though for some carers, this implies them having to stop work or leisure time. While there has been an increase in the number of economic studies related to NMDs, there is still a need to carry out research on the economic calculations applied to healthcare in this area.
In the present study, 82.7% of the carers were female, which matched other studies [59,60,61,62,63]. A study offered a possible explanation for gender differences in coping with care and concluded that women can address problematic situations by offering emotional support and care, while men focus less on those concepts [64].
Our study describes a series of economic costs faced by carers of children with NMDs. The highest annual expenses were those spent on professional fees, namely, first, physiotherapy, followed by external carers, speech therapy, private doctors, psychological care and, finally, aquatic therapy. As to the costs incurred for the carer’s physical and mental care, the greatest economic expense was found to be related to private doctors, fitness centers, physiotherapy and psychological care. These results matched the study carried out in Spain with carers of children with DMD [58]. This study reported that all families incurred in monthly medical costs, and those costs were more than EUR 50/month. As stated before, some health services (such as psychologists, physiotherapists, psychomotor educators, aquatic therapists, equine therapists and speech therapists) are not covered by social security. Consequently, carers have to invest a considerable part of their salary in accessing these services. Analyzing the costs globally, the highest amounts were spent on technical aid for the child. This finding is consistent with the study by Larkindale et al. [65] on costs incurred by relatives of people with NMDs, where the highest costs were found to be related to technical aids aimed at improving the peoples’ mobility.
Professional carers’ costs spent by some participants in the study were lower than those found in children with Marfan syndrome [31], but higher in terms of non-medical costs (e.g., cost of informal care by family caregivers). Additionally, it is important to note that there is some public funding for those affected to ensure that they can have access to health services. However, funding from regional governments and non-profit organizations is virtually non-existent for expenses associated with professional support for carers. This can lead to social inequality for caregivers, produced by the environment itself and economic systems that are not able to meet their needs.
The number of average weekly hours spent by informal carers doing activities necessary for their child with an NMD was much higher than the number of hours spent by carers of children with other chronic diseases [66] and higher than the number of hours spent by carers of elderly people with disabilities [67]. Considering previous research conducted on carers of people affected by rare diseases (RDs), the number of average weekly hours was lower than that reported by the participants included in the present sample. This was mentioned in studies such as that by Hendriksz et al. [68], performed on people with Morquio syndrome, and that by López-Bastida et al. [13], carried out on carers of people with spinal muscular atrophy. In comparison with carers of people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, the average number of hours spent per week by carers was higher than that reported by the present sample [69].
Regarding the assessment of informal costs, the present study found that the higher the level of dependence of the child, the higher the costs. This is consistent with the study by Laskar, Gupta, Kumar, Sharma and Singh [70], which showed that as the demands of person with NMD care increased, costs increased accordingly. This is also supported by a study conducted in India on people with diseases that affected the locomotor system, which indicated that the financial burden was higher in families of children with severe dependence [70].
Overall, the highest percentage of the income of the family unit per year used to cover professionals’ fees was spent on professional care for the child. In particular, it was allocated to physiotherapy, psychological care and speech therapy, the former being the most dominant. The highest percentage of family income allocated to professional care services for the carers themselves was spent on private doctors, physiotherapy and psychological care. These percentages are important for families, particularly for the most disadvantaged ones, who are faced with a critical financial situation that affects all areas of their lives and increases their stress levels. The carers who were most affected were those with low income and those with children with high dependence [71].
The costs of informal care have been identified as one of the main factors driving the financial burden of the NMD, with expenses increasing as the disease progresses [17]. The replacement method has been used in this study, since it is a method widely used by researchers at national and international level [57,71,72,73,74,75,76].
Cost associated with care according to the substitution or replacement method was much higher than that of the present sample in comparison with studies carried out in the United States [73,77]. The cost associated with care according to the substitution or replacement method was much higher than that of the present sample. However, when factoring in the fact that the average hours were found to be lower than in this study, the carers’ salaries for the work done were higher. In comparison with a study carried out with carers of dependent people in the UK, the cost associated with care was also higher [72]. In an investigation carried out throughout Spain on carers of people with disabling diseases, the same method was used, but with different scenarios. As the study was performed in 2009, the salary of reference for that year was used, and therefore, the results are not comparable. It can be seen in different studies with carers of people with Alzheimer’s disease in the United States and in Spain that the annual informal costs are also higher than in the present study [75,76].
Nevertheless, the replacement method [55] shows a higher informal economic cost in this sample than in the study by Moreno and Guerrero [57], which studied multiple pathologies and included diseases with low and high prevalence. The study by Chevreul et al. [12] on carers of people with systemic sclerosis also showed lower informal costs than those in the present study. This result is similar when compared to that of Delgado et al. [56], which reported lower informal costs in carers of people with chronic heart failure. Another study on informal carers of people with dementia performed in the United States found that costs were lower than those of the present sample, considering similar scenarios using the replacement method [74].
This study also measured loss of work productivity, and it was seen that 58 percent of the carers either were working or had worked during the previous 12 months. However, of that 58 percent, our results indicated that eight percent of the carers had been compelled to leave their jobs, and those who were married were less likely to leave work. In couples, one of the members of the couple was able to take care of the child, and therefore, there were no high work absenteeism figures. This result may be explained by the fact that living alone often means that the father or mother is the main carer and consequently cannot spend much time doing other tasks [78]. It was also found that the use of psychological care services for the carers had an impact on them leaving their jobs. Carers who had not seen a psychologist had a lower dropout rate than those who had. One possible explanation is that their job could serve as a protective factor or an escape route to reduce the psychological consequences of the disease on the carer [79]. Finally, parents who had a child with moderate or severe disability had a higher rate of absenteeism than informal carers of children with mild disability or no dependence. It seems possible that this result is due to the fact that the dependence of the child, in many cases, requires specific care that is usually provided by the father or mother, and as the dependence increases, it requires more time, which may lead to one of the two parents leaving work. The use of medical services was also associated with greater rates of dropout from work, which could have been because of the increase in sick leave due to physical or psychological problems derived from the child’s illness.
One of the indirect consequences of the emotional effects of care and costs was the feeling of overload experienced by parents. Several psychological variables were analyzed. Differences between men and women were found in terms of somatic symptoms, with women obtaining the highest score. The literature has also indicated that female informal carers suffer more severe somatic symptoms than male informal carers [80,81]. Differences were found between the marital status of the carer, their burden and QoL. Those who were separated or single had higher scores in terms of feeling overloaded than the rest, and single people had lower QoL scores. This could be explained by the lack of social support perceived by those who did not have a stable partner [82]. This is consistent with other studies that have stated that the carer’s marital status can contribute to an excessive burden and consequently reduce QoL [83,84]. In addition, there were differences between the occupation of the carer and the overload scores (a greater overload was felt by those who were studying and did not work); QoL (retirees and students had poorer QoL scores); somatic symptoms (the unemployed had more severe somatic symptoms). The findings showed that all those who were not in a position to obtain paid work scored more highly in psychological distress measures. There were also differences between dropout from work and carer overload. Those who left work suffered from a stronger feeling of overload. Carer overload has been described in studies such as that by del Castillo et al. [85] as having higher scores in depression. Thus, a possible explanation to this relationship is that people who score highly in feeling overloaded may score highly in depression, and this has been associated with the probability of losing working hours [84,86].
The carers who used psychology services had higher scores in somatic symptoms, and those who used physiotherapy services also had lower QoL scores, higher scores in somatic symptoms and a stronger sense of feeling overloaded. This matched the study by Rodríguez-González et al. [87].
Study limitations included the length of the instruments and their duration, which might have influenced carers when deciding whether to complete it or not. Another limitation can be focused on the sample recruitment, with a major percentage of people affected by Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Besides, the groups created according to the level of dependency were not homogeneous. Other limitation of this study include the difficulty of making comparisons related to informal costs between international studies, as salaries are not homogeneous worldwide. Another limitation is related to the methodology of this study. This study is cross-sectional, and cause and effect cannot be inferred. Finally, sex ratio of participants is unbalanced, so the costs of caring for Spanish men cannot be inferred.

7. Conclusions

This study shows that carers of children with NMDs have to face a number of high costs related to their own physical and psychological health. Women represented the majority percentage of participants, and most of them had severely dependent children. Therefore, it was perceived that both the group of children with severe support needs, as well as their carers, had greater needs. In turn, it is important to note that there is some public funding for those affected to ensure that they can have access to health services. However, funding from regional governments and non-profit organizations is virtually non-existent for expenses associated with professional support for carers. Moreover, if these carers start from a low socioeconomic situation, dedicating themselves to caregiving increases their vulnerability. Therefore, these situations give rise to social inequality in this group. Finally, our study also found that carers who are female, single or separated and unemployed showed worse physical and psychological health.
Future lines of research could try to generate a unified protocol to be able to assess the informal costs of a disease both nationally and internationally in an equitable way. As previously mentioned, although research on costs incurred in connection with certain pathologies has increased, there is no methodology to assess them at present. Finally, a longitudinal study would be suitable in order to evaluate the evolution of costs attending the worsening of participants’ NMDs.

Author Contributions

I.A., S.B., Ó.M. and M.G. performed some of the statistical analysis. M.A.-R., E.L., P.M.L., P.P.-N. and N.P. helped to create and promote the participant assessment tools. Ó.M., I.A., P.C., J.F.L.-P. and M.P. read and approved the final manuscript. A.A.R., Ó.M. and I.A. wrote the article. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by a PTC Therapeutics.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This project has been approved by the ethics committee of the University of Deusto (Ref: ETK-39/18-19) and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was provided to participants. They had to sign it if they agreed to participate. In this informed consent, they were informed that the participation was voluntary, and they could drop out whenever they wanted. They were also informed about the data privacy and that only the researcher will have access to the data.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available, because they belong to the University of Deusto, but are available from the corresponding author (Alicia Aurora Rodríguez) on reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We thank the patients and their families for intensive cooperation in the study; we thank “Federación Española de Enfermedades Neuromusculares (ASEM)” for helping us to recruit families to participate in this study. This work was supported and financed by PTC Therapeutics.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

List of Abbreviations

NMDs: neuromuscular diseases; QoL: quality of life; RDs: rare diseases.

References

  1. Deenen, J.C.; Horlings, C.G.; Verschuuren, J.J.; Verbeek, A.L.; Van Engelen, B.G. The epidemiology of neuromuscular disorders: A comprehensive overview of the literature. J. Neuromuscul. Dis. 2015, 2, 73–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Masdeu, M.J.; Ferrer, A. Función de los músculos respiratorios en las enfermedades neuromusculares. Arch. Bronconeumol. 2003, 39, 176–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Altman, L.; Zurynski, Y.; Breen, C.; Hoffmann, T.; Woolfenden, S. A qualitative study of health care providers’ perceptions and experiences of working together to care for children with medical complexity (CMC). BMC Health Serv. Res. 2018, 18, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Boström, K. Living with Deteriorating and Hereditary Disease: Experiences over Ten Years of Persons with Muscular Dystrophy and Their Next of Kin. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Caring Sciences, Faculty of Humanities and Social Science, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  5. Boström, K.; Ahlström, G.; Sunvisson, H. Being the next of kin of an adult person with muscular dystrophy. Clin. Nurs. Res. 2006, 15, 86–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Buchanan, D.C.; LaBarbera, C.J.; Roelofs, R.; Olson, W. Reactions of families to children with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Gen. Hosp. Psychiatry 1979, 1, 262–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hoefman, R.; Al-Janabi, H.; McCaffrey, N.; Currow, D.; Ratcliffe, J. Measuring caregiver outcomes in palliative care: A construct validation study of two instruments for use in economic evaluations. Qual. Life Res. 2015, 24, 1255–1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Magliano, L.; Ms, M.P.; Sagliocchi, A.; Scutifero, M.; Zaccaro, A.; D’Angelo, M.G.; Civati, F.; Brighina, E.; Vita, G.; Vita, G.L.; et al. Burden, professional support, and social network in families of children and young adults with muscular dystrophies. Muscle Nerve 2014, 52, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Nozoe, K.T.; Polesel, D.N.; Moreira, G.A.; Pires, G.N.; Akamine, R.T.; Tufik, S.; Andersen, M.L. Sleep quality of mother-caregivers of Duchenne muscular dystrophy patients. Sleep Breath. 2016, 20, 129–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Smith, J. The Experience and Needs of Parents Whose Children Died due to Degenerative Disabilities: A Qualitative Analysis. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Maryland, Maryland, VA, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  11. Picci, R.L.; Oliva, F.; Trivelli, F.; Carezana, C.; Zuffranieri, M.; Ostacoli, L.; Furlan, P.M.; Lala, R. Emotional burden and coping strategies of parents of children with rare diseases. J. Child Fam. Stud. 2013, 24, 514–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chevreul, K.; Brigham, K.B.; Gandré, C.; Mouthon, L.; The BURQOL-RD Research Network. The economic burden and health-related quality of life associated with systemic sclerosis in France. Scand. J. Rheumatol. 2015, 44, 238–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. López-Bastida, J.; Peña-Longobardo, L.M.; Aranda-Reneo, I.; Tizzano, E.; Sefton, M.; Oliva-Moreno, J. Social/economic costs and health-related quality of life in patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) in Spain. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2017, 12, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. World Health Organization (WHO) QOL Group. The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): Development and general psychometric properties. Soc. Sci. Med. 1998, 46, 1569–1585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Pardo, X.M.; Cárdenas, S.J.; Venegas, J.M. Variables que predicen la aparición de sobrecarga en cuidadores primarios informales de niños con cáncer. Psicooncología 2015, 12, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Power, P.W.; Orto, A.E.D. Role of the Family in the Rehabilitation of the Physically Disabled; University Park Press: Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  17. Schreiber-Katz, O.; Klug, C.; Thiele, S.; Schorling, E.; Zowe, J.; Reilich, P.; Nagels, K.H.; Walter, M.C. Comparative cost of illness analysis and assessment of health care burden of Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophies in Germany. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2014, 9, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Viana, M.C.; Gruber, M.J.; Shahly, V.; Alhamzawi, A.; Alonso, J.; Andrade, L.H.; Angermeyer, M.C.; Benjet, C.; Bruffaerts, R.; Caldas-de-Almeida, J.M.; et al. Family burden related to mental and physical disorders in the world: Results from the WHO World Mental Health (WMH) surveys. Braz. J. Psychiatry 2013, 35, 115–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Palau, F. Enfermedades raras, un paradigma emergente en la medicina del siglo XXI. Med. Clin. 2010, 134, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Seco-Suances, M.O.; Ruiz-Callado, R. Las enfermedades raras en España. Un enfoque social. Prism. Soc. 2016, 17, 373–395. [Google Scholar]
  21. Abegunde, D.O.; Mathers, C.D.; Adam, T.; Ortegon, M.; Strong, K. The burden and costs of chronic diseases in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet 2007, 370, 1929–1938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chapman, K.R.; Mannino, D.M.; Soriano, J.B.; Vermeire, P.A.; Buist, A.S.; Thun, M.J.; Connell, C.; Jemal, A.; Lee, T.A.; Miravitlles, M.; et al. Epidemiology and costs of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Eur. Respir. J. 2006, 27, 188–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Hime, N.J.; Fitzgerald, D.; Robinson, P.; Selvadurai, H.; Van Asperen, P.; Jaffe, A.; Zurynski, Y. Childhood interstitial lung disease due to surfactant protein C deficiency: Frequent use and costs of hospital services for a single case in Australia. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2014, 9, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Keren, R.; Zaoutis, T.E.; Saddlemire, S.; Luan, X.Q.; Coffin, S.E. Direct medical cost of influenza-related hospitalizations in children. Pediatrics 2006, 118, e1321–e1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ernst, R.L.; Hay, J.W. The US economic and social costs of Alzheimer’s disease revisited. Am. J. Public Health 1994, 84, 1261–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Hay, J.W.; Ernst, R.L. The economic costs of Alzheimer’s disease. Am. J. Public Health 1987, 77, 1169–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Landfeldt, E.; Alfredsson, L.; Straub, V.; Lochmüller, H.; Bushby, K.; Lindgren, P. Economic evaluation in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: Model frameworks for cost-effectiveness analysis. PharmacoEconomics 2017, 35, 249–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Landfeldt, E.; Eagle, M.; Straub, V.; Lochmüller, H.; Bushby, K.; Lindgren, P. Mortality cost of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Glob. Reg. Health Technol. Assess. Ital. North Eur. Span. 2017, 4, 260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Souêtre, E.J.; Qing, W.; Vigoureux, I.; Lozet, H.; Dartigues, J.F.; Lacomblez, L.; Derousené, C. Economic analysis of Alzheimer’s disease in outpatients: Impact of symptom severity. Alzheimer Dis. 1994, 7, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Saka, Ö.; McGuire, A.; Wolfe, C. Cost of stroke in the United Kingdom. Age Ageing 2009, 38, 27–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Achelrod, D.; Blankart, C.R.; Linder, R.; Von Kodolitsch, Y.; Stargardt, T. The economic impact of Marfan syndrome: A non-experimental, retrospective, population-based matched cohort study. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2014, 9, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Iskrov, G.; BURQOL-RD Research Network; Astigarraga, I.; Stefanov, R.; López-Bastida, J.; Linertová, R.; Oliva-Moreno, J.; Serrano-Aguilar, P.; Posada-De-La-Paz, M.; Schieppati, A.; et al. Social/economic costs and health-related quality of life in patients with histiocytosis in Europe. Eur. J. Health Econ. 2016, 17, 67–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Parish, S.L.; Cloud, J.M. Financial well-being of young children with disabilities and their families. Soc. Work 2006, 51, 223–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Peltz, A.; Hall, M.; Rubin, D.M.; Mandl, K.D.; Neff, J.; Brittan, M.; Cohen, E.; Hall, D.E.; Kuo, D.Z.; Agrawal, R.; et al. Hospital utilization among children with the highest annual inpatient cost. Pediatrics 2016, 137, e20151829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Wilson, M.R.; Van Houtven, C.H.; Stearns, S.C.; Clipp, E.C. Depression and missed work among informal caregivers of older individuals with dementia. J. Fam. Econ. Issues 2007, 28, 684–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Schepelmann, K.; Winter, Y.; Spottke, A.E.; Claus, D.; Grothe, C.; Schröder, R.; Heuss, D.; Vielhaber, S.; Mylius, V.; Kiefer, R.; et al. Socioeconomic burden of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, myasthenia gravis and facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. J. Neurol. 2010, 257, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Argumosa, A.; Herranz, J.L. La repercusión económica de las enfermedades crónicas: El coste de la epilepsia infantil en el año. Bol. Pediatr. 2000, 41, 23–29. [Google Scholar]
  38. DeVol, R.; Bedroussian, A.; Charuworn, A.; Chatterjee, A.; Kim, I.; Kim, S.; Klowden, K. An Unhealthy America: The Economic Burden of Chronic Disease; Paper presented at: Stakeholder Forum; 2007 Oct 11; Milken Institute: Santa Mónica, CA, USA; Volume 326, pp. 2010–2060.
  39. López, B.J. Los costes socioeconómicos y la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud en pacientes con enfermedades raras en España. Rev. Esp. Discap. 2012, 1, 251. [Google Scholar]
  40. Jorgensen, N.; Cabañas, M.; Oliva, J.; León, T.; Rejas, J. Los costes de los cuidados informales asociados a enfermedades neurológicas discapacitantes de alta prevalencia en España. Neurología 2008, 23, 29–39. [Google Scholar]
  41. Kroenke, K.; Spitzer, R.L.; Williams, J.B.W. The PHQ-15: Validity of a new measure for evaluating the severity of somatic symptoms. Psychosom. Med. 2002, 64, 258–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Ros, S.; Comas, A.; Garcia-Garcia, M. Validación de la versión española del cuestionario PHQ-15 para la evaluación de síntomas físicos en pacientes con trastornos de depresión y/o ansiedad: Estudio DEPRE-SOMA. Actas Esp. Psiquiatr. 2010, 38, 345–357. [Google Scholar]
  43. Zarit, S.H.; Reever, K.E.; Bach-Peterson, J. Relatives of the impaired elderly: Correlates of feelings of burden. Gerontologist 1980, 20, 649–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Ramírez, V.J.A.; del Río, B.R.; Russell, M.E.R.; López, C.G.F. Validez de la entrevista de carga de Zarit en una muestra de cuidadores primarios informales. Psicol. Salud. 2013, 18, 237–245. [Google Scholar]
  45. Diener, E.; Emmons, R.A.; Larsen, R.J.; Griffin, S. The satisfaction with life scale. J. Personal. Assess. 1985, 49, 71–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Sarid, O.; Slonim-Nevo, V.; Pereg, A.; Friger, M.; Sergienko, R.; Schwartz, D.; Greenberg, D.; Shahar, I.; Chernin, E.; Vardi, H.; et al. Coping strategies, satisfaction with life, and quality of life in Crohn’s disease: A gender perspective using structural equation modeling analysis. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0172779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Atienza, F.L.; Pons, D.; Balaguer, I.; García-Merita, M. Propiedades psicométricas de la Escala de Satisfacción con la Vida en adolescentes. Psicothema 2000, 12, 314–319. [Google Scholar]
  48. Hoefman, R.J.; van Exel, N.J.A.; Foets, M.; Brouwer, W.B. Sustained informal care: The feasibility, construct validity and test-retest reliability of the CarerQol-instrument to measure the impact of informal care in long-term care. Aging Ment. Health 2011, 15, 1018–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hoefman, R.J.; Van Exel, N.J.A.; De Jong, S.L.; Redekop, W.K.; Brouwer, W.B.F. A new test of the construct validity of the CarerQol instrument: Measuring the impact of informal care giving. Qual. Life Res. 2011, 20, 875–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Reverte, R.S. Validación del Test de la Calidad de Vida Relacionada con el Cuidado. Trabajo de Fin de Máster, Máster Universitario de Investigación en Atención Primaria, University of Miguel-Hernández, Valencia, Spain, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  51. Jain, P.; PEPSQOL Study Team; Subendran, J.; Smith, M.L.; Widjaja, E. Care-related quality of life in caregivers of children with drug-resistant epilepsy. J. Neurol. 2018, 265, 2221–2230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hanly, P.; Maguire, R.; Balfe, M.; Hyland, P.; Timmons, A.; O’Sullivan, E.; Butow, P.; Sharp, L. Burden and happiness in head and neck cancer carers: The role of supportive care needs. Support. Care Cancer 2016, 24, 4283–4291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Mahone, F.L.; Wood, O.H.; Barthel, D.W. Rehabilitation of chronically ill patients: The influente of complications on the final goal. South Med. 1958, 5, 605–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Cid-Ruzafa, J.; Damián-Moreno, J. Valoración de la discapacidad física: El índice de Barthel. Rev. Esp. Salud Pública 1997, 71, 127–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Van den Berg, B.; Brouwer, W.B.F.; Koopmanschap, M.A. Economic valuation of informal care. Eur. J. Health Econ. 2004, 5, 36–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Delgado, J.F.; Oliva, J.; Llano, M.; Pascual-Figal, D.; Grillo, J.J.; Comín-Colet, J.; Diaz, B.; de La Concha, L.M.; Marti, B.; Pena, L.M. Costes sanitarios y no sanitarios de personas que padecen insuficiencia cardiaca crónica sintomática en España. Rev. Esp. Cardiol. 2014, 67, 643–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Moreno, J.O.; Guerrero, R.O. Los costes de los cuidados informales en España. Presup. Gasto Público 2009, 56, 163–181. [Google Scholar]
  58. Flores, D.; Ribate, M.P.; Montolio, M.; Ramos, F.J.; Gómez, M.; García, C.B. Quantifying the economic impact of caregiving for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) in Spain. Eur. J. Health Econ. 2020, 21, 1015–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Iwata, N.; Horiguchi, K. Differences in caregivers’ psychological distress and associated factors by care recipients’ gender and kinship. Aging Ment. Health 2016, 20, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lai, D.W.L.; Leonenko, W. Effects of caregiving on employment and economic costs of Chinese family caregivers in Canada. J. Fam. Econ. Issues 2007, 28, 411–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Sharma, N.; Chakrabarti, S.; Grover, S. Gender differences in caregiving among family—Caregivers of people with mental illnesses. World J. Psychiatry 2016, 6, 7–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Van Der Steen, I.; Berg, J.-P.V.D.; Buskens, E.; Lindeman, E.; Berg, L.H.V.D. The costs of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, according to type of care. Amyotroph. Lateral Scler. 2009, 10, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Garriga, O.T.; Pousa, S.L.; Franch, J.V.; Estrada, A.T.; Nierga, I.P.; Gallego, M.L.; Ferràndiz, M.H.; Cors, O.S.; Pujol, X.P.; Vila, S.M.; et al. Valor económico anual de la asistencia informal en la enfermedad de Alzheimer. Rev. Neurol. 2010, 51, 201–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Tiegs, T.J.; Heesacker, M.; Ketterson, T.U.; Pekich, D.G.; Rittman, M.R.; Rosenbek, J.C.; Stidham, B.S.; Gonzalez-Rothi, L.J. Coping by stroke caregivers: Sex similarities and differences. Top. Stroke Rehabil. 2006, 13, 52–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Larkindale, J.; Yang, W.; Hogan, P.F.; Simon, C.J.; Zhang, Y.; Jain, A.; Habeeb-Louks, E.M.; Kennedy, A.; Cwik, V.A. Cost of illness for neuromuscular diseases in the United States. Muscle Nerve 2013, 49, 431–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Van Houtven, C.H.; Ramsey, S.D.; Hornbrook, M.C.; Atienza, A.A.; van Ryn, M. Economic burden for informal caregivers of lung and colorectal cancer patients. Oncologist 2010, 15, 883–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Harrow, B.S.; Tennstedt, S.L.; McKinlay, J.B. How costly is it to care for disabled elders in a community setting? Gerontologist 1995, 35, 803–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Hendriksz, C.J.; Lavery, C.; Coker, M.; Ucar, S.K.; Jain, M.; Bell, L.; Lampe, C. Burden of disease in patients with Morquio A syndrome: Results from an international patient-reported outcomes survey. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2014, 9, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. López-Bastida, J.; Perestelo-Perez, L.; Montón-Álvarez, F.; Serrano-Aguilar, P.; Alfonso-Sanchez, J.L. Social economic costs and health-related quality of life in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in Spain. Amyotroph. Lateral Scler. 2009, 10, 237–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Laskar, A.R.; Gupta, V.K.; Kumar, D.; Sharma, N.; Singh, M.M. Psychosocial effect and economic burden on parents of children with locomotor disability. Indian J. Pediatr. 2010, 77, 529–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Moreira de Souza, R.; Turrini, R.N.T. Paciente oncológico terminal: Sobrecarga del cuidador. Enfermería Glob. 2011, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Hanratty, B.; Drever, F.; Jacoby, A.; Whitehead, M. Retirement age caregivers and deprivation of area of residence in England and Wales. Eur. J. Ageing 2007, 4, 35–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Joo, H.; Fang, J.; Losby, J.L.; Wang, G. Cost of informal caregiving for patients with heart failure. Am. Heart J. 2015, 169, 142–148.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Langa, K.M.; Chernew, M.E.; Kabeto, M.U.; Herzog, R.A.; Ofstedal, R.M.; Willis, R.J.; Wallace, R.B.; Mucha, L.M.; Straus, W.L.; Fendrick, A.M. National estimates of the quantity and cost of informal caregiving for the elderly with dementia. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2001, 16, 770–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Rice, D.P.; Fox, P.J.; Max, W.; Webber, P.A.; Hauck, W.W.; Lindeman, D.A.; Segura, E. The economic burden of Alzheimer’s disease care. Health Aff. 1993, 12, 164–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Rivera, B.; Casal, B.; Currais, L. Provisión de cuidados informales y enfermedad de Alzheimer: Valoración económica y estudio de la variabilidad del tiempo. Rev. Econ. Pública 2009, 189, 107–130. [Google Scholar]
  77. Hollander, M.J.; Liu, G.; Chappell, N.L. Who cares and how much. Q. Health 2009, 12, 42–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Wilson, L.S.; Moskowitz, J.T.; Acree, M.; Heyman, M.B.; Harmatz, P.; Ferrando, S.J.; Folkman, S. The economic burden of home care for children with HIV and other chronic illnesses. Am. J. Public Health 2005, 95, 1445–1452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Sloan, M.M. Emotion management and workplace status: Consequences for well-being. Int. J. Work Organ. Emot. 2008, 2, 255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Masterson, M.P.; Hurley, K.E.; Zaider, T.; Corner, G.; Schuler, T.; Kissane, D.W. Psychosocial health outcomes for family caregivers following the first year of bereavement. Death Stud. 2015, 39, 573–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Silverstein, B. Gender difference in the prevalence of clinical depression: The role played by depression associated with somatic symptoms. Am. J. Psychiatry 1999, 156, 480–482. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  82. Vivaldi, F.; Barra, E. Bienestar psicológico, apoyo social percibido y percepción de salud en adultos mayores. Ter. Psicológica 2012, 30, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Dorz, S.; Novara, C.; Sica, C.; Sanavio, E. Predicting burnout among HIV/AIDS and oncology health care workers. Psychol. Health 2003, 18, 677–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Yılmaz, A.; Turan, E.; Gundogar, D. Predictors of burnout in the family caregivers of Alzheimer’s disease: Evidence from Turkey. Australas. J. Ageing 2009, 28, 16–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Del Castillo, O.I.A.R.; Morales-Vigil, T.; Vázquez-Pineda, F.; Sánchez-Román, S.; Ramos-del-Río, B.; Guevara-López, U. Sobrecarga, ansiedad y depresión en cuidadores primarios de pacientes con dolor crónico y terminales. Rev. Méd. IMSS 2008, 46, 485–494. [Google Scholar]
  86. Valladares, A.; Dilla, T.; Sacristán, J. La depresión: Una hipoteca social. Últimos avances en el conocimiento del coste de la enfermedad. Actas Esp. Psiquiatr. 2009, 37, 49–53. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  87. Rodríguez-González, A.M.; Rodríguez-Míguez, E.; Duarte-Pérez, A.; Díaz-Sanisidro, E.; Barbosa-Álvarez, Á.; Clavería, A. Estudio observacional transversal de la sobrecarga en cuidadoras informales y los determinantes relacionados con la atención a las personas dependientes. Atención Primaria 2017, 49, 156–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Table
Table 1. Distribution of socio-demographic characteristics (n = 110).
Table 1. Distribution of socio-demographic characteristics (n = 110).
Socio-Demographic Variables n (%)
SexMen19 (17.2%)
Women91 (82.8%)
Marital statusMarried84 (76.4%)
Living with their partner7 (6.4%)
Divorced8 (7.3%)
Separated5 (4.5%)
Single6 (5.4%)
Academic levelWithout school certificate4 (3.6%)
Compulsory education11 (10%)
Post-compulsory education15 (13.6%)
Intermediate-level vocational training12 (10.9%)
Higher-level vocational training16 (14.5%)
Ordinary degree16 (14.5%)
Bachelor’s degree (with honours)23 (20.9%)
Graduate5 (4.5%)
Master’s degree2 (1.8%)
PhD6 (5.4%)
Employment statusWage-earner57 (51.8%)
Unpaid work3 (2.7%)
Self-employed7 (6.4%)
Unemployed for health reasons2 (1.8%)
Unemployed for other reasons15 (13.6%)
Retired5 (4.5%)
Housework12 (10.9%)
Student7 (6.4%)
Disabled2 (1.8%)
Type of NMDDuchenne muscular dystrophy40 (36.4%)
Charcot–Marie–Tooth11 (10%)
Becker muscular dystrophy5 (4.5%)
Ullrich congenital muscular dystrophy1 (0.9%)
Spinal muscular atrophy10 (9.1%)
Myotonic dystrophy (Steinert disease)12 (10.9%)
Myopathies7 (6.4%)
Arthrogryposis multiplex congénita1 (0.9%)
Merosin-deficient congenital muscular dystrophy 2 (1.8%)
Limb-girdle muscular dystrophy5 (5.5%)
Merosin-deficient congenital muscular dystrophy3 (2.7%)
Limb-girdle muscular dystrophy due to Fukutin-related protein (FKRP) deficiency1 (0.9%)
Corpus callosum hypoplasia1 (0.9%)
Hereditary spastic paraparesis1 (0.9%)
Congenital myasthenia2 (1.8%)
Collagen VI related muscular dystrophy3 (2.7%)
Sarcoglycanopathy2 (1.8%)
Pelizaeus Merzbacher disease1 (0.9%)
Friedreich ataxia2 (1.8%)
Table
Table 2. Annual direct social welfare and health-related cost (n = 110).
Table 2. Annual direct social welfare and health-related cost (n = 110).
n *Annual Direct Cost (EUR)
M ± SD		Annual Public Funding (EUR)
M ± SD
Professionals required for the child
Private doctor39 (35.4%)1032.5 ± 1686.523.44 ± 97.53
Psychological care42 (38.1%)992.06 ± 1549.7921.25 ± 92.97
Physiotherapy95 (86.3%)1640.24 ± 1887.82142.06 ± 680.71
External carers18 (16.3%)1189.82 ± 1632.190
Speech therapy25 (22.7%)1055.21 ± 633.49148.18 ± 311.22
Psychomotor education23 (20.9%)405.47 ± 590.8350.78 ± 215.18
Private tutors24 (21.8%)768.23 ± 602.9178.26 ± 375.32
Learning support11 (10.0%)185 ± 381.010
Dietary supplements47 (42.7%)377.53 ± 484.320
Fitness centre20 (18.1%)424.2 ± 327.2850 ± 223.6
Aquatic therapy56 (50.9%)859.93 ± 443.6440.83 ± 260.34
Equine therapy10 (9.0%)727.78 ± 550.6-
Total costs for professionals required for the child1101868.64 ± 2937.09152.62 ± 457.92
Professionals required for the carer
Psychological care37 (33.6%)305 ± 626.040
Physiotherapy58 (52.7%)344.89 ± 449.1726.94 ± 139.77
Fitness centre42 (38.1%)346.96 ± 328.680
Private doctor30 (27.2%)644.5 ± 800.860
Support group15 (13.6%)32 ± 70.040
Training63 (57.2%)197.31 ± 485.730
Total costs for professionals required for the carer110306.80 ± 581.540
* Percentage of multiple responses: professionals selected/requested by carers.
Table
Table 3. Annual percentage of annual income used to cover health-related costs by caregivers. (n = 110).
Table 3. Annual percentage of annual income used to cover health-related costs by caregivers. (n = 110).
n *Annual Percentage (EUR)
M ± SD
Professionals required for the child
Private doctor39 (35.4%)2.68 ± 3.59
Psychological care42 (38.1%)4.37 ± 8.7
Physiotherapy95 (86.3%)4.44 ± 5.65
External carers18 (16.3%)3.5 ± 4.09
Speech therapy25 (22.7%)3.89 ± 3.54
Psychomotor education23 (20.9%)1.4 ± 1.97
Private tutors24 (21.8%)2.72 ± 2.8
Learning support11 (10.0%)1.02 ± 2.23
Dietary supplements47 (42.7%)2.16 ± 3.42
Fitness centre20 (18.1%)1.03± 1.16
Aquatic therapy56 (50.9%)1.78 ± 1.45
Equine therapy10 (9.0%)2.49 ± 2.49
Total annual percentage used to professionals required for the child1104.72 ± 10.15
Professionals required for the carer
Psychological care37 (33.6%)1.02 ± 1.7
Physiotherapy58 (52.7%)1.21 ± 2.65
Fitness centre42 (38.1%)0.91 ± 0.74
Private doctor30 (27.2%)1.75 ± 2.78
Support group15 (13.6%)0.13 ± 0.25
Training63 (57.2%)0.86 ± 2.46
Total annual percentage used to professionals required for the carer1100.91 ± 2.11
* Percentage of multiple responses: professionals selected/requested by carers.
Table
Table 4. Cost of informal care according to the level of disability. (n = 95).
Table 4. Cost of informal care according to the level of disability. (n = 95).
Level of DisabilitynM ± SD
Mild dependence33 (34.7%)6563.84 ± 4254.00
Moderate dependence14 (14.7%)11,059.20 ± 5479.60
Severe dependence48 (50.5%)17,922.81 ± 8704.39
Table
Table 5. Kruskal–Wallis test analysis of sociodemographic and clinical variables. (n = 110).
Table 5. Kruskal–Wallis test analysis of sociodemographic and clinical variables. (n = 110).
Clinical VariablesSociodemographic Mean Rank
VariablesnMeanHpη2
Carer’s overload 11.730.01975
Married7243.5354.59
Living with their partner648.9256.5
Divorced
Separated863.6964.75
Single47269.25
Widowed671.8369.16
0--
Quality of life 12.840.0120.084
Married7343.7112.36
Living with their partner648.7512.83
Divorced
Separated86915
Single480.8816.25
Widowed559.513.6
0--
Carer’s overload 19.20.0140.139
Wage-earner4750.1658.34
Self-employed628.546
Unpaid work314.8339.66
Unemployed for health reasons249.556
Unemployed for other reasons
Retired1354.5860.23
Housework
Student547.756
Disabled1235.2149.16
676.7572
276.573
Quality of life 21.020.0070.159
Wage-earner4742.5512.27
Self-employed633.9211.66
Unpaid work333.511.33
Unemployed for health reasons256.7513.5
Unemployed for other reasons
Retired1366.0414.38
Housework
Student568.415
Disabled1237.6311.83
672.1715
276.7515.5
Somatic symptoms 19.420.0130.159
Wage-earner4137.5510.31
Self-employed525.37.4
Unpaid work336.339.66
Unemployed for health reasons258.7517
Unemployed for other reasons
Retired1364.3517.92
Housework
Student544.811.8
Disabled1239.5811
456.8814.5
185.530
Table
Table 6. Mann–Whitney U test analysis of sociodemographic and clinical variables of the carers (n = 110).
Table 6. Mann–Whitney U test analysis of sociodemographic and clinical variables of the carers (n = 110).
Clinical VariablesSociodemographic Mean Rank
VariablesnMean UpR
Somatic symptomsMen11277.632310.0190.391
Women7545.9227
Carer’s overloadLeave employment838.568.75960.0320.41
Not leave employment4625.5955.91
Quality of lifeUse of psychological care 3558.913.91668.50.0320.327
Not use psychological care 6041.6412.13
Somatic symptomsUse of psychological care 2955.8115.44440.50.0220.379
Not use psychological care 5636.3710.32
Quality of lifeUse of physiotherapy services 5253.6713.348230.0260.226
Not use of physiotherapy services 4341.1412.11
Somatic symptomsUse of physiotherapy services 4748.4813.42635.50.0220.224
Not use of physiotherapy services 3836.2210.39
Carer’s overloadUse of physiotherapy services 5353.5360.188200.0280.235
Not use of physiotherapy services 4241.0252.83
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rodríguez, A.A.; Martínez, Ó.; Amayra, I.; López-Paz, J.F.; Al-Rashaida, M.; Lázaro, E.; Caballero, P.; Pérez, M.; Berrocoso, S.; García, M.; et al. Diseases Costs and Impact of the Caring Role on Informal Carers of Children with Neuromuscular Disease. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 2991. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18062991

AMA Style

Rodríguez AA, Martínez Ó, Amayra I, López-Paz JF, Al-Rashaida M, Lázaro E, Caballero P, Pérez M, Berrocoso S, García M, et al. Diseases Costs and Impact of the Caring Role on Informal Carers of Children with Neuromuscular Disease. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(6):2991. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18062991

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rodríguez, Alicia Aurora, Óscar Martínez, Imanol Amayra, Juan Francisco López-Paz, Mohammad Al-Rashaida, Esther Lázaro, Patricia Caballero, Manuel Pérez, Sarah Berrocoso, Maitane García, and et al. 2021. "Diseases Costs and Impact of the Caring Role on Informal Carers of Children with Neuromuscular Disease" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 6: 2991. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18062991

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop